nach oben

Empirical Economics

Erschienen in:

18.01.2023

Risk-sharing within Brazil and South America

verfasst von: Eduardo Silva, Alex Ferreira

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Our findings suggest that risk-sharing is 24.6% higher within Brazilian federal states than between a sample of South American countries. This “border effect” occurs irrespective of the geographical distance between regions which, in turn, decreases risk-sharing (by 2.3% per thousand kilometers). We report that the variance of state disposable income is between 73.1 and 78.5% lower than the variance of gross state product in Brazil. Our results show that fiscal federalism promotes risk-sharing by reducing the volatility of disposable income. The tax-transfers system is progressive as income persistently flows from rich to poorer Brazilian states. We conclude that the benefits from increasing international integration within South America will be higher than in the intranational case.

Vorheriger Artikel The economic impact of the first wave of the pandemic on 50+ Europeans

Nächster Artikel Simultaneous identification of fiscal and monetary policy shocks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

More recently, Oliveira and Carrasco-Gutierrez (2016) find that a fraction between 48 and 54% of consumers follow a rule of thumb in Brazil.

Deviations from the law of one price are less prevalent within country borders (Rogoff 1996 and Engel and Rogers 1996).

This finding is not far from other results. Cont et al. (2017) show that the federal government is responsible for reducing 10% of income volatility in Argentina. Feld et al. (2020) find that the fiscal system reduces the effects of idiosyncratic shocks by 10% in Switzerland. Andersson (2008) finds coefficients ranging from 18% and 27% in Sweden, depending on the region. Petraglia et al. (2018) find coefficients that range from 4 to 15% in Italy, depending on the method and the subsample of the data used.

See Hess and van Wincoop (2000), especially part I, van Wincoop (1995), Crucini (1999) and Athanasoulis and Wincoop (2001).

Fafchamps and Gubert (2007) finds evidence, in a household-level study for the Philippines, that geographical proximity is a major determinant of risk-sharing networks.

As mentioned, non-optimizer agents could be related to Campbell and Mankiw’s 1989 “rule of thumb” consumers, as they may face market frictions or subsistence restrictions, for example, and consume out of their current income only.

The databases and R scripts for this paper tests and estimations are available with the authors upon request.

We have also performed Wu–Hausman tests in order to check for the consistency of the IV estimator. The results of these tests suggest that the OLS estimator is preferable to the IV one for both the regional and international levels.

Those values refer to the disaggregated effects, given by \(\beta _{TR} \frac{TR_{j}}{Y_{j}}\) (Transfers) and \(-\beta _{TX} \frac{TX_{j}}{Y_{j}}\) (Taxes)

Andersson L (2008) Fiscal flows and financial markets: to what extent do they provide risk sharing within Sweden? Reg Stud 42(7):1003–1011CrossRef

Arrow KJ (1973) The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing. In Readings in Welfare Economics, pp. 258–263. Springer

Asdrubali P, Kim S (2008) Incomplete intertemporal consumption smoothing and incomplete risk sharing. J Money, Credit, Bank 40(7):1521–1531CrossRef

Asdrubali P, Sørensen BE, Yosha O (1996) Channels of interstate risk sharing: United States 1963–1990. Q J Econ 111(4):1081–1110CrossRef

Athanasoulis SG, Ev Wincoop (2001) Risk sharing within the United States: what do financial markets and fiscal federalism accomplish? Rev Econ Statis 83(4):688–698CrossRef

Backus DK, Kehoe PJ, Kydland FE (1992) International real business cycles. J Polit Econ 100(4):745–775CrossRef

Backus DK, Smith GW (1993) Consumption and real exchange rates in dynamic economies with non-traded goods. J Int Econ 35(3):297–316CrossRef

Balli F, Balli HO (2011) Income and consumption smoothing and welfare gains across Pacific Island countries: the role of remittances and foreign aid. Econ Model 28(4):1642–1649CrossRef

Balli F, Balli HO (2013) On the empirics of risk-sharing across MENA countries. Appl Econ 45(23):3370–3377CrossRef

Balli F, Basher SA, Louis RJ (2012) Channels of risk-sharing among Canadian provinces: 1961–2006. Empirical Economics 43(2):763–787CrossRef

Campbell JY, Mankiw NG (1989) Consumption, income, and interest rates: reinterpreting the time series evidence. Working Paper 2924, National Bureau of Economic Research

Chan KS, Lai JT, Yan IK (2014) Consumption risk sharing and self-insurance across provinces in China: 1952–2008. China Econ Rev 30:66–85CrossRef

Cochrane JH (1991) A simple test of consumption insurance. J Polit Econ 99(5):957–976CrossRef

Cont W, Porto A, Juarros P (2017) Regional income redistribution and risk-sharing: lessons from Argentina. J Appl Econ 20(2):241–269CrossRef

Crucini MJ (1999) On international and national dimensions of risk sharing. Rev Econ Stat 81(1):73–84CrossRef

Debreu G (1959) Theory of value: an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Yale University Press, Cowles Foundation

Decressin J (2002) Regional income redistribution and risk sharing: how does Italy compare in Europe? J Public Econ 86(2):287–306CrossRef

Devereux MB, Hnatkovska VV (2020) Borders and nominal exchange rates in risk-sharing. J Eur Econ Assoc 18(3):1238–1283CrossRef

Du J, He Q, Rui OM (2011) Channels of interprovincial risk sharing in China. J Comp Econ 39(3):383–405CrossRef

Engel C, Rogers J (1996) How wide is the border? Am Econ Rev 86(5):1112–25

Fafchamps M, Gubert F (2007) Risk sharing and network formation. Am Econ Rev 97(2):75–79CrossRef

Feld LP, Schaltegger CA, Studerus J (2020) Risk sharing, regional stabilization, and redistribution: the role of fiscal mechanisms in Switzerland. Oxf Econ Pap 73(2):601–622CrossRef

Fidrmuc J, Degler M (2021) Temporal and spatial dependence of interregional risk sharing: evidence from Russia. Macroecon Dyn 25(1):178–200CrossRef

Flavin MA (1981) The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. J Polit Econ 89(5):974–1009CrossRef

Hess GD, van Wincoop E (eds) (2000) Intranational Macroeconomics. Cambridge University Press, UK

Hevia C, Servén L (2018) Assessing the degree of international consumption risk sharing. J Dev Econ 134:176–190CrossRef

Kim D, Sheen J (2007) Consumption risk-sharing within Australia and with New Zealand. Economic Record 83(260):46–59CrossRef

Kim S, Kim SH, Wang Y (2006) Financial integration and consumption risk sharing in East Asia. Jpn World Econ 18(2):143–157CrossRef

Ko J (2020) Intranational consumption risk sharing in South Korea: 2000–2016. Asian Econ J 34(1):29–49CrossRef

Mace BJ (1991) Full insurance in the presence of aggregate uncertainty. J Polit Econ 99(5):928–956CrossRef

Martin V, Hurn S, Harris D (2013) Econometric modelling with time series: specification, estimation and testing. Cambridge University Press, USA

Mélitz J, Zumer F (1999) Interregional and international risk-sharing and lessons for EMU. In Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol 51, pp. 149–188. Elsevier

Mundell RA (1961) A theory of optimum currency areas. Am Econ Rev 51(4):657–665

Obstfeld M, Rogoff K (2000) The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: is there a common cause? NBER Macroecon Annu 15:339–390CrossRef

Oliveira LHH, Carrasco-Gutierrez CE (2016) The dynamics of the Brazilian current account with rule of thumb consumers. Economia Aplicada 20(2):287–309CrossRef

Petraglia C, Pierucci E, Scalera D (2018) Redistribution and risk sharing in Italy: learning from the past. Reg Stud 52(2):285–297CrossRef

Postali F, Rocha F (2003) Federalismo fiscal enquanto esquema de seguro regional: uma avaliação do caso brasileiro. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea)

Rana F, Balli F (2016) Would Australia-New Zealand be a viable currency union? evidence from interstate risk-sharing performances. Contemp Econ Policy 34(3):531–552CrossRef

Rogoff K (1996) The purchasing power parity puzzle. J Econ Liter 34(2):647–668

Sala-i Martin X, Sachs J (1991) Fiscal federalism and optimum currency areas: evidence for Europe from the United States. Working Paper 3855, National Bureau of Economic Research

Shea J (1995) Union contracts and the life-cycle/permanent-income hypothesis. Am Econ Rev 85(1):186–200

Sørensen BE, Wu Y-T, Yosha O, Zhu Y (2007) Home bias and international risk sharing: twin puzzles separated at birth. J Int Money Financ 26(4):587–605CrossRef

van Wincoop E (1995) Regional risksharing. Eur Econ Rev 39(8):1545–1567CrossRef

Xu X (2008) Consumption risk-sharing in China. Economica 75(298):326–341CrossRef

Titel: Risk-sharing within Brazil and South America
verfasst von: Eduardo Silva
Alex Ferreira
Publikationsdatum: 18.01.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02350-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

A stochastic dominance analysis of conventional and clean energy stocks during different oil market conditions

The economic impact of the first wave of the pandemic on 50+ Europeans

Forecasting unemployment with Google Trends: age, gender and digital divide

On the causality between household and government spending on education: evidence from a panel of 40 countries

Forecasting GDP with many predictors in a small open economy: forecast or information pooling?

A tale of two recession-derivative indicators

Premium Partner