Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Production Engineering 1/2019

28.11.2018 | Production Management

Proposal method for the classification of industrial accident scenarios based on the improved principal components analysis (improved PCA)

verfasst von: Hafaidh Hadef, Mébarek Djebabra

Erschienen in: Production Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using a risk matrix for Risk mapping constitutes the basis of risk management strategy. It aims to classify the identified risks with regards to their management and control. This risk classification, which is based on the frequency and the severity dimensions, is often carried out according to a procedure founded on experts’ judgments. In order to overcome the subjectivity bias of this classification, this paper presents the contribution of the Principal Components Analysis (PCA) method: an exploratory method for graphing risks based on factors that allow a better visualized classification of scenarios accidents. Still, the commonly encountered problem in the data classified by the PCA method resides in the main factors of classification; we judged useful to frame these letters by an algebraic formulation to make an improvement of this classification possible. The obtained results show that the suggested method is a promising alternative to solve the recurring problems of risk matrices, notably in accident scenarios’ classification.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICE) (1992) Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures, 2nd edn. New York American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICE) (1992) Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures, 2nd edn. New York
2.
Zurück zum Zitat American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICE) (1995) Tools for making acute risk decisions. New York American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICE) (1995) Tools for making acute risk decisions. New York
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barshan E, Ghodsi A, Azimifar Z, Jahromi MZ (2011) ,”Supervised principal component analysis: visualization, classification and regression on subspaces and sub-manifolds”. Pattern Recogn 44(7):1357–1371CrossRefMATH Barshan E, Ghodsi A, Azimifar Z, Jahromi MZ (2011) ,”Supervised principal component analysis: visualization, classification and regression on subspaces and sub-manifolds”. Pattern Recogn 44(7):1357–1371CrossRefMATH
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baybutt P (2014) The use of risk matrices and risk graphs for SIL determination. Process Saf Prog 33(2):179–182CrossRef Baybutt P (2014) The use of risk matrices and risk graphs for SIL determination. Process Saf Prog 33(2):179–182CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baybutt P (2016) Guidelines for designing risk matrices. Process Saf Prog 37(1):41–46CrossRef Baybutt P (2016) Guidelines for designing risk matrices. Process Saf Prog 37(1):41–46CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat CCPS (2000) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York CCPS (2000) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Da Cunha SB (2016) A review of quantitative risk assessment of onshore pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 44(11):282–298CrossRef Da Cunha SB (2016) A review of quantitative risk assessment of onshore pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 44(11):282–298CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dejan R (2013) Atool for risk assessment. Saf Eng 3(3):121–127 Dejan R (2013) Atool for risk assessment. Saf Eng 3(3):121–127
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Duijm NJ (2015) Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Saf Sci 76:21–31CrossRef Duijm NJ (2015) Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Saf Sci 76:21–31CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferjencik M (2004) The role of the two-phase scenarios concept in the matrix relative risk ranking procedure. Process Saf Prog 16(2):117–120CrossRef Ferjencik M (2004) The role of the two-phase scenarios concept in the matrix relative risk ranking procedure. Process Saf Prog 16(2):117–120CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang L, Xiao B, Yu H, You Q (2018) A stable systemic risk ranking in China’s banking sector: based on principal component analysis. Phys A 492:1997–2009CrossRef Fang L, Xiao B, Yu H, You Q (2018) A stable systemic risk ranking in China’s banking sector: based on principal component analysis. Phys A 492:1997–2009CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gul M, Guneri AF (2016) A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: a case study for aluminum industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 40(3):89–100CrossRef Gul M, Guneri AF (2016) A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: a case study for aluminum industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 40(3):89–100CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta A, Barbu A (2018) Parameterized principal component analysis. Pattern Recognit 78:215–227CrossRef Gupta A, Barbu A (2018) Parameterized principal component analysis. Pattern Recognit 78:215–227CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate data analysis. 5th Prentice Hall International, London Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate data analysis. 5th Prentice Hall International, London
15.
Zurück zum Zitat He L, Chen Y, Liu LY (2013) A risk matrix approach based on clustering algorithm. J Appl Sci 13(20):4188–4194CrossRef He L, Chen Y, Liu LY (2013) A risk matrix approach based on clustering algorithm. J Appl Sci 13(20):4188–4194CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Huihui N, Chen A, Chen N (2010) Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Saf Sci 48(10):1269–1278CrossRef Huihui N, Chen A, Chen N (2010) Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Saf Sci 48(10):1269–1278CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat ISO 31000:2009 (2009) Risk management—principles and guidelines. ISO 31000:2009, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO 31000:2009 (2009) Risk management—principles and guidelines. ISO 31000:2009, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung S, Ng D, Laird CD, Sam Mannan M (2010) A new approach for facility siting using mapping risks on a plant grid area and optimization. J Loss Prev Process Ind 23:824–830CrossRef Jung S, Ng D, Laird CD, Sam Mannan M (2010) A new approach for facility siting using mapping risks on a plant grid area and optimization. J Loss Prev Process Ind 23:824–830CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat LRET (LLOYD’S Register Energy and Transport) (2007) A severe accident analysis report of the industrial group “Total—Sonatarch—Repsol. Report ABN0961615/01 REV.04, realized by LLOYD’S Register EMEA Group Energy and Transport LRET (LLOYD’S Register Energy and Transport) (2007) A severe accident analysis report of the industrial group “Total—Sonatarch—Repsol. Report ABN0961615/01 REV.04, realized by LLOYD’S Register EMEA Group Energy and Transport
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Manwendra K, Tripathi PP, Chatto P, Ganguly S (2015) Multivariate analysis and classification of bulk metallic glasses using principal component analysis. Comput Mater Sci 107:79–87CrossRef Manwendra K, Tripathi PP, Chatto P, Ganguly S (2015) Multivariate analysis and classification of bulk metallic glasses using principal component analysis. Comput Mater Sci 107:79–87CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Marhavilas PK, Koulouriotis D, Gemeni V (2011) Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. J Loss Prev Process Ind 24(5):477–523CrossRef Marhavilas PK, Koulouriotis D, Gemeni V (2011) Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. J Loss Prev Process Ind 24(5):477–523CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Merad M (2004) Analyse de l’état de l’art sur les grilles de criticité. INERIS report, France, DRA–D38 Merad M (2004) Analyse de l’état de l’art sur les grilles de criticité. INERIS report, France, DRA–D38
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore DA (2004) The use of a ranking matrix and recommendation prioritization system for process hazard analysis studies. Process Saf Prog 16(2):83–85CrossRef Moore DA (2004) The use of a ranking matrix and recommendation prioritization system for process hazard analysis studies. Process Saf Prog 16(2):83–85CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Palese LL (2018) A random version of principal component analysis in data clustering. Comput Biol Chem 73(4):57–64CrossRef Palese LL (2018) A random version of principal component analysis in data clustering. Comput Biol Chem 73(4):57–64CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Peeters W, Peng Z (2015) An approach towards global standardization of the risk matrix. J Space Saf Eng 2(1):31–38CrossRef Peeters W, Peng Z (2015) An approach towards global standardization of the risk matrix. J Space Saf Eng 2(1):31–38CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Penkova TG (2017) Principal component analysis and cluster analysis for evaluating the natural and anthropogenic territory safety. Proc Comput Sci 112:99–108CrossRef Penkova TG (2017) Principal component analysis and cluster analysis for evaluating the natural and anthropogenic territory safety. Proc Comput Sci 112:99–108CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Reniers G-L-L, Dullaert W, Ale B-J-M, Soudan K (2005) Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18(3):127–138CrossRef Reniers G-L-L, Dullaert W, Ale B-J-M, Soudan K (2005) Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18(3):127–138CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ringnér M (2008) “What is principal component analysis? “Nat Biotechnol 26(3):303–304 Ringnér M (2008) “What is principal component analysis? “Nat Biotechnol 26(3):303–304
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng SC (2017) Principal component analysis to reduce dimension on digital image. Proc Comput Sci 111:113–119CrossRef Ng SC (2017) Principal component analysis to reduce dimension on digital image. Proc Comput Sci 111:113–119CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt MS (2016) Making sense of risk tolerance criteria. J Loss Prev Process Ind 41(5):344–354CrossRef Schmidt MS (2016) Making sense of risk tolerance criteria. J Loss Prev Process Ind 41(5):344–354CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Tixier J, Dusserre G, Salvi O, Gaston D (2002) Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. J Loss Prevent Process Ind 15(4):291–303CrossRef Tixier J, Dusserre G, Salvi O, Gaston D (2002) Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. J Loss Prevent Process Ind 15(4):291–303CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Villeneuve E (2012) Hybridization of the cognitive and static experience feedbacks for risks assessment. PhD thesis presented at the University of Toulouse, France Villeneuve E (2012) Hybridization of the cognitive and static experience feedbacks for risks assessment. PhD thesis presented at the University of Toulouse, France
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu Q, Kuang X, Shen Y (2003) Risk matrix method and its application in the field of technical project risk management. Eng Sci 5(1):89–94 Zhu Q, Kuang X, Shen Y (2003) Risk matrix method and its application in the field of technical project risk management. Eng Sci 5(1):89–94
Metadaten
Titel
Proposal method for the classification of industrial accident scenarios based on the improved principal components analysis (improved PCA)
verfasst von
Hafaidh Hadef
Mébarek Djebabra
Publikationsdatum
28.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Production Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0944-6524
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-7353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0859-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Production Engineering 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.