Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 3/2016

29.08.2015

Stability of the 13-item sense of coherence (SOC) scale: a longitudinal prospective study in women treated for breast cancer

verfasst von: Carina Lindblad, Kerstin Sandelin, Lena-Marie Petersson, Camelia Rohani, Ann Langius-Eklöf

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purposes

To test the stability of the SOC scale over time and to test the stability of the latent construct in 417 breast cancer patients at the time of diagnosis, after 1 year and in a subsample (n = 80) also 2 and 3 years later.

Methods

The 13-item SOC scale was firstly tested with mean values and ICC over time and secondly explored with cross-sectional factor analysis, separately for two time points (baseline and after 1 year), followed by a longitudinal factor analyses.

Results

Our results provide support for the stability over time (ICC 0.68, effect size 0.06). The cross-sectional factor analysis revealed a modified three-factor and a second-order factor model meeting criteria for goodness of fit. The longitudinal modified second-order factor model confirmed the construct stability character of the SOC scale with an acceptable goodness-of-fit criteria; X 2/df = 2.91; GFI = 0.87; RMSEA = 0.07; CFI = 0.84; AIC = 962.3. The proportion of variance (R 2) was 0.42.

Conclusions

The SOC scale is stable over time when applied to women with breast cancer. The longitudinal factor analysis gives support of a stable latent construct in the second-order factor model, allowing for merging all items to one scale reflecting the theoretical construct of SOC. Measurement errors between some items challenge future studies on alternative factor structures.
Vorheriger Artikel Concurrent validity of the PROMIS® pediatric global health measure
Nächster Artikel Dutch–Flemish translation of nine pediatric item banks from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)®

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Eriksson, M., & Lindstrom, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(6), 460–466.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
Kenne Sarenmalm, E., Browall, M., Persson, L. O., Fall-Dickson, J., & Gaston-Johansson, F. (2013). Relationship of sense of coherence to stressful events, coping strategies, health status, and quality of life in women with breast cancer. Psychooncology, 22(1), 20–27.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Kenne Sarenmalm, E., Ohlen, J., Jonsson, T., & Gaston-Johansson, F. (2007). Coping with recurrent breast cancer: Predictors of distressing symptoms and health-related quality of life. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(1), 24–39.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Gustavsson-Lilius, M., Julkunen, J., Keskivaara, P., & Hietanen, P. (2007). Sense of coherence and distress in cancer patients and their partners. Psychooncology, 16(12), 1100–1110.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Gustavsson-Lilius, M., Julkunen, J., Keskivaara, P., Lipsanen, J., & Hietanen, P. (2012). Predictors of distress in cancer patients and their partners: The role of optimism in the sense of coherence construct. Psychol Health, 27(2), 178–195.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Mendel, B., Bergenius, J., & Langius, A. (2001). The sense of coherence: A tool for evaluating patients with peripheral vestibular disorders. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences, 26(1), 19–24.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Surtees, P. G., Wainwright, N. W., Luben, R., Khaw, K. T., & Day, N. E. (2006). Mastery, sense of coherence, and mortality: evidence of independent associations from the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Cohort Study. Health Psychology, 25(1), 102–110.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Feldt, T., Leskinen, E., Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (2000). Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of the stability of sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 239–257.CrossRef
10.
Schnyder, U., Buchi, S., Sensky, T., & Klaghofer, R. (2000). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence: Trait or state? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 69(6), 296–302.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Sjostrom, H., Langius-Eklof, A., & Hjertberg, R. (2004). Well-being and sense of coherence during pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 83(12), 1112–1118.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Langius-Eklof, A., & Samuelsson, M. (2009). Sense of coherence and psychiatric morbidity in terms of anxiety and depression in patients with major depression before and after electric convulsive treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 23(2), 375–379.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Forsberg, C., Bjorvell, H., & Cedermark, B. (1996). Well-being and its relation to coping ability in patients with colo-rectal and gastric cancer before and after surgery. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 10(1), 35–44.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Langius-Eklof, A., Lidman, K., & Wredling, R. (2009). Health-related quality of life in relation to sense of coherence in a Swedish group of HIV-infected patients over a two-year follow-up. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 23(1), 59–64.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Baigi, A., Hildingh, C., Virdhall, H., & Fridlund, B. (2008). Sense of coherence as well as social support and network as perceived by patients with a suspected or manifest myocardial infarction: a short-term follow-up study. Clin Rehabil, 22(7), 646–652.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Nilsson, B., Holmgren, L., Stegmayr, B., & Westman, G. (2003). Sense of coherence-stability over time and relation to health, disease, and psychosocial changes in a general population: a longitudinal study. Scand J Public Health, 31(4), 297–304.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Smith, P. M., Breslin, F. C., & Beaton, D. E. (2003). Questioning the stability of sense of coherence—The impact of socio-economic status and working conditions in the Canadian population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38(9), 475–484.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Ding, Y., Bao, L. P., Xu, H., Hu, Y., & Rahm Hallberg, I. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Sense of Coherence Scale in women with cervical cancer. Psychooncology, 21, 1205–1214.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Hittner, J. B. (2007). Factorial invariance of the 13-item Sense of Coherence scale across gender. J Health Psychol, 12(2), 273–280.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Holmefur, M., Sundberg, K., Wettergren, L., & Langius-Eklof, A. (2015). Measurement properties of the 13-item sense of coherence scale using Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research, 24(6), 1455–1463.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Feldt, T., Lintula, H., Suominen, S., Koskenvuo, M., Vahtera, J., & Kivimaki, M. (2007). Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: Prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Quality of Life Research, 16(3), 483–493.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Boman, L., Bjorvell, H., Langius, A., & Cedermark, B. (1999). Two models of care as evaluated by a group of women operated on for breast cancer with regard to their perceived well-being. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 8(2), 87–96.CrossRef
23.
Kulik, L., & Kronfeld, M. (2005). Adjustment to breast cancer: The contribution of resources and causal attributions regarding the illness. Social Work in Health Care, 41(2), 37–57.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Sackey, H., Johansson, H., Sandelin, K., Liljegren, G., MacLean, G., Frisell, J., & Brandberg, Y. (2015). Self-perceived, but not objective lymphoedema is associated with decreased long-term health-related quality of life after breast cancer surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 41(4), 577–584.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Sackey, H., Magnuson, A., Sandelin, K., Liljegren, G., Bergkvist, L., Fulep, Z., et al. (2014). Arm lymphoedema after axillary surgery in women with invasive breast cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 101(4), 390–397.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Fleiss, J. L. (1986). Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. In. New York: Wiley.
28.
Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modelling: Applications using Mplus. Chichester, West Sussex.: Wiley.CrossRef
29.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.CrossRef
30.
Munro, B. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia, PA.: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
31.
Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332.CrossRef
32.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Courvoisier, D. S., & Cole, D. A. (2010). Analyzing true change in longitudinal multitrait-multimethod studies: Application of a multimethod change model to depression and anxiety in children. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 29–45.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Lerdal, A., Fagermoen, M., Bonsaksen, T., Gay, C., & Kottorp, A. (2014). Rasch analysis of the sense of coherence scale in a sample of people with morbid obesity—A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychology, 2(1), 1.CrossRef
34.
Naaldenberg, J., Tobi, H., van den Esker, F., & Vaandrager, L. (2011). Psychometric properties of the OLQ-13 scale to measure Sense of Coherence in a community-dwelling older population. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 9, 37.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Stability of the 13-item sense of coherence (SOC) scale: a longitudinal prospective study in women treated for breast cancer
verfasst von
Carina Lindblad
Kerstin Sandelin
Lena-Marie Petersson
Camelia Rohani
Ann Langius-Eklöf
Publikationsdatum
29.08.2015
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1114-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Quality of Life Research 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes

Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Evaluating a new methodology for providing individualized feedback in healthcare on quality of life and its importance, using the WHOQOL-BREF in a community population

Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Symptom clusters in women with breast cancer: an analysis of data from social media and a research study

OriginalPaper

Health-related needs of people with multiple chronic diseases: differences and underlying factors

Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Evaluation of pedometry as a patient-centered outcome in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT): a comparison of pedometry and patient reports of symptoms, health, and quality of life

OriginalPaper

Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise