Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Fire Technology 1/2016

01.01.2016

Ranking the Level of Openness in Blind Compartment Fire Modelling Studies

verfasst von: M. J. Spearpoint, G. B. Baker

Erschienen in: Fire Technology | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper considers what is meant by, and the purpose of, blind modelling in the context of fire engineering. A discussion is presented on the very important interaction between the model and the model users, and five generic groups of model users are defined. The paper goes on to provide details of previous blind modelling studies from the literature, as well as a recent blind modelling programme that was conducted in New Zealand. A so-called ‘Openness Assessment Framework’ is proposed as a way of scoring or ranking existing or planned blind modelling programmes, with the recent New Zealand programme forming the case study for the evaluation. This framework is then applied to a range of evaluation definitions that are given in the literature, the five generic model user groups, as well as the range of blind modelling exercises already identified. Finally, a seven-step methodology for designing blind modelling studies and experimental comparisons in the context of full-scale multi-item compartment fire experiments is proposed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
In English the word ‘oaf’ means a ‘stupid person’ and it has been suggested the word might derive from the French word for egg (œuf) and the similar sounding Gaelic word (ubh), i.e. an unborn being that therefore has no knowledge.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, G., Frank, K., Spearpoint, M., Fleischmann, C., & Wade, C. (2013). The Next Generation of Performance-Based Fire Safety Engineering in New Zealand. In S. Kajewski, K. Manley, & K. Hampson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International CIB World Building Congress. Brisbane, Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Australia. Baker, G., Frank, K., Spearpoint, M., Fleischmann, C., & Wade, C. (2013). The Next Generation of Performance-Based Fire Safety Engineering in New Zealand. In S. Kajewski, K. Manley, & K. Hampson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International CIB World Building Congress. Brisbane, Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Australia.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wade, C., Baker, G., Frank, K., Robbins, A., Harrison, R., Spearpoint, M., & Fleischmann, C. (2013). B-RISK User Guide and Technical Manual, BRANZ Study Report SR 282. Porirua, New Zealand: BRANZ Ltd. Wade, C., Baker, G., Frank, K., Robbins, A., Harrison, R., Spearpoint, M., & Fleischmann, C. (2013). B-RISK User Guide and Technical Manual, BRANZ Study Report SR 282. Porirua, New Zealand: BRANZ Ltd.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker G, Fleury R, Spearpoint M, Fleischmann C, Wade C (2011) Ignition of Secondary Objects in a Design Fire Simulation Tool. Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium. International Association for Fire Safety Science, College Park, MD, pp 1359–1372. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.10-1359 Baker G, Fleury R, Spearpoint M, Fleischmann C, Wade C (2011) Ignition of Secondary Objects in a Design Fire Simulation Tool. Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium. International Association for Fire Safety Science, College Park, MD, pp 1359–1372. doi:10.​3801/​IAFSS.​FSS.​10-1359
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker GB, Collier PC, Wade CA, Spearpoint MJ, Fleischmann CM, Frank KM, Sazegara S (2013) A comparison of a priori modelling predictions with experimental results to validate a design fire generator submodel. Proceedings Fire and Materials 2013-Thirteenth International Conference. Interscience Commuincations Ltd, San Francisco, pp 449–460 Baker GB, Collier PC, Wade CA, Spearpoint MJ, Fleischmann CM, Frank KM, Sazegara S (2013) A comparison of a priori modelling predictions with experimental results to validate a design fire generator submodel. Proceedings Fire and Materials 2013-Thirteenth International Conference. Interscience Commuincations Ltd, San Francisco, pp 449–460
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank K, Spearpoint, M, Fleischmann, CM, Wade C (2011) A comparison of sources of uncertainty for calculating sprinkler activation. Fire safety science—proceedings of the tenth international symposium. International Association for Fire Safety Science, College Park, MD, pp 1101–1114. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.10-1101 Frank K, Spearpoint, M, Fleischmann, CM, Wade C (2011) A comparison of sources of uncertainty for calculating sprinkler activation. Fire safety science—proceedings of the tenth international symposium. International Association for Fire Safety Science, College Park, MD, pp 1101–1114. doi:10.​3801/​IAFSS.​FSS.​10-1101
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Keski-Rahkonen O, Hostikka S (1998) CIB W14 round robin of code assessment: design report for scenario B, Internal Report RTE119-IR-2/1998 Part 1. Espoo. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland Keski-Rahkonen O, Hostikka S (1998) CIB W14 round robin of code assessment: design report for scenario B, Internal Report RTE119-IR-2/1998 Part 1. Espoo. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dey MK (2011) Blind versus open fire model validation: Issues, Pros & Cons, Deytec Technical Report No. 2011-01. Deytec, Inc, Yellow Springs Dey MK (2011) Blind versus open fire model validation: Issues, Pros & Cons, Deytec Technical Report No. 2011-01. Deytec, Inc, Yellow Springs
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Beard AN (2008) Reliability of computer models in fire safety design. Industrial Fire Journal, hemmingfire.com/news/printpage.php/aid/131/Reliability_of_computer_models_in_fire_safety_design.html. Accessed Sept 2013 Beard AN (2008) Reliability of computer models in fire safety design. Industrial Fire Journal, hemmingfire.com/news/printpage.php/aid/131/Reliability_of_computer_models_in_fire_safety_design.html. Accessed Sept 2013
10.
Zurück zum Zitat ASTM. (2012). ASTM E1355 Standard Guide for Evaluating the Predictive Capability of Deterministic Fire Models. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: American Society of Testing and Materials. ASTM. (2012). ASTM E1355 Standard Guide for Evaluating the Predictive Capability of Deterministic Fire Models. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: American Society of Testing and Materials.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, L. Y., Harkleroad, M., Quintiere, J., & Rinkinen, W. (1982). An Experimental Study of Upper Hot Layer Stratification in Full-Scale Multiroom Fire Scenarios. Journal of Heat Transfer, 104(4), 741-749. doi:10.1115/1.3245194 CrossRef Cooper, L. Y., Harkleroad, M., Quintiere, J., & Rinkinen, W. (1982). An Experimental Study of Upper Hot Layer Stratification in Full-Scale Multiroom Fire Scenarios. Journal of Heat Transfer, 104(4), 741-749. doi:10.​1115/​1.​3245194 CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Beard, A. (2005). Problems with Using Models for Fire Safety. In A. Beard, & R. Carvel (Eds.), The Handbook of Tunnel Fire Safety. London, UK: Thomas Telford Publishing.CrossRef Beard, A. (2005). Problems with Using Models for Fire Safety. In A. Beard, & R. Carvel (Eds.), The Handbook of Tunnel Fire Safety. London, UK: Thomas Telford Publishing.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips WG, Beller DK, revised by Fahy RF (2008) Section 5, Chapter 9, computer simulation for fire risk analysis. In DiNenno PJ, Drysdale D, Beyler CL, Walton WD, Custer RL, Hall Jr. JR, Watts Jr. JM (Eds) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 5-155 to 5-167 Phillips WG, Beller DK, revised by Fahy RF (2008) Section 5, Chapter 9, computer simulation for fire risk analysis. In DiNenno PJ, Drysdale D, Beyler CL, Walton WD, Custer RL, Hall Jr. JR, Watts Jr. JM (Eds) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 5-155 to 5-167
14.
Zurück zum Zitat McGrattan K, Peacock, R, Overholt K (2014) Fire model validation—eight lessons learned. 11th International symposium on fire safety science. University of Canterbury, New Zealand McGrattan K, Peacock, R, Overholt K (2014) Fire model validation—eight lessons learned. 11th International symposium on fire safety science. University of Canterbury, New Zealand
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wald F, Burgess I, Kwasniewski L, Horová K, Caldová E (Eds) (2014) Benchmark studies: experimental validation of numerical models in fire engineering. CTU Publishing House, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague Wald F, Burgess I, Kwasniewski L, Horová K, Caldová E (Eds) (2014) Benchmark studies: experimental validation of numerical models in fire engineering. CTU Publishing House, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles SD, Kumar S, Cox G (2000) Comparison of ‘blind predictions’ of a CFD model with experimental data. In: Curtat M (Ed) Fire safety science—proceedings of the sixth international symposium. International Association for Fire Safety Science, Potiers, pp 543–554. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.6-543 Miles SD, Kumar S, Cox G (2000) Comparison of ‘blind predictions’ of a CFD model with experimental data. In: Curtat M (Ed) Fire safety science—proceedings of the sixth international symposium. International Association for Fire Safety Science, Potiers, pp 543–554. doi:10.​3801/​IAFSS.​FSS.​6-543
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rein, G., Torero, J. L., Jahn, W., Stein-Gottfried, R. N., Desanghere, S., Lazaro, M., Mowrer, F., Coles, A., Joyeux, D., Alvear, D., Copte, J. A., Jowsey, A., Reszka, P. (2009). Round-Robin Study of A Priori Modelling Predictions of the Dalmarnock Fire Test One. Fire Safety Journal, 44(4), 590-602. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.12.008.CrossRef Rein, G., Torero, J. L., Jahn, W., Stein-Gottfried, R. N., Desanghere, S., Lazaro, M., Mowrer, F., Coles, A., Joyeux, D., Alvear, D., Copte, J. A., Jowsey, A., Reszka, P. (2009). Round-Robin Study of A Priori Modelling Predictions of the Dalmarnock Fire Test One. Fire Safety Journal, 44(4), 590-602. doi:10.​1016/​j.​firesaf.​2008.​12.​008.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Keski-Rahkonen O, Hostikka S (2003) Zone model validation of room fire scenarios, NISTIR 6986. International collaborative project to evaluate fire models for nuclear power plant applications: summary of 5th meeting. Appendix C. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, pp C/59–72 Keski-Rahkonen O, Hostikka S (2003) Zone model validation of room fire scenarios, NISTIR 6986. International collaborative project to evaluate fire models for nuclear power plant applications: summary of 5th meeting. Appendix C. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, pp C/59–72
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rein G, Abecassis-Empis C, Carvel R (Eds) (2007) The Dalmarnock fire tests: experiments and modelling. The School of Engineering and Electronics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Rein G, Abecassis-Empis C, Carvel R (Eds) (2007) The Dalmarnock fire tests: experiments and modelling. The School of Engineering and Electronics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dey MK (2010) Lessons learned in ICFMP project for verification and validation of computer models for nuclear plant fire safety analysis, Deytec Technical Report No. 2010-01. Deytec Inc, Yellow Springs Dey MK (2010) Lessons learned in ICFMP project for verification and validation of computer models for nuclear plant fire safety analysis, Deytec Technical Report No. 2010-01. Deytec Inc, Yellow Springs
22.
Zurück zum Zitat ISO. (1993). International Standard ISO 9705:1993(E), Fire Tests - Full-Scale Room Test for Surface Products. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. ISO. (1993). International Standard ISO 9705:1993(E), Fire Tests - Full-Scale Room Test for Surface Products. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat ISO. (2002). International Standard ISO 5660-1:2002 (E), Reaction-to-fire tests—heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate—Part 1: heat release rate (cone calorimeter method). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland ISO. (2002). International Standard ISO 5660-1:2002 (E), Reaction-to-fire tests—heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate—Part 1: heat release rate (cone calorimeter method). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
Metadaten
Titel
Ranking the Level of Openness in Blind Compartment Fire Modelling Studies
verfasst von
M. J. Spearpoint
G. B. Baker
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Fire Technology / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0015-2684
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8099
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-014-0431-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Fire Technology 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe