Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Software and Systems Modeling
Erschienen in: Software and Systems Modeling 4/2014

01.10.2014 | Special Section Paper

Stateful component-based performance models

verfasst von: Lucia Happe, Barbora Buhnova, Ralf Reussner

Erschienen in: Software and Systems Modeling | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The accuracy of performance-prediction models is crucial for widespread adoption of performance prediction in industry. One of the essential accuracy-influencing aspects of software systems is the dependence of system behaviour on a configuration, context or history related state of the system, typically reflected with a (persistent) system attribute. Even in the domain of component-based software engineering, the presence of state-reflecting attributes (the so-called internal states) is a natural ingredient of the systems, implying the existence of stateful services, stateful components and stateful systems as such. Currently, there is no consensus on the definition or method to include state-related information in component-based prediction models. Besides the task to identify and localise different types of stateful information across component-based software architecture, the issue is to balance the expressiveness and complexity of prediction models via an effective abstraction of state modelling. In this paper, we identify and classify stateful information in component-based software systems, study the performance impact of the individual state categories, and discuss the costs of their modelling in terms of the increased model size. The observations are formulated into a set of heuristics-guiding software engineers in state modelling. Finally, practical effect of state modelling on software performance is evaluated on a real-world case study, the SPECjms2007 Benchmark. The observed deviation of measurements and predictions was significantly decreased by more precise models of stateful dependencies.
Vorheriger Artikel Modeling event-based communication in component-based software architectures for performance predictions
Nächster Artikel Deriving performance-relevant infrastructure properties through model-based experiments with Ginpex

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Note that the PCM supports value-passing and value-guarded control-flow constructs, which imply that already a minor modification of an input value in the usage profile may influence system behaviour significantly.
 
Literatur
1.
Bagrodia, R., Shen, C.: Midas: integrated design and simulation of distributed systems. Trans. Softw. Eng. 17(10), 1042–1058 (1991)CrossRef
2.
Balsamo, S., Di Marco, A., Inverardi, P., Simeoni, M.: Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(5), 295–310 (2004)CrossRef
3.
Becker, S., Grunske, L., Mirandola, R., Overhage, S.: Performance prediction of component-based systems. In: Architecting Systems with Trustworthy Components. LNCS, vol. 3938, pp. 169–192. Springer, Berlin (2006)
4.
Becker, S., Happe, J., Koziolek, H.: Putting components into context: supporting QoS-predictions with an explicit context model. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Component Oriented Programming (WCOP) (2006)
5.
Becker, S., Koziolek, H., Reussner, R.: The palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction. J. Syst. Softw. 82(1), 3–22 (2009)CrossRef
6.
Bertolino, A., Mirandola, R.: Modeling and analysis of non-functional properties in component-based systems. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Test and Analysis of Component-Based Systems (TACoS). ENTCS, vol. 82, pp. 158–168. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
7.
Bertolino, A., Mirandola, R.: CB-SPE tool: Putting component-based performance engineering into practice. In: Proceedings of Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE). LNCS, vol. 3054, pp. 233–248. Springer, Berlin (2004)
8.
Diaconescu, A., Murphy, J.: Automating the performance management of component-based enterprise systems through the use of redundancy. In: Proceedings of Conference on Automated software engineering (ASE). IEEE (2005)
9.
Firus, V., Becker, S., Happe, J.: Parametric performance contracts for QML-specified software components. In: Proceedings of Formal Foundations of Embedded Software and Component-based Software Architectures (FESCA). ENTCS, vol. 141, pp. 73–90. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)
10.
Gallotti, S., Ghezzi, C., Mirandola, R., Tamburrelli, G.: Quality prediction of service compositions through probabilistic model checking. In: Proceedings of Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA). LNCS, vol. 5281, pp. 119–134. Springer, Berlin (2008)
11.
Hamlet, D.: Subdomain testing of units and systems with state. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Software testing and analysis (ISSTA). ACM (2006)
12.
13.
Happe, J., Becker, S., Rathfelder, C., Friedrich, H., Reussner, R.H.: Parametric performance completions for model-driven performance prediction. Perform. Eval. 67(8), 694–716 (2009)CrossRef
14.
Happe, J., Westermann, D., Sachs, K., Kapova, L.: Statistical inference of software performance models for parametric performance completions. In: Research into Practice-Reality and Gaps (Proceedings of QoSA 2010). LNCS, vol. 6093, pp. 20–35. Springer, Berllin (2010)
15.
Hissam, S., Moreno, G., Stafford, J., Wallnau, K.: Enabling predictable assembly. J. Syst. Softw. 65(3), 185–198 (2003)CrossRef
16.
Kapova, L., Buhnova, B., Martens, A., Happe, J., Reussner, R.: State dependence in performance evaluation of component-based software systems. In: Proceedings of the Joint WOSP/SIPEW International Conference on Performance engineering (ICPE). ACM (2010)
17.
18.
Kapova, L., Reussner, R.: Application of advanced model-driven techniques in performance engineering. In: Computer Performance Engineering. LNCS, vol. 6342, pp. 17–36. Springer, Berlin (2010)
19.
Koziolek, H.: Performance evaluation for component-based software systems: a survey. Perform. Eval. 67(8), 634–658 (2010)CrossRef
20.
Koziolek, H., Becker, S.: Transforming operational profiles of software components for quality of service predictions. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Component Oriented Programming (WCOP) (2005)
21.
Koziolek, H., Becker, S., Happe, J.: Predicting the performance of component-based software architectures with different usage profiles. In: Proceedings of Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA). LNCS, vol. 4880, pp. 145–163. Springer, Berlin (2007)
22.
Koziolek, H., Happe, J., Becker, S.: Parameter dependent performance specifications of software components. In: Proceedings of Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA). LNCS, vol. 4214, pp. 163–179. Springer, Berlin (2006)
23.
Liu, Y., Fekete, A., Gorton, I.: Design-level performance prediction of component-based applications. Trans. Softw. Eng. 31(11), 928–941 (2005)CrossRef
24.
Meyerhofer, M., Meyer-Wegener, K.: Estimating non-functional properties of component-based software based on resource consumption. In: Proceedings of the Software Composition Workshop (SC). ENTCS, vol. 114, pp. 25–45. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)
25.
26.
Mos, A., Murphy, J.: Performance management in component-oriented systems using a model driven architecture approach. In: Proceedings of Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 227–237. IEEE (2002)
27.
Object Management Group: CORBA Component Model 4.0 Specification. Tech. Rep. formal/06-04-01, Object Management Group (2006)
28.
Object Management Group: MOF 2.0 Query/View/Transfor- mation, version 1.0 (2008)
29.
Sentilles, S., Vulgarakis, A., Bureš, T., Carlson, J., Crnković, I.: A component model for control-intensive distributed embedded systems. In: International Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE). LNCS, vol. 5282, pp. 310–317. Springer, Berlin (2008)
30.
Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: New software performance antipatterns: more ways to shoot yourself in the foot. In: Proceedings of International CMG Conference. Computer Measurement Group (2002)
31.
32.
33.
34.
Szyperski, C.: Component software—beyond object-oriented programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)
35.
Westermann, D., Happe, J., Hauck, M., Heupel, C.: The performance cockpit approach: a framework for systematic performance evaluations. In: Proceedings of the EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 31–38. IEEE Computer Society (2010)
36.
Woodside, M., Franks, G., Petriu, D.C.: The future of software performance engineering. In: Proceedings of Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 171–187. IEEE (2007)
37.
Zimmerova, B.: Modelling and formal analysis of component-based systems in view of component interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Masaryk University, Czech Republic (2008)
38.
Zimmerova, B., Vařeková, P., Beneš, N., Černá, I., Brim, L., Sochor, J.: The common component modeling example: comparing software component models. LNCS, vol. 5153, chap. Component-Interaction Automata Approach (CoIn), pp. 146–176. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Metadaten
Titel
Stateful component-based performance models
verfasst von
Lucia Happe
Barbora Buhnova
Ralf Reussner
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Software and Systems Modeling / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1619-1366
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-1374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-013-0336-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Software and Systems Modeling 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Regular Paper

Effects of stability on model composition effort: an exploratory study

Theme Section Paper

Extraction and evolution of architectural variability models in plugin-based systems

Theme Section Paper

Evaluating probabilistic models with uncertain model parameters

Theme Section Paper

The KlaperSuite framework for model-driven reliability analysis of component-based systems

Special Section Paper

Reengineering component-based software systems with Archimetrix

Theme Section Paper

Modeling event-based communication in component-based software architectures for performance predictions