nach oben

Erschienen in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Revisiting National Economic Planning and Industrial Policy: Concepts, Experiences and the Ecosystem

verfasst von : Murat Yülek

Erschienen in: Economic Planning and Industrial Policy in the Globalizing Economy

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This introductory chapter provides an overview of economic planning and industrial policy, discussing their origins, first appearance, taxonomies and the motivations behind them with a view to explaining the basis for their role in the current world economy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nächstes Kapitel Modern Economic Development Concepts

The Battle of Kadesh led to the first known recorded international treaty in history between the Hittites and Egypt. The reason for the battle was that both sides wanted to gain control of the Mesopotamian trade routes.

Estrin and Holmes (1990) stress that some of the successful developed economies, including Japan and Sweden, continued to utilize economic plans during the 1980s.

Some economists are careful to distinguish planning and dirigisme, the latter considered to refer to heavy government intervention in the economy without a formal strategy or plan. See Kindleberger (1967, p. 287).

Kindleberger (1967), Wellisz (1960).

Estrin and Holmes (1990), Millikan (1967, pp. 3–4).

Wellizs (1960, p. 252).

Kindleberger (1967).

Wickham (1963).

Balassa (1990), Lopes (2013).

Balassa (1990) remarks that the World Bank’s 1949−1950 Annual Report (p. 18) stated that member countries “know, too, that if they formulate a well-balanced development program based on the [Bank] Mission’s recommendations, the Bank will stand ready to help them carry out the program by financing appropriate projects.”

Katzenstein (1985, p. 61).

Katzenstein (1985 p. 61).

Katzenstein (1985, p. 61), Barbash (1972, p. 7), Lindbeck (1973, pp. 168−169).

Katzenstein (1985, pp. 116–118), Erichsen E (1978).

Balassa (1990, pp. 1–2).

US Government Records of the War Finance Corporation (1918). In fact, it is well known that Hamilton (1791) was a pioneer in the discussion of industrial policy.

See also Galbraith et al. (1976).

As Colm summarized, under the legislation, the President would generate annually, an “Economic Report” including macroeconomic targets (such as employment and production) under the current economic environment, setting forth targets and developing policies (by suggested changes in the existing frame work required to influence economic development in the direction of the goals set forth). Those are indeed indicative planning functions.

That trend has continued. The Five-Year Economic Development Strategy for the District of Columbia, adopted in November 2012, defines itself as “the first document from the District to lay out a clear roadmap for sustained, sector-driven economic development.” The plan “contains the visions, strategies and initiatives that will transform the District by creating 100,000 new jobs and generating $1 billion in new tax revenue to support city services over the next five years.” See Government of the District of Columbia (2013, p. 12).

Chang (1999).

See, for example, Balassa (1990) for neo-liberal criticisms of planning.

Lopes (2013).

Arrow (1958, p. 95), Lange (1949, p. 166, 170), Klosterman (1985, p. 6–9), Moore (1978).

Lange (1949, p. 167), Black (1968, p. 305).

Chenery (1975).

Lange (1949, p. 167).

Black (1968, p. 310).

Malinvaud (1992, pp. 22–23).

Estrin and Holmes (1990, pp. 532–533).

Massè (1962).

As Estrin and Holmes (1990, p. 535) argue, that was probably the case for post war Europe.

Leontief (1976, p. 10) also emphasizes the coordination role of planning. Colm’s (1964, pp. 40–41) account of the USA also could be interpreted as a policy coordination role for the Council of Economic Advisors and the President’s Annual Economic Report.

Dent (2004, p. 81).

Perroux et al. (1949), Kindleberger (1967), Estrin and Holmes (1990), Malinvaud (1992).

Malinvaud (1992, p. 17).

Malinvaud (1992, p. 24).

See McArthur and Scott (1969), Estrin and Holmes (1990).

See Lavoie (1985) or Kirzner (1984), among others, for that discussion.

Wellizs (1960).

Katzenstein (1985, p. 61), Wellizs (1960).

Millikan (1967, p. 6).

Chakravarty (1991).

Wellizs (1960, p. 263), Hampton (1971, p. 338).

Baum and Tolbert (1985) call this “comprehensive” planning.

Estrin and Holmes (1990, p. 537), for example, explain the Dutch and Japanese planning, where the planning body is a relatively powerless think tank with basically no coercive powers vis-a-vis the other governmental departments, contrasted with early French planning where the planning body had significant powers.

In some cases, such as Turkey, shorter term plans were called “programs.” In the Turkish case, plans until recently were drawn for 5 years and programs covered a single year. In other cases, a longer, framework, such as 10 years, was programmed using 3-year plans.

Wellizs (1960, p. 263).

Wickham (1963, p. 335).

“Not at all costs, but by means of reasonable corrective measures” as Massé (1965, p. 266) notes.

Tinbergen (1956) calls policy variables “means” or “instruments” which can be used to “reform” the “foundations,” or to change “qualitative” (structural) or “quantitative” (macroeconomic) aspects of the economy.

Black (1968).

During the Meiji restoration and the High Growth Period (1953–1973), rapid development and “catchup” was a key theme in Japan. The process was accompanied by related slogans such as “fukokukyōhei” (“rich nation-powerful army”) or “shokusan kogyo” (“develop industry and support firms”).

Johnson (1982, p. 18, 19).

Johnson (1982, p. 18).

In addition, Barro (1990) showed that in an endogenous growth model, productive government investment spending can lead to higher growth rates.

As discussed in previous sections, targets versus forecasts were debated during the 1950s in economic planning circles and forecasting has been an especially prominent part of Dutch economic planning.

Quinn et al. (1988, p. 1).

Bryson (2004, p. xii).

Bryson (2004, pp. 11–13).

Stimson et al. (2006, p. 4).

Bachtler and Yuill (2001, p. 6).

Katzenstein (1985, pp. 118–119).

Fremont (1993).

Bachtler and Yuill (2001). This was the case for Western Europe. In the USA, the states and cities under them were already regional actors. Other, especially developing, countries gradually followed suit in trying to devolve powers to regional authorities.

Including the programs of the US Economic Development Administration providing financial support to strategic development plans drawn by communities.

The most typical example could be Japan where the plans were drawn by the Economic Planning Agency and the designers and implementers were the MITI and the genkyokus.

Katzenstein (1985, p. 61).

Wolf (1962, p. 23), Komiya (1975).

Estrin and Holmes (1990, p. 538).

Policies that supported R&D were used earlier in various countries, ranging from the USA and Japan to Scandinavian countries. While R&D support provides output to various industries, they still can be considered a type of industrial policy, as they are primarily directed towards technology-intensive sub-sectors.

See Yülek and Taylor (2012), Eliasson (2010), Yülek (2013).

Rothwell (1984), Edler and Georghiou (2007), Georghiou et al. (2014).

Porter (2000).

Feser (2004), Hefner (2009).

Roeland and Den Hertod (1999, p. 416).

Roelandt and Den Hertod (1999, p. 418).

Arrow KJ (1958) Tinbergen on economic policy. J Am Stat Assoc 53(281):89–97CrossRef

Bachtler J, Yuill D (2001) Policies and strategies for regional development: a shift in paradigm? University of Strathclyde, European Policies Research Centre, Glasgow

Balassa B (1990) Indicative planning in developing countries. J Comp Econ 14(4):560–574CrossRef

Barbash J, Barbash K (1972) Trade unions and national economic policy. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore

Barro R (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. JPE 98:103–125CrossRef

Baum WC, Tolbert SM (1985) Investing in development: lessons of World Bank experience. World Bank, Washington, DC

Beckerman W (1975) The Labour government’s economic record, 1964–1970. Gerald Duckworth & Company, London

Black J (1968) The theory of indicative planning. Oxf Econ Pap 20(3):303–319

Bryson JM (2004) Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. Wiley, San Francisco

Chakravarty S (1991) Development planning: a reappraisal. Camb J Econ 15(1):5–20

Chang HJ (1999) How to 'do' a developmental state: Political, organizational, andhuman resource requirements for the developmental state. In: Edigheji O (ed)Constructing a democratic developmental state in South Africa—potentials andchallenges, Human Science Research Council Press, Cape Town, 2010

Chenery HB (1975) The structuralist approach to development policy. Am Econ Rev 65(2):310–316

Colm G (1964) Economic planning in the United States. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 92:31–56

Dent CM (2004) The new international political economy of East Asia and the developmental state. In: Low L (ed) Developmental states: relevancy, redundancy or reconfiguration. Nova Publishers, New York, pp 79–99

Du Boff RB (1968) The decline of economic planning in France. West Polit Q 21(1):98–109CrossRef

Edler J, Georghiou L (2007) Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side. Res Policy 36(7):949–963CrossRef

Feser EJ (2004) Industry clusters and economic development: a learning resource. http://works.bepress.com/edwardfeser/30. Accessed 21 August 2013

Eisinger P (1990) Do the American states do industrial policy? Br J Polit Sci 20(4):509–535CrossRef

Eliasson G (2010) Advanced public procurement as industrial policy. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef

Erichsen E (1978) Economic planning and policies in Norway Challenge, Vol. 20, No. 6 (January/February 1978), pp 5–13

Estrin S, Holmes P (1983a) French planning and industrial policy. J Public Policy 3(1):131–148CrossRef

Estrin S, Holmes P (1990) Indicative planning in developed economies. J Comp Econ 14(4):531–554CrossRef

Frémont A (1993) Regional planning in France: theory and practice. Espacegéographique 1(1):33–46

Galbraith JK, Wallich H, Ulmer MJ, Weidenbaum ML (1976) The case for and against national economic planning. Challenge 19(1):30–38

Georghiou L, Edler J, Uyarra E, Yeow J (2014) Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: choice, design and assessment. Technol Forecas Soc Chang 86:1–12

Gerschenkron A (1962) Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Government of the District of Columbia (2013) The five-year economic development strategy for the district of Columbia. Washington DC

Hamilton A (1791) Report on Manufactures

Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530

Hampton W (1971) Democratic planning. Parliam Aff 24(4):338–346

Hefner F (2009) Cluster theory: a new prescription for old style government planning? In: Calcagno PT, Hall JC, Sobel RS (eds) Unleashing capitalism: a prescription for economic prosperity in South Carolina. Columbia, pp 109–128

Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R (2008) Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases. Pearson Education, Harlow

Johnson C (1982) MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy: 1925–1975. Stanford University Press, Stanford

Johnson C (1999) The developmental state: Odyssey of a concept. In: Woo-Cumings M (ed) The developmental state. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 32–60

Katzenstein PJ (1985) Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

Kindleberger CP (1967) French planning. In Millikan MF (ed) National Economic Planning, Columbia University Press, New York, pp 279–303

Klosterman RE (1985) Arguments for and against planning. Town Plan Rev 56(1):5

Kirzner IM (1984) Economic planning and the knowledge problem. Cato J 4:407

Komiya R (1975) Economic planning in Japan. Challenge 18(2):9–20

Lange O (1949) The practice of economic planning and the optimum allocation of resources. Econom: J Econ Soc 17 166–171

Lavoie D (1985) National economic planning: what is left? Cato Institute, Washington, DC

Leontief W (1976) National economic planning: methods and problems. Challenge 19(3):6–11

Lindbeck A (1973) Swedish economic policy. University of California Press, Berkeley

Lopes C (2013) 50 years of development planning in Africa: Retrospect and Prospects, Welcome and Opening Statement by Mr. Carlos Lopes, UN Under-Secretary General of the United Nations, Executive Secretary of the UNECA, Dakar Senegal

Malinvaud E (1992) The future of economic planning. Indian Econ Rev 27:15–24

McArthur JH, Scott BR (1969) Industrial planning in France. Int Exec 11(4):9–11CrossRef

Masse P (1962) French methods of planning. J Ind Econ 11(1):1–17CrossRef

Masse P (1965) The French plan and economic theory. Econom: J Econom Soc 33:265–276CrossRef

Meade JE (1970) The theory of indicative planning: lectures given in the University of Manchester. Manchester University Press, Manchester

Millikan MF (1967) National economic planning: a conference of the Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, National Bureau of Economic Rese, New York

Mises L (1949) Human action. Yale University Press, New Haven

Moore T (1978) Why allow planners to do what they do? Justif Econ Theory, J Am Inst Plan 44(4):387–398CrossRef

Perroux F, Tinbergen J, Rueff J, Domar ED, Lundberg EF, Kalecki M, Dalal K (1949) The practice of economic planning and the optimum allocation of resources: discussion. Econom: J Econom Soc 17:172–178

Quinn JB, Mintzberg H, James RM (1988) The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

Porter ME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ Dev Q 14(1):15–34CrossRef

Reich RB (1983) The next American frontier: a provocative program for economic renewal. Times Books, New York

Roeland TJ, Den Hertog P (1999) Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy making in OECD countries: an introduction to the theme. Boosting innovation: the cluster approach, OECD Publications Service, Paris, 9–23

Rothwell R (1984) Technology-based small firms and regional innovation potential: the role of public procurement. J Public Policy 4(04):307–332CrossRef

Sternberg E (1993) Justifying public intervention without market externalities: Karl Polanyi’s theory of planning in capitalism. Public Adm Rev 53:100–109

Stimson RJ, Stough RR, Roberts BH (2006) Regional economic development analysis and planning strategy. Springer, Berlin

Tinbergen J (1956) Economic policy: principles and design. North Holland, Amsterdam

USA Government (1918) Records of the War Finance Corporation. Record 154.1 (1918–1939)

Wellisz S (1960) Economic planning in the Netherlands, France, and Italy. J Polit Economy 68(3):252–283CrossRef

Wickham S (1963) French planning: retrospect and prospect. Rev Econ Stat 45(4):335–347CrossRef

Wolf C, Jr (1962) Economic planning in Korea. Asian Surv 10:22–28

Yülek MA (2013) “Development based public procurement: a survey of policy experience and literature” (in Turkish). Paper presented at the Third Industrial Council Meeting, Ankara

Yülek MA, Taylor TK (eds) (2012) Designing public procurement policy in developing countries: how to foster technology transfer and industrialization in the global economy. Springer, New YorkCrossRef

Titel: Revisiting National Economic Planning and Industrial Policy: Concepts, Experiences and the Ecosystem
verfasst von: Murat Yülek
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Economic Planning and Industrial Policy in the Globalizing Economy
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06473-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-06474-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06474-1_1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner