nach oben

Knowledge and Information Systems

Erschienen in:

23.06.2016 | Regular Paper

Sharing beliefs among agents with different degrees of credibility

verfasst von: Luciano H. Tamargo, Sebastian Gottifredi, Alejandro J. García, Guillermo R. Simari

Erschienen in: Knowledge and Information Systems | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper introduces an approach for sharing beliefs in collaborative multi-agent application domains where some agents can be more credible than others. In this context, we propose a formalization where every agent has its own partial order among its peers representing the credibility the agent assigns to its informants; each agent will also have a belief base where each sentence is attached with an agent identifier which represents the credibility of that sentence. We define four different forwarding criteria for computing the credibility information for a belief to be forwarded, and for determining how the receiver should handle the incoming information; the proposal considers both the sender’s and the receiver’s points of view with respect to the credibility of the source of the information.

Vorheriger Artikel SILVERBACK+: scalable association mining via fast list intersection for columnar social data

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Sabater J, Sierra C (2005) Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artif Intell Rev 24(1):33–60CrossRefMATH

Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manag Sci 49:1407–1424CrossRef

Grandison T, Sloman M (2000) A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 3(4):2–16CrossRef

Montaner M, López B, de la Rosa JL (2002) Developing trust in recommender agents. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS 2002, July 15–19, 2002, Bologna, pp 304–305

Cantwell J (1998) Resolving conflicting information. J Log Lang Inf 7(2):191–220MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Dragoni A, Giorgini P, Puliti P (1994) Distributed belief revision versus distributed truth maintenance. In: Proceedings of the sixth IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (TAI 94). IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 499–505

Harwood WT, Clark JA, Jacob JL (2010) Networks of trust and distrust: towards logical reputation systems. In: Gabbay DM, van der Torre L (eds) Logics in Security, Copenhagen, Denmark

Krümpelmann P, Tamargo LH, García AJ, Falappa MA (2009) Forwarding credible information in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge science, engineering and management (KSEM 2009), 5914/2009:41–53. Nov 2009

Tamargo LH, García AJ, Falappa MA, Simari GR (2012) Modeling knowledge dynamics in multi-agent systems based on informants. Knowl Eng Rev (KER) 27(1):87–114CrossRef

10.

Tamargo LH, García AJ, Falappa MA, Simari GR (2014) On the revision of informant credibility orders. Artif Intell 212:36–58MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

11.

Chalupsky H, Finin T, Fritzson R, McKay D, Shapiro S, Weiderhold G (1992) An overview of KQML. Technical Report

12.

Searle JR (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

13.

Alchourrón C, Makinson D (1985) On the logic of theory change: safe contraction. Stud Log 44:405–422MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

14.

Hansson SO (1994) Kernel contraction. J Symb Log 59:845–859CrossRef

15.

Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol 11(1):37–50CrossRef

16.

Dragoni A, Giorgini P, Baffetti M (1997) Distributed belief revision vs. belief revision in a multi-agent environment: first results of a simulation experiment. In: Boman M, Van de Velde W (eds) Multi-agent rationality. Springer, New York, pp 45–62CrossRef

17.

Dragoni AF, Giorgini P (1996) Belief revision through the belief-function formalism in a multi-agent environment. Intelligent agents III agent theories, architectures, and languages. Springer, New York, pp 103–115

18.

Dragoni AF, Giorgini P (2003) Distributed belief revision. Auton Agents Multi Agent Syst 6(2):115–143CrossRef

19.

Benferhat S, Dubois D, Prade H, Williams MA (2002) A practical approach to revising prioritized knowledge bases. Stud Log 1(70):105–130MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

20.

Liau CJ (2003) Belief, information acquisition, and trust in multi-agent systems-a modal logic formulation. Artif Intell 149(1):31–60MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

21.

Luke Teacy WT, Luck M, Rogers A, Jennings NR (2012) An efficient and versatile approach to trust and reputation using hierarchical bayesian modelling. Artif Intell 193:149–185MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

22.

Luke Teacy WT, Patel J, Jennings NR, Luck M (2006) TRAVOS: trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources. Auton Agents Multi Agent Syst 12(2):183–198CrossRef

23.

Cholvy L (2011) How strong can an agent believe reported information? In: Proceedings of the Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty: 11th European conference, ECSQARU 2011, Belfast, UK, June 29–July 1, 2011, pp 386–397

24.

Parsons S, Sklar E, McBurney P (2011) Using argumentation to reason with and about trust. In: Argumentation in multi-agent systems—8th international workshop, ArgMAS 2011, Taipei, May 3, 2011, Revised Selected Papers. pp 194–212

25.

Tang Y, Cai K, McBurney P, Sklar E, Parsons S (2012) Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief. J Log Comput 22(5):979–1018MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

26.

Harwood WT, Clark JA, Jacob JL (2010) A perspective on trust, security and autonomous systems. In: New security paradigms workshop

27.

Soto JP, Vizcaíno A, Portillo-Rodríguez J, Piattini M (2007) Applying trust, reputation and intuition aspects to support virtual communities of practice. In: Proceedings of the knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems, 11th international conference, KES 2007, XVII Italian workshop on neural networks, Vietri sul Mare, Part II, Sept 12–14, 2007, pp 353–360

28.

Vizcaíno A, Portillo-Rodríguez J, Soto JP, Piattini M (2009) Encouraging the reuse of knowledge in communities of practice by using a trust model. In: International conference on information, process, and knowledge management, eKNOW 2009, Cancun, Feb 1–7, 2009, pp 28–33

Titel: Sharing beliefs among agents with different degrees of credibility
verfasst von: Luciano H. Tamargo
Sebastian Gottifredi
Alejandro J. García
Guillermo R. Simari
Publikationsdatum: 23.06.2016
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Knowledge and Information Systems / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0219-1377
Elektronische ISSN: 0219-3116
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-016-0964-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Graphlet decomposition: framework, algorithms, and applications

Top-k coupled keyword recommendation for relational keyword queries

SILVERBACK+: scalable association mining via fast list intersection for columnar social data

Towards efficient top-k reliability search on uncertain graphs

Context-aware query expansion method using Language Models and Latent Semantic Analyses

DASC: data aware algorithm for scalable clustering

Premium Partner