nach oben

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions

Erschienen in:

01.06.2021 | Technical paper

Prediction of TBM penetration rate using the imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) and quantum fuzzy logic

verfasst von: Alireza Afradi, Arash Ebrahimabadi

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Quantum computer brings many advantages to the world of computations. Also, the tunnel boring machine (TBM) has been industrialized over the prior decades to make the tunneling process safer and more affordable. Several factors such as economic considerations, rock properties, and schedule deadlines play an important role in the use of TBMs mining projects. Hence, future projects are interested in enhanced means for predicting the TBM performance. The TBM penetration is usually an essential factor for the prosperous implementation of a plan for tunneling in a rock situation. In this research, the statistical analyses of rock features and the measured penetration rate of TBMs are presented using the imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) and quantum fuzzy logic. Also, a database has been used that includes the parameters of rock properties of the Queens Water Tunnel. The proposed hybrid method is applied to provide a new predictive model for improving TBM performance. Results demonstrated that this method has a high capability to predict the performance of TBM with R² = 0.93 and RMSE = 0.09. This shows that the application of the proposed approach is preferable compared to the prior models in terms of penetration rate.

Vorheriger Artikel Optimization of sustainable high-strength–high-volume fly ash concrete with and without steel fiber using Taguchi method and multi-regression analysis

Nächster Artikel Characteristic features of molybdenum, copper, tungsten and rhenium accumulation in the environment

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Yazdani-Chamzini A, Yakhchali SH (2012) Tunnel boring machine (TBM) selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 30:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.021CrossRef

Liotard P, Robert P (2019) Cutter holder for a tunnel boring machine and an associated cutting set (ed): Google Patents

DiMillo T (2000) Tunnel boring machine with crusher (ed): Google Patents

Cass DT (1999) Tunnel boring machine and method (ed) Google Patents

Koopialipoor M, Nikouei SS, Marto A, Fahimifar A, Armaghani DJ, Mohamad ET (2019) Predicting tunnel boring machine performance through a new model based on the group method of data handling. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(5):3799–3813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1349-8CrossRef

Wijk G (1992) A model of tunnel boring machine performance. Geotech Geol Eng 10(1):19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881969CrossRef

Yagiz S, Karahan H (2015) Application of various optimization techniques and comparison of their performances for predicting TBM penetration rate in rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.09.019CrossRef

Yagiz S, Gokceoglu C, Sezer E, Iplikci S (2009) Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance. Eng Appl Artif Intell 22(4–5):808–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2009.03.007CrossRef

Ozdemir L, Wang FD (1979) Mechanical tunnel boring prediction and machine design. Nasa Sti/Recon Tech Rep N 80:16239

10.

Jahed Armaghani D, Faradonbeh RS, Momeni E, Fahimifar A, Tahir MM (2018) Performance prediction of tunnel boring machine through developing a gene expression programming equation. Eng Comput 34(1):129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0526-xCrossRef

11.

Khorasani E, Zare Naghadehi M, Jimenez R, Tarigh Azali S, Jalali SME, Zare S (2018) Performance analysis of tunnel-boring machine by probabilistic systems approach. P I Civil Eng-Geotec 171(5):422–438. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.16.00190CrossRef

12.

Yagiz S, Karahan H (2011) Prediction of hard rock TBM penetration rate using particle swarm optimization. Int J Rock Mech Min 48(3):427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.02.013CrossRef

13.

Gong Q, Zhao J (2009) Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min 46(1):8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.003CrossRef

14.

Zhao Y, Yang H, Chen Z, Chen X, Huang L, Liu S (2019) Effects of jointed rock mass and mixed ground conditions on the cutting efficiency and cutter wear of tunnel boring machine. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(5):1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1667-yCrossRef

15.

Tarkoy PJ, Hendron A (1975) Rock hardness index properties and geotechnical parameters for predicting tunnel boring machine performance

16.

Liao J, Zhu X, Yao B (2018) Dynamic modeling of gripper type hard rock tunnel boring machine. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 71:166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.003CrossRef

17.

Yagiz S, Ghasemi E, Adoko AC (2018) Prediction of rock brittleness using genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization techniques. Geotech Geol Eng 36(6):3767–3777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0570-3CrossRef

18.

Gholamnejad J, Tayarani N (2010) Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate. Min Sci Technol 20(5):727–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-5264(09)60271-4CrossRef

19.

Ghasemi E, Yagiz S, Ataei M (2014) Predicting penetration rate of hard rock tunnel boring machine using fuzzy logic. B Eng Geol Environ 73(1):23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0497-0CrossRef

20.

Yoo C, Kim JM (2007) Tunneling performance prediction using an integrated GIS and neural network. Comput Geotech 34(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.08.007CrossRef

21.

Kim T (2004) Development of a fuzzy logic based utilization predictor model for hard rock tunnel boring machines, Colorado school of mines

22.

Benardos A, Kaliampakos D (2004) Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 19(6):597–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.02.128CrossRef

23.

Mahdevari S, Shahriar K, Yagiz S, Shirazi MA (2014) A support vector regression model for predicting tunnel boring machine penetration rates. Int J Rock Mech Min 72:214–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.09.012CrossRef

24.

Benato A, Oreste P (2015) Prediction of penetration per revolution in TBM tunneling as a function ofintact rock and rock mass characteristics. Int J Rock Mech Min 74:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.12.007CrossRef

25.

Huo J, Sun W, Su P, Deng L (2009) Optimal disc cutters plane layout design of the full-face rock tunnel boring machine (TBM) using an ant colony optimization algorithm. International conference on intelligent robotics and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10817-4_44CrossRef

26.

Yagiz S (2008) Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 23(3):326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.011CrossRef

27.

Oraee K, Salehzade H, Salehi B (2008) Calculation of efficiency and advanced rate TBMs in Karaj-Tehran water transfer project using practical models. In: Proceedings of the 4th national congress on civil engineering

28.

Wu SJ, Qian B, Gong ZB (2006) The time and cost prediction of tunnel boring machine in tunneling. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 11(2):385–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832128CrossRef

29.

Tarkoy PJ (1973) Predicting Tbm penetration rates in selected rock types

30.

Graham PC (1976) Rock exploration for machine manufacturers. In: Bieniawski ZT (ed) Exploration for rock engineering. Balkema, Johannesburg, pp 173–180

31.

Hughes H (1986) The relative cuttability of coal-measures stone. Min Sci Technol 3(2):95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9031(86)90250-1CrossRef

32.

Farmer I, Garrity P, Glossop N (1987) Operational characteristics of full face tunnel boring machines. In: Rapid excavation and tunneling conference, pp 188–201

33.

Tatiya RR (2005) Surface and underground excavations: methods, techniques and equipment. CRC Press, FloridaCrossRef

34.

De Silva CW (2018) Intelligent control: fuzzy logic applications. CRC Press, FloridaCrossRef

35.

Ren X, Wu C (2013) The fuzzy riemann-stieltjes integral. Int J Theor Phys 52(6):2134–2151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-013-1511-9CrossRef

36.

Yager RR, Zadeh LA (2012) An introduction to fuzzy logic applications in intelligent systems. Springer Science & Business Medi, Cham

37.

Zahedi F, Zahedi Z (2015) A review of neuro-fuzzy systems based on intelligent control. J E E 3(1–2):58–61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.23CrossRef

38.

Chen G, Pham TT (2000) Introduction to fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy control systems. CRC Press, Florida. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039818CrossRef

39.

Bisht DCS, Srivastava PK, Ram M (2018) Role of fuzzy logic in flexible manufacturing system. In: Ram M, Davim J (eds) Diagnostic techniques in industrial engineering. Management and industrial engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65497-3_9CrossRef

40.

Liu Z, Li HX (2005) A probabilistic fuzzy logic system for modeling and control. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(6):848–859. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2005.859326CrossRef

41.

Karnik NN, Mendel JM (1998) Introduction to type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In: 1998 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems proceedings. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (Cat. No. 98CH36228), pp 915–920. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1998.686240

42.

Venkatrama R, Sergioli G, Freytes H, Leporini R (2017) Fuzzy type representation of the Fredkin gate in quantum computation with mixed states. Int J Theor Phys 56(12):3860–3868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-017-3362-2CrossRef

43.

Ross TJ (2010) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119994374CrossRef

44.

Luo G, Zhou RG, Liu X, Hu W, Luo J (2018) Fuzzy matching based on gray-scale difference for quantum images. Int J Theor Phys 57(8):2447–2460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-018-3766-7CrossRef

45.

Mayburov S (2015) Fuzzy topology and geometric formalism of quantum mechanics. Int J Theor Phys 54(12):4272–4282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2480-3CrossRef

46.

Varghese A, George JS, George J (2018) A continuous assessment strategy using fuzzy logic. In: Learning strategies and constructionism in modern education settings: IGI Global, pp 69–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5430-1.ch005

47.

Yazdanbakhsh O, Dick S (2018) A systematic review ofcomplex fuzzy sets and logic. Fuzzy Set Syst 338:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2017.01.010CrossRef

48.

Zhang Q, Liu Y, Tian X (2019) A novel fuzzy logic system with consequents as fuzzy weighted averages of antecedents. In: Proceedings of 2018 Chinese intelligent systems conference, chapter in lecture notes in electrical engineering. Springer, Cham, p 571–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2291-4_56

49.

Raghuvanshi A, Perkowski M (2010) Fuzzy quantum circuits to model emotional behaviors of humanoid robots. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, p 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2010.5586038

50.

Schmitt I, Nürnberger A, Lehrack S (2009) On the relation between fuzzy and quantum logic. In: Seising R. (eds) Views on fuzzy sets and systems from different perspectives. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93802-6_20

51.

Liao HC, Wu X, Keikha A, Hafezalkotob A (2018) Power average-based score function and extension rule of hesitant fuzzy set and the hesitant power average operators. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(3):3873–3882. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-18794CrossRef

52.

Khaled AA, Hosseini S (2015) Fuzzy adaptive imperialist competitive algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 26(4):813–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1752-4CrossRef

53.

Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C (2007) Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In: 2007 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, p 4661–4667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2007.4425083

54.

Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010) Imperialist competitive algorithm for engineering design problems. Asian J Civ Eng 11(6):675–697

55.

Talatahari S, Azar BF, Sheikholeslami R, Gandomi A (2012) Imperialist competitive algorithm combined with chaos for global optimization. Commun Nonlinear Sci 17(3):1312–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.08.021CrossRef

56.

Mollajan A, Memarian H, Quintal B (2019) Imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) optimization method for nonlinear AVA inversion. Geophysics 84(3):81–92. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0507.1CrossRef

57.

Abdechiri M, Faez K, Bahrami H (2010) Adaptive imperialist competitive algorithm (AICA). In: 9th IEEE international conference on cognitive informatics (ICCI'10), pp 940–945. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/COGINF.2010.5599776

58.

Yazdani M, Jolai F, Taleghani M, Yazdani R (2018) A modified imperialist competitive algorithm for a two-agent single-machine scheduling under periodic maintenance consideration. Int J Oper Res 32(2):127–155. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2018.092011CrossRef

59.

Mikaeil R, Haghshenas SS, Haghshenas SS, Ataei M (2018) Performance prediction of circular saw machine using imperialist competitive algorithm and fuzzy clustering technique. Neural Comput Appl 29(6):283–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2557-4CrossRef

60.

Tashayo B, Behzadafshar K, Tehrani MS, Banayem HA, Hashemi MH, Nezhad SST (2019) Feasibility of imperialist competitive algorithm to predict the surface settlement induced by tunneling. Eng Comput 35(3):917–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0641-3CrossRef

61.

Hasanipanah M, Amnieh HB, Khamesi H, Armaghani DJ, Golzar SB, Shahnazar A (2018) Prediction of an environmental issue of mine blasting: an imperialistic competitive algorithm-based fuzzy system. Int J Environ Sci Te 15(3):551–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1395-yCrossRef

62.

Afradi A, Ebrahimabadi A, Hallajian T (2019) Prediction of the penetration rate and number of consumed disc cutters of tunnel boring machines (TBMs) using artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (svm)-case study: beheshtabad water conveyance tunnel in Iran. Asian j water environ pollut 16(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW190006CrossRef

63.

Afradi A, Ebrahimabadi A, Hallajian T (2020) Prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate using ant colony optimization, bee colony optimization and the particle swarm optimization, case study: Sabzkooh water conveyance tunnel . M M D 14:75–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33271/mining14.02.075

64.

Afradi A, Ebrahimabadi A, Hallajian T (2020) Prediction of TBM penetration rate using support vector machine. Geosaberes 11:467–479CrossRef

65.

ZareNaghadehi M, Samaei M, Ranjbarnia M, Nourani V (2018) State-of-the-art predictive modeling of TBM performance in changing geological conditions through gene expression programming. Measurement 126:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.049CrossRef

66.

Adoko AC, Gokceoglu C, Yagiz S (2017) Bayesian prediction of TBM penetration rate in rock mass. Eng Geol 226:245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.06.014CrossRef

Titel: Prediction of TBM penetration rate using the imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) and quantum fuzzy logic
verfasst von: Alireza Afradi
Arash Ebrahimabadi
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00467-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Development of supplementary cementitious materials from Algerian kaolin: elaboration of metakaolin and assessment of pozzolanicity

Feasibility study of utilisation of ferrochrome slag as fine aggregate and rice husk ash as cement replacement for developing sustainable concrete

Durability study of expansive clay treated with bagasse ash and cement slag

Evaluation of efficacy of basalt textile fabric on retrofitting of damaged reinforced concrete external beam–column joints

Effect of steel fibres on the torsional behaviour of concrete elements: unified model using Artificial Neural Networks

Experimental and numerical study for the optimization of bottom of foundation shapes on soft soils