Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Contemporary research is considering new forms of literacy that extend beyond the skills required to process alphanumeric data. The skills involved in visualising, reasoning, and communicating about 2D and 3D spatial information are commonly referred to as ‘Spatial Literacy’. Research has highlighted a positive relationship between Spatial Literacy and achievement across a diverse range of subject areas. Internationally, researchers have observed that students often have underdeveloped levels of Spatial Literacy on matriculation to third-level courses, particularly in the STEM area. In an attempt to better understand the potential reasons for this, this paper endeavours to unpack the complex nature of Spatial Literacy, its definition and associated metrics. Concerns are raised about the Spatial Literacy levels of Irish students based on international metrics and benchmarking against other jurisdictions. This paper seeks to problematize Spatial Literacy within the Irish educational context with a particular focus on dominant curriculum ideologies and education policy discourse.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Ariga, T., Watanabe, T., Otani, T., & Masuzawa, T. (2016). Learning program for enhancing visual literacy for non-design students using a CMS to share outcomes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 133–148. CrossRef
Asmus, E., Jr. (2004). Music teaching and music literacy. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 13(2), 6–8. CrossRef
Avgerinoue, M., & Ericson, J. (1997). A review of the concept of visual literacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 280–291. CrossRef
Bailey, N. M., & Van Harken, E. M. (2014). Visual images as tools of teacher enquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(3), 241–260. CrossRef
Ball, S. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 299–301. CrossRef
Baynes, K. (2014). Graphicacy and visual culture. In X. Danos (Ed.), Graphicacy and culture—refocusing on visual learning. Leicestershire: Loughborough Design Press Ltd.
Bednarz, S., Kemp, K. (2011). Understanding and nurturing spatial literacy. In International Conference: Spatial Thinking and Geographic Information Sciences 2011 (Vol. 21, pp. 18–23). Tokyo.
Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G. & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Vol. 107, Vol. 5).
Black, R. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of english-language learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–128. CrossRef
Bowe, B., Nevin, E., Carthy, D., Seery, N., & Sorby, S. (2016a). National Spatial Skills Project—Preliminary Findings of Phase One. In CREATE Dublin Institute of Technology (Contributions to Research in Engineering and Applied Technology Education) 2016. Dublin Institute of Technology.
Bowe, B., Seery, N., & Buckley, J. (2016b). Spatial Skills in Education: A National Study. In 33rd International Manufacturing Conference. University of Limerick, Ireland.
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy: What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 21–34.
Buckley, J., Seery, N., & Canty, D. (2017). Spatial cognition in engineering education: Developing a spatial ability framework to support the translation of theory into practice. European Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1327944.
Carmody-Hagwood, M. (2000). New times, new millennium, new literacies. Reading Research and Instruction, 39(4), 311–328. CrossRef
Carr, W. (1998). The curriculum in and for a democratic society. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 6(3), 323–340.
CEEB. (1939). CEEB special aptitude test in spatial relations (MCT). USA: College Entrance Examination Board.
Cervetti, G., Damico, J., & Pearson, P. D. (2010). Mutiple literacies, new literacies, and teacher education. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 378–386. CrossRef
Clerkin, A., Perkins, R., & Cunningham, R. (2016). TIMSS 2015 in Ireland: Mathematics and Science in primary and post-primary schools. Dublin, Ireland: Educational Research Centre.
Close, S., & Shiel, G. (2009). Gender and PISA mathematics: Irish results in context European Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 20–33.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies. New Learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. CrossRef
Curtis, R. (1978). A call for the new literacy. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(5), 26–29. CrossRef
Delahunty, T., Seery, N., & Lynch, R. (2017). Exploring the use of electroencephalography to gather objective evidence of cognitive processing during problem solving. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9712-2.
DES (2011). Literacy and Numeracy for Learning and Life: The National Strategy to Improve Literacy and Numeracy among Children and Young People 2011–2020 Department of Education and Skills.
DES. (2016a). Action plan for education Dublin. Ireland: Department of Education and Skills.
DES. (2016b). Ireland’s National Skills Strategy 2025. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Education and Skills.
DES. (2017). STEM education policy statement 2017–2026. Ireland: Dublin.
Duffy, G., Farrell, S., Harding, R., Behan, A., Mac Raighne, A., Howard, R., Nevin, E., & Bowe, B. (2015). The effects of spatial skills and spatial skills training on academic performance in STEM education. In The 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES, 2015). Dublin, Ireland.
Eilam, B., & Ben-Peretz, M. (2010). Revisiting curriculum inquiry: The role of visual representations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(6), 751–774. CrossRef
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343. CrossRef
Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. (1990). Amplifying the Mind’s eye: Sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo, 23(1), 117–126. CrossRef
Francis, K., Khan, S., & Davis, B. (2016). Enactivism, spatial reasoning and coding. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–20. CrossRef
Gagnier, K., Fisher, K. (2016). Spatial thinking: A missing building block in STEM education. http://edpolicy.education.jhu.edu/spatial-thinking-a-missing-building-block-in-stem-education/. Accessed October 10th 2017.
Gaughran, W. (2002). Cognitive Modelling for Engineers. In Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering education Annual Conference and Exposition. Montreal, Canada: American Society for Engineering Education.
Gentner, D., Özyürek, A., Gürcanli, Ö., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition, 127(3), 318–330. CrossRef
Grek, S. (2008). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. CrossRef
Guay, R. B. (1977). Purdue spatial visualization test: Rotations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.
Hegarty, M., Uttal, D., Stieff, M., Lowrie, T., Vosniadou, S. (2017). Educating Spatial Thinking for STEM Success. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, E. Davelaar (Eds.) 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 27–28). London, UK.
Hetland, L. (2000). Learning to make music enhances spatial reasoning. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 179–238. CrossRef
Hoffman, M., Gneezy, U., & List, J. A. Nurture affects gender differences in spatial abilities. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011 (Vol. 108, pp. 14786–14788, Vol. 36). doi: http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015182108.
Hyland, A. (2011). Entry to Higher Education in Ireland in the 21st Century—Discussion Paper for the NCCA/HEA Seminar to be held on 21st Sep 2011. Dublin, Ireland NCCA/HEA.
IEA (2017). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)—About Us. http://www.iea.nl/about-us. Accessed November 28, 2017.
IUA (2012). Reform of Selection and Entry to University in the Context of National Educational Policy. In C. O. T. I. U. Association (Ed.). Dublin: Council of the Irish Universities Association.
Julià, C., & Antolì, J. Ò. (2017). Enhancing spatial ability and mechanical reasoning through a STEM course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9428-x.
Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R., & Greenlee, M. W. (2002). Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(2), 203–212. CrossRef
Lane, D., Hamlin, AJ., Veurink, N., & Seery, N. (2012). The Role of Observational Sketching in Forming and Manipulating Graphical Libraries. In A. S. F. E. Education (Ed.), ASEE Annual Conference. San Antonio, TX.
Lane, D., & Sorby, S. A. (2015). Blending a spatial skills intervention into a mainstream technology teacher education program. In Proceedings of Annual Conference for the American Society of Engineering Education. Seattle, Washington American Society for Engineering Education.
Lawn, M., & Nóvoa, A. (2013). The European Educational Space: New Fabrications. SISYPHUS Journal of Education, 1(1), 11–17.
Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for Schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1252855. CrossRef
Linn, M., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and Characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. CrossRef
Lippa, R., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 Nations. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 39, 990–997. CrossRef
Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022. CrossRef
Luna, C., Solsken, J., & Kutz, E. (2000). Defining Literacy—Lessons from high-stakes teacher testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 276–288. CrossRef
Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1–17.
Lynch, R., & McGarr, O. (2014). Negotiating subject hierarchies: Neo-liberal influences on the comprehensive curriculum in Ireland. Educational Policy, 30, 1–19.
Martin, M., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
McCormack, O., Lynch, R., & Hennessy, J. (2015). Plastic people in pinstripe suits: An exploration of the views of Irish parents on the publication of school league tables. Educational Studies, 41(5), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2015.1062080. CrossRef
McGarr, O., & Lynch, R. (2015). Monopolising the STEM agenda in second-level schools: exploring power relations and subject subcultures. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9333-0.
Messaris, P. (1994). Visual “literacy”: Image, mind, and reality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Metoyer, S., & Bednarz, R. (2017). Spatial thinking assists geographic thinking: Evidence from a study exploring the effects of geospatial technology. Journal of Geography, 116(1), 20–33. CrossRef
MoE. (2012). Singapore mathematics syllabus—Secondary one to four. Singapore: Ministry of Education Singapore.
Montello, D., Grossner, K., Janelle, DG. (Ed.). (2014). Space in Mind: Concepts for Spatial Learning and Education: MIT Press.
Moore, D. (2011). Technology literacy: The extension of cognition. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 185–193. CrossRef
Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J. M., Chiu, M. M., & Bateman, S. M. (2013). Teachers’ spatial literacy as visualization, reasoning, and communication. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 97–109. CrossRef
Mullis, I., & Martin, M. O. (2013). TIMMS 2015 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA.: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Mullis, I., Martin, MO., & Sainsbury, M. (2015). PIRLS 2016 reading framework. In I. Mullis, Martin, MO. (Ed.), PIRLS 2016 assessment framework. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Student Center, Boston College.
NCCA (2015). Framework for Junior Cycle 2015. In DES (Ed.). Dublin Department of Education and Skills.
Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Building spatial skills in preschool. British Psychologist (April Issue), 48–51.
Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2015). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In J. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. Dordrecht: Springer.
NRC (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC.
OECD. (2000). Literacy in the Information age. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). CrossRef
OECD. (2017a). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: France. CrossRef
OECD (2017b). What is PISA? http://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/. Accessed November 10, 2017.
Ozga, J. (2008). Governing Knowledge: Research steering and research quality. European Educational Research Journal, 7(3), 261–272. CrossRef
Parker, R., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., & Nurss, J. R. (1995). The test of functional health literacy in adults. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10(10), 537–541. CrossRef
Pearson. (1996). DAT for selection—General abilities battery: Technical manual and user guide. London: Pearson Clinical and Talent Assessment.
Perkins, R., & Shiel, G. (2016). PISA in classrooms: Implications for the teaching and learning of mathematics in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland St Patrick’s College.
Risner, D., & Anderson, J. (2008). Digital dance literacy: An integrated dance technology curriculum pilot project. Research in Dance Education, 9(2), 113–128. CrossRef
Roskos, K., & Christie, J. (2001). Examining the play-literacy interface: A critical review and furture directions. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(1), 59–89. CrossRef
Shiel, G., & Kelleher, C. (2017). An evaluation of the impact of project maths on the performance of students in junior cycle mathematics (p. 9). Dublin: St Patrick’s Campus.
Shiel, G., Kelleher, C., McKeown, C., & Denner, S. (2016). Future Ready? The Performance of 15-year-olds in Ireland on Science, Reading Literacy and Mathematics in PISA 2015. In G. Shiel (Ed.). Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
Shiel, G., Surgenor, P., Close, S., & Millar, D. (2006). The 2004 National Assessment of Mathematics Achievement. Dublin.
Shin, E. E., Milson, A. J., & Smith, T. J. (2016). Future teachers’ spatial thinking skills and attitudes. Journal of Geography, 115(4), 139–146. CrossRef
SILC (2018). Spatial intelligence and learning center. http://www.spatiallearning.org/. Accessed August 24, 2018.
Sorby, S. (2011). Developing Spatial Thinking Workbook: Cengage.
Sorby, S. A., Nevin, E., Behan, A., Mageean, E., & Sheridan, S. (2014). Spatial skills as predictors of success in first-year engineering. In M. Cardella, Meier, R., Pears, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Madrid, Spain: IEEE.
Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
UCLES. (2013). What is literacy? An investigation into definitions of English as a subject and the relationship between English, literacy and ‘being literate’—A Research Report Commissioned by Cambridge Assessment. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
Uhlig, G. (1983). Dimensions of technological literacy in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(5), 2–5. CrossRef
UNESCO (2006). Education for All—Literacy for Life. Paris.
UNESCO (2017). Literacy. https://en.unesco.org/themes/literacy-all. Accessed November 22, 2017.
Utal, D., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 147–181. CrossRef
Utal, D., Mullier, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: Links to Achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367–373. CrossRef
Vanderberg, S., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Pereceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604. CrossRef
Veurink, N. L., & Sorby, S. A. (2017). Longitudinal study of the impact of requiring training for students with initially weak spatial skills. European Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1390547.
Wagner, D. (2008). Adult literacy: Monitoring and evaluation for practice and policy. International Review of Education, 54, 651–672. CrossRef
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains aligning over 50 Years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. CrossRef
- Problematizing spatial literacy within the school curriculum
- Springer Netherlands
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
BorgWarner, dSpace, FEV, Valeo Logo/© Valeo, TE Connectivity Corporation/© TE Connectivity Corporation, Neuer Inhalt