nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Resilience Quantification and Assessment

verfasst von : Igor Linkov, Benjamin D. Trump

Erschienen in: The Science and Practice of Resilience

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Risk quantification is an essential element of any risk or resilience management tool. Traditionally, chemical risk quantification is undertaken with the assistance of extensive data in an exposure-driven approach, where both human and environmental health risk is evaluated in repeated trials. In infrastructure risk quantification, less common events, such as natural disasters, may be quantified through probabilities reliant on extensive historical data. However, in the absence of rigorous quantitative data, exposure-driven risk assessment may be replaced (however temporarily) by qualitative assessment. Regardless of method chosen, however, the ultimate goal of risk quantification is to classify a material or project as containing no risk, prohibitive risk, or some gradient in between.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Resilience and Governance

Nächstes Kapitel The State of Practice

Alberts, D. S., & Hayes, R. E. (2003). Power to the edge: Command… control… in the information age. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC, Command and Control Research Program (CCRP).

Ayyub, B. M. (2014). Systems resilience for multihazard environments: Definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making. Risk Analysis, 34(2), 340–355.

Bakkensen, L. A., Fox-Lent, C., Read, L. K., & Linkov, I. (2017). Validating resilience and vulnerability indices in the context of natural disasters. Risk Analysis, 37(5), 982–1004.

Balnaves, M., & Caputi, P. (2001). Introduction to quantitative research methods: An investigative approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Bernard, H. R., & Bernard, H. R. (2012). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Collier, Z. A., & Linkov, I. (2014). Decision making for resilience within the context of network centric operations. Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg MS Engineer Research and Development Center.

Committee on Increasing National Resilience to Hazards and Disasters, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, and The National Academies. (2012). Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2014). The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change, 29, 65–77.

Eisenberg, D. A., Linkov, I., Park, J., Bates, M. E., Fox-Lent, C., & Seager, T. P. (2014a). Resilience metrics: Lessons from military doctrines. Solution, 5(5), 76–87.

Eisenberg, D. A., Park, J., Bates, M. E., Fox-Lent, C., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2014b). Resilience metrics: Lessons from military doctrines. Solutions, 5(5), 76–87.

Fox-Lent, C., Bates, M. E., & Linkov, I. (2015). A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: An illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(2), 209–218.

Francis, R., & Bekera, B. (2014). A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 90–103.

Frazier, A., Arendt, L., Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., & Bruneau, M. (2010). A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework (MCEER, pp. 10–0006).

Ganin, A. A., et al. (2016). Operational resilience: Concepts, design and analysis. Scientific Reports, 6, 19540.CrossRef

Ganin, A. A., Kitsak, M., Marchese, D., Keisler, J. M., Seager, T., & Linkov, I. (2017). Resilience and efficiency in transportation networks. Science Advances, 3(12), e1701079.CrossRef

Gao, J., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., & Stanley, H. E. (2011). Robustness of a network of networks. Physical Review Letters, 107(19), 195701.

Gao, J., Buldyrev, S. V., Stanley, H. E., & Havlin, S. (2012). Networks formed from interdependent networks. Nature Physics, 8(1), 40.

Gao, J., Barzel, B., & Barabási, A. L. (2016). Universal resilience patterns in complex networks. Nature, 530(7590), 307.

Governing Magazine. (2017). Car ownership in U.S. cities data and map. Retrieved July 1, 2018, from http://www.governing.com/gov-data/car-ownership-numbers-of-vehicles-by-city-map.html.

Kelic, A., Collier, Z. A., Brown, C., Beyeler, W. E., Outkin, A. V., Vargas, V. N., & Ehlen, M. A. (2013). Decision framework for evaluating the macroeconomic risks and policy impacts of cyber attacks. Environment Systems and Decisions, 33(4), 544–560.

King, G., Keohane, R., & Verba, S. (1994). Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kitsak, M., Gallos, L. K., Havlin, S., Liljeros, F., Muchnik, L., Stanley, H. E., et al. (2010). Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Physics, 6(11), 888.

Larkin, S., Fox-Lent, C., Eisenberg, D. A., Trump, B. D., Wallace, S., Chadderton, C., & Linkov, I. (2015). Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(2), 185–195.CrossRef

Linkov, I., & Moberg, E. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis: Environmental applications and case studies. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Linkov, I., Eisenberg, D. A., Bates, M. E., Chang, D., Convertino, M., Allen, J. H., Flynn, S. E., & Seager, T. P. (2013a). Measurable resilience for actionable policy. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(18), 10108–10110.

Linkov, I., Eisenberg, D. A., Plourde, K., Seager, T. P., Allen, J., & Kott, A. (2013b). Resilience metrics for cyber systems. Environment Systems and Decisions, 33(4), 471–476.

Linkov, I., Anklam, E., Collier, Z. A., DiMase, D., & Renn, O. (2014a). Risk-based standards: Integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(1), 134–137.CrossRef

Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F., Decker, J., Fox-Lent, C., Kröger, W., & Lambert, J. H. (2014b). Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Climate Change, 4(6), 407–409.CrossRef

Linkov, I., Fox-Lent, C., Keisler, J., Sala, S. D., & Sieweke, J. (2014c). Risk and resilience lessons from Venice. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(3), 378–382.CrossRef

Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Ditmer, R., & Hazle, M. (2014d). Munitions and explosives of concern: International governance and applications for the United States. Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(1), 30.CrossRef

Linkov, I., Trump, B., Jin, D., Mazurczak, M., & Schreurs, M. (2014e). A decision-analytic approach to predict state regulation of hydraulic fracturing. Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(1), 20.CrossRef

Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., & Fox-Lent, K. (2016). Resilience: Approaches to risk analysis and governance. IRGC, Resource Guide on Resilience, EPFL International Risk Governance Center, Lausanne, v29-07-2016. Retrieved October 10, 2016, from https://www.irgc.org/riskgovernance/resilience/.

Linkov, I., Poinsatte-Jones, K., Trump, B. D., Ganin, A. A., & Kepner, J. (2019). Rulemaking for insider threat mitigation. In A. Kott & I. Linkov (Eds.), Cyber resilience of systems and networks (pp. 265–286). Cham: Springer.

Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227–249.

Massaro, E., Ganin, A., Perra, N., Linkov, I., & Vespignani, A. (2018). Resilience management during large-scale epidemic outbreaks. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1859.CrossRef

Park, J., Seager, T. P., Rao, P. S. C., Convertino, M., & Linkov, I. (2013). Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Analysis, 33(3), 356–367.CrossRef

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

Roege, P. E., Collier, Z. A., Mancillas, J., McDonagh, J. A., & Linkov, I. (2014). Metrics for energy resilience. Energy Policy, 72, 249–256.

Rosati, J. D., Touzinsky, K. F., & Lillycrop, W. F. (2015). Quantifying coastal system resilience for the US Army Corps of Engineers. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(2), 196–208.

Vugrin, E. D., Warren, D. E., & Ehlen, M. A. (2011). A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane. Process Safety Progress, 30(3), 280–290.

Yatsalo, B., Gritsyuk, S., Sullivan, T., Trump, B., & Linkov, I. (2016). Multi-criteria risk management with the use of DecernsMCDA: Methods and case studies. Environment Systems and Decisions, 36(3), 266–276.

Titel: Resilience Quantification and Assessment
verfasst von: Igor Linkov
Benjamin D. Trump
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: The Science and Practice of Resilience
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04563-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-04565-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04565-4_6