nach oben

Electronic Commerce Research

Erschienen in:

21.04.2021

Smartphone-based information acquisition and wheat farm performance: insights from a doubly robust IPWRA estimator

verfasst von: Hongyun Zheng, Wanglin Ma

Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study examines the impact of smartphone-based information acquisition on crop yields, net returns, return on investment (ROI), and production costs, using survey data collected from 558 wheat farmers in rural China. We employ a double-robust inverse probability weighted regression adjustment estimator to address the potential selection bias issue. The results reveal that information acquisition via smartphones significantly increases wheat yields, net returns, and ROI by 7%, 31%, and 39%, respectively, and it has a negative but insignificant impact on production costs. These results largely echo the results estimated from propensity score matching and endogenous switching regression models. In general, our findings suggest that policy interventions targeting to boost farm economic performance should consider distributing agricultural production and marketing information via smartphones.

Nächster Artikel Variance does matter in affecting the box office: a multi-aspect investigation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Ideally, smartphone-based information acquisition is expected to reduce production costs. It is worth to mention here that smartphone-based information acquisition might increase production costs if it induces farmers to use expensive inputs such as drought-tolerant wheat varieties, organic fertilizers and green pesticides.

As rightly pointed by an anonymous reviewer, the crop price might have no variations if the marketing price of crops for the whole market is fixed at a certain time. Therefore, the crop price is discussed in Sect. 2.1 in consideration of the theoretical framework generalization, but it is not considered as an outcome variable in our empirical analysis.

Although IPWRA estimator has advantages over PSM model, RA estimator, and IPW estimator, it cannot fully address the selection bias. In fact, IPWRA estimator only mitigates selection bias arising from observed factors [51, 65].

Nakasone, E., Torero, M., & Minten, B. (2014). The power of information: The ICT revolution in agricultural development. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6(1), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012714CrossRef

Nakasone, E., & Torero, M. (2016). A text message away: ICTs as a tool to improve food security. Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12314CrossRef

Krell, N. T., Giroux, S. A., Guido, Z., Hannah, C., Lopus, S. E., Caylor, K. K., & Evans, T. P. (2020). Smallholder farmers’ use of mobile phone services in central Kenya. Climate and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1748847CrossRef

Omulo, G., & Kumeh, E. M. (2020). Farmer-to-farmer digital network as a strategy to strengthen agricultural performance in Kenya: A research note on ‘Wefarm’ platform. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120120CrossRef

Haile, M. G., Wossen, T., & Kalkuhl, M. (2019). Access to information, price expectations and welfare: The role of mobile phone adoption in Ethiopia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.017CrossRef

Birthal, P. S., Kumar, S., Negi, D. S., & Roy, D. (2015). The impacts of information on returns from farming: Evidence from a nationally representative farm survey in India. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 46(4), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12181CrossRef

Abdul-Salam, Y., & Phimister, E. (2017). Efficiency effects of access to information on small-scale agriculture: Empirical evidence from Uganda using stochastic frontier and IRT models. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(2), 494–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12194CrossRef

Shiferaw, B., Kebede, T., Kassie, M., & Fisher, M. (2015). Market imperfections, access to information and technology adoption in Uganda: Challenges of overcoming multiple constraints. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 46(4), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12175CrossRef

World Bank. (2018). Information and communications for development 2018: Data-driven development. World Bank.CrossRef

10.

Camacho, A., & Conover, E. (2019). The impact of receiving SMS price and weather information on small scale farmers in Colombia. World Development, 123, 104596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.020CrossRef

11.

Mariscal Avilés, J., Benítez Larghi, S., & Martínez Aguayo, M. A. (2016). The informational life of the poor: A study of digital access in three Mexican towns. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.11.001CrossRef

12.

Kirui, O. K., Okello, J. J., Nyikal, R. A., & Njiraini, G. W. (2013). Impact of mobile phone-based money transfer services in agriculture: Evidence from Kenya. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 52(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.173644CrossRef

13.

Wyche, S., & Steinfield, C. (2016). Why don’t farmers use cell phones to access market prices? Technology affordances and barriers to market information services adoption in rural Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 22(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1048184CrossRef

14.

Van Campenhout, B. (2017). There is an app for that? The impact of community knowledge workers in Uganda. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200644CrossRef

15.

Fan, Q., & Salas Garcia, V. B. (2018). Information access and smallholder farmers’ market participation in Peru. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(2), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12243CrossRef

16.

Kiiza, B., & Pederson, G. (2012). ICT-based market information and adoption of agricultural seed technologies: Insights from Uganda. Telecommunications Policy, 36(4), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.01.001CrossRef

17.

Van Campenhout, B., Spielman, D. J., & Lecoutere, E. (2021). Information and communication technologies to provide agricultural advice to smallholder farmers: Experimental evidence from Uganda. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103(1), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajae.12089CrossRef

18.

Carrión-Yaguana, V. D., Alwang, J., & Barrera, V. H. (2020). Promoting behavioral change using text messages: A case study of blackberry farmers in Ecuador. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 52(3), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2020.7CrossRef

19.

Cole, S. A., & Fernando, A. (2018). ‘Mobile’izing agricultural advice: Technology adoption, diffusion and sustainability. Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2179008.

20.

Ogutu, S. O., Okello, J. J., & Otieno, D. J. (2014). Impact of information and communication technology-based market information services on smallholder farm input use and productivity: The case of Kenya. World Development, 64, 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.011CrossRef

21.

Casaburi, L., Kremer, M., Mullainathan, S., & Ramrattan, R. (2014). Harnessing ICT to increase agricultural production: Evidence from Kenya. Harvard Business School Working Paper, September 2013 (pp. 1–33).

22.

Sekabira, H., & Qaim, M. (2017). Mobile money, agricultural marketing, and off-farm income in Uganda. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 48(5), 597–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12360CrossRef

23.

Okello, J. J., Kirui, O. K., & Gitonga, Z. M. (2020). Participation in ICT-based market information projects, smallholder farmers’ commercialisation, and agricultural income effects: Findings from Kenya. Development in Practice, 30(8), 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1754340CrossRef

24.

Aker, J. C., Ghosh, I., & Burrell, J. (2016). The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 47, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12301CrossRef

25.

Kabunga, N. S., Dubois, T., & Qaim, M. (2012). Heterogeneous information exposure and technology adoption: The case of tissue culture bananas in Kenya. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 43(5), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00597.xCrossRef

26.

Hübler, M., & Hartje, R. (2016). Are smartphones smart for economic development? Economics Letters, 141, 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.02.001CrossRef

27.

Ma, W., Renwick, A., Nie, P., Tang, J., & Cai, R. (2018). Off-farm work, smartphone use and household income: Evidence from rural China. China Economic Review, 52, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.06.002CrossRef

28.

Ma, W., Grafton, R. Q., & Renwick, A. (2020). Smartphone use and income growth in rural China: Empirical results and policy implications. Electronic Commerce Research, 20(4), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9323-xCrossRef

29.

Kiberiti, B. S., Sanga, C. A., Mussa, M., Tumbo, S. D., Mlozi, M. R. S., & Haug, R. (2016). Farmers’ access and use of mobile phones for improving the coverage of agricultural extension service. International Journal of ICT Research in Africa and the Middle East, 5(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijictrame.2016010103CrossRef

30.

Liao, C. N., Chen, Y. J., & Tang, C. S. (2019). Information provision policies for improving farmer welfare in developing countries: Heterogeneous farmers and market selection. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 21(2), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0599CrossRef

31.

Ma, W., & Abdulai, A. (2017). The economic impacts of agricultural cooperatives on smallholder farmers in rural China. Agribusiness, 33(4), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21522CrossRef

32.

Kleemann, L., Abdulai, A., & Buss, M. (2014). Certification and access to export markets: Adoption and return on investment of organic-certified pineapple farming in Ghana. World Development, 64, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.005CrossRef

33.

Liu, R., Gao, Z., Nayga, R. M., Shi, L., Oxley, L., & Ma, H. (2020). Can “green food” certification achieve both sustainable practices and economic benefits in a transitional economy? The case of kiwifruit growers in Henan Province, China. Agribusiness, 36(4), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21641CrossRef

34.

Ma, W., Renwick, A., & Bicknell, K. (2018). Higher intensity, higher profit? Empirical evidence from dairy farming in New Zealand. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12261CrossRef

35.

Manda, J., Gardebroek, C., Kuntashula, E., & Alene, A. D. (2018). Impact of improved maize varieties on food security in Eastern Zambia: A doubly robust analysis. Review of Development Economics, 22(4), 1709–1728. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12516CrossRef

36.

Adolwa, I. S., Schwarze, S., & Buerkert, A. (2019). Impacts of integrated soil fertility management on yield and household income: The case of Tamale (Ghana) and Kakamega (Kenya). Ecological Economics, 161, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.023CrossRef

37.

Tambo, J. A., & Mockshell, J. (2018). Differential impacts of conservation agriculture technology options on household income in sub-saharan Africa. Ecological Economics, 151, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.005CrossRef

38.

Walker, I., & Zhu, Y. (2018). University selectivity and the relative returns to higher education: Evidence from the UK. Labour Economics, 53, 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2018.05.005CrossRef

39.

Wossen, T., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A., Haile, M. G., Feleke, S., Olanrewaju, A., & Manyong, V. (2017). Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022CrossRef

40.

CRSY. (2019). China rural statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press.

41.

Zhang, L., & Fan, W. (2020). Rural homesteads withdrawal and urban housing market: A pilot study in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(1), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1556157CrossRef

42.

Kaske, D., Mvena, Z. S. K., & Sife, A. S. (2018). Mobile phone usage for accessing agricultural information in southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 19(3), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2017.1371023CrossRef

43.

Li, J., Ma, W., Renwick, A., & Zheng, H. (2020). The impact of access to irrigation on rural incomes and diversification: Evidence from China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 12(4), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-09-2019-0172CrossRef

44.

Martey, E., Etwire, P. M., & Kuwornu, J. K. M. (2020). Economic impacts of smallholder farmers’ adoption of drought-tolerant maize varieties. Land Use Policy, 94, 104524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104524CrossRef

45.

Fu, X., & Akter, S. (2012). Impact of mobile telephone on the quailty and speed of agricultural extension services delivery: Evidence from rural e-services project in India. In International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) 2012 triennial conference.

46.

McAfee, R. P. (1995). Multiproduct equilibrium price dispersion. Journal of Economic Theory, 67(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1995.1066CrossRef

47.

Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/258464CrossRef

48.

Hao, J., Bijman, J., Gardebroek, C., Heerink, N., Heijman, W., & Huo, X. (2018). Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels—Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China. Food Policy, 74, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.004CrossRef

49.

Liu, Y., Ma, W., Renwick, A., & Fu, X. (2019). The role of agricultural cooperatives in serving as a marketing channel: Evidence from low-income regions of Sichuan province in China. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 22(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2018.0058CrossRef

50.

Takahashi, K., & Barrett, C. B. (2014). The system of rice intensification and its impacts on household income and child schooling: Evidence from rural Indonesia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat086CrossRef

51.

Kang, J. D. Y., & Schafer, J. L. (2007). Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Statistical Science, 22(4), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS227CrossRef

52.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.

53.

Zheng, H., Ma, W., & Li, G. (2020). Adoption of organic soil amendments and its impact on farm performance: Evidence from wheat farmers in China*. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12406CrossRef

54.

Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.5CrossRef

55.

Stata Press. (2019). Stata treatment-effects reference manual: Potential outcomes/counterfactual outcomes release 16.

56.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2007). Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. Journal of Econometrics, 141(2), 1281–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.02.002CrossRef

57.

Cattaneo, M. D. (2010). Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability. Journal of Econometrics, 155(2), 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.09.023CrossRef

58.

Raghunathan, K., Kannan, S., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2019). Can women’s self-help groups improve access to information, decision-making, and agricultural practices? The Indian case. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 50(5), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12510CrossRef

59.

D’Amato, A., Giaccherini, M., & Zoli, M. (2019). The role of information sources and providers in shaping green behaviors. Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 164, 106292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.004CrossRef

60.

Larochelle, C., Alwang, J., Travis, E., Barrera, V. H., & Dominguez Andrade, J. M. (2019). Did you really get the message? Using text reminders to stimulate adoption of agricultural technologies. Journal of Development Studies, 55(4), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1393522CrossRef

61.

Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference: For statistics, social, and biomedical sciences an introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751CrossRef

62.

Diekmann, F., Loibl, C., & Batte, M. T. (2009). The economics of agricultural information: Factors affecting commercial farmers’ information strategies in ohio. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(4), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01470.xCrossRef

63.

Handino, T. D., D’Haese, M., Demise, F., & Tamirat, M. (2019). De-commoditizing Ethiopian coffees after the establishment of the Ethiopian Commodity Exchange: An empirical investigation of smallholder coffee producers in Ethiopia. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 22(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2018.0047CrossRef

64.

Simtowe, F., Amondo, E., Marenya, P., Rahut, D., Sonder, K., & Erenstein, O. (2019). Impacts of drought-tolerant maize varieties on productivity, risk, and resource use: Evidence from Uganda. Land Use Policy, 88, 104091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104091CrossRef

65.

Mano, Y., Takahashi, K., & Otsuka, K. (2020). Mechanization in land preparation and agricultural intensification: The case of rice farming in the Cote d’Ivoire. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 51(6), 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12599CrossRef

Titel: Smartphone-based information acquisition and wheat farm performance: insights from a doubly robust IPWRA estimator
verfasst von: Hongyun Zheng
Wanglin Ma
Publikationsdatum: 21.04.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1389-5753
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9362
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09481-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Online marketplace sellers’ influence on rating scores and comment orientation

Capacity pooling games in crowdsourcing services

Gender difference in visual attention to digital content of place-based advertising: a data-driven scientific approach

Nominal effect vs actual effect: overconfidence in a consignment omnichannel

Variance does matter in affecting the box office: a multi-aspect investigation

Shill bidding in lenders’ eyes? A cross-country study on the influence of large bids in online P2P lending