Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation 4/2021

05.05.2021

Probabilistic Dual-Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Multi-attribute Group Decision-Making

verfasst von: Chunliang Ji, Runtong Zhang, Jun Wang

Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As modern socioeconomic decision-making problems are becoming more and more complex, it also becomes more and more difficult to appropriately depict decision makers’ cognitive information in decision-making process. In addition, in group decision-making problems, decision makers’ cognition is usually diverse, which makes it more complicated to express the overall preference information. Recently, the dual-hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets (DHPFSs) have been proved to be an effective tool to depict decision makers’ evaluation values in multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) procedure. The basic elements of DHPFSs are dual-hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (DHFNs), which are characterized by some possible membership degrees and non-membership degrees. In a DHFN, all members have the same importance, which indicates that multiple occurrence and appearance of some elements is ignored. Hence, the DHPFSs still have some drawbacks when expressing decision makers’ evaluation information in MAGDM problems. This paper aims at proposing a novel tool to describe decision maker’s evaluation values and apply it in solving MAGDM problems. This paper extends the traditional DHPFSs to probabilistic dual-hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PDHPFSs), which consider not only multiple membership and non-membership degrees, but also their probabilistic information. Afterward, we investigate the applications of PDHPFSs in MAGDM process. To this end, we first introduce the concept of DHPFSs as well as some related notions, such as operational rules, score function, accuracy function, comparison method, and distance measure. Second, based on the power average and Hamy mean, some aggregation operators for DHPFSs are presented. Properties of these new operators are also discussed. Third, we put forward a novel MAGDM method under PDHPFSs. A novel MAGDM method is developed, and further, we conduct numerical examples to show the performance and advantages of the new method. Results indicate that our method can effectively handle MAGDM problems in reality. In addition, comparative analysis also reveals the advantages of our method. This paper contributed a novel MAGDM method and numerical examples as well as comparative analysis were provided to show the effectiveness and advantages of our proposed method. Our contributions provide decision makers a new manner to determine the optimal alternative in realistic MAGDM problems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Yager RR. Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2014;22(4):958–65.CrossRef Yager RR. Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2014;22(4):958–65.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang RT, Wang J, Zhu XM, Xia MM, Yu M. Some generalized Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operators with their application to multiattribute group decision-making. Complexity. 2017;5937376, 16 pages. Zhang RT, Wang J, Zhu XM, Xia MM, Yu M. Some generalized Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operators with their application to multiattribute group decision-making. Complexity. 2017;5937376, 16 pages.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg H. A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2016;31(1):529–40.CrossRef Garg H. A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2016;31(1):529–40.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng XD, Yang Y. Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic set. Comput Eng Appl. 2016;52(23):50–4. Peng XD, Yang Y. Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic set. Comput Eng Appl. 2016;52(23):50–4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Geng YS, Liu PD, Teng F, Liu ZM. Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain linguistic TODIM method and their application to multiple criteria group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2017;33(6):3383–95.CrossRef Geng YS, Liu PD, Teng F, Liu ZM. Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain linguistic TODIM method and their application to multiple criteria group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2017;33(6):3383–95.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei GW, Lu M, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2017;33:1129–42.CrossRef Wei GW, Lu M, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2017;33:1129–42.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Du YQ, Hou FJ, Zafar W, Yu Q, Zhai YB. A novel method for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Intell Syst. 2017;32(10):1085–112.CrossRef Du YQ, Hou FJ, Zafar W, Yu Q, Zhai YB. A novel method for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Intell Syst. 2017;32(10):1085–112.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu HC, Quan MY, Shi H, Guo C. An integrated MCDM method for robot selection under interval-valued Pythagorean uncertain linguistic environment. Int J Intell Syst. 2019;34(2):188–214.CrossRef Liu HC, Quan MY, Shi H, Guo C. An integrated MCDM method for robot selection under interval-valued Pythagorean uncertain linguistic environment. Int J Intell Syst. 2019;34(2):188–214.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Wei GW, Gao H. Approaches to multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy information. Mathematics. 2018;6(10):201.CrossRef Wang J, Wei GW, Gao H. Approaches to multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy information. Mathematics. 2018;6(10):201.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei GW, Lu M. Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Arch Control Sci. 2017;27(3):265–395.MathSciNetMATH Wei GW, Lu M. Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Arch Control Sci. 2017;27(3):265–395.MathSciNetMATH
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu B, Xu ZS, Xia MM. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J Appl Math. 2012;879629, 13 pages. Zhu B, Xu ZS, Xia MM. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J Appl Math. 2012;879629, 13 pages.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu JP, Tang XY, Wei GW, Wei C, Wei Y. Bidirectional project method for dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making and their application to performance assessment of new rural construction. Int J Intell Syst. 2019;34(8):1920–34.CrossRef Lu JP, Tang XY, Wei GW, Wei C, Wei Y. Bidirectional project method for dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making and their application to performance assessment of new rural construction. Int J Intell Syst. 2019;34(8):1920–34.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji XN, Yu LX, Fu JP. Evaluating personal default risk in P2P lending platform: based on dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach. Mathematics. 2020;8(1):8.CrossRef Ji XN, Yu LX, Fu JP. Evaluating personal default risk in P2P lending platform: based on dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach. Mathematics. 2020;8(1):8.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang XY, Wei GW. Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators in multi-attribute decision making. Arch Control Sci. 2019;29(2):339–86.MathSciNetMATH Tang XY, Wei GW. Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators in multi-attribute decision making. Arch Control Sci. 2019;29(2):339–86.MathSciNetMATH
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang XY, Wei GW. Multiple attribute decision-making with dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy information. Cogn Comput. 2019;11:193–211.CrossRef Tang XY, Wei GW. Multiple attribute decision-making with dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy information. Cogn Comput. 2019;11:193–211.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei GW, Wang J, Wei C, Wei Y, Zhang Y. Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Hamy mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access. 2019;7:86697–716.CrossRef Wei GW, Wang J, Wei C, Wei Y, Zhang Y. Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Hamy mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access. 2019;7:86697–716.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pang Q, Wang H, Xu ZS. Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci. 2016;369:128–43.CrossRef Pang Q, Wang H, Xu ZS. Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci. 2016;369:128–43.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2012;20(1):109–19.CrossRef Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2012;20(1):109–19.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang DC, Kobina A, Quan W. Grey relational analysis method for probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making based on geometric Bonferroni mean. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2018;20:2234–44.CrossRef Liang DC, Kobina A, Quan W. Grey relational analysis method for probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making based on geometric Bonferroni mean. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2018;20:2234–44.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie WY, Xu ZS, Ren ZL, Wang H. Probabilistic linguistic analytic hierarchy process and its application on the performance assessment of Xiongan new area. Int J Inf Tech Decis Mak. 2018;17(6):1693–724. CrossRef Xie WY, Xu ZS, Ren ZL, Wang H. Probabilistic linguistic analytic hierarchy process and its application on the performance assessment of Xiongan new area. Int J Inf Tech Decis Mak. 2018;17(6):1693–724. CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu PD, Teng F. Some Muirhead mean operators for probabilistic linguistic term sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision-making. Appl Soft Comput. 2018;68:396–431.CrossRef Liu PD, Teng F. Some Muirhead mean operators for probabilistic linguistic term sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision-making. Appl Soft Comput. 2018;68:396–431.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao HC, Jiang LS, Xu ZS, Xu JP, Francisco H. A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information. Inf Sci. 2017;415–416:341–55.CrossRef Liao HC, Jiang LS, Xu ZS, Xu JP, Francisco H. A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information. Inf Sci. 2017;415–416:341–55.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang F, Ma Q. Multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment with application to evaluate the transformation efficiency. Appl Intell. 2018;48:953–65.CrossRef Jiang F, Ma Q. Multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment with application to evaluate the transformation efficiency. Appl Intell. 2018;48:953–65.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Song CY, Zhao H, Xu ZS, Hao ZN. Interval-valued probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set and its application in the Arctic geopolitical risk evaluation. Int J Intell Syst. 2019;34(4):627–51.CrossRef Song CY, Zhao H, Xu ZS, Hao ZN. Interval-valued probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set and its application in the Arctic geopolitical risk evaluation. Int J Intell Syst. 2019;34(4):627–51.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hao ZN, Xu ZS, Zhao H, Su Z. Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set and its application in risk evaluation. Knowl-Based Syst. 2017;127:16–28.CrossRef Hao ZN, Xu ZS, Zhao H, Su Z. Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set and its application in risk evaluation. Knowl-Based Syst. 2017;127:16–28.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu PD, Khan Q, Mahmood T. Application of interval neutrosophic power Hamy mean operators in MAGDM. Infomatica. 2019;30(2):293–325.CrossRef Liu PD, Khan Q, Mahmood T. Application of interval neutrosophic power Hamy mean operators in MAGDM. Infomatica. 2019;30(2):293–325.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yager RR. The power average operator. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum. 2001;31:724–31.CrossRef Yager RR. The power average operator. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum. 2001;31:724–31.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara T, Uchiyama M, Takahasi SE. A refinement of various mean inequalities. J Inequal Appl. 1998;2(4):387–95.MathSciNetMATH Hara T, Uchiyama M, Takahasi SE. A refinement of various mean inequalities. J Inequal Appl. 1998;2(4):387–95.MathSciNetMATH
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Brodie D, Bacchetta M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS in adults. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(20):1905–14.CrossRef Brodie D, Bacchetta M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS in adults. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(20):1905–14.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Villar J, Sulemanji D, Kacmarek RM. The acute respiratory distress syndrome: incidence and mortality, has it changed? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(1):3–9.CrossRef Villar J, Sulemanji D, Kacmarek RM. The acute respiratory distress syndrome: incidence and mortality, has it changed? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(1):3–9.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Villar J, Blanco J, Añón JM, Santos-Bouza A, Blanch L, Ambrós A, Gandía F, Carriedo D, Mosteiro F, Basaldúa S, Fernández RL, Kacmarek RM, ALIEN Network. The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(12):1932–41.CrossRef Villar J, Blanco J, Añón JM, Santos-Bouza A, Blanch L, Ambrós A, Gandía F, Carriedo D, Mosteiro F, Basaldúa S, Fernández RL, Kacmarek RM, ALIEN Network. The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(12):1932–41.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg H, Kaur G. Algorithm for probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on aggregation operators with new distance measures. Mathematics. 2018;6(12):280.CrossRef Garg H, Kaur G. Algorithm for probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on aggregation operators with new distance measures. Mathematics. 2018;6(12):280.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Probabilistic Dual-Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Multi-attribute Group Decision-Making
verfasst von
Chunliang Ji
Runtong Zhang
Jun Wang
Publikationsdatum
05.05.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cognitive Computation / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09858-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Cognitive Computation 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner