nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Shared Micro-mobility: A Panacea or a Patch for Our Urban Transport Problems?

verfasst von : Zhenpeng Zou

Erschienen in: Intelligence for Future Cities

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Shared micro-mobility, including station-based bike-sharing and dock-less bike-/scooter-sharing, experienced phenomenal growth in the past decade in cities across the globe. It is low traffic impact, eco-friendly, and associated with a healthy lifestyle. Cities see it as a viable solution to solve issues related to congested, polluted, and auto-centric urban transport. In this chapter, I overview the history of shared micro-mobility. I then broadly summarize the existing research on shared micro-mobility systems around the world and explore how shared micro-mobility has transformed urban transport for its users. Using an empirical case from the city of Brisbane, Australia, I demonstrate the usage and limitations associated with shared micro-mobility trip big data. Lastly, I narrate two possible scenarios of the shared micro-mobility future. I conclude the chapter with a call for collaborations between cities, vendors, and researchers to make shared micro-mobility work for our future urban transport.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Platformization of Public Participation: Considerations for Urban Planners Navigating New Engagement Tools

Nächstes Kapitel Understanding Bikeability: Insight into the Cycling-City Relationship Using Massive Dockless Bike-Sharing Records in Beijing

Abduljabbar, R. L., Liyanage, S., & Dia, H. (2021). The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research. Part D, Transport and Environment, 92, 102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102734

Aman, J. & Smith-Colin, J. (2021). Leveraging Social Media to Understand Public Perceptions toward Micromobility Policies: The Dallas Scooter Ban Case. Findings.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2022). Greater Brisbane 2021 Census All Persons QuickStats. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/3GBRI

Bakker, S. (2018). Electric Two-Wheelers, Sustainable Mobility and the City. Chapter 6 in Sustainable Cities: Authenticity, Ambition and Dream. /link?doi=https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81460

Bliss, L. (2017). Cruising a Superhighway Built for Bikes. In Bloomberg, CityLab Transportation. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-22/this-dutch-cycling-superhighway-connects-commuters

Buehler R, Hamre A (2015) Business and Bikeshare User Perceptions of the Economic Benefits of Capital Bikeshare. Transportation Research Record 2520(1):100–111. https://doi.org/10.3141/2520-12CrossRef

Butrina, P., Le Vine, S., Henao, A., Sperling, J., & Young, S. E. (2020). Municipal adaptation to changing curbside demands: Exploratory findings from semi-structured interviews with ten U.S. cities. Transport Policy, 92(C), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.005

Campbell KB, Brakewood C (2017) Sharing riders: How bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice 100:264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.017CrossRef

Chen Z, van Lierop D, Ettema D (2020) Dockless bike-sharing systems: what are the implications? Transport Reviews 40(3):333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1710306CrossRef

Cottrill CD (2020) MaaS surveillance: Privacy considerations in mobility as a service. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice 131:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.026CrossRef

Fishman E, Washington S, Haworth N (2014) Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research. Part D, Transport and Environment 31:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013CrossRef

Frias-Martinez, V., Sloate, E., Manglunia, H., & Wu, J. (2021). Causal effect of low-income areas on shared dockless e-scooter use. Transportation Research. Part D, Transport and Environment, 100, 103038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103038

Grise, E., & El-Geneidy, A. (2018). Where is the happy transit rider? Evaluating satisfaction with regional rail service using a spatial segmentation approach. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice, 114, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.005

Hamilton TL, Wichman CJ (2018) Bicycle infrastructure and traffic congestion: Evidence from DC’s Capital Bikeshare. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 87:72–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.03.007CrossRef

He, P., Zou, Z., Zhang, Y., & Baiocchi, G. (2020). Boosting the eco-friendly sharing economy: the effect of gasoline prices on bikeshare ridership in three u.s. metropolises. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11), 114021–114021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbb52

Herlihy DV (2004) Bicycle : the history. Yale University Press

Hollingsworth J, Copeland B, Johnson JX (2019) Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters 14(8):84031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8CrossRef

Huré M, Passalacqua A (2017) La Rochelle, France, and the invention of bike sharing public policy in the 1970s. Journal of Transport History 38(1):106–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022526616676275CrossRef

Hyra, D. (2016). Commentary. Cityscape (Washington, D.C.), 18(3), 169–178.

Kelley, T. (2016). Riding Arlington’s Capital Bikeshare Stations. https://www.bikearlington.com/riding-all-of-arlingtons-capital-bikeshare-stations/

Kong, H., Jin, S. T., & Sui, D. Z. (2020). Deciphering the relationship between bikesharing and public transit: Modal substitution, integration, and complementation. Transportation Research. Part D, Transport and Environment, 85, 102392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102392

Lang, N., Schellong, D., Hagenmaier, M., Herrmann, A., & Hohenreuther, M. (2022). Putting Micromobility at the Center of Urban Mobility. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/the-future-of-urban-mobility

Leszczynski, A., & Kong, V. (2022). Walking (with) the platform: bikesharing and the aesthetics of gentrification in Vancouver. Urban Geography, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2036926

Luo H, Kou Z, Zhao F, Cai H (2019) Comparative life cycle assessment of station-based and dock-less bike sharing systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 146:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.003CrossRef

Ma T, Liu C, Erdoğan S (2015) Bicycle Sharing and Public Transit. Transportation Research Record 2534(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2534-01CrossRef

McKenzie G (2020) Urban mobility in the sharing economy: A spatiotemporal comparison of shared mobility services. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 79:101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101418CrossRef

Mitra R, Hess PM (2021) Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel, Behaviour & Society 23:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004CrossRef

Oeschger, G., Carroll, P., & Caulfield, B. (2020). Micromobility and public transport integration: The current state of knowledge. Transportation Research. Part D, Transport and Environment, 89, 102628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102628

Orozco-Fontalvo, M., Llerena, L., & Cantillo, V. (2022). Dockless electric scooters: A review of a growing micromobility mode. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2044097

Parkes SD, Marsden G, Shaheen SA, Cohen AP (2013) Understanding the diffusion of public bikesharing systems: evidence from Europe and North America. Journal of Transport Geography 31:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.003CrossRef

Qian X, Jaller M (2020) Bikesharing, equity, and disadvantaged communities: A case study in Chicago. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice 140:354–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.004CrossRef

Riggs W, Kawashima M, Batstone D (2021) Exploring best practice for municipal e-scooter policy in the United States. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice 151:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.025CrossRef

Shaheen SA, Guzman S, Zhang H (2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transportation Research Record 2143(1):159–167. https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-20CrossRef

Stahley, L. H., Camhi, S. M., Wright, J. A., & Troped, P. J. (2022). Correlates of bike share use and its association with weight status at an urban university. PloS One, 17(8), e0270870–e0270870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270870

Taylor, A. The Bike-Share Oversupply in China: Huge Piles of Abandoned and Broken Bicycles. https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2018/03/bike-share-oversupply-in-china-huge-piles-of-abandoned-and-broken-bicycles/556268/

Teixeira João Filipe, Lopes Miguel (2020) The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York’s Citi Bike. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 6:100166CrossRef

Topos Magazine. (2016). Cykelslangen Copenhagen: An Urban Snake. https://toposmagazine.com/copenhagen-cykelslangen/#Rasmus-Hjortshoj-Cykelslangen-LARGE-16-631%C3%97440

Transportation for America. (2022). Shared Micromobility Playbook. https://playbook.t4america.org/

Triple M. (2021). New E-Scooter Safety Trial Launches In Brisbane. https://www.triplem.com.au/story/new-e-scooter-safety-trial-launches-in-brisbane-189954

The Brisbane City Council. (2022). Brisbane’s e-mobility strategy. https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/traffic-and-transport/transport-plan-for-brisbane/transport-plan-for-brisbane-implementation-plan/brisbanes-e-mobility-strategy

The North American Bikeshare & Scootershare Association (NABSA). (2021). 3^rd Annual Shared Micromobility: State of the Industry Report. https://nabsa.net/about/industry/

The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO). (2018). Bike Share in the U.S.: 2017. https://nacto.org/bike-share-statistics-2017/

The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO). (2020). Shared Micromobility in the U.S.: 2019. https://nacto.org/shared-micromobility-2019/

Van der Zee, R. (2016). Story of cities #30: how this Amsterdam inventor gave bike-sharing to the world. In the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/apr/26/story-cities-amsterdam-bike-share-scheme

Wang, K., Qian, X., Fitch, D. T., Lee, Y., Malik, J., & Circella, G. (2022). What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings. Transport Reviews, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2015639

Woodcock, J., Tainio, M., Cheshire, J., O’Brien, O., & Goodman, A. (2014). Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: health impact modelling study. BMJ (Online), 348(feb13 1), g425–g425. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g425

Xu D (2019) Burn Calories, Not Fuel! The effects of bikeshare programs on obesity rates. Transportation Research. Part D, Transport and Environment 67:89–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.002CrossRef

Yang Y, Heppenstall A, Turner A, Comber A (2019) A spatiotemporal and graph-based analysis of dockless bike sharing patterns to understand urban flows over the last mile. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 77:101361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101361CrossRef

Zhang Y, Mi Z (2018) Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis. Applied Energy 220:296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101CrossRef

Zhou X (2015) Understanding spatiotemporal patterns of biking behavior by analyzing massive bike-sharing data in Chicago. PloS One 10(10):e0137922–e0137922. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137922CrossRef

Zou. Z. (2021). Planning towards an equitable sharing economy: On housing, on transportation, on policymaking. Doctoral dissertation, available at: https://doi.org/10.13016/mnq5-4cq2

Zou, Z., Younes, H., Erdoğan Sevgi, & Wu, J. (2020). Exploratory analysis of real-time e-scooter trip data in Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(8), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120919760

Zuniga-Garcia, N., Tec, M., Scott, J. G., & Machemehl, R. B. (2022). Evaluation of e-scooters as transit last-mile solution. Transportation Research. Part C, Emerging Technologies, 139, 103660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103660

Titel: Shared Micro-mobility: A Panacea or a Patch for Our Urban Transport Problems?
verfasst von: Zhenpeng Zou
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: Intelligence for Future Cities
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31745-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-31746-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31746-0_6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"