nach oben

Erschienen in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

13. Social Welfare, Relative Deprivation, and the Gini Coefficient

verfasst von : Shlomo Yitzhaki, Edna Schechtman

Erschienen in: The Gini Methodology

Verlag: Springer New York

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to elaborate on the role of the Gini coefficient in two major competing theories that dominate the theoretical considerations in the area of income distribution. The major theory that dominates the economic thinking with respect to the role of the government in the area of income distribution is the Bergson’s (1938) social welfare function approach (hereafter SWF). The other theory that is gaining acceptability among economists is the theory of relative deprivation (hereafter RD).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction to Applications

Nächstes Kapitel Policy Analysis

A monopolistic behavior implies that an athlete takes into account that his achievements may affect the scoring system. Note, however, that the arguments raised continue to hold under monopolistic behavior.

One can complicate the presentation by introducing public goods, leisure, monopolistic behavior, etc. Introducing those issues will complicate the presentation without adding relevant content.

A well-behaved utility function is defined only over the commodity owned and consumed by the individual, the marginal utilities are positive and declining, and for every set of prices, there is one optimal allocation of commodities that maximizes it.

Hopkins (2008) surveys the different approaches toward relativity and the implications of the connection between happiness and inequality. Note, however, that the relativity in Runciman’s approach arises because deprivation depends on the reference group, and reference groups among individuals may differ. Would we use the same reference group for the whole population then deprivation ceases to be relative.

Sen (1976b) describes the assumptions that lead to national income comparisons.

See Chakravarty and Mukherjee (1999), Bossert and D’Ambrosio (2006), Bossert, D’Ambrosio, and Peragine (2007), and D’Ambrosio and Frick (2007) for different views. Deaton (2) uses the theory to explain differential mortality.

Hey and Lambert (1980) consider a different interpretation. The individual compares his income to the income of each individual in the society. As far as we can see this is a crucial difference in interpreting the implication of the theory.

The classification of a society into classes is the corner stone of the Marxist theory but it is rarely done in the measurement of inequality. For a recent example see Wolff and Zacharias (2007b).

The decomposition is applied to the Gini coefficient only. Although the extended Gini can also represent deprivation and other theories (Ebert & Moyes, 2000; Moyes, 2007), it is not decomposable in the same way as the Gini.

Nineteenth Century hymn (Mrs. C. F. Alexander) brought to our attention by Susanne Freund.

To see that note that G_b can be negative while the two terms involving G_bp in (13.24) cancel each other. G_b can be negative if one group includes poor people and a small number of extremely rich people so that the covariance between average rank and average income among groups is negative.

Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Jornal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 762–800.CrossRef

Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.MathSciNetCrossRef

Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. (1980). Lectures on public economics. London: McGraw-Hill.MATH

Benabou, R. (2000). Unequal societies: Income distribution and the social contract. American Economic Review, 90(1), 96–129.CrossRef

Ben-Porath, Y. (1980). The F-connection: Families, friends, and firms and the organization of exchange. Population and Development Review, 6(1 (March)), 19–39.

Bergson, A. (1938). A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52(2 (February)), 310–334.CrossRef

Bossert, W., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2006). Reference groups and individual deprivation. Economics Letters, 90, 421–426.CrossRef

Bossert, W., D’Ambrosio, C., & Peragine, V. (2007). Deprivation and Social Exclusion. Economica, 74(296), 777–803.CrossRef

Chakravarty, S. R., & Mukherjee, D. (1999). Measures of deprivation and their meaning in terms of social satisfaction. Theory and Decision, 47, 89–100.MATHCrossRef

Crosby, F. (1979). Relative deprivation revisited: A response to Miller, Bolce, and Halligan. The American Political Science Review, 73(1 (March)), 103–112.

D’Ambrosio, C., & Frick, J. R. (2007). Income satisfaction and relative deprivation: An empirical link. Social Indicators Research, 81, 497–519.CrossRef

Deaton, A. (2). Relative deprivation, inequality, and mortality. NBER WP no. 8099 (January).

Duclus, J.-Y., Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2004). Polarization: Concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica, 72(6), 1737–1772.MathSciNetCrossRef

Ebert, U., & Moyes, P. (2000). An axiomatic characterization of Yitzhaki’s index of individual deprivation. Economics Letters, 68, 263–270.MATHCrossRef

Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica, 62, 819–852.MATHCrossRef

Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (1999). Conflict and distribution. Journal of Economic Theory, 87, 819–852.MathSciNetCrossRef

Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2). Collective action and group size paradox. American Political Science Review, 95, 663–672.CrossRef

Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2005). A model of ethnic conflict. Working Paper, September.

Frick, R. J., Goebel, J., Schechtman, E., Wagner, G. G., & Yitzhaki, S. (2006). Using analysis of Gini (ANOGI) for detecting whether two sub-samples represent the same universe: The German Socio-Economic Panel study (SOEP) experience. Sociological Methods and Research, 34(4 (May)), 427–468.MathSciNetCrossRef

Gurin, P. (1985). Women’s gender consciousness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(2 (Summer)), 143–163.CrossRef

Hopkins, E. (2008). Inequality, happiness and relative concerns: What actually is their relationship. Journal of Economic Inequality, 6, 351–372.CrossRef

Lambert, P. J. (1985). Social welfare and the Gini coefficient revisited. Mathematical Social Sciences, 9, 19–26.MATHCrossRef

Lambert, P., & Yitzhaki, S. (1995). Equity, equality and welfare. European Economic Review, 39, 674–682.CrossRef

Layard, R. (1980). Human satisfaction and public policy. The Economic Journal, 90(360), 737–750.CrossRef

Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and public policy: A challenge to the profession. The Economic Journal, 116(March), C24–C33.CrossRef

Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.

Merton, R. K., & Kitt, A. (1950). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. K. Merton & P. F. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of “The American Soldier” (pp. 42–53). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2003). Religeous polarization and economic development. Economic Letters, 80, 201–210.CrossRef

Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005). Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. American Economic Review, 95(3 (June)), 796–816.CrossRef

Moyes, P. (2007). An extended Gini approach to inequality measurement. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5, 279–303.CrossRef

Newberry, D. (1970). A theorem on the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(September), 264–266.MathSciNetCrossRef

Pedersen, A. W. (2004). Inequality as relative deprivation, a sociological approach to inequality measurement. Acta Sociologica, 47(1 (March)), 31–49.CrossRef

Podder, N. (1996). Relative deprivation, envy and economic inequality. Kyklos, 49, 353–376.CrossRef

Pyatt, G. (1976). On the interpretation and disaggregation of Gini coefficient. The Economic Journal, 86(342), 243–255.CrossRef

Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Sen, A. K. (1976b). Real national income. Review of Economic Studies, 43(1 (February)), 19–39.MATHCrossRef

Shayo, M. (2007). A theory of social identity with an application to redistribution. mimeo.SSRN.com.

Sheshinski, E. (1972). Relation between a social welfare function and the Gini Index of Income Inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 98–100.MathSciNetCrossRef

Stark, O., & Yitzhaki, S. (1988). Labour migration as a response to relative deprivation. Journal of Population Economics, 1(1), 57–70. A similar version is reprinted in Maital S. (Ed.) (1989). Applied behavioral economics. Brighton Wheatsheaf Books NY and New York University Press.CrossRef

Stouffer, S. A., Suchmam, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Van Praag, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2008). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wodon, Q., & Yitzhaki, S. (2009). Does growth lead to deprivation. Mimeo. http://ssrn.com.

Wolff, E. N., & Zacharias, A. (2007b). Class structure and economic inequality. Working paper no. 487, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, January.

Yaari, M. E. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55(1 (January)), 95–115.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Yaari, M. E. (1988). A controversial proposal concerning inequality measurement. Journal of Economic Theory, 44(2), 381–397.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Yitzhaki, S. (1979). Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(2 (May)), 321–324.CrossRef

Yitzhaki, S. (1982a). Stochastic dominance, mean variance, and the Gini’s mean difference. American Economic Review, 72, 178–185.

Yitzhaki, S. (1982b). Relative deprivation and economic welfare. European Economic Review, 17, 99–113.CrossRef

Yitzhaki, S. (1982c). A tax programming model. Journal of Public Economics, 19, 107–120.CrossRef

Yitzhaki, S. (1996). On using linear regression in welfare economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14(4 (October)), 478–486.MathSciNet

Yitzhaki, S. (2010). Is there room for polarization. The Review of Income and Wealth., 56(1 (March)), 7–22.MathSciNetCrossRef

Yitzhaki, S., & Semrod, J. (1991). Welfare dominance: An application to commodity taxation. American Economic Review, 81(3 (June)), 480–496.

Zhang, X., & Kanbur, R. (2). What difference do polarization measures make? An application to China. Journal of Development Studies, 37(3 (February)), 85–98.

Titel: Social Welfare, Relative Deprivation, and the Gini Coefficient
verfasst von: Shlomo Yitzhaki
Edna Schechtman
Verlag: Springer New York
Buch: The Gini Methodology
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4719-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4614-4720-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4720-7_13

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner