Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cluster Computing
Erschienen in: Cluster Computing 1/2018

19.06.2017

Research from the perspective of resource orchestration on digital ecosystem

verfasst von: Zhengyan Cui, Taohua-Ouyang

Erschienen in: Cluster Computing | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Since digital technologies have brought opportunities for marginal enterprises to rise, it deserves attentions from the academia about how marginal enterprises reconfigure ecosystems. This thesis has a case study of Duch Group (Duch) in 3D printing from the perspective of resource orchestration. It deeply investigates the dynamic process of how marginal enterprises reconfigure the ecosystem by digital technologies and attain the core position. It is found that the marginal enterprises, adhering to the “point-line-surface” principle, successively reconfigure the manufacturing process, industry chain and ecosystem by implementing actions of structuring, bundling and leveraging on the key resources such as digital technologies to attain the core position. This research benefits both academics and practitioners by contributing to cumulative theoretical developments and by offering practical insights.
Vorheriger Artikel Space–time visualization analysis of bus passenger big data in Beijing
Nächster Artikel Study of cloud service queuing model based on imbedding Markov chain perspective

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Luo, M., Li, L.: The age of the internet business model innovation: value creation perspective. China Ind. Econ. 57(1), 95–107 (2015)
2.
Adner, R., Kapoor, R.: Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: re-examining technology S-curves. Strateg. Manag. J. 3, 1–24 (2015)
3.
Selander, L., Henfridsson, O., Svahn, F.: Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems. J. Inf. Technol. 28(3), 183–197 (2013)CrossRef
4.
Christensen, C.M., Bower, J.L.: Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 17, 197–218 (1996)CrossRef
5.
Liu, L., Tan, C., Jiang, S., Lei, H.: Li Feng’s process of platform leadership achievement: a resource dependence perspective. China Ind. Econ. 1, 134–146 (2015)
6.
Wareham, J., Fox, P.B., Cano Giner, J.: Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4), 1195–1215 (2014)CrossRef
7.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 724–735 (2010)CrossRef
8.
Thomas, L.D.W., Autio, E.: Modeling the Ecosystem: A Meta-synthesis of Ecosystem and Related Literatures. DRUID, Copenhagen (2012)
9.
Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28(13), 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRef
10.
Perrigot, R., Pénard, T.: Determinants of E-commerce strategy in franchising: a resource-based view. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 17(3), 109–130 (2013)CrossRef
11.
Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., et al.: Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. J. Manag. 37(5), 1390–1412 (2011)
12.
Adner, R., Kapoor, R.: Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(3), 306–333 (2010)CrossRef
13.
Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002)
14.
Moore, J.F.: Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harv. Bus. Rev. 71(3), 75–83 (1993)
15.
Tan, B., Pan, S.L., Lu, X., Huang, L.: Leveraging digital business ecosystems for enterprise agility: the tri-logic development strategy of Alibaba.com. In: ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 171 (2009)
16.
Yamakami, T.: 2010 13th International Conference on a Mobile Digital Ecosystem Framework: Lessons from the Evolution of Mobile Data Services, pp. 516–520. IEEE (2010)
17.
Koshutanski, H., Ion, M., Telesca, L.: The International Conference on Distributed Identity Management Model for Digital Ecosystems, pp. 132–138. IEEE (2007)
18.
Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Pers. Psychol. 20(2), 88–90 (2004)
19.
Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as ecology. Harv. Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68–81 (2004)
20.
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Research commentary—platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 675–687 (2010)CrossRef
21.
Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Inf. Syst. J. 23(2), 173–192 (2013)CrossRef
22.
Wright, M., Marlow, S.: Entrepreneurial activity in the venture creation and development process. Int. Small Bus. J. 30(2), 107–114 (2012)CrossRef
23.
Kor, Y.Y., Mahoney, J.T., Michael, S.C.: Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. J. Manag. Stud. 44(7), 1187–1212 (2007)CrossRef
24.
Cui, M., Pan, S.L.: Developing focal capabilities for E-commerce adoption: a resource orchestration perspective. Inf. Manag. 52(2), 200–209 (2014)CrossRef
25.
Bridoux, F., Smith, K.G., Grimm, C.M.: The management of resources temporal effects of different types of actions on performance. J. Manag. 39(4), 928–957 (2013)
26.
Sirmon, D.G., Gove, S., Hitt, M.A.: Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: the effects of resource bundling and deployment. Acad. Manag. J. 51(5), 919–935 (2008)CrossRef
27.
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, London (2013)
28.
Ouyang, T.: Case study method in the field of business administration. Nankai Bus. Rev.: Tianjin, China 7(2), 100–105 (2004)
29.
Patton, M.Q.: How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park (1987)
30.
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Transaction Publishers, Chicago (2009)
31.
Evered, R., Louis, M.R.: Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside”. Acad. Manag. Rev. 6(3), 385–395 (1981)CrossRef
32.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: toward a shared craft. Educ. Res. 13(5), 20–30 (1984)CrossRef
33.
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)
34.
Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 320–330 (2006)CrossRef
35.
Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)
36.
Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 25 (2007)CrossRef
37.
Pan, S.L., Tan, B.: Demystifying case research: a structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies. Inf. Organ. 21(3), 161–176 (2011)CrossRef
38.
Eamonn, K.: Blurring Boundaries, Uncharted Frontiers, pp. 17–28. Deloitte University Press (2015)
39.
Nambisan, S., Baron, R.A.: Interactions in virtual customer environments: implications for product support and customer relationship management. J. Interact. Mark. 21(2), 42–62 (2007)CrossRef
40.
Jawahar, I.M., McLaughlin, G.L.: Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26, 397–414 (2001)
41.
Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Arregle, J.-L., Campbell, J.T.: Capability strengths and weaknesses in dynamic markets: investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(13), 1386–1409 (2010)CrossRef
42.
Agarwal, R., Gort, M.: Products and firm life cycles and firm survival. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, 184–190 (2002)CrossRef
43.
Smith, K.G., Mitchell, T.R., Summer, C.E.: Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life cycle. Acad. Manag. J. 28, 799–820 (1985)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Research from the perspective of resource orchestration on digital ecosystem
verfasst von
Zhengyan Cui
Taohua-Ouyang
Publikationsdatum
19.06.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cluster Computing / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1386-7857
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7543
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0906-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Cluster Computing 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Extracting reference text from citation contexts

OriginalPaper

Large deviations for the stochastic present value of aggregate net claims with infinite variance in the renewal risk model and its application in risk management

OriginalPaper

Estimation of software features based birthmark

OriginalPaper

Formation path control method for group coordination based on fuzzy logic control method

OriginalPaper

Extreme learning machine based microscopic red blood cells classification

OriginalPaper

Hybrid spatial air index for processing queries in road networks

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise