nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.11.2013

Quality-of-life loss of people admitted to burn centers, United States

verfasst von: Ted Miller, Soma Bhattacharya, William Zamula, Dennis Lezotte, Karen Kowalske, David Herndon, James Fauerbach, Loren Engrav

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 9/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate quality-of-life loss per serious burn survivor in a large U.S. cohort.

Methods

Longitudinal functional assessments of all 1,587 people receiving primary treatment in 5 burn centers between 2000 and 2009 included pre-burn (retrospective), at time of discharge, and 6, 12, and 24 months post-injury. We assessed adults with RAND Short Form (SF) 12 and children with SF-10 or Child Health Questionnaire, the child surveys scored using standard norms-based scoring. A literature review identified 20 quality-adjusted life year utility scorings for SF-12 and 27 scorings for EQ-5d response distributions predicted from SF-12 scores. We computed composite scores for each patient and time period by applying 32 scorings that met quality/non-duplication criteria.

Results

Mean quality-of-life scores were 0.805 4 weeks pre-burn, 0.562 at discharge, rebounded through 1 year, and stabilized at 0.735 (0.750 for TBSA burned below 25 %, 0.722 for TBSA burned of 25–50 %, and 0.695 for larger burns). As a percentage of initial levels, burns reduced short-term quality of life by 30 %. Long-term loss averaged 11 %, ranging from 9 % for TBSA burned below 25–13 % for TBSA burned above 50 %. Children recovered faster and more fully.

Conclusion

Burns cause substantial losses in quality of life, with long-term losses comparable to traumatic brain injury.

Vorheriger Artikel Deriving clinically meaningful cut-scores for fatigue in a cohort of breast cancer survivors: a Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) Study

Nächster Artikel Integrating health-related quality of life with sickness leave days for return-to-work assessment in traumatic limb injuries

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Whitehead, S., & Ali, S. (2010). Health outcomes in economic evaluation: The QALY and utilities. British Medical Bulletin, 96(1), 5–21.PubMedCrossRef

Sanchez, J.-L. A., Pereperez, S. B., Bastida, J. L., & Martinez, M. M. (2007). Cost-utility analysis applied to the treatment of burn patients in a specialized center. Archives of Surgery, 142(1), 50–57.PubMedCrossRef

Oster, C., Willebrand, M., Dyster-Aas, J., Kildal, M., & Ekselius, L. (2009). Validation of the EQ-5d questionnaire in burn-injured adults. Burns, 35(5), 723–732.PubMedCrossRef

Polinder, S., van Beeck, E. F., Essink-Bot, M. L., Toet, H., Looman, C. W. N., et al. (2007). Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 62(1), 133–141.

Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.PubMedCrossRef

Ware, J. J. E., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D. M., & Gandek, B. (2002). How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated.

Turner-Bowker, D. M., Bayliss, M. S., Kosinski, M., Zhao, J., & Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2003). SF-10 for children™,a user’s guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc.

HealthActCHQ. (2008). Child health questionnaire scoring and interpretation manual. Cambridge MA: HealthActCHQ Inc.

McHorney, C., Ware, J., Rogers, W., Raczek, A. E., Lu, J. F., et al. (1992). The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Medical Care, 30(5), MS253–MS265.PubMed

10.

Schofield, M., & Mishra, G. (1998). Validity of the SF-12 compared with the SF-36 Health Survey in pilot studies of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 259–271.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Gray, A., Rivero-Arias, O., & Clarke, P. (2006). Estimating the association between SF-12 reponses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Medical Decision Making, 26, 18–29.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Econsys. (2008). A study of compensation payments for service-connected disabilities: Earnings and quality of life loss analysis (Vol. III). Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs.

13.

Grenier, W., Weijnen, T., Nieuwenhuizen, M., Oppe, S., Badia, X., et al. (2003). A single European currency for EQ-5D health states: Results from a six-country study. The European Journal of Health Economics, 4(3), 222–231.CrossRef

14.

Sengupta, N., Nichol, M. B., Wu, J., & Globe, D. (2004). Mapping the SF-12 to the HU13 and VAS in a managed care population. Medical Care, 42(9), 927–937.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Mortimer, D., & Segal, L. (2008). Comparing the incomparable? A systematic review of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY-weights. Medical Decision Making, 28, 66–89.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Lundberg, L., Johannesson, M., Isacson, D. G. I., & Borgquist, L. (1999). The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population. Medical Decision Making, 19, 128–140.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Shmueli, A. (1999). Subjective health status and health values in the general population. Medical Decision Making, 19, 122–127.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Fryback, D. G., Lawrence, W. F., Martin, P. A., Klein, R., & Klein, B. E. (1997). Predicting quality of well-being scores from the SF-36: Results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. Medical Decision Making, 17, 1–9.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sullivan, P., & Ghushchyan, V. (2006). Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: U.S. general population preferences in a nationally representive sample. Medical Decision Making, 26, 401–409.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Bult, J. R., Bosch, J., & Hunink, M. (1996). Heterogeneity in the relationship between the standary-gamble utility measure and health-status dimensions. Medical Decision Making, 16, 226–233.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Bult, J. R., Hunick, G. M., Tsevat, J., & Weinstein, M. C. (1998). Heterogeneity in the relationship between the time tradeoff and short form-36 for HIV-infected and primary care patients. Medical Care, 36, 523–532.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Wittrup-Jensen, K. U., & Pedersen, K. M. (2008). Estimation of a preference-based index measure of health for SF-12 by applying multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT)—an experiment: University of Southern Denmark. http://www.sam.sdu.dk/healtheco/publications/20088.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2008.

24.

Drummond, M. F., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (1997). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

25.

Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education/Prentice Hall.

26.

Ray, D. R., Zamula, W. W., Miller, T. R., Brigham, P., Cohen, M., Douglass, J., Galbraith, M., et al. (1993). Estimating the costs to society of cigarette fire injuries. Report to Congress in response to the Fire Safe Cigarette Act of 1990 (Vol. 6). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office and Consumer Product Safety Commission.

27.

Ewing, J. A. (1984). Detecting alcoholism: The CAGE questionnaire. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252, 1905–1907.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2005). Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Quality of Life Research, 14(6), 1523–1532.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Farivar, S. S., Liu, H., & Hays, R. D. (2004). Half standard deviation estimate of the minimum important difference in HRQOL scores? Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 4(5), 515–523.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Franks, P., Lubetkin, E., Gold, M., Tancredi, D., & Jia, H. (2004). Mapping the SF-12 to the EuroQol EQ-5D index in a national U.S. sample. Medical Decision Making, 24, 247–254.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Franks, P., Lubetkin, E., Gold, M., & Tancredi, D. (2003). Mapping the SF-12 to preference-based instruments convergent validity in a low-income, minority population. Medical Care, 41(11), 1277–1283.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Lawrence, W., & Fleishman, J. (2004). Predicting EuroQol EQ-5D preference scores from the SF-12 health survey in a nationally representive sample. Medical Decision Making, 24, 160–169.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Nichols, M. B., Sengupta, N., & Globe, D. (2001). Evaluating quality-adjusted life years: Estimation of the Health Utility Index (HU12) from the SF-36. Medical Decision Making, 21, 105–112.

34.

Shmueli, A. (2004). The relationship between the visual analog scale and the SF-36 scales in the general population: An update. Medical Decision Making, 24(1), 61–63.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Stratmann-Schoene, D., Kuehn, T., Kreienberg, R., & Leidl, R. (2006). A preference-based index for the SF-12. Health Economics, 15(6), 553–564.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Badia, X., Schiaffino, A., Alonso, J., & Herdman, M. (1998). Using the EuroQol 5-D in the Catalan general population: Feasibility and construct validity. Quality of Life Research, 7(4), 311–322.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Cleemput, I., Kesteloot, K., Moons, P., Vanrenterghem, Y., Van Hooff, J., et al. (2004). The construct and concurrent validity of the EQ-5D in a renal transplant population. Value in Health, 7(4), 499–509.PubMedCrossRef

38.

EuroQol Group. (2007). EQ-5D value sets: Inventory, comparative review and user guide. The Netherlands: Springer.

39.

Jelsma, J., Hansen, K., Weerdt, W., de Cock, P., & Kind, P. (2003). How do Zimbabweans value health states? Population Health Metrics, 1(1), 11.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Johnson, J., & Coons, S. (1998). Comparison of the EuroQol and the SF-12 in an adult US sample. Quality of Life Research, 7, 155–166.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Lamers, L. M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P. F. M., Krabbe, P. F. M., & Busschbach, J. J. V. (2006). The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics Letters, 15(10), 1121–1132.CrossRef

42.

Shaw, J., Johnson, J., & Coons, S. J. (2005). U.S. valuation of the EQ-5D health states development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43(3), 203–220.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Tsuchiya, A., Ikeda, S., Ikegami, N., Nishimura, S., Sakai, I., et al. (2002). Estimating an EQ-5D populating value set: The case of Japan. Health Economics, 11(4), 341–353.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Hakim, Z., & Pathak, D. S. (1999). Modelling the EuroQol data: A comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modeling. Health Economics, 8, 103–116.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Quality-of-life loss of people admitted to burn centers, United States
verfasst von: Ted Miller
Soma Bhattacharya
William Zamula
Dennis Lezotte
Karen Kowalske
David Herndon
James Fauerbach
Loren Engrav
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2013
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0321-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2013

Validation of a Dutch version of the Neurological Fatigue Index (NFI-MS) for patients with multiple sclerosis in the Netherlands

Reliability and validity of the English (Singapore) and Chinese (Singapore) versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 in a multi-ethnic Urban Asian population in Singapore

Development of a vision-targeted health-related quality of life item measure

Impact of telemonitoring on older adults health-related quality of life: the Tele-ERA study

Changing values, changing outcomes: the influence of reprioritization response shift on outcome assessment after spine surgery

Quality of life, human insecurity, and distress among Palestinians in the Gaza Strip before and after the Winter 2008–2009 Israeli war

Premium Partner