Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 3/2017

09.09.2016

Privacy-Preserving Yoking Proof with Key Exchange in the Three-Party Setting

verfasst von: Yangguang Tian, Guomin Yang, Yi Mu

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Yoking proof is a very useful security primitive that can be used to prove the co-existence of two or multiple entities in an identification protocol. It can be incorporated into radio frequency identification (RFID) protocols and used in many practical applications such as pharmaceutical distribution and manufacturing. However, the existing yoking proofs do not support secure key establishment, which is required in order to allow secure communication between the reader and the RFID tags after the identification process. In this paper, we propose a novel yoking proof with key exchange that allows the reader to establish a secure communication channel with the tags. We define the formal security models for yoking proof with key exchange and prove that the proposed protocol can achieve yoking proof soundness, session key security and tag identity privacy.
Vorheriger Artikel Transmission Optimized Generalized Spatial Modulation Over Correlated Fading Channels
Nächster Artikel Ergodic Channel Capacity for Rayleigh Fading Channels with Impairments Due to Errors in M-Branch Hybrid Diversity Combining

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Batina, L., Lee, Y. K., Seys, S., Singelée, D., & Verbauwhede, I. (2012). Extending ecc-based RFID authentication protocols to privacy-preserving multi-party grouping proofs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(3), 323–335.CrossRef
2.
Bellare, M., Boldyreva, A., Desai, A., & Pointcheval, D. (2001). Key-privacy in public-key encryption. In Advances in cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2001, 7th international conference on the theory and application of cryptology and information security, Gold Coast, Australia, December 9–13, proceedings (pp. 566–582).
3.
Bellare, M., Canetti, R., & Krawczyk, H. (1998). A modular approach to the design and analysis of authentication and key exchange protocols (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on the theory of computing, Dallas, Texas, USA, May 23–26 (pp. 419–428).
4.
Bellare, M., & Neven, G. (2006). Multi-signatures in the plain public-key model and a general forking lemma. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on computer and communications security, CCS 2006, Alexandria, VA, USA, October 30–November 3 (pp. 390–399).
5.
Bellare, M., Pointcheval, D., & Rogaway, P. (2000). Authenticated key exchange secure against dictionary attacks. In Advances in cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2000, international conference on the theory and application of cryptographic techniques, Bruges, Belgium, May 14–18, proceedings (pp. 139–155).
6.
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1993). Entity authentication and key distribution. In Advances in cryptology—CRYPTO ’93, 13th annual international cryptology conference, Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 22–26, proceedings (pp. 232–249).
7.
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1995). Provably secure session key distribution: The three party case. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, 29 May–1 June, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (pp. 57–66).
8.
Canetti, R., & Krawczyk, H. (2001). Analysis of key-exchange protocols and their use for building secure channels. In Advances in cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2001, international conference on the theory and application of cryptographic techniques, Innsbruck, Austria, May 6–10, proceedings (pp. 453–474).
9.
Cramer, R., & Shoup, V. (1998). A practical public key cryptosystem provably secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack. In Advances in cryptology—CRYPTO ’98, 18th annual international cryptology conference, Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 23–27, proceedings (pp. 13–25).
10.
Cremers, C. (2011). Examining indistinguishability-based security models for key exchange protocols: the case of CK, CK-HMQV, and eCK. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM symposium on information, computer and communications security, ASIACCS 2011, Hong Kong, China, March 22–24 (pp. 80–91).
11.
Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. E. (1976). New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22(6), 644–654.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
12.
Hermans, J., & Peeters, R. (2012). Private yoking proofs: Attacks, models and new provable constructions. In Radio frequency identification. Security and privacy issues—8th international workshop, RFIDSec 2012, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, July 2–3, 2012, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 96–108).
13.
Juels, A. (2004). “yoking-proofs” for RFID tags. In 2nd IEEE conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom 2004 Workshops), 14–17 March, Orlando, FL, USA (pp. 138–143).
14.
15.
Kaliski, B. S, Jr. (2001). An unknown key-share attack on the MQV key agreement protocol. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 4(3), 275–288. CrossRef
16.
Krawczyk, H. (2005). HMQV: A high-performance secure diffie-hellman protocol. In Advances in cryptology—CRYPTO 2005: 25th annual international cryptology conference, Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 14–18, proceedings (pp. 546–566).
17.
Law, L., Menezes, A., Qu, M., Solinas, J. A., & Vanstone, S. A. (2003). An efficient protocol for authenticated key agreement. Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 28(2), 119–134.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
18.
Matsumoto, T., Takashima, Y., & Imai, H. (1986). On seeking smart public-key-distribution systems. IEICE Transactions (1976–1990), 69(2), 99–106.
19.
Okamoto, T., & Pointcheval, D. (2001). The gap-problems: A new class of problems for the security of cryptographic schemes. In Public key cryptography, 4th international workshop on practice and theory in public key cryptography, PKC 2001, Cheju Island, Korea, February 13–15, proceedings (pp. 104–118).
20.
Piramuthu, S. (2006). On existence proofs for multiple RFID tags. In Proceedings of the ACS/IEEE international conference on pervasive services 2006, ICPS ’06, 26–29 June 2006, Lyon, France (pp. 317–320).
21.
Saito, J., & Sakurai, K. (2005). Grouping proof for RFID tags. In 19th international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA 2005), 28–30 March, Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 621–624).
22.
Schnorr, C. (1989). Efficient identification and signatures for smart cards. In Advances in cryptology—CRYPTO ’89, 9th annual international cryptology conference, Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 20–24, proceedings (pp. 239–252).
23.
Shoup, V. (2004). Sequences of games: A tool for taming complexity in security proofs. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 332.
24.
Ustaoglu, B. (2008). Obtaining a secure and efficient key agreement protocol from (H)MQV and NAXOS. Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 46(3), 329–342.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Metadaten
Titel
Privacy-Preserving Yoking Proof with Key Exchange in the Three-Party Setting
verfasst von
Yangguang Tian
Guomin Yang
Yi Mu
Publikationsdatum
09.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3667-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Wireless Personal Communications 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

An Universal MMSE Channel Estimator for OFDM Receiver

OriginalPaper

Advanced Secure Anonymous Authentication Scheme for Roaming Service in Global Mobility Networks

OriginalPaper

Reduced-Complexity Decoding of LT Codes

OriginalPaper

Construction of Pseudoinverse Matrix Over Finite Field and Its Applications

OriginalPaper

Benchmarking and Modeling of Routing Protocols for Delay Tolerant Networks

OriginalPaper

Asymmetrically CPW-Fed Hourglass Shaped UWB Monopole Antenna with Defected Ground Plane

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise