nach oben

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Erschienen in:

01.01.2022 | Original article

Robust decision outcomes with induced correlations in climatic and economic parameters

verfasst von: Julia Reis, Julie Shortridge

Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Robust decision making, a growing approach to infrastructure planning under climate change uncertainty, aims to evaluate infrastructure performance across a wide range of possible conditions and identify the most robust strategies and designs. Robust decision making seeks to find potential weaknesses in systems in order to gird these through a combination of policy, infrastructure, and, in some cases, resilient or recovery strategies. A system can be explored by simulating many combinations of uncertain climatic and economic parameters; statistical clustering can identify parameter thresholds that lead to unacceptable performance. Often, however, uncertain variables are correlated, complicating the robustness analysis and casting doubt upon the thresholds identified. Here, we evaluate the impact of ordinary, hidden correlations in uncertainty parameters that drive simulation in robust decision making. We induced correlations between temperature and key climatic and economic parameters. We tested correlations of 0%, 30%, 60%, and 90% between temperature and the absolute value of precipitation, coefficient of variation, and downward surface solar radiation, and negative correlations between temperature and net variable benefit and the discount rate. We used a calibrated simulation model of a dam system regulating Lake Tana, Ethiopia, to compute the agricultural supply and net present value of the reservoirs. As the correlation strength increased, the results converged in a smaller region. We found that strong correlations depressed robustness scores of lower-performing alternatives and conversely increased results of the higher-performing alternatives. As the correlations increased in favorable alternatives, the failure thresholds became more extreme, speciously suggesting that only intense changes would result in poor performance. This overall analysis highlights the degree to which correlations of an interconnected climatic and economic system can impact outcomes of robust decision making and suggests methods to avoid confounding results.

Vorheriger Artikel EU’s bioethanol potential from wheat straw and maize stover and the environmental footprint of residue-based bioethanol

Nächster Artikel Do rice varieties matter? Climate change adaptation and livelihood diversification among rural smallholder households in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Acres International. (1995). Birr and Koga irrigation project: Koga irrigation project feasibility study. Ethiopian Ministry of Water Resources.

Alemayehu T, McCartney M, Kebede S (2010) The water resource implications of planned development in the Lake Tana catchment. Ethiopia Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 10(2–4):211–221. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10104-011-0023-6CrossRef

Alexander LV, Zhang X, Peterson TC, Caesar J, Gleason B, Klein Tank AMG, Vazquez-Aguirre JL (2006) Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. J Geophys Res 111(D5):D05109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006290CrossRef

Bartholomew E, Kwakkel JH (2020) On considering robustness in the search phase of robust decision making: a comparison of many-objective robust decision making, multi-scenario many-objective robust decision making, and many objective robust optimization. Environmental Modelling & Software 127:104699CrossRef

BCEOM. (1999). Abbay River basin master plan project - phase 3 - main report.

Brown, C., Ghile, Y., Laverty, M., & Li, K. (2012). Decision scaling: linking bottom-up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector. Water Resources Research, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011212

Bryant, B. P. (2014). Sdtoolkit: scenario discovery tools to support robust decision making.

Bryant BP, Lempert RJ (2010) Thinking inside the box: a participatory, computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(1):34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.002CrossRef

Dalal S, Han B, Lempert RJ, Jaycocks A, Hackbarth A (2013) Improving scenario discovery using orthogonal rotations. Environ Model Softw 48:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.013CrossRef

Donat MG, Alexander LV, Yang H, Durre I, Vose R, Dunn RJH, Kitching S (2013) Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: the HadEX2 dataset. J Geophys Res: Atmospheres 118(5):2098–2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50150CrossRef

Drouet L, Bosetti V, Tavoni M (2015) Selection of climate policies under the uncertainties in the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Nat Clim Chang 5(10):937–940CrossRef

Easterling DR, Evans JL, Groisman PY, Karl TR, Kunkel KE, Ambenje P (2000) Observed variability and trends in extreme climate events: a brief review *. Bull Am Meteor Soc 81(3):417–425. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081%3c0417:OVATIE%3e2.3.CO;2CrossRef

Fasullo JT, Otto-Bliesner BL, Stevenson S (2018) ENSO’s changing influence on temperature, precipitation, and wildfire in a warming climate. Geophys Res Lett 45(17):9216–9225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079022CrossRef

Fischbach J, Lempert RJ, Molina-Perez E, Tariq A, Finucane M, Hoss F (2015) Managing water quality in the face of uncertainty: a robust decision making demonstration for EPA’s National Water Program. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR720CrossRef

Giuliani M, Castelletti A (2016) Is robustness really robust? How different definitions of robustness impact decision-making under climate change. Clim Change 135(3–4):409–424CrossRef

Gleick PH (1986) Methods for evaluating the regional hydrologic impacts of global climatic changes. J Hydrol 88(1–2):97–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(86)90199-XCrossRef

Gold MR (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press

Groves DG, Lempert RJ (2007) A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 17(1):73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.006CrossRef

Gudmundsson L, Bremnes JB, Haugen JE, Engen-Skaugen T (2012) Technical note: downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations & a comparison of methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(9):3383–3390. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012CrossRef

Hadka D, Herman J, Reed P, Keller K (2015) An open source framework for many-objective robust decision making. Environ Model Softw 74:114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.014CrossRef

Hallegatte, S., Shah, A., Lempert, R. J., Brown, C., & Gill, S. (2012). Investment decision making under deep uncertainty -- application to climate change.

Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations - the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol 34(3):623–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711CrossRef

Hassanzadeh E, Elshorbagy A, Wheater H, Gober P (2016) A risk-based framework for water resource management under changing water availability, policy options, and irrigation expansion. Adv Water Resour 94:291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.05.018CrossRef

Herman JD, Zeff HB, Reed PM, Characklis GW (2014) Beyond optimality: multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty. Water Resour Res 50(10):7692–7713. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015338CrossRef

Herman JD, Reed PM, Zeff HB, Characklis GW (2015) How should robustness be defined for water systems planning under change? J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(10):04015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000509CrossRef

Huber I, Bugliaro L, Ponater M, Garny H, Emde C, Mayer B (2016) Do climate models project changes in solar resources? Sol Energy 129:65–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.016CrossRef

Islam T, Pruyt E (2016) Scenario generation using adaptive sampling: the case of resource scarcity. Environ Model Softw 79:285–299CrossRef

Kalra, N. R., Groves, D. G., Bonzanigo, L., Molina Perez, E., Ramos, C., Brandon, C. J., & Rodriguez Cabanillas, I. (2015). Robust decision-making in the water sector: a strategy for implementing Lima’s long-term water resources master plan.

Kasprzyk JR, Nataraj S, Reed PM, Lempert RJ (2013) Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change. Environ Model Softw 42:55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.007CrossRef

Kasprzyk JR, Reed PM, Hadka D (2016) Battling Arrow’s paradox to discover robust water management alternatives. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(2):04015053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000572CrossRef

Kebede S, Travi Y, Alemayehu T, Marc V (2006) Water balance of Lake Tana and its sensitivity to fluctuations in rainfall, Blue Nile basin. Ethiopia J Hydrol 316(1–4):233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.011CrossRef

Kendon EJ, Roberts NM, Fowler HJ, Roberts MJ, Chan SC, Senior CA (2014) Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model. Nat Clim Chang 4(7):570–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2258CrossRef

Kunsch HR (1989) The Jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann Stat 17(3):1217–1241. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347265CrossRef

Kwakkel JH, Haasnoot M, Walker WE (2015) Developing dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a computer-assisted approach for developing adaptive strategies for a deeply uncertain world. Clim Change 132(3):373–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1210-4CrossRef

Kwakkel, J. H., Eker, S., & Pruyt, E. (2016). How robust is a robust policy? Comparing alternative robustness metrics for robust decision-making. In Robustness analysis in decision aiding, optimization, and analytics (pp. 221–237). Springer, Cham.

Kwakkel JH, Haasnoot M, Walker WE (2016b) Comparing robust decision-making and dynamic adaptive policy pathways for model-based decision support under deep uncertainty. Environ Model Softw 86:168–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017CrossRef

Lempert, R. J. (2019). Robust decision making (RDM). In Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (pp. 23–51). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05252-2_2

Lempert RJ, Groves DG, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2006) A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manage Sci 52(4):514–528. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0472CrossRef

Lempert RJ, Groves DG (2010) Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(6):960–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.007CrossRef

Liepert BG (2002) Observed reductions of surface solar radiation at sites in the United States and worldwide from 1961 to 1990. Geophys Res Lett 29(10):61–1–61–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL014910CrossRef

Liu S, Ding Y, Shangguan D, Zhang Y, Li J, Han H, Xie C (2006) Glacier retreat as a result of climate warming and increased precipitation in the Tarim river basin, northwest China. Ann Glaciol 43:91–96. https://doi.org/10.3189/172756406781812168CrossRef

Marchau, V. A., Walker, W. E., Bloemen, P. J., & Popper, S. W. (2019). Decision making under deep uncertainty: from theory to practice. Springer Nature.

Mariotti A, Pan Y, Zeng N, Alessandri A (2015) Long-term climate change in the Mediterranean region in the midst of decadal variability. Clim Dyn 44(5–6):1437–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2487-3CrossRef

McPhail C, Maier HR, Kwakkel JH, Giuliani M, Castelletti A, Westra S (2018) Robustness metrics: how are they calculated, when should they be used and why do they give different results? Earth’s Future 6(2):169–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000649CrossRef

McPhail C, Maier HR, Westra S, Kwakkel JH, van der Linden L (2020) Impact of scenario selection on robustness. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026515CrossRef

Mo KC (2010) Interdecadal modulation of the impact of ENSO on precipitation and temperature over the United States. J Clim 23(13):3639–3656. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3553.1CrossRef

Moody P, Brown C (2013) Robustness indicators for evaluation under climate change: application to the upper Great Lakes. Water Resour Res 49(6):3576–3588. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20228CrossRef

NASA. (2015). NASA earth exchange global daily downscaled projections (NEX-GDPP) technical note.

Nassopoulos H, Dumas P, Hallegatte S (2012) Adaptation to an uncertain climate change: cost benefit analysis and robust decision making for dam dimensioning. Clim Change 114(3–4):497–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0423-7CrossRef

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., … Duchesnay, É. (2012). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python.

Peng S, Huang J, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Zhong X, Cassman KG (2004) Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101(27):9971–9975. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403720101CrossRef

Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, hare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond. Series A, Math Phys Sci 193(1032):120–45. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPA.1948.0037CrossRef

Quinn, J. D., Hadjimichael, A., Reed, P. M., & Steinscheinder, S. (2020). Can exploratory modeling of water scarcity vulnerabilities and robustness be scenario neutral? Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001650

Rambaud SC, Torrecillas MJM (2005) Some considerations on the social discount rate. Environ Sci Policy 8(4):343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2005.04.003CrossRef

Reis, J., Lacombe, G., Hoanh, C. T., McCartney, M., Douangsavanh, S., Metzger, L., … Sellamuttu, S. S. (2011). Adjusting hydropower dam operation to compliment livelihood strategies in the Lower Mekong Basin. In The 3rd International Forum on Water and Food. Tshwane, South Africa: Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF).

Reis J, Culver TB, Lacombe G, Sellamuttu SS (2015) Reservoir operation for recession agriculture in mekong basin, Laos. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(7). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000485

Reis J, Shortridge JE (2020) Impact of uncertainty parameter distribution on robust decision making outcomes for climate change adaptation under deep uncertainty. Risk Anal 40(3):494–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13405CrossRef

Rosenzweig C, Tubiello FN, Goldberg R, Mills E, Bloomfield J (2002) Increased crop damage in the US from excess precipitation under climate change. Glob Environ Chang 12(3):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00008-0CrossRef

Sanchez-Lorenzo A, Enriquez-Alonso A, Wild M, Trentmann J, Vicente-Serrano SM, Sanchez-Romero A, Hakuba MZ (2017) Trends in downward surface solar radiation from satellites and ground observations over Europe during 1983–2010. Remote Sens Environ 189:108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSE.2016.11.018CrossRef

Schlenker W, Roberts MJ (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(37):15594–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906865106CrossRef

Schwalm, C. R., Glendon, S., & Duffy, P. B. (2020). RCP8.5 tracks cumulative CO₂ emissions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(33), 19656–19657. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007117117

Hausfather Z, Peters GP (2020) Emissions - the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature 577:618–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3CrossRef

Shortridge JE (2019) Observed trends in daily rainfall variability result in more severe climate change impacts to agriculture. Clim Change 157(3):429–444CrossRef

Shortridge JE, Guikema SD (2016) Scenario discovery with multiple criteria: an evaluation of the robust decision-making framework for climate change adaptation. Risk Anal 36(12):2298–2312. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12582CrossRef

Shortridge JE, Guikema SD, Zaitchik BF (2017) Robust decision making in data scarce contexts: addressing data and model limitations for infrastructure planning under transient climate change. Clim Change 140(2):323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1845-4CrossRef

Shortridge JE, Zaitchik BF (2018) Characterizing climate change risks by linking robust decision frameworks and uncertain probabilistic projections. Clim Change 151(3–4):525–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2324-xCrossRef

Shortridge JE, Guikema SD, Zaitchik BF (2016) Machine learning methods for empirical streamflow simulation: a comparison of model accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty in seasonal watersheds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(7):2611–2628. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2611-2016CrossRef

SMEC (2008). Hydrological study of the Tana-Beles sub-basins, main report. Addis Ababa.

Tahal Group. (2009). Irrigation and Drainage Projects in Lake Tana Sub-Basin. Addis Ababa.

Tingstad AH, Groves D, Lempert RJ (2014) Paleoclimate scenarios to inform decision making in water resources management: example from Southern California’s Inland Empire. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(10):04014025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000403CrossRef

Trenberth KE, Cheng L, Jacobs P, Zhang Y, Fasullo J (2018) Hurricane Harvey links to ocean heat content and climate change adaptation. Earth’s Future 6(5):730–744. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000825CrossRef

Wasko C, Sharma A (2017) Global assessment of flood and storm extremes with increased temperatures. Sci Rep 7(1):7945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08481-1CrossRef

WEAP. (2017). Water evaluation and planning tool. Stockholm Environment Institute.

Weaver CP, Lempert RJ, Brown C, Hall JA, Revell D, Sarewitz D (2013) Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 4(1):39–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.202CrossRef

Wild M, Folini D, Henschel F, Fischer N, Müller B (2015) Projections of long-term changes in solar radiation based on CMIP5 climate models and their influence on energy yields of photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy 116:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2015.03.039CrossRef

Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey D, Huber-Lee A (2005) WEAP21—a demand-, priority-, and preference-driven water planning model. Water Int 30(4):487–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060508691893CrossRef

Yuan Y, Li Z, Huang B (2016) Robust optimization under correlated uncertainty: formulations and computational study. Comput Chem Eng 85:58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.10.017CrossRef

Titel: Robust decision outcomes with induced correlations in climatic and economic parameters
verfasst von: Julia Reis
Julie Shortridge
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09970-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Do rice varieties matter? Climate change adaptation and livelihood diversification among rural smallholder households in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam

A comparison of flood-protective decision-making between German households and businesses

Implications of spatial priority areas for hydrological ecosystem services through coupling hydrology model and Zonation model under different economic costs of water utilizations in northernmost of Japan

Can remittances contribute to financing climate actions in developing countries? Evidence from analyses of households’ climate hazard exposure and adaptation actors in SE Nigeria

Surviving the jungle of soil organic carbon certification standards: an analytic and critical review

The economic impact of a deep decarbonisation pathway for China: a hybrid model analysis through bottom-up and top-down linking