Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Turning Engineering Green: Sustainable Development and Engineering Education Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2012 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

17. Socio-Technical Integration: Research Policies in the United States, European Union, and China

verfasst von : Hannot Rodríguez, Hu Mingyan, Erik Fisher

Erschienen in: Engineering, Development and Philosophy

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Research policies in the United States and the European Union have shown increasing eagerness in the last two decades to incorporate insights from publics and the human and social sciences into natural science and engineering research, while Chinese research policies devote relatively little attention to socio-technical integration. The ELSI (Ethical, Legal and Societal Implications) program of the US Human Genome Project functioned primarily as a parallel exercise with little real influence on genomic research practices, but more recent research policies for nanotechnology go as far as to redefine research and development in this field as a confluence of technological and societal research. In the EU, the Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development show a progressive radicalization of integration discourses and practices. ELSA (Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects) research, for example, which has been conducted since the 2nd Framework Programme (FP2, 1987–1991) in parallel to the natural science and ­engineering research it studies, has been conceived as a constitutive part of ­science and engineering research projects since FP6 (2002–2006). Although there are few formal Chinese science and technology policies that encourage socio-technical integration, more and more Chinese scholars from both natural and social science and humanities have embraced the idea of integrating social and ethical concerns at an early stage of science and technology development.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Ex-students Engaged in “Engineers Without Borders”: What Have They Become?
Nächstes Kapitel Inheritance Ethics in Engineering Development: Comparison Between Shenyang and Ruhr on Industrial Heritage Conservation
Fußnoten
1
This section is based heavily on and reproduces portions of Fisher and Mahajan (2006).
 
Literatur
Barben, D., E. Fisher, C. Selin, and D.H. Guston. 2008. Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration. In The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd ed, ed. E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M.E. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 979–1000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bennett, I., and D. Sarewitz. 2006. Too little, too late? Research policies on the societal implications of nanotechnology in the United States. Science as Culture 15(4): 309–325.CrossRef
Bjornstad, D.J., and A.K. Wolfe. 2011. Adding to the mix: Integrating ELSI into a national nanoscale science and technology center. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 743–760.CrossRef
Braithwaite, M., R. Fries, T. Zadrozny, N. Wuiame, M. Anasagasti-Corta, and N. Ings. 2007. Final report of the study on the integration of science and society issues in the Sixth Framework Programme (Report to the European Commission). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Briggle, A. 2010. A rich bioethics: Public policy, biotechnology, and the Kass Council. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Cao, N. 1995. The social study of science and technology in China. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 15(4): 159–162.CrossRef
CAS (Chinese Academy of Sciences). 2007a. Guanyu kexue linian de xuanyan (Declaration on the idea of science). Zhongguo Keji Qikan Yanjiu (Chinese Journal of Science and Technical Periodical) 18(2): 202–203.
CAS (Chinese Academy of Sciences). 2007b. Zhongguo kexueyuan guanyu jiaqiang keyan xingwei guifan jianshe de yijian (Suggestions for improving the norm construction of scientific research conduct). Zhongguo Keji Qikan Yanjiu (Chinese Journal of Science and Technical Periodical) 18(2): 204–205.
Commission of the European Communities. 2001. European governance: A white paper. Brussels, 25.7.2001, COM(2001) 428 final.
Elizalde, J. 1998. General introduction: ELSA in F.P.4, in European Commission, e(thical), l(egal) and s(ocial) a(spects) of the Life Sciences and Technologies Programmes of Framework Programme IV. Catalogue of contracts. EUR 18309: 11–14.
European Council. 2000. European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000. Lisbon: Conclusions of the presidency. Bulletin of the European Parliament (27.03.2000), 01/S-2000, PE 289.667: 9–29.
European Commission. 2007. Work programme 2007, capacities, part 5: Science in society (European Commission C(2007)563 of 26.02.2007).
Fisher, E. 2005. Lessons learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications program (ELSI): Planning societal implications research for the National Nanotechnology Program. Technology in Society 27(3): 321–328.CrossRef
Fisher, E. 2007. Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. NanoEthics 1(2): 155–165.CrossRef
Fisher, E. 2010. Public value integration in science policy. Paper prepared for the Science of Science Policy Measurement Workshop. Office of Science and Technology Policy. National Press Club, Washington, DC, 2–3 December. http://​www.​nsf.​gov/​sbe/​sosp. Accessed 27 Mar 2011.
Fisher, E., and R.L. Mahajan. 2006. Contradictory intent? US federal legislation on integrating societal concerns into nanotechnology research and development. Science and Public Policy 33(1): 5–16.CrossRef
Fisher, E., S. Biggs, S. Lindsay, and J. Zhao. 2010. Research thrives on integration of natural and social sciences. Correspondence. Nature 463(25 February): 1018.CrossRef
Gaskell, G. 2008. Lessons from the bio-decade: A social scientific perspective. In What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? Social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs, ed. K. David and P.B. Thompson, 237–259. Burlington: Academic.
Holbrook, J.B. 2005. Assessing the science–society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s second merit review criterion. Technology in Society 27(4): 437–451.CrossRef
Janssen, M.A., M.L. Schoon, W. Ke, and K. Börner. 2006. Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 240–252.CrossRef
Juengst, E.T. 1996. Self-critical federal science? The ethics experiment within the U.S. Human Genome Project. Social Philosophy and Policy 13(2): 63–95.CrossRef
Li, Z. 2009. “Kexue zai shequ” – Cong sixiang dao xingdong (“Science in community” – From thinking to practice). In Lunli Keyi Guan Kexue Ma? (Can ethics regulate science?), ed. X. Jiang and B. Liu, 180–193. Shanghai: Eastern China Normal University Press.
Macnaghten, P., M.B. Kearnes, and B. Wynne. 2005. Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Science Communication 27(2): 268–291.CrossRef
Rabinow, P., and G. Bennett. 2009. Human practices: Interfacing three modes of collaboration. In The ethics of protocells: Moral and social implications of creating life in the laboratory, ed. M.A. Bedau and E.C. Parke, 263–290. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sarewitz, D., and E.J. Woodhouse. 2004. Small is powerful. In Living with the genie: Essays on technology and the quest for human mastery, ed. A. Lightman, D. Sarewitz, and C. Dresser, 63–84. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Schuurbiers, D., and E. Fisher. 2009. Lab-scale intervention. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Reports 10(5): 424–427.
Stančič, Z. 2007. Foreword. In Integrating science in society issues in scientific research: Main findings of the study on the integration of science and society issues in the sixth framework programme (Report to the European Commission), ed. M. Braithwaite, R. Fries, T. Zadrozny, N. Wuiame, M. Anasagasti-Corta, and N. Ings, 1. EUR 22976. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
The Council of the European Union. 2002. Council decision of 30 September 2002 adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ (2002–2006) (2002/834/EC). Official Journal of the European Communities (29.10.2002; L 294/1). Brussels.
The Council of the European Union .2006. Council decision of 19 December 2006 concerning the Specific Programme “Cooperation” implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) (2006/971/EC). Official Journal of the European Union (30.12.2006; L 400/86). Brussels.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union .2002. Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in, and for the dissemination of research results for, the implementation of the European Community Sixth Framework Programme (2002–2006). Official Journal of the European Communities (30.12.2002; L 355/23). Brussels.
US Congress. 2003. 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act of 2003. Public Law no 108–153, 117 STAT. 1923.
US House Committee on Science. 2003. Report 108–89. S. Boehlert, US House of Representatives, 108th Congress, 1st Session.
Zhao, Y., and C. Bai. 2005. Nanosafety: Bio-environmental activities of nanoscale materials. In Science development report, 137–142. Beijing: Science Press
Zhao, F., Y. Zhao, and C. Wang. 2008. Activities related to health, environmental and societal aspects of nanotechnology in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(8–9): 1000–1002.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Socio-Technical Integration: Research Policies in the United States, European Union, and China
verfasst von
Hannot Rodríguez
Hu Mingyan
Erik Fisher
Copyright-Jahr
2012
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
Engineering, Development and Philosophy

Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5281-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-5282-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2012

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5_17

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise