Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Requisites for Open Budgeting: A Comparison of the ‘Budget for Citizens’ in Russian Regions Using QCA

verfasst von : Leonid Smorgunov

Erschienen in: Digital Transformation and Global Society

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The practice of citizens’ involvement in the process of the formation, monitoring and evaluation of performance of the public budget has become one of the most important forms of cooperation of citizens and government. Of particular importance is acquiring a digital form of government where the public use of data creates a solid platform for the modern type of “co-production” of public budgets. Modern budgeting based on cooperation transforms designs of budgetary policy, accountability systems, processes of identifying public values, and others. Ensuring citizen-oriented data relating to the budget here gets particular importance, and sharing the learning of citizens and the government for inclusive budget process becomes the main requisite for successful collaboration. This paper analyzes the Russian practice of open budget and “budget for the citizens” in the context of different requisites: social-economic and informational, which construct an inclusive capacity of the regions. This practice was introduced in 2013 at the federal and regional levels. Though institutions of “budget for the citizens” inure for legitimating regimes, they are also good factors for mutual learning for cooperation. Transparency of budgetary data, its transformation for the citizens, and budgeting, initiated by citizens, affect the character of Russian designs for inclusive budgeting in the regions. On the basis of different ratings of open budgeting and requisites, this paper explains the complex configuration of requisites for the open budget and the ‘budget for citizens’ and three models of introducing forms of e-participation. The main hypothesis of the study is the higher the level of inclusive capacity of the region, the higher the openness of budget data and the “budget for citizens”. For a comparison of 22 Russian regions, the QCA method has been used.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abell, P.: Foundations for a qualitative comparative method. Int. Rev. Soc. Hist. 34(1), 105–115 (1989)CrossRef Abell, P.: Foundations for a qualitative comparative method. Int. Rev. Soc. Hist. 34(1), 105–115 (1989)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ansell, C., Gash, A.: Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18(4), 543–571 (2008)CrossRef Ansell, C., Gash, A.: Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18(4), 543–571 (2008)CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Boukhis, I., Ayachi, R., Eloedi, Z., Mellouli, S., Amor, N.B.: Decision model for policy makers in the context of citizens engagement: application on participatory budgeting. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34(6), 740–756 (2015)CrossRef Boukhis, I., Ayachi, R., Eloedi, Z., Mellouli, S., Amor, N.B.: Decision model for policy makers in the context of citizens engagement: application on participatory budgeting. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34(6), 740–756 (2015)CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabannes, Y.: Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ. Urban. 16(1), 27–31 (2004)CrossRef Cabannes, Y.: Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ. Urban. 16(1), 27–31 (2004)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rihoux, B., Ragin, C. (eds.): Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009) Rihoux, B., Ragin, C. (eds.): Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganuza, E., Frances, F.: The deliberative turn in participation: the problem of inclusion and deliberative opportunities in participatory budgeting. Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4(2), 283–302 (2012)CrossRef Ganuza, E., Frances, F.: The deliberative turn in participation: the problem of inclusion and deliberative opportunities in participatory budgeting. Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4(2), 283–302 (2012)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rihoux, B., Grimm, H. (eds.): Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer, New York (2006) Rihoux, B., Grimm, H. (eds.): Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer, New York (2006)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kernaghan, K.: Moving towards integrated public governance: improving service delivery through community engagement. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 75(2), 239–254 (2009)CrossRef Kernaghan, K.: Moving towards integrated public governance: improving service delivery through community engagement. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 75(2), 239–254 (2009)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Krenjova, J., Raudla, R.: Policy diffusion at the local level: participatory budgeting in Estonia. Urban Aff. Rev. 3(4), 1–29 (2017) Krenjova, J., Raudla, R.: Policy diffusion at the local level: participatory budgeting in Estonia. Urban Aff. Rev. 3(4), 1–29 (2017)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Markoff, J.: A comparative method: reflections on Charles Ragin’s innovations in comparative analysis. Hist. Methods: J. Quant. Interdiscip. Hist. 23(4), 177–181 (1990)CrossRef Markoff, J.: A comparative method: reflections on Charles Ragin’s innovations in comparative analysis. Hist. Methods: J. Quant. Interdiscip. Hist. 23(4), 177–181 (1990)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ragin, C. (ed.): Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research. E. J. Brill, Leiden (1991) Ragin, C. (ed.): Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research. E. J. Brill, Leiden (1991)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ragin, C.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987) Ragin, C.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ragin, C.: The logic of the comparative method and the algebra of logic. J. Quant. Anthropol. 1(4), 373–398 (1989) Ragin, C.: The logic of the comparative method and the algebra of logic. J. Quant. Anthropol. 1(4), 373–398 (1989)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ragin, C., Meyer, S., Drass, K.: Assessing discrimination: a Boolean approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49(2), 221–234 (1984)CrossRef Ragin, C., Meyer, S., Drass, K.: Assessing discrimination: a Boolean approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49(2), 221–234 (1984)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rios, A.-M., Bastida, F., Benito, B.: Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: an international approach. Am. Rev. Pub. Adm. 46(5), 546–568 (2014)CrossRef Rios, A.-M., Bastida, F., Benito, B.: Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: an international approach. Am. Rev. Pub. Adm. 46(5), 546–568 (2014)CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocker, A.: Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)CrossRef Rocker, A.: Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Romme, A.: Boolean comparative analysis of qualitative data: a methodological note. Qual. Quant. 29(3), 317–329 (1995)CrossRef Romme, A.: Boolean comparative analysis of qualitative data: a methodological note. Qual. Quant. 29(3), 317–329 (1995)CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Souza, C.: Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environ. Urban. 13(1), 159–184 (2001)CrossRef Souza, C.: Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environ. Urban. 13(1), 159–184 (2001)CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, P., Shannon, P.: Participatory governance: towards a strategic model. Commun. Dev. J. 46(2), ii63–ii82 (2011) Walker, P., Shannon, P.: Participatory governance: towards a strategic model. Commun. Dev. J. 46(2), ii63–ii82 (2011)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Warren, M.E.: Governance-driven democratization. Crit. Policy Stud. 3(1), 3–13 (2009)CrossRef Warren, M.E.: Governance-driven democratization. Crit. Policy Stud. 3(1), 3–13 (2009)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Requisites for Open Budgeting: A Comparison of the ‘Budget for Citizens’ in Russian Regions Using QCA
verfasst von
Leonid Smorgunov
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_21