nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Secrecy of Telecommunications as a Sui Generis Limitation for Data Circumvention in Russia’s Digital Economy: Statement of Problem and Directions for Development

verfasst von : Vladislav Arkhipov, Ruzanna Akhobekova, Roman Amelin, Sergey Channov, Victor Naumov

Erschienen in: Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper provides a legal overview of the Russian secrecy regulations in one of the areas, namely communication secrecy, taken as a representative example to which big data technologies may be especially relevant if applied to analysis of masses of information that is sensitive, but at the same time very promising if processed by the big data instruments. The main legal challenge for processing of this information on a large scale is not only personal data laws, but also very special secrecy regimes of their kind. The authors analyze the applicable rules, heavily focus on detailed analysis of the voluminous case law, and provide argument for the directions of development of legislation that may enable more infusion of “open” big data technologies into these areas. The directions are focused around re-defining of legal concepts in this area, providing formal certainty of the definition of personal data and explicit recognition of anonymization techniques employing removal of “linking codes”. The authors use formal legal method and discuss the topic from the domestic legal perspective; hence, it may be useful, inter alia, for comparative legal research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Approaches to Analysis of Factors Affecting the Residential Real Estate Bid Prices in Case of Open Data Use

Nächstes Kapitel Social Media Sentiment Analysis with Context Space Model

Timoshina, E.: Theory and sociology of law of L.I. Petrazycki in the context of classical and postclassical legal understanding. Dissertation for seeking of the degree of Doctor of Legal Sciences. Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (2013). (in Russian)

Arkhipov, V., Akhobekova R., Naumov V., et al.: Determination of the scope of data comprising bank secrets, telecommunication secrets, medical secrets, commercial secrets and other kinds of secrets and procedure of their transfer to third parties. Skolkovo Foundation, Moscow (2018). http://sk.ru/foundation/legal/m/sklegal03/22588/download.aspx. Accessed 2019 July 24. (in Russian)

Van Hoecke, M.: Methodology of comparative legal research. Law Method, 1–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000010. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Hague

Jones, M.: It’s about time: privacy, information lifecycles, and the right to be forgotten. Stanford Technol. Law Rev. 16, 101–154 (2012)

Reidenberg, J.: The data surveillance state in the US and Europe. Fordham law legal studies research paper no. 2349269 (2013). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2349269. Accessed 2019 July 24

Obar, J., Clement, A.: Internet surveillance and boomerang rooting: a call for Canadian network sovereignty. In: TEM 2013: Proceedings of the Technology & Emerging Media Track – Annual Conference of the Canadian Communication Association, pp. 1–10, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2311792. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2311792. Accessed 2019 July 24

Bhatia, G.: State surveillance and the right to privacy in India: a constitutional biography. National Law School India Rev. 26(2), 127–158 (2014)

Leenes, R., Koops, B.-J.: ‘Code’ and privacy – or how technology is slowly eroding privacy. Michigan Telecommun. Technol. Law Rev. 12(1), 115–188 (2005)

Solove, D., Schwartz, P.: Information Privacy Law, 6th edn. Wolters Kluwer, New York (2018)

10.

Bygrave, L.: Data Privacy Law: An International Perspective, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)CrossRef

11.

Warren, S., Brandeis, L.: The right to privacy. Harvard Law Rev. (5), 193–220 (1890)CrossRef

12.

Rodotà, S.: Data protection as a fundamental right. In: Gutwirth, S., Poullet, Y., De Hert, P., de Terwangne, C., Nouwt, S. (eds.) Reinventing Data Protection?, pp. 77–82. Springer, Dordrecht (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9498-9_3CrossRef

13.

Dmitrik, N.: Limits of legal regulation in digital age. Inf. Soc. (3), 47–58 (2018). (in Russian)

14.

Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B.: A right to reasonable inferences: re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI. Columbia Bus. Law Rev. (2), 494–620 (2019)

15.

Stalla-Bourdillon, S., Knight, A.: Anonymous data v. personal data – a false debate: an EU perspective on anonymization, pseudonymization and personal data. Wisconsin Int. Law J. 34(2), 284–322 (2017)

16.

Pleshanov, A., Fetisov A.: The role of principles of legality and fairness in ensuring the implementation of the right to privacy of communication: material and procedural legal aspects. Arbitr. Civil Process (12), 58–60 (2018). (in Russian)

17.

Ismailov, C.: Operative investigation events that limit constitutional rights to secrecy of correspondence when searching for missing people: problems of implementation and ways for improvement. Russian Investigator (20), 40–44 (2016). (in Russian)

18.

Savelyev, A.: Problems of the application of personal data legislation in the era of big data. Law J. High. School Econ. (1), 54–61 (2015). (in Russian)

19.

Savelyev, A.: Directions of regulation of big data and protecting privacy in new economic realities. Law (5), 122–144 (2018). (in Russian)

20.

Savelyev, A.: Towards the concept of data regulation in the digital economy. Law (4), 174–195 (2019). (in Russian)

21.

Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 28 July 2017 No. 1631-p “On Approval of the Program ‘Digital Economy of the Russian Federation’” (lost its effect), “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

22.

Passport of the National Program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation”, approved by the Presidium of the Council of the President of the Russian Federation on Strategic Development and National Projects, Protocol of 24 December 2018, No. 16, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

23.

Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 9 May 2017 No. 203 “On the Strategy of Development of Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030”, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

24.

Tereshchenko, L.: State control in the area of personal data protection. Law J. High. School Econ. (4), 142–161 (2018). (in Russian)

25.

Sergeev, A., Tereshchenko, L.: Big data: in the search of place in the system of civil law. Law (11), 106–123 (2018). (in Russian)

26.

IDC forecasts revenues for big data and business analytics solutions will reach $189.1 billion this year with double-digit annual growth through 2022, 4 April 2019. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS44998419. Accessed 2019 July 24

27.

The Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12, 1993, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

28.

The Federal Law of July 7, 2003 No. 126-FZ “On Communications”, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

29.

The Federal Law of July 17, 1999 No. 176-FZ “On Postal Communications”, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

30.

The Russian Federation Constitutional Court Judgment No. 25-P of October 26, 2017, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

31.

The Russian Federation Constitutional Court Ruling No. 345-O of October 2, 2003, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

32.

Tereshchenko, L.: Certain issues arising in court practice when applying communication secrecy rules. In: Yaroshenko, K.B. (ed.) Case Law Commentary, pp. 145–153. INFRA-M, Moscow (2016)

33.

The Russian Federation Constitutional Court Ruling No. 525-O-O of October 21, 2008 “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

34.

The Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeals Judgment of August 6, 2014 in case No. A40-57559/14, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

35.

The Federal Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit Judgment of March 12, 2014 in case No. A40-56142/13-130-551, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

36.

The Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeals Judgment of November 28, 2014 in case No. A40-113991/13, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

37.

The Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeals Judgment of May 5, 2014 in case No. A40-153867/13, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

38.

The Moscow Arbitrazh Court Decision of May 19, 2014 in case No. A40-28184/14, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

39.

The Russian Federation Supreme Court Plenum Judgment No. 19 of June 1, 2017, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

40.

The Federal Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit Judgment of January 15, 2014 in case No. A40-56844/13-149-539, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

41.

The Kurgan Oblast Court Judgment of August 15, 2015, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

42.

The Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeals Judgment of October 12, 2016 in case No. A70-5136/2016, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

43.

The Federal Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit Judgment in case no. A40-56844/13-149-539 of January 15, 2015, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

44.

The Russian Federation Supreme Court Judgment No. 82-AD16-5 of October 11, 2016, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

45.

The Kurgan Oblast Court Judgment No. 4A-178/2015 of August 10, 2015, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

46.

The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences of December 30, 2001 No. 195-FZ, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

47.

The Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeals Judgment in case No. A40-14902/16, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

48.

The Russian Federation Supreme Court Plenum Judgment No. 8 of October 31, 1995, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

49.

The Russian Federation Criminal Procedure Code of December 18, 2001 No. 174-FZ, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

50.

The Federal Law of August 12, 1995 No. 144-FZ “On Intelligence and Surveillance Operations”, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

51.

The Federal Law of July 27, 2006 No. 152-FZ “On Personal Data”, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

52.

The Federal Law of July 27, 2006 No. 149-FZ “On Information, Information Technologies and on Protection of Information”, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

53.

The Appellate ruling of Moscow City Court of September 16, 2015 in case No. 33-30344, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

54.

The Russian Federation President’s Decree No. 188 of March 6, 1997 (version of July 13, 2015) “On Approving the List of Information of a Confidential Nature”, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

55.

The Roscomnadzor Order No. 996 “On Approval of the Requirements and Methods for Anonymization of Personal Data” of September 5, 2013, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

56.

The Russian Federation Civil Code (part four) of December 18, 2006 No. 230-FZ, “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

57.

Bachilo, I.: An important step in regulation of information rights of citizens. Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice No. 11 (2006). “ConsultantPlus” legal reference system. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

58.

Abrutyn, S.: Money, love, and sacredness: generalised symbolic media and the production of instrumental, affectual, and moral reality. Czech Sociol. Rev. (3), 445–471 (2015)CrossRef

59.

Arkhipov, V.: Premises of the concept of semantic limits of law in the context of modern informational culture. In: Informational Space: Ensuring Informational Security and Law. Collection of works, pp. 272–287. Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (2018). (in Russian)

60.

Arkhipov, V., Naumov, V.: Pervasive legal problems of the Internet of Things and the limits of law: Russian perspective. In: Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 94–123 (2018)

61.

Polyakova, T.: Information and legal record systems of federal state authorities: experience of creation and problems. Adm. Law Process (10), 23–30 (2015). (in Russian)

62.

Savva Shipov: Deputy head of the Ministry of economic development: the perspective of smart control over business is closer than it seems (2019). http://www.cnews.ru/articles/2019-05-31_savva_shipovzamglavy_minekonomrazvitiya_perspektiva_umnogo. (in Russian). Accessed 2019 July 24

Titel: Secrecy of Telecommunications as a Sui Generis Limitation for Data Circumvention in Russia’s Digital Economy: Statement of Problem and Directions for Development
verfasst von: Vladislav Arkhipov
Ruzanna Akhobekova
Roman Amelin
Sergey Channov
Victor Naumov
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39295-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-39296-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_28

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner