Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Stakeholder Management: Proposal for Research—Do Successful Project Managers Employ ‘Interest-Based Negotiation’ to Create Successful Project Outcomes?

verfasst von : John Heathcote, Colin Butlin, Hadi Kazemi

Erschienen in: Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Increasingly the management of stakeholders is reported, by research on the management of projects, as being critical to the successful development of projects. Current research into the management of stakeholders charts a move from: classifying who stakeholders might be, to one of determining whether and how to manage them, to one of recommending ‘engagement’. Stakeholders are seemingly important players in the project’s environment because they are able to both significantly influence the project’s delivery and because they may well be the arbiters of whether the project can be considered successful or not. This latter point indicates the role that stakeholders and those stakeholders that are beneficiaries of the project can have in determining how ‘value’ is interpreted. This research proposal identifies a gap in existing literature; that gap is in the final process of stakeholder management. Aligned to a risk management process, stakeholder management ends with the idea that the stakeholder will be managed. As writers show that ‘engagement’ might be beneficial, then ‘interest-based negotiation’ (IBN) allows for a project manager to engage with these groups through IBN. Anecdotal evidence shows that elements of IBN might be unconscious components of successful project managers’ interactions with stakeholders. This paper proposes a study design that will allow for the hypothesis H1 ‘Successful stakeholder engagement can be correlated with project managers employing elements of interest-based negotiation’ to be tested.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2010). A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 381–397.CrossRef Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2010). A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 381–397.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Achterkamp, M. C., & Vos, J. F. J. (2008). Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 749–757.CrossRef Achterkamp, M. C., & Vos, J. F. J. (2008). Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 749–757.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Association for Project Management. (2006). APM body of knowledge (5th ed.). Princes Risborough: Association for Project Management. Association for Project Management. (2006). APM body of knowledge (5th ed.). Princes Risborough: Association for Project Management.
Zurück zum Zitat Baarveld, M., Smit, M., & Dewulf, G. (2015). Negotiation processes in urban redevelopment projects: Dealing with conflicts by balancing integrative and distributive approaches. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(3), 363–384.CrossRef Baarveld, M., Smit, M., & Dewulf, G. (2015). Negotiation processes in urban redevelopment projects: Dealing with conflicts by balancing integrative and distributive approaches. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(3), 363–384.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2003). Business research methods (Vol. 539). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2003). Business research methods (Vol. 539). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (1995). Management research: An introduction. London: Sage Publications. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (1995). Management research: An introduction. London: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Emery, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business research methods. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin. Emery, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business research methods. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Books. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputesby Oxford University Press. Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputesby Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsen, J. T. (2008). Forming relationships with stakeholders in engineering projects. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2, 35–49.CrossRef Karlsen, J. T. (2008). Forming relationships with stakeholders in engineering projects. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2, 35–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, S., & Wang, L. (2014). Understanding the impact of risks on performance in internal and outsourced information technology projects: The role of strategic importance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1494–1510. Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef Liu, S., & Wang, L. (2014). Understanding the impact of risks on performance in internal and outsourced information technology projects: The role of strategic importance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1494–1510. Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell et al. (1997). The Conspicuous lCorporationBusiness, Public Policy, and Representative Democracy University of Michigan Press. Mitchell et al. (1997). The Conspicuous lCorporationBusiness, Public Policy, and Representative Democracy University of Michigan Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris, P. W. (2013). Reconstructing project management. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRef Morris, P. W. (2013). Reconstructing project management. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murtoaro, J., & Kujala, J. (2007). Project negotiation analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 722–733.CrossRef Murtoaro, J., & Kujala, J. (2007). Project negotiation analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 722–733.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murtoaro, J., Kujala, J., & Artto, K. (2005). Negotiations in project sales and delivery process: An application of negotiation analysis. Espoo, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Industrial Engineering and Management, Report 2005/3. Murtoaro, J., Kujala, J., & Artto, K. (2005). Negotiations in project sales and delivery process: An application of negotiation analysis. Espoo, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Industrial Engineering and Management, Report 2005/3.
Zurück zum Zitat Polit, D.F., and Beck, C.T. (2012), Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice 9. Reference and Research Book News, Vol. 26(3).Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Polit, D.F., and Beck, C.T. (2012), Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice 9. Reference and Research Book News, Vol. 26(3).Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Zurück zum Zitat Pollack, J. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 266–274.CrossRef Pollack, J. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 266–274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pruitt and Rubin (1986). Pruitt, D. G. and Rubin, J. Z. 1986. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, settlement, New York: Random House. Pruitt and Rubin (1986). Pruitt, D. G. and Rubin, J. Z. 1986. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, settlement, New York: Random House.
Zurück zum Zitat Susskind, L., Mnookin, R. H., Rozdeiczer, L., & Fuller, B. (2005). What we have learned about teaching multi-party negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 21(3), 395–408.CrossRef Susskind, L., Mnookin, R. H., Rozdeiczer, L., & Fuller, B. (2005). What we have learned about teaching multi-party negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 21(3), 395–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, L. (2011). The mind and heart of the negotiator. Upper Side River, NJ: Pearson Education. Thompson, L. (2011). The mind and heart of the negotiator. Upper Side River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, R, (2009). A Model of project complexity: distinguishing dimensions of complexity from severity. In International Research Network of Project Management Conference (IRNOP), 2009-10-11-2009-10-13. Turner, R, (2009). A Model of project complexity: distinguishing dimensions of complexity from severity. In International Research Network of Project Management Conference (IRNOP), 2009-10-11-2009-10-13.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87–99.CrossRef Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87–99.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Rijswick, M., & Salet, W. (2012). Enabling the contextualization of legal rules in responsive strategies to climate change. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 18. Van Rijswick, M., & Salet, W. (2012). Enabling the contextualization of legal rules in responsive strategies to climate change. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 18.
Metadaten
Titel
Stakeholder Management: Proposal for Research—Do Successful Project Managers Employ ‘Interest-Based Negotiation’ to Create Successful Project Outcomes?
verfasst von
John Heathcote
Colin Butlin
Hadi Kazemi
Copyright-Jahr
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_19