Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Business and Psychology
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology 1/2014

01.03.2014

Proactive Personality at Work: Seeing More to Do and Doing More?

verfasst von: Diane M. Bergeron, Tiffany D. Schroeder, Hector A. Martinez

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop and test a model relating proactive personality to job behaviors (task and citizenship behaviors) through the intervening mediator of perceived role breadth.

Design/methodology/approach

Survey data were obtained from 530 faculty members in 69 U. S. research universities.

Findings

Proactive personality was positively related to task behavior and OCB. Perceived role breadth mediated the relationship between proactive personality and OCB, but did not mediate the relationship between proactive personality and task behavior. Despite not viewing their role more broadly, individuals higher in proactive personality engaged more frequently in both task behavior and OCB; and also worked more hours per week.

Implications

Having a better understanding of proactive individuals is important in terms of managing them. Because these individuals tend to do more in their jobs and subsequently work more hours, they may be more susceptible to burnout and may require additional help in determining priorities and balancing their work and lives.

Originality/value

This is the first study to show that proactive personality is positively related to the frequency with which these individuals engage in task and citizenship behavior. Although role breadth is generally an antecedent of such job behaviors, individuals higher in proactive personality engage more frequently in task behaviors regardless of whether or not they perceive them as part of their role. This is one of the first studies to show that working more hours each week is a potential cost of having a proactive personality.
Vorheriger Artikel Too Old to Train or Reprimand: The Role of Intergroup Attribution Bias in Evaluating Older Workers
Nächster Artikel Reexamining the Nature of Learner Control: Dimensionality and Effects on Learning and Training Reactions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
We also included number of children as a control variable in our initial set of analyses, but removed it because it had no significant effect on our dependent or mediating variables.
 
2
In post hoc analyses, we further tested for relationships between role breadth and job behaviors (i.e., task, OCB). The above results for Hypothesis 3b showed a positive relationship between OCB role breadth and its two corresponding OCB dimensions. In order to be comprehensive, we also tested the relationship between role breadth and the task behavior dimensions. For each of these job behavior outcomes, their respective role breadth dimension contributed significantly and independent of the effects of the control variables and proactive personality. Full results are available from the first author.
 
3
We also ran mediation analyses to see if proactive personality had an indirect effect on hours worked through job behaviors. We found that none of the job behaviors significantly predicted hours worked, and we found no support for an indirect effect using Preacher and Hayes (2008) bias-corrected bootstrapping method. For the set of 5 job behaviors, point estimate = .46, SE = .39, bias corrected 95 % CI [−.3098, 1.2442].
 
Literatur
Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596–606.CrossRef
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRef
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.CrossRef
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1999). Proactive behavior: Meaning, impact, recommendations. Business Horizons, 42, 63–70.CrossRef
Becherer, R. C., & Maurer, J. G. (1999). The proactive personality disposition and entrepreneurial behavior among small company presidents. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 28–36.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Campbell D. J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 52–66.
Chan, D. (2006). Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 475–481.CrossRefPubMed
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., Kessler, I., & Purcell, J. (2004). Exploring organizationally directed citizenship behavior: Reciprocity or “It’s my job”? Journal of Management Studies, 41, 85–106.CrossRef
Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 532–537.CrossRef
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462.CrossRef
De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & de Luque, M. F. (2010). Proactivity with image in mind: How employee and manager characteristics affect evaluations of proactive behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 347–369.CrossRef
Dierdorff, E. C., Rubin, R. S., & Bachrach, D. G. (2012). Role expectations as antecedents of citizenship and the moderating effects of work context. Journal of Management, 38, 573–598.CrossRef
Dilts, D. A., Haber, L. J., & Bialik, D. (1994). Assessing what professors do: An introduction to academic performance appraisal in higher education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs and organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 859–891.CrossRef
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 133–187). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Fuller, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 329–345.CrossRef
Graen, G. (1976). Role making processes within complex organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201–1245). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. In A. P. Brief & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 28, pp. 3–34). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted-U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 61–76.PubMedCrossRef
Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2010). Employee life satisfaction and work behaviors? A field investigation of the mediating role of the self-concordance model. Personnel Psychology, 63, 539–560.CrossRef
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327–347.CrossRef
Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1452–1465.CrossRefPubMed
Hillman, A. J. (2005). Reflections on service orientations, community, and professions. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 185–188.CrossRef
Hinkin, T., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). The development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 561–567.CrossRef
Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader–member exchange and content-specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 170–178.CrossRefPubMed
Howard, G. S., Maxwell, S. E., Wiener, R. L., Boynton, K. S., & Rooney, W. M. (1980). Is a behavioral measure the best estimate of behavioral parameters? Perhaps not. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 293–311.CrossRef
Ilgen, D. & Hollenbeck, J. (1991). The structure of work: Job design and roles. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 165–208). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Jacobs, J. A. (1998). Measuring time at work: Are self-reports accurate? Monthly Labor Review, December, 42–53.
Kamdar, D., McAllister, D. J., & Turban, D. B. (2006). “All in a day’s work”: How follower individual differences and justice perceptions predict OCB role definitions and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 841–855.CrossRefPubMed
Karambayya, R. (1990). Contexts for organizational citizenship behavior: Do high performing and satisfying units have better ‘citizens’. York University Working Paper, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
Ketchen, D. J. (2008). Volunteer and shirking behaviors among the Daca. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 217–220.CrossRef
Latham, G. P., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1995). Criterion-related validity of the situational and patterned behavior description interviews with organizational citizenship behavior. Human Performance, 8, 67–80.CrossRef
Li, N., Harris, T. B., Boswell, W. R., & Xie, Z. (2011). The role of organizational insiders’ developmental feedback and proactive personality on newcomers’ performance: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1317–1327.CrossRefPubMed
Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 395–404.CrossRefPubMed
Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58, 703–722.CrossRef
MacKinnon, D. P., Coxe, S., & Baraldi, A. N. (2012). Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 1–14.PubMedCrossRef
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Maletz, M. C. & Nohria, N. (2001). Managing in the whitespace. Harvard Business Review, February, 102–111.
Maslach, C., Shaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.PubMedCrossRef
McAllister, D. J., Kamdar, D., Morrison, E. W., & Turban, D. B. (2007). Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1200–1211.CrossRefPubMed
Minbashian, A., Bright, J. E., & Bird, K. D. (2009). Complexity in the relationships among the subdimensions of extraversion and job performance in managerial occupations. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 82, 537–549.CrossRef
Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K. A., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 399–406.CrossRefPubMed
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543–1567.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480.CrossRef
Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). Challenging the status quo: What motivates proactive behaviour? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 623–629.CrossRef
Oliver, R. L., & Anderson, E. (1994). An empirical test of the consequences of behavior- and outcome-based sales control systems. Journal of Marketing, 58, 53–67.CrossRef
Oliver, R. L., & Anderson, E. (1995). Behavior- and outcome-based sales control systems: Evidence and consequences of pure-form and hybrid governance. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 15, 1–15.
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85–98.CrossRef
Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education, 67, 46–84.CrossRef
Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role-breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 835–852.CrossRefPubMed
Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827–856.CrossRef
Parker, D. F., & DeCotiis, T. A. (1983). Organizational determinants of job stress. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 160–177.CrossRef
Parker, S. K., & Sprigg, C. A. (1999). Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 925–939.CrossRefPubMed
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.CrossRefPubMed
Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39, 313–338.CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262–270.CrossRefPubMed
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 351–363.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.PubMedCrossRef
Restegary, H. & Landy, F. (1993). The interaction among time urgency, uncertainty, and time pressure. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human. Judgment and decision making (pp. 217–235). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80.CrossRefPubMed
Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1991). Improving performance: How to manage the white space in the organization chart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.PubMedCrossRef
Sax, L. J., Astin, A. W., Arredondo, M. & Korn, W. S. (1996). The American college teacher: National norms for the 1995-1996 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California.
Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 3–43). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416–427.CrossRefPubMed
Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54, 845–974.CrossRef
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.PubMedCrossRef
Spector, P. E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 385–392.CrossRef
Tepper, B. J., Lockhart, D., & Hoobler, J. (2001). Justice, citizenship and role definition effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 789–796.CrossRefPubMed
Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 275–300.CrossRef
Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1011–1017.CrossRefPubMed
U.S. Department of Labor, United States Employment Service, & The North Carolina Occupational Analysis Field Center. (1991). Dictionary of Occupational Titles, (Revised 4th ed., ICPSR Publication No. 6100). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535.CrossRefPubMed
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216–226.CrossRef
Walz, S. M., & Niehoff, B. P. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: Their relationship to organizational effectiveness. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 24, 301–319.CrossRef
Wanner, R. A., Lewis, L. S., & Gregorio, D. I. (1981). Research productivity in academia: A comparative study of the sciences, social sciences and humanities. Sociology of Education, 54, 238–253.CrossRef
Whitman, D. S., Van Rooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Personnel Psychology, 63, 41–81.CrossRef
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.CrossRef
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63, 847–870.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Proactive Personality at Work: Seeing More to Do and Doing More?
verfasst von
Diane M. Bergeron
Tiffany D. Schroeder
Hector A. Martinez
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9298-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Journal of Business and Psychology 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Getting Followers to Transcend Their Self-Interest for the Benefit of Their Company: Testing a Core Assumption of Transformational Leadership Theory

OriginalPaper

Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How

OriginalPaper

Reexamining the Nature of Learner Control: Dimensionality and Effects on Learning and Training Reactions

OriginalPaper

Differences in Emotional Labor Across Cultures: A Comparison of Chinese and U.S. Service Workers

OriginalPaper

Conceptual and Statistical Interactions: An Illustration with the AB5C and CWBs

OriginalPaper

Role Definition as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Safety Climate and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Among Hospital Nurses

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise