Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation 1/2019

20.10.2018

Stochastic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Method Based on Stochastic Dominance and Almost Stochastic Dominance Rules with an Application to Online Purchase Decisions

verfasst von: Guang-Tian Jiang, Zhi-Ping Fan, Yang Liu

Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although some stochastic multiple-attribute decision making (SMADM) methods based on the stochastic dominance (SD) rules have been proposed, there is still the limitation that the dominance relations between some pairs of alternatives cannot be identified. In this paper, almost stochastic dominance (ASD) rules are used as supplements of the SD rules to identify dominance relations between the pairs of alternatives, and a new method for SMADM based on the SD and ASD rules is proposed. In the method, a procedure for identifying the dominance relation between each pair of alternatives based on the SD and ASD rules is given. Then, according to the identified dominance relation, the priority degree that one alternative is superior to another alternative concerning each attribute is calculated. Further, according to the obtained priority degrees, an approach for ranking alternatives is proposed using the simple weighted method. Finally, the proposed method is applied to the selection of passenger car(s) based on online ratings, and a comparison between the proposed method and the existing methods based on a numerical example is given. The proposed method can obtain more precise ranking results of alternatives. ASD rules are important supplements of the SD rules for identifying dominance relations. Based on the SD and ASD rules, the proposed SMADM method is important for developing theories and methods for SMADM.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Avignon GR, Vincke P. An outranking method under uncertainty. Euro J Oper Res. 1988;36(3):311–21.CrossRef D'Avignon GR, Vincke P. An outranking method under uncertainty. Euro J Oper Res. 1988;36(3):311–21.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Durbach IN, Calder JM. Modelling uncertainty in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Omega-Int J Manage Sci. 2016;64:13–23.CrossRef Durbach IN, Calder JM. Modelling uncertainty in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Omega-Int J Manage Sci. 2016;64:13–23.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan ZP, Liu Y, Feng B. A method for stochastic multiple criteria decision making based on pairwise comparisons of alternatives with random evaluations. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;207(2):906–15.CrossRef Fan ZP, Liu Y, Feng B. A method for stochastic multiple criteria decision making based on pairwise comparisons of alternatives with random evaluations. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;207(2):906–15.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg A, Li JH, Hou J, Berretta C, Garg A. A new computational approach for estimation of wilting point for green infrastructure. Measurement. 2017;111:351–8.CrossRef Garg A, Li JH, Hou J, Berretta C, Garg A. A new computational approach for estimation of wilting point for green infrastructure. Measurement. 2017;111:351–8.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Y, Gao L, Yi Z, Tai K, Kalita P, Prapainainar P, et al. An application of evolutionary system identification algorithm in modelling of energy production system. Measurement. 2018;114:122–31.CrossRef Huang Y, Gao L, Yi Z, Tai K, Kalita P, Prapainainar P, et al. An application of evolutionary system identification algorithm in modelling of energy production system. Measurement. 2018;114:122–31.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang CL, Yoon KP. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981.CrossRef Hwang CL, Yoon KP. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Janjic A, Andjelkovic A, Docic M. Multi-attribute risk assessment using stochastic dominance. Int J Econ Stat. 2013;1(3):105–12. Janjic A, Andjelkovic A, Docic M. Multi-attribute risk assessment using stochastic dominance. Int J Econ Stat. 2013;1(3):105–12.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang YP, Liang HM, Sun M. A method for discrete stochastic MADM problems based on the ideal and nadir solutions. Comput Ind Eng. 2015;87:114–25.CrossRef Jiang YP, Liang HM, Sun M. A method for discrete stochastic MADM problems based on the ideal and nadir solutions. Comput Ind Eng. 2015;87:114–25.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1976. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1976.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lahdelma R, Makkonen S, Salminen P. Multivariate Gaussian criteria in SMAA. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;170(3):957–70.CrossRef Lahdelma R, Makkonen S, Salminen P. Multivariate Gaussian criteria in SMAA. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;170(3):957–70.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leshno M, Levy H. Preferred by "all" and preferred by "most" decision makers: almost stochastic dominance. Manag Sci. 2002;48(8):1074–85.CrossRef Leshno M, Levy H. Preferred by "all" and preferred by "most" decision makers: almost stochastic dominance. Manag Sci. 2002;48(8):1074–85.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy H. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manag Sci. 1992;38(4):555–93.CrossRef Levy H. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manag Sci. 1992;38(4):555–93.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy H. Stochastic Dominance: Investment decision making under uncertainty. Boston: Kluwer; 1998.CrossRef Levy H. Stochastic Dominance: Investment decision making under uncertainty. Boston: Kluwer; 1998.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Wang J. Multi-criteria outranking methods with hesitant probabilistic fuzzy sets. Cogn Comput. 2017;9(5):611–25.CrossRef Li J, Wang J. Multi-criteria outranking methods with hesitant probabilistic fuzzy sets. Cogn Comput. 2017;9(5):611–25.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu PD, Zhang XH. A novel picture fuzzy linguistic aggregation operator and its application to group decision-making. Cogn Comput. 2018;10(2):242–59.CrossRef Liu PD, Zhang XH. A novel picture fuzzy linguistic aggregation operator and its application to group decision-making. Cogn Comput. 2018;10(2):242–59.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Bi JW, Fan ZP. Ranking products through online reviews: a method based on sentiment analysis technique and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. Inform Fusion. 2017;36:149–61.CrossRef Liu Y, Bi JW, Fan ZP. Ranking products through online reviews: a method based on sentiment analysis technique and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. Inform Fusion. 2017;36:149–61.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Fan ZP, You TH, Zhang WY. Large group decision-making (LGDM) with the participators from multiple subgroups of stakeholders: a method considering both the collective evaluation and the fairness of the alternative. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;122:262–72.CrossRef Liu Y, Fan ZP, You TH, Zhang WY. Large group decision-making (LGDM) with the participators from multiple subgroups of stakeholders: a method considering both the collective evaluation and the fairness of the alternative. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;122:262–72.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Fan ZP, Zhang X. A method for large group decision-making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups. Inform Fusion. 2016;29:132–41.CrossRef Liu Y, Fan ZP, Zhang X. A method for large group decision-making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups. Inform Fusion. 2016;29:132–41.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Fan ZP, Zhang Y. A method for stochastic multiple criteria decision making based on dominance degrees. Inform Sci. 2011;181(19):4139–53.CrossRef Liu Y, Fan ZP, Zhang Y. A method for stochastic multiple criteria decision making based on dominance degrees. Inform Sci. 2011;181(19):4139–53.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Martel JM, D'Avignon GR, Couillard J. A fuzzy outranking relation in multicriteria decision making. Eur J Oper Res. 1986;25(2):258–71.CrossRef Martel JM, D'Avignon GR, Couillard J. A fuzzy outranking relation in multicriteria decision making. Eur J Oper Res. 1986;25(2):258–71.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Martel JM, D'Avignon GR. Projects ordering with multicriteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;10(1):56–69.CrossRef Martel JM, D'Avignon GR. Projects ordering with multicriteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;10(1):56–69.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Martel JM, Zaras K. Stochastic dominance in multicriterion analysis under risk. Theor Decis. 1995;39(1):31–49.CrossRef Martel JM, Zaras K. Stochastic dominance in multicriterion analysis under risk. Theor Decis. 1995;39(1):31–49.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Montes I, Montes S. Stochastic dominance and statistical preference for random variables coupled by an archimedean copula or by the fréchet-hoeffding upper bound. J Multivar Anal. 2016;143:275–98.CrossRef Montes I, Montes S. Stochastic dominance and statistical preference for random variables coupled by an archimedean copula or by the fréchet-hoeffding upper bound. J Multivar Anal. 2016;143:275–98.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nowak M. Preference and veto thresholds in multicriteria analysis based on stochastic dominance. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;158(2):339–50.CrossRef Nowak M. Preference and veto thresholds in multicriteria analysis based on stochastic dominance. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;158(2):339–50.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nowak M. Insdecm—an interactive procedure for stochastic multicriteria decision problems. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;175(3):1413–30.CrossRef Nowak M. Insdecm—an interactive procedure for stochastic multicriteria decision problems. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;175(3):1413–30.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nowak M. Aspiration level approach in stochastic mcdm problems. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;177(3):1626–40.CrossRef Nowak M. Aspiration level approach in stochastic mcdm problems. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;177(3):1626–40.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadopoulos A, Karagiannidis A. Application of the multi-criteria analysis method electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems. Omega-Int J Manage Sci. 2008;36(5):766–76.CrossRef Papadopoulos A, Karagiannidis A. Application of the multi-criteria analysis method electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems. Omega-Int J Manage Sci. 2008;36(5):766–76.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng HG, Wang JQ. Outranking decision-making method with Z-number cognitive information. Cogn Comput. 2018;10(1):1–17.CrossRef Peng HG, Wang JQ. Outranking decision-making method with Z-number cognitive information. Cogn Comput. 2018;10(1):1–17.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun B, Xu XF. A dynamic stochastic decision-making method based on discrete time sequences. Knowl- Based Syst. 2016;105(C):23–8.CrossRef Sun B, Xu XF. A dynamic stochastic decision-making method based on discrete time sequences. Knowl- Based Syst. 2016;105(C):23–8.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tervonen T, Hakonen H, Lahdelma R. Elevator planning with stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Omega-Int J Manage Sci. 2008;36(3):352–62.CrossRef Tervonen T, Hakonen H, Lahdelma R. Elevator planning with stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Omega-Int J Manage Sci. 2008;36(3):352–62.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang HC, Lin DM, Lahdelma R, Li XL. Developing a multicriteria decision support framework for CHP based combined district heating systems. Appl Energy. 2017;205:345–68.CrossRef Wang HC, Lin DM, Lahdelma R, Li XL. Developing a multicriteria decision support framework for CHP based combined district heating systems. Appl Energy. 2017;205:345–68.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JQ, Kuang JJ, Wang J, Zhang HY. An extended outranking approach to rough stochastic multi-criteria decision-making problems. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(6):1–17 33. Wang JQ, Kuang JJ, Wang J, Zhang HY. An extended outranking approach to rough stochastic multi-criteria decision-making problems. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(6):1–17 33.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaras K, Martel JM. Multiattribute analysis based on stochastic dominance. Springer Netherlands: models and experiments in risk and rationality; 1994. Zaras K, Martel JM. Multiattribute analysis based on stochastic dominance. Springer Netherlands: models and experiments in risk and rationality; 1994.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaras K. Rough approximation of pairwise comparisons described by multi-attribute stochastic dominance. J Multicrit Decis Anal. 2015;8(5):291–7.CrossRef Zaras K. Rough approximation of pairwise comparisons described by multi-attribute stochastic dominance. J Multicrit Decis Anal. 2015;8(5):291–7.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaras K. Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute stochastic dominance for determinist and stochastic evaluation problems. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;130(2):305–14.CrossRef Zaras K. Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute stochastic dominance for determinist and stochastic evaluation problems. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;130(2):305–14.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaras K. Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute dominance for deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy decision problems. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;159(1):196–206.CrossRef Zaras K. Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute dominance for deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy decision problems. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;159(1):196–206.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zawisza M, Trzpiot G. Multicriteria analysis based on stochastic and probabilistic dominance in measuring quality of life. Multiple objective and goal programming. 3: Physica-Verlag HD; 2002. Zawisza M, Trzpiot G. Multicriteria analysis based on stochastic and probabilistic dominance in measuring quality of life. Multiple objective and goal programming. 3: Physica-Verlag HD; 2002.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Fan ZP, Liu Y. A method based on stochastic dominance degrees for stochastic multiple criteria decision making. Comput Ind Eng. 2010;58(4):544–52.CrossRef Zhang Y, Fan ZP, Liu Y. A method based on stochastic dominance degrees for stochastic multiple criteria decision making. Comput Ind Eng. 2010;58(4):544–52.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou Q, Xia R, Zhang C. Online shopping behavior study based on multi-granularity opinion mining: China versus America. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(4):587–602.CrossRef Zhou Q, Xia R, Zhang C. Online shopping behavior study based on multi-granularity opinion mining: China versus America. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(4):587–602.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Stochastic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Method Based on Stochastic Dominance and Almost Stochastic Dominance Rules with an Application to Online Purchase Decisions
verfasst von
Guang-Tian Jiang
Zhi-Ping Fan
Yang Liu
Publikationsdatum
20.10.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cognitive Computation / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9605-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Cognitive Computation 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner