nach oben

Environmental Earth Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.03.2024 | Original Article

Seismic hazard assessment and site-specific response spectrum at bed rock level for Ongole city, India: a deterministic framework

verfasst von: R. Siddhardha, Kiran Rathod, Kalyan Kumar Gonavaram

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 6/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this study, a detailed deterministic seismic hazard analysis of Ongole city, Andhra Pradesh, India, has been conducted. Owing to its historical seismic activity and regional tectonics, a control region with a radius of 500 km around the Ongole collectorate (Latitude 15.4988º N, Longitude 80.0497º E) was selected for identifying seismic sources and development of seismotectonic map. A total of 59 seismic sources were identified, and the maximum magnitude (M_max) for each source was determined by considering regional rupture characteristics and various deterministic methods. Eleven Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs), including those developed for Peninsular India as well as similar tectonic regions elsewhere, were taken into account and the log-likelihood (LLH) method applied to assign weightage factors to each GMPE. The city of Ongole was divided into 180 grid points, each measuring 0.004º × 0.004º (equivalent to 0.4 km × 0.4 km). Spatial variations of rock site Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) maps were plotted for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 considering Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis (DSHA). Based on the findings of the study, it is observed that PGA ranges from 0.148 to 0.173 g for Scenario 1, from 0.188 to 0.220 g for Scenario 2, and from 0.168 to 0.196 g for Scenario 3 with controlling source of Gundlakamma Fault. Additionally, a comparative assessment was carried out between the results of this study, past studies in the literature, and the IS 1893 (Part 1) (Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures, part-I. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, 2016) codal provisions. Finally, the response spectrum has been plotted for the Ongole collectorate, considering all three scenarios. The outcomes of the present study could significantly assist insurance agencies in policy-making and aid builders in designing new structures and retrofitting existing ones.

Vorheriger Artikel Evaluating river pollution in Iran: insights into sedimentary toxic metal levels and algae bioaccumulation

Nächster Artikel Stochastic modeling method and elastic parameter analysis of the irregular columnar jointed rock masses considering the joint characteristics within the cross section

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Anbazhagan P, Vinod JS, Sitharam TG (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore. Nat Hazards 48:145–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9253-3CrossRef

Anbazhagan P, Kumar A, Sitharam TG (2013) Ground motion prediction equation considering combined dataset of recorded and simulated ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 53:92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.06.003CrossRef

Anbazhagan P, Bajaj K, Moustafa SSR, Al-Arifi NSN (2015) Maximum magnitude estimation considering the regional rupture character. J Seismol 19:695–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9488-xCrossRef

Anbazhagan P, Sreenivas M, Ketan B et al (2016) Selection of ground motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis of Peninsular India. J Earthquake Eng 20:699–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1104747CrossRef

Ansari A, Zahoor F, Rao KS, Jain A (2022) Seismic hazard assessment studies based on deterministic and probabilistic approaches for the Jammu region, NW Himalayas. Arab J Geosci 15:1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10330-zCrossRef

Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-Motion prediction equations for eastern North America from a referenced empirical approach: implications for epistemic uncertainty. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:1304–1318. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070199CrossRef

Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:2181–2205. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050245CrossRef

Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2011) Modifications to existing ground-motion prediction equations in light of new data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100270CrossRef

Bajaj K, Anbazhagan P (2019) Regional stochastic ground-motion model for low to moderate seismicity area with variable seismotectonic: application to Peninsular India. Bull Earthq Eng 17:3661–3680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00646-9CrossRef

Baro O, Kumar A (2017) Seismic source characterization for the Shillong Plateau in Northeast India. J Seismol 21:1229–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9664-2CrossRef

Bendick R, Bilham R (1999) Search for buckling of the southwest Indian coast related to Himalayan collision. In: Himalaya and Tibet: Mountain Roots to Mountain Tops. Geological Society of America

Bodin P, Malagnini L, Akinci A (2004) Ground-motion scaling in the Kachchh Basin, India, deduced from aftershocks of the 2001 M w 7.6 Bhuj earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1658–1669CrossRef

Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Scherbaum F et al (2010) On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. Seismol Res Lett 81:783–793CrossRef

Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of Strong Ground Motion Using the Hybrid Empirical Method and Its Use in the Development of Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1012–1033. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020002CrossRef

Chandra U (1977) Earthquakes of peninsular India—a seismotectonic study. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67:1387–1413

Chittem PB, Kunda SK (2017) Constraints analysis of Litopenaeus vannamei culture in Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Res Stud Biosci 5:10–17

Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0580051583CrossRef

Cramer CH (2001) A seismic hazard uncertainty analysis for the New Madrid seismic zone. Eng Geol 62:251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00064-3CrossRef

Cramer CH, Kumar A (2003) 2001 Bhuj, India, earthquake engineering seismoscope recordings and eastern North America ground-motion attenuation relations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1390–1394CrossRef

Das R, Wason HR, Sharma ML (2011) Global regression relations for conversion of surface wave and body wave magnitudes to moment magnitude. Nat Hazards 59:801–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9796-6CrossRef

Decanini L, Mollaioli F, Panza GF, et al (2001) Probabilistic vs deterministic evaluation of seismic hazard and damage earthquake scenarios: a general problem, particularly relevant for seismic isolation. In: Proc. 7th International Post-Smirt Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibration of Structures. pp 2–5

Delavaud E, Scherbaum F, Kuehn N, Riggelsen C (2009) Information-theoretic selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis: an applicability study using Californian data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3248–3263. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090055CrossRef

Dey A, Barari SK, Bhatt BP et al (2012) Livestock production system. In: Bhatt BP, Sikka A, Mukherjee J, Islam A, Dey A (eds) status of agricultural development in eastern India. ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, pp 405–455

Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64:1363–1367. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0640051363CrossRef

Giardini D (1984) Systematic analysis of deep seismicity: 200 centroid-moment tensor solutions for earthquakes between 1977 and 1980. Geophys J Int 77:883–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb02228.xADSCrossRef

GSI (2000) Seismotectonics Atlas of India and its Environs. Geological Survey of India

Gupta ID (2006) Delineation of probable seismic sources in India and neighbourhood by a comprehensive analysis of seismotectonic characteristics of the region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:766–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.007CrossRef

Heaton TH, Tajima F, Mori AW (1986) Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms. Surv Geophys 8:25–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904051ADSCrossRef

Hellmy M, Azida N (2023) Selective visualization techniques for elemental mapping analysis of granite stones by field emission scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy (FESEM-EDXS). Mater Today Proc 75:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.315CrossRef

Hwang H, Huo J-R (1997) Attenuation relations of ground motion for rock and soil sites in eastern United States. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 16:363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00016-XCrossRef

IS 1893 (Part I) (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures, part-I. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

Iyengar RN, Raghukanth STG (2004) Attenuation of Strong Ground Motion in Peninsular India. Seismol Res Lett 75:530–540. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.75.4.530CrossRef

Jade S, Shrungeshwara TS, Kumar K et al (2017) India plate angular velocity and contemporary deformation rates from continuous GPS measurements from 1996 to 2015. Sci Rep 7:11439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11697-wADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jayalakshmi S, Raghukanth STG (2015) An engineering model for seismicity of India. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 6:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2013.815282CrossRef

Johnston AC (1996) Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions-I. Instrumental Seismicity. Geophys J Int 124:381–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb07028.xADSCrossRef

Joshi GC, Sharma ML (2008) Uncertainties in the estimation of M max. J Earth Syst Sci 117:671–682ADSCrossRef

Kayal JR (2007) Recent large earthquakes in India: seismotectonic perspective. IAGR Memoir 10:189–199

Khan MM, Kumar GK (2018) Statistical completeness analysis of seismic data. J Geol Soc India 91:749–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-018-0934-6CrossRef

Kolathayar S, Sitharam TG (2012) Characterization of Regional Seismic Source Zones in and around India. Seismol Res Lett 83:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.83.1.77CrossRef

Kolathayar S, Sitharam TG, Vipin KS (2012a) Spatial variation of seismicity parameters across India and adjoining areas. Nat Hazards 60:1365–1379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9898-1CrossRef

Kolathayar S, Sitharam TG, Vipin KS (2012b) Deterministic seismic hazard macrozonation of India. J Earth Syst Sci 121:1351–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0227-1ADSCrossRef

Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

Liu R, Chen Y, Ren X et al (2007) Comparison between different earthquake magnitudes determined by China Seismograph Network. Acta Seimol Sin 20:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-007-0497-xADSCrossRef

Mahajan AK, Thakur VC, Sharma ML, Chauhan M (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of NW Himalaya and its adjoining area, India. Nat Hazards 53:443–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9439-3CrossRef

Mandal P, Rastogi BK, Sarma CSP (1998) Source parameters of Koyna earthquakes, India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:833–842. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0880030833CrossRef

Mignan A, Woessner J (2012) Estimating the magnitude of completeness for earthquake catalogs. Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis 1–45

Molchan GM, Dmitrieva OE (1992) Aftershock identification: methods and new approaches. Geophys J Int 109:501–516ADSCrossRef

Muralidhar M, Kumaran M, Jayanthi M, et al (2012) Case study on the impacts of climate change on shrimp farming and developing adaptation measures for small-scale shrimp farmers in Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, India, Network of Aquaculture Centers in Asia-Pacific, 126 p. The report is also available online

Naik N, Choudhury D (2015) Deterministic seismic hazard analysis considering different seismicity levels for the state of Goa, India. Nat Hazards 75:557–580CrossRef

Nakata T, Otsuki K, Khan SH (1990) Active faults, stress field and plate motion along the Indo-Eurasian plate boundary. Tectonophysics 181:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90009-WADSCrossRef

Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS (2011) Peak ground motion predictions in India: an appraisal for rock sites. J Seismol 15:295–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-010-9224-5CrossRef

NDMA (2010) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. Technical report by National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India.

Ni J, Barazangi M (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan Collision Zone: geometry of the underthrusting Indian Plate beneath the Himalaya. J Geophys Res 89:1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB02p01147ADSCrossRef

Pezeshk S, Zandieh A, Tavakoli B (2011) Hybrid empirical ground-motion prediction equations for eastern north america using NGA models and updated seismological parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:1859–1870. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100144CrossRef

Puri N, Jain A (2016) Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis for the State of Haryana, India. Indian Geotech J 46:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-015-0167-1CrossRef

Raghukanth STG, Iyengar RN (2006) Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai city. Curr Sci 91:1486–1494

Raghukanth STG, Iyengar RN (2007) Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in Peninsular India. J Earth Syst Sci 116:199–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-007-0020-8ADSCrossRef

Ramkrishnan R, Kolathayar S, Sitharam TG (2021) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of North and Central Himalayas using regional ground motion prediction equations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:8137–8157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02434-9CrossRef

Rao BR, Rao PS (1984) Historical seismicity of Peninsular India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:2519–2533. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0740062519CrossRef

Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982. J Geophys Res 90:5479–5495. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB07p05479ADSCrossRef

Reddy M, Reddy KR, Ch HR, Kumar GK (2020) Evaluation and comparison of seismic hazard parameters for Amaravati Region. Disaster Adv 13:11–22

Rydelek PA, Sacks IS (1989) Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogues and the hypothesis of self-similarity. Nature 337:251–253ADSCrossRef

Sarkar T, Schenk V, Berndt J (2015) Formation and evolution of a Proterozoic magmatic arc: geochemical and geochronological constraints from meta-igneous rocks of the Ongole domain, Eastern Ghats Belt, India. Contrib Mineral Petrol 169:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-014-1096-1ADSCrossRef

Scherbaum F, Delavaud E, Riggelsen C (2009) Model Selection in Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Information-Theoretic Perspective. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3234–3247. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080347CrossRef

Schulte SM, Mooney WD (2004) An updated earthquake catalog for stable continental regions, Intraplate earthquakes (495–2002). United States Geological Survey

Schweig E, Gomberg J, Petersen M et al (2003) The Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake: Global lessons for earthquake hazard in intra-plate regions. Geol Soc India 61:277–282

Scordilis EM (2006) Empirical Global relations converting M S and m b to Moment Magnitude. J Seismol 10:225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-006-9012-4CrossRef

Shreyasvi C, Venkataramana K (2022) Estimation of local site effects in indian scenario: lessons from past earthquakes, current practices, and future trends. In: Kolathayar S, Pal I, Chian SC, Mondal A (eds) Civil engineering for disaster risk reduction. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 209–226CrossRef

Singh AK (2013) Probable Agricultural Biodiversity Heritage Sites in India: XVII. The South-Central Region of Eastern Ghats. Asian Agri-History 17:199–220

Singh SK, Garcia D, Pacheco JF et al (2004) Q of the Indian Shield. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1564–1570CrossRef

Sinha R, Sarkar R (2020) Seismic Hazard assessment of Dhanbad City, India, by deterministic approach. Nat Hazards 103:1857–1880CrossRef

Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P (2007) Seismic hazard analysis for the Bangalore Region. Nat Hazards 40:261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0012-zCrossRef

Sriramadas A (1967) Geology of Eastern Ghats in Andhra Pradesh. Proc Indian Acad Sci Sect B 66:200–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03052185CrossRef

Srivastava H, Ramachandran K (1985) New catalogue of earthquakes for Peninsular India during 1839–1900. Mausam 36:351–358. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v36i3.1982CrossRef

Stepp JC (1972) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effect on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Microzonazion, Seattle. pp 897–910

Tavakoli B, Pezeshk S (2005) Empirical-stochastic ground-motion prediction for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:2283–2296CrossRef

Toro GR (2002) Modification of the Toro et al. (1997) attenuation equations for large magnitudes and short distances. Risk Engineering Technical Report 10

Uhrhammer RA (1986) Characteristics of northern and central California seismicity. Earthquake Notes 57:21

Vakov AV (1996) Relationships between earthquake magnitude, source geometry and slip mechanism. Tectonophysics 261:97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(96)82672-2ADSCrossRef

Wang Z (2011) Seismic hazard assessment: issues and alternatives. Pure Appl Geophys 168:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0148-3ADSCrossRef

Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002CrossRef

Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72:373–382CrossRef

Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the western United States, and Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:859–869CrossRef

Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: Estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:684–698CrossRef

Titel: Seismic hazard assessment and site-specific response spectrum at bed rock level for Ongole city, India: a deterministic framework
verfasst von: R. Siddhardha
Kiran Rathod
Kalyan Kumar Gonavaram
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 6/2024
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11460-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2024

Evaluation of the impact of coal mining on surface water in the Boesmanspruit, Mpumalanga, South Africa

Unravelling recharge mechanisms along the Guarani aquifer system (SAG) outcrop in southern Brazil

A RUSLE-based comprehensive strategy to assess soil erosion in a riverine country, Bangladesh

Mechanical response and failure pattern of a modified mixed compression-shear experiments based on acoustic emission and numerical simulation

Classification of geotechnical units and their associated slope movements for application to civil engineering in volcanic territories

Hg distribution and risk assessment in soil–Bozhou peony system