2008 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
Project Strategy Management
Erschienen in: Industrial Project Management
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
Strategy
can be considered in terms of
content
and
process
. The content refers to both
competitive priorities
(performance-related macroobjectives that can become Critical Success Factors — CSF) and the
interventions
made to achieve them. The latter can deal with
technological
levers (relative to the product/process and to information/communication), internal
organisational
choices and those to interface with suppliers/customers, and
managerial
levers (for example, Just-in-Time, Total Quality Management and Concurrent Engineering). The process, on the other hand, refers to the
formulation
and
implementation
of the strategy.
Traditionally, corporate strategy relies on three options: cost leadership, differentiation and segmentation (Porter, 1980). The current trend of overcoming performance trade-offs questions this distinction (Filippini et al., 1998): the aim is the joint achievement of multiple performances, giving them different importance throughout time (the
sand-cone model
– Ferdows and De Meyer, 1990).
Nowadays, strategy is mostly about defining priorities, which are not standard, but more of an
order-winning
and
qualifying
type (Hill, 1989): the former ones make it possible to steal customers from the competitors; the latter simply allow the company to enter into a certain competitive arena. Both are equally important, and when analysing the scenario, a company must decide whether to invest in one or the other type of strategy.