Skip to main content

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Psychology of Preference Reversals and Prominence Hypothesis

verfasst von : Professor Kazuhisa Takemura

Erschienen in: Behavioral Decision Theory

Verlag: Springer Japan

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Chapter 3 introduced the experimental research of Tversky et al. (1990), arguing that the preference reversal phenomenon can be interpreted as a deviation from procedural invariance. A deviation from procedural invariance refers to a trait by which preference is reversed by preference revelation procedures. Tversky et al. asserted that the preference reversal phenomenon was explainable by partial modification of expected utility theory such as transitivity and independence axiom. This chapter will describe the prominence hypothesis as a psychological interpretation of this phenomenon and the contingent-weighting model (Tversky et al. 1988; Slovic et al. 1990) of the specific representation of the hypothesis and introduce some experiments related to the model.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Iwahara, S. (1964). Non parametric ho [Non-parametric methods]. Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha. Iwahara, S. (1964). Non parametric ho [Non-parametric methods]. Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Montgomery, H. (1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. In P. C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and aiding decision processes (pp. 343–369). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRef Montgomery, H. (1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. In P. C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and aiding decision processes (pp. 343–369). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Montgomery, H. (1993). The search for a dominance structure in decision making: Examining the evidence. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 182–187). New Jersey: Ablex. Montgomery, H. (1993). The search for a dominance structure in decision making: Examining the evidence. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 182–187). New Jersey: Ablex.
Zurück zum Zitat Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J Einhorn (pp. 5–27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J Einhorn (pp. 5–27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Takemura, K. (1994). Risuku handan ni okeru sentaku kadai to matchingu kadai no mujun [On the discrepancy of risk judgment in choice and matching tasks]. Nihon risuku kenkyu gakkaishi [Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis], 5(2), 88–95. Takemura, K. (1994). Risuku handan ni okeru sentaku kadai to matchingu kadai no mujun [On the discrepancy of risk judgment in choice and matching tasks]. Nihon risuku kenkyu gakkaishi [Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis], 5(2), 88–95.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371–384.CrossRef Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371–384.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The cause of preference reversal. American Economic Review, 80, 204–217. Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The cause of preference reversal. American Economic Review, 80, 204–217.
Metadaten
Titel
Psychology of Preference Reversals and Prominence Hypothesis
verfasst von
Professor Kazuhisa Takemura
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Japan
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54580-4_4

Premium Partner