nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Quantum Radar

verfasst von : Kadir Durak, Zeki Seskir, Bulat Rami

Erschienen in: Quantum Computing Environments

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Quantum radar is a promising technology that has been getting attraction in recent years, with possible applications in military and civilian fields. In this chapter, the historical background, developments during the last two decades, proposals that are mainly referred to as quantum radar, and their experimental implementation cases are presented. Throughout this chapter, we will use the term radar to cover both radar and lidar, since quantum “radar” is not a radar in the strict sense of the meaning. It is used as an umbrella term to cover multiple proposals, some of which are capable of only detection and not ranging, with different techniques applicable both in the optical and microwave regimes. Therefore, when the term “quantum radar” is invoked, it is used for multiple purposes that are wider than just a quantum version of the classical radar systems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Future Quantum Internet

Nächstes Kapitel Quantum Finance

Query used for this search in the ISI database is: (“supersensitivity” AND “fock state”) OR (“heisenberg limit” AND “fock state”) OR (“heisenberg limit” AND “squeezed state”) OR (“supersensitivity” AND “squeezed state”) OR “gaussian state illumination” OR “quantum Illumination” OR “entanglement illumination” OR “quantum radar” OR (“NOON state” AND (“standard quantum limit” OR radar)) OR (“standard quantum limit” AND heisenberg AND measurement AND entanglement) as of August 30th 2020. Afterwards, 203 articles and proceedings were checked manually and 167 of them were found to be acceptable to include into the dataset.

For convenience, in these formulas natural units with ħ = 2 are accepted, as in Ref.[74].

Lanzagorta, M. (2011). Quantum radar. Synthesis Lectures on Quantum Computing, 3(1), 1–139. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00384ED1V01Y201110QMC005.CrossRef

Lloyd, S. (2008). Enhanced sensitivity of photodetection via quantum illumination. Science, 321(5895), 1463–1465. ISSN: 0036-8075. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160627. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/321/5895/1463.full.pdf. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/321/5895/1463.

Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2001). Quantum-enhanced positioning and clock synchronization. Nature, 412(6845), 417–419. ISSN: 1476–4687. https://doi.org/10.1038/35086525.CrossRef

Steinhardt, A., & McCrae, J. (2003). Radar in the quantum limit. In IEEE International Symposium on Phased Array Systems and Technology (pp. 31–34).

Zaugg, T. (2004). Entangled-photon range finding system and method

Edward, H. (2005). Allen and Markos Karageorgis. In Radar systems and methods using entangled quantum particles.

Brandsema, M. J., Narayanan, R. M., & Lanzagorta, M. (2016). Theoretical and computational analysis of the quantum radar cross section for simple geometrical targets. Quantum Information Processing, 16(1), 32. ISSN: 1573–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-016-1494-6.MathSciNetCrossRef

Afek, I., Ambar, O., & Silberberg, Y. (2010). High-NOON states by mixing quantum and classical light. Science, 328(5980), 879–881.MathSciNetCrossRef

Eisert, J., & Plenio, M. B. (1999). A comparison of entanglement measures. Journal of Modern Optics, 46(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349908231260. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09500349908231260. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500349908231260.

10.

Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1998). Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: is there a “Bound” entanglement in nature? Physical Review Letters, 80, 5239–5242. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5239. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5239.

11.

Yu, T., & Eberly, J. H. (2009). Sudden death of entanglement. Science, 323(5914), 598–601. ISSN: 0036-8075. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167343. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/323/5914/598.full.pdf. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/323/5914/598.

12.

Raimond, J. M., Brune, M., & Haroche, S. (2001). Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity. Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.73.565. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.73.565.

13.

Bennett, C. H., et al. (1993). Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Physical Review Letters, 70, 1895–1899. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895.

14.

Mermin, N. D. (1990). Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states. Physical Review Letters, 65, 1838–1840. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1838. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1838.

15.

Clauser, J. F., et al. (1969). Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters, 23(15), 880–884. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880.CrossRef

16.

Maccone, L., & Ren, C. (2020). Quantum radar. Physical Review Letters, 124, 200503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.200503. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.200503.

17.

Luong, D., et al. (2020). Receiver operating characteristics for a prototype quantum two-mode squeezing radar. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 56(3), 2041–2060.CrossRef

18.

Sorelli, G., et al. (2020). Detecting a target with quantum entanglement. eprint: arXiv:2005.07116.

19.

Chang, C. W. S., et al. (2019). Quantum-enhanced noise radar. Applied Physics Letters, 114(11), 112601. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5085002.CrossRef

20.

Tan, S.-H., et al. (2008). Quantum illumination with Gaussian states. Physical Review Letters, 101, 253601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.253601. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.253601.

21.

Lopaeva, E. D., et al. (2013). Experimental realization of quantum illumination. Physical Review Letters, 110, 153603. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.153603. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.153603.

22.

Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004). Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science, 306(5700), 1330–1336. ISSN: 0036-8075. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104149. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/306/5700/1330.full.pdf. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/306/5700/1330.

23.

Barzanjeh, S., et al. (2015). Microwave quantum illumination. Physical Review Letters, 114, 080503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.080503. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.080503.

24.

Barzanjeh, S., et al. (2020). Microwave quantum illumination using a digital receiver. Science Advances, 6(19). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb0451. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/19/eabb0451.full.pdf. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/19/eabb0451.

25.

Torromé, R. G., Bekhti-Winkel, N. B., & Knott, P. (2020). Introduction to quantum radar. arXiv: 2006.14238. http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14238.

26.

Harris Corporation. (2009). Quantum sensors program. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a506209.pdf.

27.

Lloyd, S. (2008). Quantum illumination. eprint: arXiv:0803.2022.

28.

Shapiro, J. H., & Lloyd, S. (2009). Quantum illumination versus coherent-state target detection. New Journal of Physics, 11(6), 063045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/6/063045.CrossRef

29.

Durak, K., Jam, N., & Dindar, C. (2019). Object tracking and identification by quantum radar. arXiv:1908.06850.

30.

Torromé, R. G., Bekhti-Winkel, N. B., & Knott, P. (2020). Quantum illumination with multiple entangled photons. arXiv:2008.09455.

31.

Bell, J. S. (2004). On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. In Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics (pp. 14–21). Cambridge University Press.

32.

Greenberger, D. M., et al. (1990). Bell’s theorem without inequalities. American Journal of Physics, 58(12), 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16243.MathSciNetCrossRef

33.

Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1996). Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Physics Letters, A 223(1), 1–8. ISSN: 0375-9601. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960196007062.

34.

Horodecki, P. (1997). Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition. Physics Letters A, 232(5), 333–339. ISSN: 0375–9601. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(97)00416-7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960197004167.

35.

Chruściński, D., & Sarbicki, G. (2014). Entanglement witnesses: construction, analysis and classification. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47(48), 483001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/47/48/483001.MathSciNetCrossRef

36.

Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994). Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. Physical Review Letters, 72, 3439–3443. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3439. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3439.

37.

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physics Review, 47, 777–780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.

38.

Schrödinger, E. (1935). Die gegenwärtige situation in der quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 23(48), 807–812. ISSN: 1432–1904. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01491891.CrossRef

39.

Ekert, A. K. (1991). Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Physical Review Letters, 67, 661–663. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661.

40.

Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992). Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Physical Review Letters, 69, 2881–2884. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881.

41.

Mattle, K., et al. (1996). Dense coding in experimental quantum communication. Physical Review Letters, 76, 4656–4659. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4656. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4656.

42.

Horodecki, R., et al. (2009). Quantum entanglement. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 865–942. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865.

43.

Kimble, H. J. (2008). The quantum internet. Nature, 453(7198), 1023–1030. ISSN: 1476–4687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07127. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07127.

44.

Amico, L., et al. (2008). Entanglement in many-body systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 80, 517–576. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517.

45.

Dür, W., & Briegel, H. J. (2007). Entanglement purification and quantum error correction. Reports on Progress in Physics, 70(8), 1381–1424. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/70/8/r03.MathSciNetCrossRef

46.

Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009). Entanglement detection. Physics Reports, 474(1), 1–75. ISSN: 0370–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157309000623.

47.

Plenio, M. B., & Virmani, S. (2007). An introduction to entanglement measures. Quantum Information and Computation, 7(1), 1–51. ISSN: 1533–7146.MathSciNetCrossRef

48.

Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2009). Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 42(50), 504005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504005.MathSciNetCrossRef

49.

Blatt, R., & Wineland, D. (2008). Entangled states of trapped atomic ions. Nature, 453(7198). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07125.

50.

Heaney, L., & Vedral, V. (2009). Natural mode entanglement as a resource for quantum communication. Physical Review Letters, 103, 200502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.200502. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.200502.

51.

de Vicente, J. I., Spee, C., & Kraus, B. (2013). Maximally entangled set of multipartite quantum states. Physical Review Letters, 111, 110502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.110502. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.110502.

52.

Werner, R. F. (1989). Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hiddenvariable model. Physical Review A, 40, 4277–4281. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277.

53.

Thirring, W., et al. (2011). Entanglement or separability: the choice of how to factorize the algebra of a density matrix. The European Physical Journal D, 64(2), 181–196. ISSN: 1434–6079. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2011-20452-1.CrossRef

54.

Mintert, F., Ku ś, M., & Buchleitner, A. (2004). Concurrence of mixed bipartite quantum states in arbitrary dimensions. Physical Review Letters, 92, 167902. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.167902. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.167902.

55.

Cramer, M., Plenio, M. B., & Wunderlich, H. (2011). Measuring entanglement in condensed matter systems. Physical Review Letters, 106, 020401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.020401. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.020401.

56.

Bennett, C. H., et al. (1999). Quantum nonlocality without entanglement. Physical Review Letters, 59, 1070–1091. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1070. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1070.

57.

Ollivier, H., & Zurek, W. H. (2001). Quantum discord: a measure of the quantumness of correlations. Physical Review Letters, 88, 017901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901.

58.

Henderson, L., & Vedral, V. (2001). Classical, quantum and total correlations. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34(35), 6899–6905. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315.MathSciNetCrossRef

59.

Bera, A., et al. (2017). Quantum discord and its allies: a review of recent progress. Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(2), 024001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa872f.MathSciNetCrossRef

60.

De Chiara, G., & Sanpera, A. (2018). Genuine quantum correlations in quantum many-body systems: a review of recent progress. Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(7), 074002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aabf61.MathSciNetCrossRef

61.

Streltsov, A. (2014). Quantum correlations beyond entanglement: And their role in quantum information theory. SpringerBriefs in Physics. Springer International Publishing. ISBN: 978-3319096568. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=-rQjBQAAQBAJ.

62.

Fanchini, F. F., de Oliveira Soares Pinto, D., & Adesso, G. (2017). Lectures on general quantum correlations and their applications. Quantum Science and Technology. Springer International Publishing. ISBN: 978-3319534121. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=G3opDwAAQBAJ.

63.

Yuen, H. P. (1986). Amplification of quantum states and noiseless photon amplifiers. Physics Letters A, 113(8), 405–407.MathSciNetCrossRef

64.

Adnane, H., Teklu, B., & Paris, M. G. A. (2019). Quantum phase communication channels assisted by non-deterministic noiseless amplifiers. JOSA B, 36(11), 2938–2945.CrossRef

65.

Abram, I., & Levenson, J. A. (1994). Quantum noise in parametric amplification. In Nonlinear spectroscopy of solids (pp. 251–287). Springer.

66.

Zavatta, A., Fiurášek, J., & Bellini, M. (2011). A high-fidelity noiseless amplifier for quantum light states. Nature Photonics, 5(1), 52–56.CrossRef

67.

He, H., et al. (2020). Non-classical semiconductor photon sources enhancing the performance of classical target detection systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 38, 4540–4547.CrossRef

68.

Boto, A. N., et al. (2000). Quantum interferometric optical lithography: exploiting entanglement to beat the diffraction limit. Physical Review Letters, 85, 2733–2736. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2733. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2733.

69.

Israel, Y., Rosen, S., & Silberberg, Y. (2014). Supersensitive polarization microscopy using NOON states of light. Physical Review Letters, 112(10), 103604.CrossRef

70.

Wang, W., et al. (2019). Heisenberg-limited single-mode quantum metrology in a superconducting circuit. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–6.CrossRef

71.

Luo, C., et al. (2017). Heisenberg-limited Sagnac interferometer with multiparticle states. Physical Review A, 95(2), 023608.CrossRef

72.

Zhou, Z.-Y., et al. (2017). Superresolving phase measurement with short-wavelength noon states by quantum frequency up-conversion. Physical Review Applied, 7(6), 064025.CrossRef

73.

Smith III, J. F. (2009). Quantum entangled radar theory and a correction method for the effects of the atmosphere on entanglement. In Quantum information and computation VII (Vol. 7342). International Society for Optics and Photonics, 73420A.

74.

Adesso, G., & Illuminati, F. (2007). Entanglement in continuous-variable systems: recent advances and current perspectives. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40(28), 7821–7880. ISSN: 1751–8113. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S01. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S01.

75.

Wang, X., et al. (2007). Quantum information with Gaussian states. Physics Reports, 448(1–4), 1–111. ISSN: 03701573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.005. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0370157307001822.

76.

Weedbrook, C., et al. (2012). Gaussian quantum information. Reviews of Modern Physics, 84(2), 621–669. ISSN: 00346861. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621. eprint: 1110.3234.

77.

Barzanjeh, S., et al. (2019). Stationary entangled radiation from micromechanical motion. Nature, 570(7762), 480–483. ISSN: 0028–0836. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1320-2. http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1320-2.

78.

Zhang, Z., et al. (2015). Entanglement-enhanced sensing in a lossy and noisy environment. Physical Review Letters, 114(11). ISSN: 10797114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.110506. arXiv:1411.5969.

79.

Luong, D., Rajan, S., & Balaji, B. (2020). Quantum two-mode squeezing radar and noise radar: correlation coefficients for target detection. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2971851. arXiv: 1911.09062.

80.

Shapiro, J. H. (2019). The quantum illumination story. eprint: arXiv:1910.12277.

81.

Brandsema, M. J., Narayanan, R. M., & Lanzagorta, M. O. (2020). Correlation properties of single photon binary waveforms used in quantum radar/lidar. In A. M. Raynal & K. I. Ranney (Ed.), Radar sensor technology XXIV (p. 35). SPIE, Apr. ISBN: 9781510635937. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2560184. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/11408/2560184/Correlation-properties-of-single-photon-binary-waveforms-used-in-quantum/10.1117/12.2560184.full.

82.

Torromé, R. G., Bekhti-Winkel, N. B., & Knott, P. (2020). Quantum illumination with multiple entangled photons. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09455.

83.

Gilbert, G., & Weinstein, Y. S. (2008). Aspects of practical remote quantum sensing. Journal of Modern Optics, 55(19–20), 3283–3291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340802428314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340802428314.

84.

Gilbert, G., & Hamrick, M. (2000). Practical quantum cryptography: a comprehensive analysis (part one). eprint: arXiv:quant-ph/0009027.

85.

Barnett, S. M., Fabre, C., & Maítre, A. (2003). Ultimate quantum limits for resolution of beam displacements. The European Physical Journal D – Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics, 22(3), 513–519. ISSN: 1434–6079. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2003-00003-3.

86.

Simon, C., et al. (2010). Quantum memories. The European Physical Journal D, 58(1), 1–22. ISSN: 1434-6079. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-00103-y.CrossRef

87.

Heshami, K., et al. (2016). Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances. Journal of Modern Optics, 63(20), 2005–2028. PMID: 27695198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2016.1148212.CrossRef

88.

Hadfield, R. H. (2009). Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications. Nature Photonics, 3(12), 696–705. ISSN: 1749-4893. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.230.CrossRef

89.

Chunnilall, C. J., et al. (2014). Metrology of single-photon sources and detectors: a review. Optical Engineering, 53(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.8.081910.CrossRef

90.

Maccone, L., & Riccardi, A. (2020). Squeezing metrology: a unified framework. Quantum, 4, 292. ISSN: 2521-327X. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-07-09-292.CrossRef

91.

Skolnik, M. (2002). Introduction to radar systems. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN: 0072881380.

92.

Liu, K., et al. (2014). Analysis of quantum radar cross section and its influence on target detection performance. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 26(11), 1146–1149.CrossRef

93.

Fang, C., et al. (2018). The calculation and analysis of the bistatic quantum radar cross section for the typical 2-D plate. IEEE Photonics Journal, 10(2), 1–14.CrossRef

94.

Chang, C. W. S., et al. (2018). Generating multimode entangled microwaves with a superconducting parametric cavity. Physical Review Applied, 10(4), 044019.CrossRef

95.

Messaoudi, N., et al. (2020). Quantum-enhanced noise radar. Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 65.

96.

England, D. G., Balaji, B., & Sussman, B. J. (2019). Quantum-enhanced standoff detection using correlated photon pairs. Physical Review A, 99(2), 023828.CrossRef

97.

Zhang, Z., et al. (2017). Floodlight quantum key distribution: demonstrating a framework for high-rate secure communication. Physical Review A, 95, 012332. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012332. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012332.

98.

Shapiro, J. H., et al. (2019). Quantum low probability of intercept. Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics, 36(3), B41–B50. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.36.000B41. http://josab.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-36-3-B41.

99.

Berchera, I. R., & Degiovanni, I. P. (2019). Quantum imaging with sub-Poissonian light: challenges and perspectives in optical metrology. Metrologia, 56(2), 024001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/aaf7b2.CrossRef

100.

Gregory, T., et al. (2020). Imaging through noise with quantum illumination. Science Advances, 6(6) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2652. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/6/eaay2652.full.pdf. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/6/eaay2652.

Titel: Quantum Radar
verfasst von: Kadir Durak
Zeki Seskir
Bulat Rami
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Quantum Computing Environments
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89745-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-89746-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89746-8_4

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Nachhaltigkeitsaward Key Visual/© Cometis AG/Global ESG Monitor | Daniel Rupp | Generiert mit KI, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Jonas Klose/© Pine Valley Capital GmbH, Carina Kießling von der Strategieberatung Roland Berger/© Monika Walther Fotografie | ATZ, Beijing Auto Show 2024: Deutsche Hersteller wollen angreifen./© EKH-Pictures / Generated with AI / Stock.adobe.com, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2024/© AndreyPopov / Getty Images / iStock, 2023_Antrieb/© supervisuell, ATZ-Webinar: Prototypenfreie Entwicklung durch Offline- und Driver-in-the-Loop-HiL-Tests /© (c) VI-grade

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.