nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Recycling and Lifecycle Assessment

verfasst von : Toshiyuki Seko, Shu Yamashita, Ken-ichi Shida, Ichiro Daigo

Erschienen in: Innovative Structural Materials

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Recycling and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) are important issues for future materials development. Here, in the narrow sense, “recycling” means materials recycling, and is a recycling method in which waste is reused as the raw material for new products. Development of recycling technologies for aluminum alloys and CFRP products was carried out as part of the Project. In substitution of automotive materials for auto body weight reduction, it is necessary to consider the effects on society as a whole. In the Project, we created an LCA model with a system boundary extended spatially and temporally, which can evaluate the environmental, social and economic impacts in Japanese society as a whole up to the year 2050, together with the necessary database, and developed an evaluation tool that demonstrates the model and its database. Technology development related to recycling and LCA is described in detail in this Chap. 8, “Recycling and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).”

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Prototyping of Multi-material Parts—Efforts to Realize Practical Application of Innovative Materials and Technologies

Nächstes Kapitel Review and Future Development

The Hall–Héroult process, the only refining method practically applied, is a representative of molten salt electrolysis, which obtains the target material by electrolyzing molten raw material. However, enormous energy is required to extract metallic aluminum from alumina.

While a metal with a relatively low standard electrode potential is called a “less-noble” metal, a metal with a relatively high standard electrode potential is called a “noble” metal.

Sizing agent is applied to the carbon fiber surface to prevent the fiber from damage and improve adhesion with the matrix resin.

Functional unit: When conducting the LCA, the functions of products and services for assessment should be identified in setting the objective and scope. The environmental burden as an assessment result is analyzed by the unit quantity of the identified function. This unit quantity of a function is called a functional unit, which should be expressed in a physical quantity and others.

T. Ishikawa et al., J. Surf. Finish. Soc. Jpn. 49, 347 (1998)CrossRef

V. Schwarz et al., J. Appl. Electrochem. 25, 34 (1995)CrossRef

Y. Wang et al., J. Clean. Prod. 287, 125043 (2021)CrossRef

V. Kamavaram et al., Electrochim. Acta 50, 3286 (2005)CrossRef

D. Paradhan et al., Electrochim. Acta 54, 6661 (2009)CrossRef

Metallic materials series to use in the field, Aluminum, edited by Japan Aluminum Association, Maruzen Publishing (2011)

Y. Kojima, Development of new production processes for aluminum, Research and development for innovative structural materials, “FY 2021 accomplishment report meeting”, presentation overview (2022), p. 78

UACJ (Fukaya branch office), Development of new production processes for aluminum, Research and development for innovative structural materials, “FY 2020 accomplishment report meeting”, collection of posters (2021), p. 47

10.

Y. Maeda, The Recent Trends of Carbon Fiber (CMC Publishing, 2013), pp. 1–6

11.

I. Okajima, M. Hiramatsu, Y. Shimamura, T. Awaya, T. Sako, Chemical recycling of carbon fiber reinforced plastic using supercritical methanol. J. Supercrit. Fluids 91, 68–76 (2014)CrossRef

12.

J. Jiang, G. Deng, X. Chen, X. Gao, Q. Guo, C. Xu, L. Zhou, On the successful chemical recycling of carbon fiber/epoxy resin composites under the mild condition. Compos. Sci. Tech. 151, 243–251 (2017)CrossRef

13.

K. Shibata, M. Nakagawa, CFRP recycling technology using depolymerization under ordinary pressure. Hitachi Chem. Tech. Rep. 56, 6–11 (2013)

14.

M. Wada et al., Compos. A 85, 156–162 (2016)CrossRef

15.

National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (Nagoya Moriyama branch office): Development of evaluation technology for recycled carbon fiber, Research and development for innovative structural materials, “FY 2020 accomplishment report meeting” collection of posters (2021), p. 48

16.

ISO 14040:2006, Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework

17.

ISO 14044:2006, Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines

18.

H. Baumann, A.-M. Tillman, The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA. An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Application (Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden, 2004), p. 534

19.

S.M. Kaufman, 3—Quantifying sustainability: industrial ecology, materials flow and life cycle analysis, in Metropolitan Sustainability: Understanding and Improving the Urban Environment (Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, 2012), pp. 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096463.1.40

20.

I. Daigo, Y. Matsuno, K. N. Ishihara, Y. Adachi, Tetsu-to-Hagane 91, 159–166 (2005). (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.91.1_159

21.

M.J. Eckelman, I. Daigo, Ecol. Econ. 67, 265–273 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2008.05.020CrossRef

22.

D.L. Schrijvers, P. Loubet, G. Sonneman, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 976–993 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1063-3CrossRef

23.

B. Weidema, J. Ind. Ecol. 4, 11–33 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1162/108819800300106366CrossRef

24.

M. Wang, A. Elgowainy, U. Lee, A. Bafana, S. Banerjee, P.T. Benavides, P. Bobba, A. Burnham, H. Cai, U.R. GracidaAlvarez, T.R. Hawkins, R.K. Iyer, J.C. Kelly, T. Kim, K. Kingsbury, H. Kwon, Y. Li, X. Liu, Z. Lu, L. Ou, N. Siddique, P. Sun, P. Vyawahare, O. Winjobi, M. Wu, H. Xu, E. Yoo, G.G. Zaimes, G. Zang, Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies Model® (2021.Net). Computer Software. USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (2021). Web. https://doi.org/10.11578/GREET-Net-2021/dc.20210903.1

25.

R. Geyer, User Guide for the University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB) Automotive Energy & GHG Model 5. (2017). Accessed from https://www.worldautosteel.org/downloads/ucsb-model-5-user-guide/. Accessed 31 Aug 2021

26.

M. Kobayashi, A. Inaba, T. Nakayama, J. Jpn Inst. Energy 73(12), 1075 (1994)CrossRef

27.

AIST (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology): Inventory Database for Environmental Analysis (IDEA) version 3.1.0. (2021). Accessed from https://riss.aist.go.jp/lca-consortium/. Accessed 15 May 2022

28.

LCA Society of Japan: JLCA database. https://lcaforum.org/database/

29.

K. Nansai, Y. Moriguchi, S. Tohno: Embodied Energy and Emission Intensity Data for Japan Using Input-Output Tables, 3EID. https://www.cger.nies.go.jp/publications/report/d031/jpn/index_j.htm

30.

UNEP Life Cycle Initiative: Global LCA Data network, G. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/resources-2/global-lca-data-network-glad-2/

31.

Y. Kikuchi, J. Life Cycle Assess. Jpn. 18, 11–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3370/lca.18.11CrossRef

32.

G. Finnveden, M.Z. Hauschild, T. Ekvall, J. Guinée, R. Heijungs, S. Hellweg, A. Koehler, D. Pennington, S. Suh, J. Environ. Manag. 91, 1–21 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018CrossRef

33.

T. Ekvall, Attributional and consequential life cycle assessment, in Sustainability Assessment at the 21st century [Internet], eds. by M.J. Bastante-Ceca, J.L. Fuentes-Bargues, L. Hufnagel, F. Mihai, C. Iatu (IntechOpen, London, UK, 2019). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89202. Accessed 25 Apr 2022

34.

M.A. Curran, M. Mann, G. Norris, J. Clean. Prod. 13, 853–862 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2002.03.001CrossRef

35.

T. Schaubroeck, S. Schaubroeck, R. Heijungs, A. Zamagni, M. Brandão, E. Benetto, Sustainability 13, 7386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137386CrossRef

36.

J. Liu, I. Daigo, D. Panasiuk, P. Dunuwila, K. Hamada, T. Hoshino, J. Clean. Prod. 349, 131317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131317

37.

ISO 20915:2018, Life cycle inventory calculation methodology for steel products

38.

JISQ 20915:2019, Life cycle inventory calculation methodology for steel products (in Japanese)

39.

C. Broadbent, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 1658–1665 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1081-1CrossRef

40.

World Steel Association: Methodology report–Life cycle inventory study for steel products (Belgium, 2011), p. 48

41.

The Japan Iron and Steel Federation: Life Cycle Thinking. https://www.jisf.or.jp/business/lca/lct/index.html (in Japanese). Accessed 15 May 2022

42.

European Commission: Results and deliverables of the Environmental Footprint pilot phase. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/PEFCR_OEFSR_en.htm. Accessed 15 May 2022

43.

CFP program: The list of certified CFP-PCR. https://www.cfp-japan.jp/calculate/authorize/pcr.php (in Japanese). Accessed 15 May 2022

44.

European Commission: Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules Guidance version 6.3 (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/PEFCR_guidance_v6.3.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2022

45.

T. Ekvall, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 29, 91–109 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00057-9CrossRef

46.

I. Daigo, K. Hamada, K. Takeyama, P. Dunuwila, D. Panasiuk, T. Hoshino, Conditions for selecting an allocation approach of the avoided burden by material recycling in life cycle inventory analysis. EcoBalance 2020, in 14th The International Conference on EcoBalance, On-line (2021)

47.

I. Daigo, K. Iwata, I. Ohkata, Y. Goto, Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 8691–8696 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01164CrossRef

48.

H. Hatayama, I. Daigo, Y. Matsuno, Y. Adachi, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 6457–6463 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/es100044nCrossRef

49.

I. Daigo, K. Tajima, H. Hayashi, D. Panasiuk, K. Takeyama, H. Ono, Y. Kobayashi, K. Nakajima, T. Hoshino, ISIJ Int. 61, 498–505 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2020-377

Titel: Recycling and Lifecycle Assessment
verfasst von: Toshiyuki Seko
Shu Yamashita
Ken-ichi Shida
Ichiro Daigo
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: Innovative Structural Materials
Print ISBN: 978-981-9935-21-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-9935-22-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3522-2_8

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht