nach oben

Policy Sciences

Erschienen in:

13.11.2022 | Research Article

Politicking with evidence: examining evidence-based issues in electoral policy narratives

verfasst von: Laura Wolton, Deserai A. Crow

Erschienen in: Policy Sciences | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The construction, influence, and strategic use of narratives to influence policy decisions have garnered increased scholarly attention over the past decade as the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) has matured within the policy studies field. Our prior analysis extended the NPF scholarship to examine electoral policy narrative construction during the 2018 elections. We found that the NPF can apply to electoral politics, but there are differences in how electoral policy narratives are constructed according to candidate party, gender, and electoral outcomes. Analyzing the narratives from both Republican and Democratic campaigns in U.S. House swing districts, here we assess whether policy issues can be differentiated based on their use of evidence and examine narratives to understand if there are systematic differences of construction according to policy issue type. The findings suggest that narrative use of evidence by congressional campaigns varies strategically and systematically by policy issue. Overall, the article presents a novel application of NPF analysis across policy domains while proposing a relationship between evidence and the setting and moral of the story element of narrative form based on issue type.

Vorheriger Artikel What counts? Policy evidence in public hearing testimonies: the case of single-payer healthcare in New York State

Nächster Artikel Understanding policy transfer through social network analysis: expanding methodologies with an intensive case study approach

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Hudler, J. A swing district is a congressional district that shows a reasonable chance of changing from representation by one political party to the other. Due to the partisan process of gerrymandering in drawing congressional maps in the U.S., there are fewer competitive districts than ever before. Government Affairs Institute, Georgetown University: https://gai.georgetown.edu/the-houses-competitiveness-problem-or-lack-thereof/.

NC-09 is considered undetermined because the Republican victory was later nullified due to election fraud when the State Board of Elections refused to certify the outcome. McDonald, J. “Republican Dan Bishop defeats Democrat Dan McCready in redo of North Carolina House race, NBC News projects,” September 10, 2019, CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/10/dan-bishop-beats-dan-mccready-in-north-carolina-house-special-election.html.

See more on dictionary design in Wolton, L.P., Crow, D.A., & Heikkila, T. Stepping forward: Towards a more systematic NPF with automation. In Narratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework, Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, and Elizabeth A. Shanahan (eds.), Montana State University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15788/npf3

Employment here refers to workers, labor, unions, and wage topics while economy includes broader discussions of employment rates and other factors that relate to the economy.

Although these are the top categories associated with the use of evidence, they are not necessarily indicative of the party that produced the most narratives in each category. For instance, Democrats produced more narratives on employment, while Republicans produced significantly more immigration narratives.

The reader should remember that Tweets without policy referents were filtered out.

General solutions are not included in Table 3 but are also associated with above-average use of evidence (9.82%). It was not included because there is no comparable issue category for general solutions even though a general solution may be presented with an issue in a narrative. Example: “Releasing 42,000 documents the night before the hearing does not count as transparency.” The implied fix is the need for more transparency which is not an issue-specific solution.

Birkland, T. A. (2004). Learning and policy improvement after disaster. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(3), 341–364.CrossRef

Birkland, T. A., & Warnement, M. K. (2014). Focusing events in disasters and development. In Disaster and Development (pp. 39–60). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04468-2_3

Ben-Nun Bloom, P., & Courtemanche, M. (2019). "Men prefer redheads": Media framing of polls and its effect on trust in media. In O. Feldman & S. Zmerli (Eds.), The psychology of political communicators: How politicians, culture, and the media construct and shape public discourse (Vol. 6., pp. 204–224).

Boswell, C. (2009). Knowledge, legitimation and the politics of risk: The functions of research in public debates on migration. Political Studies, 57(1), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00729.xCrossRef

Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave Pivot.

Crow, D. A., Albright, E. A., & Koebele, E. A. (2019). Stakeholder participation and strategy in rulemaking: A comparative analysis. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 19(2), 208–235.CrossRef

Crow, D. A., Albright, E. A., & Koebele, E. A. (2020). Evaluating stakeholder participation and influence on state-level rulemaking. Policy Studies Journal, 48(4), 953–981.CrossRef

Crow, D. A., & Berggren, J. (2014). Using the narrative policy framework to understand stakeholder strategy and effectiveness: A multi-case analysis. In M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahan, & M. K. McBeth (Eds.), The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.

Crow, D. A., & Jones, M. D. (2018). Narratives as tools for influencing policy change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217–234.CrossRef

Crow, D. A., Lawhon, L. A., Berggren, J., Huda, J., Koebele, E. A., & Kroepsch, A. (2017). A narrative policy framework analysis of wildfire policy discussions in two Colorado communities. Politics & Policy, 45(4), 626–656.CrossRef

Crow, D. A., & Wolton, L. (2020). Talking policy in congressional campaigns: Construction of policy narratives in electoral politics. Politics & Policy, 48(4), 658–699.CrossRef

Daviter, F. (2015). The political use of knowledge in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 48(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9232-yCrossRef

Donahue, A. K., Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2014). Ready or not? How citizens and public officials perceive risk and preparedness. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(4 suppl), 89S-111S.CrossRef

Ertas, N. (2015). Policy narratives and public opinion concerning charter schools. Politics & Policy, 43(3), 426–451.CrossRef

Gupta, K., Ripberger, J. T., & Collins, S. (2014). The strategic us of policy narratives: Jaitapur and the politics of siting a nuclear power plant in India. Springer.

Han, H. C. (2009). Moved to action: Motivation, participation, and inequality in American politics. Standford University Press

Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. Theories of the Policy Process, 3, 183–224.

Jones, M. D. (2010). Heroes and villains: Cultural narratives, mass opinions, and climate change. University of Oklahoma.

Jones, M. D. (2013). Cultural characters and climate change: How heroes shape our perception of climate science. Social Science Quarterly, 95(1), 1–39.CrossRef

Jones, M. D., & Crow, D. A. (2018). Mastering the art of the narrative: Using stories to shape public policy. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.

Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329.CrossRef

Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Shanahan, E. A. (Eds.). (2014). Introducing the narrative policy framework. In The Science of Stories : Applications of the Narrative policy framework in public policy analysis (pp. 1–25). Palgrave Macmillan.

Kahan, D. M. (2014). Making climate-science communication evidence-based. Culture, politics and climate change: How information shapes our common future, 203.

Kraft, M. (2015). Environmental policy and politics. Routledge.CrossRef

Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving (Vol. 21). Yale University Press.

McBeth, M. K., Jones, M. D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2014a). The narrative policy framework. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process. Westview Press.

McBeth, M. K., Lybecker, D. L., & Husmann, M. A. (2014b). The narrative policy framework and the practitioner: Communicating recycling policy. In M. D. Jones, M. K. McBeth, & E. A. Shanahan (Eds.), The science of stories. Springer.

Merry, M. K. (2016). Constructing policy narratives in 140 characters or less: The case of gun policy organizations. Policy Studies Journal, 44(4), 373–395.CrossRef

Merry, M. K. (2020). Warped narratives: Distortion in the framing of gun policy. University of Michigan Press.CrossRef

Morris, J. S. (2005). The fox news factor. Harvard International Journal of Press/politics, 10(3), 56–79.CrossRef

Pearce, W., Wesselink, A., & Colebatch, H. (2014). Evidence and meaning in policy making. Evidence & Policy, 10(2), 161–165.CrossRef

Peterson, D. A. M. (2018). The dynamic construction of candidate image. Electoral Studies, 54, 289–296.CrossRef

Pew Research Center. (2018). Voter enthusiasm at record high in nationalized midterm environment. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/09/Midterm-report-for-release.pdf

Schlaufer, C. (2018). The narrative uses of evidence. Policy Studies Journal, 46(1), 90–118.CrossRef

Schlaufer, C., Stucki, I., & Sager, F. (2018). The political use of evidence and its contribution to democratic discourse. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12923CrossRef

Severson, A. W., & Coleman, E. A. (2015). Moral frames and climate change policy attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12159CrossRef

Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Lane, R. R. (2013). An angel on the wind: How heroic policy narratives shape policy realities. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 453–483.CrossRef

Shanahan, E. A., Adams, S. M., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2014). The blame game: Narrative persuasiveness of the intentional causal mechanism. The science of stories (pp. 69–88). Springer.

Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Radaelli, C. (2018). The narrative policy framework. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 173–213). Westview Press.CrossRef

Smith-Walter, A., Peterson, H. L., Jones, M. D., & Marshall, A. (2016). Gun stories: How evidence shapes firearm policy in the United States. Politics & Policy, 44(6), 1053–1088.CrossRef

Stevens, A. (2007). Survival of the ideas that fit: An evolutionary analogy for the use of evidence in policy. Social Policy and Society, 6(01), 25–35.CrossRef

Stucki, I. (2018). Evidence-based arguments in direct democracy: The case of smoking bans in Switzerland. Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.019CrossRef

Wagner, J. M., Nick, & DeBonis, M. (2018). Trump reverses course, signs order ending his policy of separating families at the border. The Washington Post.

Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2009). Coalitions, science, and belief change: Comparing adversarial and collaborative policy subsystems. Policy Studies Journal, 37(2), 195–212.CrossRef

Weiss, C. H. (1986). The circuitry of enlightenment: Diffusion of social science research to policymakers. Knowledge, 8(2), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708600800211CrossRef

Wlezien, C. (2005). On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem.’ Electoral Studies, 24(4), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.01.009CrossRef

Zanocco, C., Song, G., & Jones, M. D. (2017). Fracking bad guys: Narrative character affect in public opinion about hydraulic fracturing. Available at SSRN 3033321.

Titel: Politicking with evidence: examining evidence-based issues in electoral policy narratives
verfasst von: Laura Wolton
Deserai A. Crow
Publikationsdatum: 13.11.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Policy Sciences / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09478-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

From hierarchy to continuum: classifying the technical dimension of policy goals

Understanding policy transfer through social network analysis: expanding methodologies with an intensive case study approach

‘Windows of opportunity’: exploring the relationship between social media and plastic policies during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Count on trust: the indirect effect of trust in government on policy compliance with health behavior instructions

Seeking policy solutions in a complex system: experimentalist governance in China’s healthcare reform

The promises and perils of populism for democratic policymaking: the case of Mexico

Premium Partner