Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Decisions in Economics and Finance 2/2016

31.05.2016

Real options game models of R&D competition between asymmetric firms with spillovers

verfasst von: Chi Man Leung, Yue Kuen Kwok

Erschienen in: Decisions in Economics and Finance | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using real options game models, we consider the characterization of strategic equilibria associated with an asymmetric Research and Development (R&D) race between an incumbent firm and an entrant firm in the development of a new innovative product under market and technological uncertainties. The random arrival time of the discovery of the patent protected innovative product is modeled as a Poisson process. Input spillovers on the R&D effort are modeled by the change in the leader’s hazard rate of success of innovation upon the follower’s entry into the R&D race. Asymmetry between the two competing firms include sunk costs of investment, stochastic revenue flow rates generated from the product, and hazard rates of arrival of success of R&D efforts of the two firms. Under asymmetric duopoly, we obtain the complete characterization of the three types of Markov perfect equilibria (sequential leader–follower, preemption and simultaneous entry) of the firms’ optimal R&D entry decisions with respect to various sets of model parameters. Our model shows that under positive input spillover, preemptive equilibrium does not occur in the R&D race due to the presence of dominant second mover advantage. The two firms choose optimally to enter simultaneously if the sunk cost asymmetry is relatively small; otherwise, sequential equilibrium would occur. When the initial hazard rate is low relative to the level of input spillover, simultaneous entry would occur as an optimal decision, signifying another scenario of dominant second mover advantage. On the other hand, when the initial hazard rate is sufficiently high so that the first mover advantage becomes more significant, simultaneous equilibrium does not occur even under high level of positive input spillover.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Though continual R&D expenses would normally incur during the research phase, the assumption of an instantaneous sunk cost [also adopted by Weeds (2002)] leads to less clumsy calculations in our later analysis of strategic equilibria. Using a R&D flow cost that stops at the time of innovation would add a new term (with dependence on the hazard rates) to the total R&D costs. The analytic procedures for analyzing the strategic equilibriums in both cases of R&D costs assumption are essentially similar.
 
2
The assumption of different sunk costs for the two firms does not add complexity into the model. When the respective value functions and revenue flows of each firm are normalized by the corresponding sunk cost, we may set the two sunk costs to assume unit value. The sunk costs are essentially taken to be the numeraires of the respective firm value functions.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Azevedo, A., Paxson, D.: Rivalry with market, efficiency (technical) and technological uncertainty in the adoption of new technologies. Working paper of Hull University Business School and Manchester Business School (2012) Azevedo, A., Paxson, D.: Rivalry with market, efficiency (technical) and technological uncertainty in the adoption of new technologies. Working paper of Hull University Business School and Manchester Business School (2012)
Zurück zum Zitat Cottrell, T., Sick, G.: Real options and follower strategies: the loss of real option value to first-mover advantage. Eng. Econ. 47, 232-263 (2002)CrossRef Cottrell, T., Sick, G.: Real options and follower strategies: the loss of real option value to first-mover advantage. Eng. Econ. 47, 232-263 (2002)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dixit, A.K., Pindyck, R.S.: Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994) Dixit, A.K., Pindyck, R.S.: Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)
Zurück zum Zitat Femminis, G., Martini, G.: Irreversible investment and R&D spillovers in a dynamic duopoly. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 35, 1061-1090 (2011)CrossRef Femminis, G., Martini, G.: Irreversible investment and R&D spillovers in a dynamic duopoly. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 35, 1061-1090 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev. Financ. Stud. 52, 383-401 (1985) Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev. Financ. Stud. 52, 383-401 (1985)
Zurück zum Zitat Hausenschild, N.: On the role of input and output spillovers when R&D projects are risky. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 21, 1065-1089 (2003)CrossRef Hausenschild, N.: On the role of input and output spillovers when R&D projects are risky. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 21, 1065-1089 (2003)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jaffe, A.B.: Economic analysis of research spillover: implications for the advanced technology program. Report of National Bureau of Economic Research (1996) Jaffe, A.B.: Economic analysis of research spillover: implications for the advanced technology program. Report of National Bureau of Economic Research (1996)
Zurück zum Zitat Kamien, M., Muller, E., Zang, I.: Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Am. Econ. Rev. 82(5), 1293-1306 (1992) Kamien, M., Muller, E., Zang, I.: Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Am. Econ. Rev. 82(5), 1293-1306 (1992)
Zurück zum Zitat Kamien, M.I., Zang, I.: Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 18, 995-1012 (2000)CrossRef Kamien, M.I., Zang, I.: Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 18, 995-1012 (2000)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kong, J., Kwok, Y.K.: Real options in strategic investment games between two asymmetric firms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181, 967-985 (2007)CrossRef Kong, J., Kwok, Y.K.: Real options in strategic investment games between two asymmetric firms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181, 967-985 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leung, C.M.: Several essays on real options game models. Ph.D. thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (2011) Leung, C.M.: Several essays on real options game models. Ph.D. thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (2011)
Zurück zum Zitat Martin, S.: Spillovers, appropriability, and R&D. J. Econ. 75, 1-32 (2002)CrossRef Martin, S.: Spillovers, appropriability, and R&D. J. Econ. 75, 1-32 (2002)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miyagiwa, K., Ohno, Y.: Uncertainty, spillovers, and cooperative R&D. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 20, 855-876 (2002)CrossRef Miyagiwa, K., Ohno, Y.: Uncertainty, spillovers, and cooperative R&D. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 20, 855-876 (2002)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pawlina, G., Kort, P.M.: Real options in an asymmetric duopoly: who benefits from your competitive disadvantage. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 15(1), 1-35 (2006)CrossRef Pawlina, G., Kort, P.M.: Real options in an asymmetric duopoly: who benefits from your competitive disadvantage. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 15(1), 1-35 (2006)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thijssen, J.J.J.: Equilibria in continuous time preemption games with spectrally-negative Markovian payoffs. Working paper, University of York (2012) Thijssen, J.J.J.: Equilibria in continuous time preemption games with spectrally-negative Markovian payoffs. Working paper, University of York (2012)
Zurück zum Zitat Weeds, J.: Strategic delay in a real options model of R&D competition. Rev. Econ. Stud. 69, 729-747 (2002)CrossRef Weeds, J.: Strategic delay in a real options model of R&D competition. Rev. Econ. Stud. 69, 729-747 (2002)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou, H.W.: R&D tournaments with spillovers. Atl. Econ. J. 34, 327-339 (2006)CrossRef Zhou, H.W.: R&D tournaments with spillovers. Atl. Econ. J. 34, 327-339 (2006)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Real options game models of R&D competition between asymmetric firms with spillovers
verfasst von
Chi Man Leung
Yue Kuen Kwok
Publikationsdatum
31.05.2016
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Decisions in Economics and Finance / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1593-8883
Elektronische ISSN: 1129-6569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-016-0176-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Decisions in Economics and Finance 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe