Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction: New Opportunities for Development? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. Recommendations from Instructors for Adopting Successful Online Learning

verfasst von : Maike Gerken, Therese Grohnert

Erschienen in: Transformative Perspectives and Processes in Higher Education

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Emergent technologies propose new ways to deliver and teach online courses, thereby offering learners more flexibility and new ways to build knowledge (Anderson and Elloumi 2004). When shifting from traditional face-to-face teaching to teaching online, universities and instructors must reconsider their teaching and learning paradigm. They must understand how to effectively design, implement and teach online courses. In this respect, the instructor has a central role. This chapter examines the role of the instructor and challenges faced when transitioning from traditional face-to-face settings to online courses. Through semi-structured interviews with experienced instructors of both online courses, this chapter derives a series of best practices addressing three key challenges for instructors: course design, learner engagement and technological issues.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Potential of Communities of Learning for Dual Career PhD Programs – A Case Study
Nächstes Kapitel What Can Higher Education Learn from the Workplace?
Literatur
Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.
Allen, I., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Needham: Sloan Consortium.
Alvarez, I., Guasch, T., & Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: A theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 321–336. doi:10.​1080/​0261976080262410​4.CrossRef
Anderson, T. (2001). The hidden curriculum in distance education an updated view. Change, 33(6), 28–35.CrossRef
Barker, A. (2003). Faculty development for teaching online: Educational and technological issues. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 34(6), 273–278.
Benson, V., Anderson, D., & Ooms, A. (2011). Educators’ perceptions, attitudes and practices: Blended learning in business and management education. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 143–154. doi:10.​1080/​21567069.​2011.​586676.CrossRef
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.CrossRef
Chin, S. T. S., & Williams, J. B. (2006). A theoretical framework for effective online course design. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 12–21.
Clark-Ibáñez, M., & Scott, L. (2008). Learning to teach online. Teaching Sociology, 36(1), 34–41.CrossRef
Conrad, D. (2004). University instructors’ reflections on their first online teaching experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 31–44.
Coppola, N., Hiltz, S., & Rotter, N. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169–189.
Cowham, T., Duggleby, J., & College, T. S. (2005). Pedagogy and quality assurance in the development of online learning for online instructors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 15–27.
Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65–79. doi:10.​1080/​0158791070130531​9.CrossRef
Desai, M., Hart, J., & Richards, T. (2009). E-learning: Paradigm shift in education. Education, 129(2), 327–335.
Garrison, D. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 287–299.CrossRef
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Greene, B., & Land, S. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the World Wide Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2), 151–179.
Grosse, C. (2004). How distance learning changes faculty. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(6), 25–34.
Hannay, M., & Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of online and traditional learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 1–11.
Hinson, J. M., & LaPrairie, K. N. (2005). Learning to teach online: Promoting success through professional development. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29(6), 483–493. doi:10.​1080/​1066892059093419​8.CrossRef
Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRef
Hummel, H. G. K., Tattersall, C., Burgos, D., Brouns, F., Kurvers, H., & Koper, R. (2005). Facilitating participation: From the EML web site to the learning network for learning design. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1–2), 55–69. doi:10.​1080/​1049482050017347​4.CrossRef
Jaffee, D. (2003). Virtual transformation: Web-based technology and pedagogical change. Teaching Sociology, 31(2), 227–236.CrossRef
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2010). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). New York: Routledge.
Koepke, K., & O’Brien, A. (2012). Advancing pedagogy: Evidence for the role of online instructor training in improved pedagogical practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 73–83.
McQuiggan, C. (2012). Faculty development for online teaching as a catalyst for change. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 27–61.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1990). In-depth interviewing: Researching people. Hong Kong: Longman Cheshire.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRef
Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57–76. doi:10.​1007/​BF02504526.CrossRef
Savery, J. (2005). BE VOCAL: Characteristics of successful online instructors. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 141–152.
Schoonenboom, J. (2014). Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others. Computers & Education, 71, 247–256. doi:10.​1016/​j.​compedu.​2013.​09.​016.CrossRef
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135. doi:10.​3102/​0034654307600109​3.CrossRef
Tan, L., Wang, M., & Xiao, J. (2010). Best practices in teaching online or hybrid courses: A synthesis of principles. In P. Tsang, S. K. S. Cheung, V. S. K. Lee, & R. Huang (Eds.), Hybrid learning (pp. 117–126). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRef
The Sloan Consortium. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States 2011. Babson Park: Babson Survey Research Group.
Van Uden, J. M., Ritzen, H., & Pieters, J. M. (2014). Engaging students: The role of teacher beliefs and interpersonal teacher behavior in fostering student engagement in vocational education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 21–32. doi:10.​1016/​j.​tate.​2013.​08.​005.CrossRef
West, R. E., Waddoups, G., & Graham, C. R. (2006). Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 1–26. doi:10.​1007/​s11423-006-9018-1.CrossRef
Xie, K., DeBacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67–89.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Recommendations from Instructors for Adopting Successful Online Learning
verfasst von
Maike Gerken
Therese Grohnert
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Transformative Perspectives and Processes in Higher Education

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09246-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-09247-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09247-8_10

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise