nach oben

Cellulose

Erschienen in:

15.06.2022 | Original Research

Production of sphere-like bacterial cellulose in cultivation media with different carbon sources: a promising sustained release system of rifampicin

verfasst von: Silmara C. Lazarini, Caroline Yamada, Tainá Rosa da Nóbrega, Wilton Rogério Lustri

Erschienen in: Cellulose | Ausgabe 11/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose (BC) production can be performed using a static or dynamic culture method. In the static culture method, the BC is obtained presents three-dimensional thinner network structures and excellent mechanical properties. In the dynamic culture method, BC is produced in the form of granules or fibrous threads with a lower degree of polymerization, mechanical strength, and crystallinity than those formed in static fermentation. Compared with BC membranes, sphere-like BC (SBC) cultured under dynamic conditions showed advantages for adsorption due to its larger surface area. The objectives of this work were to obtain SBC, by the bacterial strain Komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 23769, in dynamic culture, using media containing different carbon sources carbon sources, such as fructose (FRU), glucose and sucrose (MS1), sucrose (Y) and glucose (Z and HS), aiming to produce supports for sustained release of rifampicin (RIF). SBC has been produced under agitation at 130 rpm and 25 °C. SBC obtained were processed to remove bacteria and residues from the culture media and lyophilized. The SBC characterizations were performed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Field emission gun-scanning electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The SBC produced were impregnated with antibiotic RIF and tested for the sustained release capacity of this drug by diffusion method and Frans cell kinetics. SBC that the best results for all tests were produced in FRU, Z and MS1 media, respectively. The results demonstrate the potential of the SBC to contribute to the design of new drug delivery systems with biomedical applications.

Vorheriger Artikel Cellulose surface modification for improved attachment of carbon nanotubes

Nächster Artikel Birefringent properties of aqueous cellulose nanocrystal suspensions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abeer MM, Amin MCI, Martin C (2014) A review of bacterial cellulose-based drug delivery systems: their biochemistry, current approaches and future prospects. J Pharm Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12234CrossRefPubMed

Agrawal S, Ashokraj Y, Bharatam PV et al (2004) Solid-state characterization of rifampicin samples and its biopharmaceutic relevance. Eur J Pharm Sci 22:127–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2004.02.011CrossRefPubMed

Alifano P, Palumbo C, Pasanisi D, Talà A (2014) Rifampicin-resistance, rpoB polymorphism and RNA polymerase genetic engineering. J Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.11.024CrossRefPubMed

Badshah M, Ullah H, Rahman A et al (2018) Surface modification and evaluation of bacterial cellulose for drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 113:526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.135CrossRefPubMed

Cacicedo ML, Castro MC, Servetas I et al (2016) Progress in bacterial cellulose matrices for biotechnological applications. Bioresour Technol 213:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.071CrossRefPubMed

Carvalho SG, Cipriano DF, Carlos J et al (2020) Physicochemical characterization and in vitro biological evaluation of solid compounds from furazolidone-based cyclodextrins for use as leishmanicidal agents. Drug Deliv Transl Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00841-1CrossRefPubMed

Carvalho SG, Silvestre ALP, dos Santos AM et al (2021) Polymeric-based drug delivery systems for veterinary use: state of the art. Int J Pharm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120756CrossRefPubMed

CLSI (2019) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Lab Stand Inst 29

Costa AFS, Almeida FCG, Vinhas GM, Sarubbo LA (2017) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii using corn steep liquor as nutrient sources. Front Microbiol 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027CrossRef

Czaja W, Romanovicz D, Brown R, malcolm, (2004) Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture. Cellulose 11:403–411. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:cell.0000046412.11983.61CrossRef

de Oliveira Barud HG, da Silva RR, da Silva BH et al (2016) A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 153:406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.059CrossRefPubMed

Diaz-Ramirez J, Urbina L, Eceiza A et al (2021) Superabsorbent bacterial cellulose spheres biosynthesized from winery by-products as natural carriers for fertilizers. Int J Biol Macromol 191:1212–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.203CrossRefPubMed

Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M et al (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3874-0CrossRef

El-saied H, Basta AH, Gobran RH (2007) Research progress in friendly environmental technology for the production of cellulose products (bacterial cellulose and its application ). Polym Plast Technol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1081/PPT-120038065CrossRef

Fernandes IdeAA, Pedro AC, Ribeiro VR et al (2020) Bacterial cellulose: from production optimization to new applications. Int J Biol Macromol 164:2598–2611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.255CrossRefPubMed

Fontes MLDe, Meneguin AB, Tercjak A et al (2017) Effect of in situ modification of bacterial cellulose with carboxymethylcellulose on its nano/microstructure and methotrexate release properties. Carbohydr Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.061CrossRef

Fredenberg S, Wahlgren M, Reslow M, Axelsson A (2011) The mechanisms of drug release in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based drug delivery systems—a review. Int J Pharm 415:34–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.05.049CrossRefPubMed

Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0580345CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hoshi T, Yamazaki K, Sato Y et al (2018) Production of hollow-type spherical bacterial cellulose as a controlled release device by newly designed floating cultivation. Heliyon 4:e00873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00873CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004775229149CrossRef

Islam MU, Ullah MW, Khan S et al (2017) Strategies for cost-effective and enhanced production of bacterial cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 102:1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.110CrossRefPubMed

Juncu G, Stoica-Guzun A, Stroescu M et al (2016) Drug release kinetics from carboxymethylcellulose-bacterial cellulose composite films. Int J Pharm 510:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.11.053CrossRefPubMed

Jung HIl, Lee OM, Jeong JH et al (2010) Production and characterization of cellulose by Acetobacter sp. V6 using a cost-effective molasses-corn steep liquor medium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162:486–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8759-9CrossRefPubMed

Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J, Farokhzad OC (2015) Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem Rev. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346CrossRef

Kumar V, Sharma DK, Bansal V et al (2019) Efficient and economic process for the production of bacterial cellulose from isolated strain of Acetobacter pasteurianus of RSV-4 bacterium. Bioresour Technol 275:430–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.042CrossRefPubMed

Lazarini SC, de Aquino R, Amaral AC et al (2016) Characterization of bilayer bacterial cellulose membranes with different fiber densities: a promising system for controlled release of the antibiotic ceftriaxone. Cellulose 23:737–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0843-4CrossRef

Lazarini SC, Yamada C, Barud HS et al (2018) Influence of chemical and physical conditions in selection of Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC 23769 strains with high capacity to produce bacterial cellulose for application as sustained antimicrobial drug-release supports. J Appl Microbiol 125:777–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13916CrossRefPubMed

Lee CY, Huang CH, Lu PL et al (2017) Role of rifampin for the treatment of bacterial infections other than mycobacteriosis. J Infect 75:395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2017.08.013CrossRefPubMed

Lin WC, Lien CC, Yeh HJ et al (2013) Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym 94:603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076CrossRefPubMed

Lustri WR, Barud HGdeO, Barud HdaS et al (2015) Microbial cellulose—biosynthesis mechanisms and medical applications. Cell Fundam Asp Curr Trends. https://doi.org/10.5772/61797CrossRef

Machado RTA, Meneguin AB, Sábio RM et al (2018) Komagataeibacter rhaeticus grown in sugarcane molasses-supplemented culture medium as a strategy for enhancing bacterial cellulose production. Ind Crops Prod 122:637–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.048CrossRef

Meng C, Hu J, Gourlay K et al (2019a) Controllable synthesis uniform spherical bacterial cellulose and their potential applications. Cellulose 26:8325–8336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02446-5CrossRef

Meng C, Zhong N, Hu J et al (2019b) The effects of metal elements on ramie fiber oxidation degumming and the potential of using spherical bacterial cellulose for metal removal. J Clean Prod 206:498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.072CrossRef

Mohammadkazemi F, Azin M, Ashori A (2015) Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr Polym 117:518–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.008CrossRefPubMed

Mohd Amin MCI, Ahmad N, Pandey M, Jue Xin C (2014) Stimuli-responsive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels for oral controlled release drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 40:1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2013.819882CrossRefPubMed

Negut I, Grumezescu V, Grumezescu AM (2018) Treatment strategies for infected wounds. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Politano AD, Campbell KT, Rosenberger LH, Sawyer RG (2013) Use of silver in the prevention and treatment of infections: silver review. Surg Infect 14:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2011.097CrossRef

Saad EA, Kiwan HA, Hassanien MM, Al-adl HE (2020) Synthesis, characterization, and antitumor activity of a new iron-rifampicin complex: a novel prospective antitumor drug. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 57:101671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101671CrossRef

Schianti JN, Cerize NNP, de Oliveira AM et al (2013) Rifampicin nanoprecipitation using flow focusing microfluidic device. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7439.1000172CrossRef

Shah N, Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, Park JK (2013) Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydr Polym 98:1585–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.018CrossRefPubMed

Simon A, Amaro MI, Healy AM et al (2016) Comparative evaluation of rivastigmine permeation from a transdermal system in the Franz cell using synthetic membranes and pig ear skin with in vivo-in vitro correlation. Int J Pharm 512:234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.08.052CrossRefPubMed

Sperotto G, Stasiak LG, Godoi JPMG et al (2021) A review of culture media for bacterial cellulose production: complex, chemically defined and minimal media modulations. Cellulose 5:2649–2673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03754-5CrossRef

Sutradhar I, Zaman MH (2021) Evaluation of the effect of temperature on the stability and antimicrobial activity of rifampicin quinone. J Pharm Biomed Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.113941CrossRefPubMed

Tanskul S, Amornthatree K, Jaturonlak N (2013) A new cellulose-producing bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. MI 2: screening and optimization of culture conditions. Carbohydr Polym 92:421–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.017CrossRefPubMed

Treesuppharat W, Rojanapanthu P, Siangsanoh C et al (2017) Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose and gelatin-based hydrogel composites for drug-delivery systems. Biotechnol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.07.002CrossRef

Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Park JK (2012a) Water holding and release properties of bacterial cellulose obtained by in situ and ex situ modification. Carbohydr Polym 88:596–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.006CrossRef

Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Park JK (2012b) Nanoreinforced bacterial cellulose-montmorillonite composites for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 89:1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.093CrossRefPubMed

Ullah H, Wahid F, Santos HA, Khan T (2016) Advances in biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of functional bacterial cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 150:330–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.029CrossRefPubMed

Urbina L, Eceiza A, Gabilondo N et al (2020) Tailoring the in situ conformation of bacterial cellulose-graphene oxide spherical nanocarriers. Int J Biol Macromol 163:1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.077CrossRefPubMed

Vazquez A, Foresti ML, Cerrutti P, Galvagno M (2013) Bacterial cellulose from simple and low cost production media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Polym Environ 21:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0541-3CrossRef

Wahid F, Bai H, Xie FWY (2019) Facile synthesis of bacterial cellulose and polyethyleneimine based hybrid hydrogels for antibacterial applications. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02806-1CrossRef

Wang SS, Han YH, Chen JL et al (2018) Insights into bacterial cellulose biosynthesis from different carbon sources and the associated biochemical transformation pathways in Komagataeibacter sp. W1. Polymers (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10090963CrossRefPubMedCentral

Wang J, Tavakoli J, Tang Y (2019) Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods—a review. Carbohydr Polym 219:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.008CrossRefPubMed

Yamada Y (2014) Transfer of Gluconacetobacter kakiaceti, Gluconacetobacter medellinensis and Gluconacetobacter maltaceti to the genus komagataeibacter as komagataeibacter kakiaceti comb. nov., komagataeibacter medellinensis comb. nov. and komagataeibacter maltaceti comb. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:1670–1672. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.054494-0CrossRefPubMed

Yamanaka S, Watanabe K, Kitamura N et al (1989) The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci 24:3141–3145. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139032CrossRef

Zhou LL, Sun DP, Hu LY et al (2007) Effect of addition of sodium alginate on bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0218-4CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Production of sphere-like bacterial cellulose in cultivation media with different carbon sources: a promising sustained release system of rifampicin
verfasst von: Silmara C. Lazarini
Caroline Yamada
Tainá Rosa da Nóbrega
Wilton Rogério Lustri
Publikationsdatum: 15.06.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Cellulose / Ausgabe 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04644-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2022

Manufacturing heat-damaged papers as model materials for evaluating conservation methods

Cellulose as a polyol in the synthesis of bio-based polyurethanes with simultaneous film formation

Influence of the freezing and lyophilization of bacterial cellulose hydrogel on water removal from both water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsion

Supramolecular hydrogen-bonded organic networks grown on cellulose fibers for efficient proton conduction

Cellulose surface modification for improved attachment of carbon nanotubes

Evaluation of pineapple peel cellulose nanocrystals/EGCG complexes for improving the stability of curcumin emulsion