nach oben

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Erschienen in:

08.04.2020 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sustainability performance indicators for additive manufacturing: a literature review based on product life cycle studies

verfasst von: Getasew Taddese, Severine Durieux, Emmanuel Duc

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 7-8/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A number of researchers tried to work on assuring sustainability in the design and manufacturing of products. But to date, there are subjective understandings on sustainability itself and limitations on balanced consideration of sustainability dimensions for product life cycle in decision-making. Moreover, following an emerging shift toward the design for additive manufacturing from design for manufacturing, less effort has been put to identify opportunities of sustainability performance of additive manufacturing. Therefore, a comprehensive list and interpretation of sustainable performance indicators targeting additive manufacturing needs further study. This study aims to propose sustainability performance indicators for additive manufacturing based on product life cycle studies. It incorporates detailed interpretation on how to use each indicator depending on type of product, application, and goal of decision makers to assure sustainable performance of a product during pre-manufacturing, manufacturing, use, post-use, and associated logistics stages of its life cycle. Authors performed extensive review and assessment of existing literature on sustainability, sustainable design, and manufacturing and additive manufacturing and its opportunity for realizing a more sustainable product. A sustainability performance indicators’ list for 68 sub-subcategory of sustainability among which 29 for environment, 9 for economic, and 30 for social dimension is carefully identified and interpreted. Finally, an application section is supplemented to justify robustness of the results by considering life cycle aspect of a product to illustrate selection strategy of indicators from the proposed list and validation for exhaustiveness through comparison with ten of the widely accepted indicator sets and guidelines.

Vorheriger Artikel An experimental study on lap joining of multiple sheets of aluminium alloy (AA 5754) using friction stir spot welding

Nächster Artikel Study on the influence of kerosene content on burn in high speed–wire cut electrical discharge machining dielectric fluid

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ahmad S, Wong KY, Tseng ML, Wong WP (2018) Sustainable product design and development: a review of tools, applications and research prospects. Resour Conserv Recycl 132:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.020 CrossRef

Alarcon B, Aguado A, Manga R, Josa A (2010) A value function for assessing sustainability: application to industrial buildings. Sustainability 3:35–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3010035 CrossRef

Badurdeen F, Jawahir IS (2017) Strategies for value creation through sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Manuf 8:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.002 CrossRef

Beaucaire P, Gayton N, Duc E, Lemaire M, Dantan J-Y (2012) Statistical tolerance analysis of a hyperstatic mechanism, using system reliability methods. Comput Ind Eng 63:1118–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.06.017 CrossRef

Behrisch J, Ramirez M, Giurco D (2011) Representation of ecodesign practice: international comparison of industrial design consultancies. Sustainability 3:1778–1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101778 CrossRef

Beng LG, Omar B (2014) Integrating axiomatic design principles into sustainable product development. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 1:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-014-0015-2 CrossRef

Bereketli I, Erol Genevois M (2013) An integrated QFDE approach for identifying improvement strategies in sustainable product development. J Clean Prod 54:188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.053 CrossRef

Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2 CrossRef

Boks C (2006) The soft side of ecodesign. J Clean Prod 14:1346–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.015 CrossRef

10.

Bonvoisin J, Lelah A, Mathieux F, Brissaud D (2014) An integrated method for environmental assessment and ecodesign of ICT-based optimization services. J Clean Prod 68:144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.003 CrossRef

11.

Borchardt M, Wendt MH, Pereira GM, Sellitto MA (2011) Redesign of a component based on ecodesign practices: environmental impact and cost reduction achievements. J Clean Prod 19:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.006 CrossRef

12.

Boulanger P-M (2008) Sustainable development indicators: a scientific challenge, a democratic issue. Surv Perspect Integr Environ Soc 1:59–73. https://doi.org/10.5194/sapiens-1-59-2008 CrossRef

13.

Bourell D, Kruth JP, Leu M, Levy G, Rosen D, Beese AM, Clare A (2017) Materials for additive manufacturing. CIRP Ann 66:659–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009 CrossRef

14.

Bovea MD, Pérez-Belis V (2012) A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J Clean Prod 20:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012 CrossRef

15.

Bracke S, Yamada S, Kinoshita Y, Inoue M, Yamada T (2017) Decision making within the conceptual design phase of eco-friendly products. Procedia Manuf 8:463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.059 CrossRef

16.

Brones F, Monteiro de Carvalho M (2015) From 50 to 1: integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model. J Clean Prod 96:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.036 CrossRef

17.

Buchert T, Kaluza A, Halstenberg FA, Lindow K, Hayka H, Stark R (2014) Enabling product development engineers to select and combine methods for sustainable design. Procedia CIRP 15:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.025 CrossRef

18.

Casamayor JL, Su D (2013) Integration of eco-design tools into the development of eco-lighting products. J Clean Prod 47:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.011 CrossRef

19.

Ceschin F, Gaziulusoy I (2016) Evolution of design for sustainability: from product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Des Stud 47:118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002 CrossRef

20.

Chaim O, Muschard B, Cazarini E, Rozenfeld H (2018) Insertion of sustainability performance indicators in an industry 4.0 virtual learning environment. Procedia Manuf 21:446–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.143 CrossRef

21.

Chatzisideris MD, Espinosa N, Laurent A, Krebs FC (2016) Ecodesign perspectives of thin-film photovoltaic technologies: a review of life cycle assessment studies. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 156:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.048 CrossRef

22.

Chong L, Ramakrishna S, Singh S (2018) A review of digital manufacturing-based hybrid additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:2281–2300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1345-3 CrossRef

23.

Cobut A, Beauregard R, Blanchet P (2015) Reducing the environmental footprint of interior wood doors in non-residential buildings – part 2: ecodesign. J Clean Prod 109:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.068 CrossRef

24.

Cohen S, Bose S, Guo D, Miller A, DeFrancia K, Berger O, Filiatraut B, Loman M, Qiu W, Zhang C (2014) Sustainability metrics

25.

Cor E, Domingo L, Brissaud D, Zwolinski P (2014) A protocol to perform usage oriented ecodesign. CIRP Ann 63:169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.096 CrossRef

26.

de Pauw IC, Karana E, Kandachar P, Poppelaars F (2014) Comparing biomimicry and cradle to cradle with Ecodesign: a case study of student design projects. J Clean Prod 78:174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.077 CrossRef

27.

Deutz P, McGuire M, Neighbour G (2013) Eco-design practice in the context of a structured design process: an interdisciplinary empirical study of UK manufacturers. J Clean Prod 39:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.035 CrossRef

28.

Duc E, Pateloup V, Ray P (2006) The certification of CAM output toolpaths: a necessary improvement. IFAC Proc 39:837–842CrossRef

29.

Dufrene M, Zwolinski P, Brissaud D (2013) An engineering platform to support a practical integrated eco-design methodology. CIRP Ann 62:131–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.065 CrossRef

30.

Eastwood MD, Haapala KR (2015) A unit process model based methodology to assist product sustainability assessment during design for manufacturing. J Clean Prod 108:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.105 CrossRef

31.

Emerson J, Levy M, Salteli A (2008) Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). Choice Rev Online 45:45-2621-45–2621. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.45-2621 CrossRef

32.

Esty DC, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, Sherbinin A (2005) 2005 environmental sustainability index: benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship

33.

Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z CrossRef

34.

Gallagher J, Styles D, McNabola A, Williams AP (2015) Making green technology greener: achieving a balance between carbon and resource savings through ecodesign in hydropower systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.015 CrossRef

35.

Gardan N, Schneider A (2015) Topological optimization of internal patterns and support in additive manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 37:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.07.003 CrossRef

36.

Gebisa AW, Lemu HG (2017) Design for manufacturing to design for additive manufacturing: analysis of implications for design opimality and product sustainability [WWW document]. URL https://ac-els-cdn-com.sicd.clermont-universite.fr/S2351978917307552/1-s2.0-S2351978917307552-main.pdf?_tid=spdf-77e36862-5c53-4476-8a1a-be70723a9b6d&acdnat=1519751811_b49a5188b531594dc34568bc67af362f. Accessed 2.27.18

37.

Ghobadian A, Talavera I, Bhattacharya A, Kumar V, Garza-Reyes JA, O’Regan N (2018) Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability. Int J Prod Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.001

38.

Giffi A, Gangula B, Illinda P (2014) 3D-opportunity-auto-industry [WWW document]. URL https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/additive-manufacturing-3d-opportunity-in-automotive/DUP_707-3D-Opportunity-Auto-Industry_MASTER.pdf. Accessed 3.5.18

39.

Golinska P, Kosacka M, Mierzwiak R, Werner-Lewandowska K (2015) Grey decision making as a tool for the classification of the sustainability level of remanufacturing companies. J Clean Prod 105:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.040 CrossRef

40.

Gonzalez EDRS, Sarkis J, Huisingh D, Huatuco LH, Maculan N, Montoya-Torres JR, de Almeida CMVB (2015) Making real progress toward more sustainable societies using decision support models and tools: introduction to the special volume. J Clean Prod 105:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.047 CrossRef

41.

Gri G (2000) Sustainability reporting guidelines

42.

Gupta N, Weber C, Newsome S (2012) Additive manufacturing: status and opportunities. Sci Technol Policy Inst Wash

43.

Gupta K, Laubscher RF, Davim JP, Jain NK (2016) Recent developments in sustainable manufacturing of gears: a review. J Clean Prod 112:3320–3330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.133 CrossRef

44.

Haapala KR, Zhao F, Camelio J, Sutherland JW, Skerlos SJ, Dornfeld DA, Jawahir IS, Clarens AF, Rickli JL (2013) A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 135:041013CrossRef

45.

Hapuwatte B, Seevers KD, Badurdeen F, Jawahir IS (2016) Total life cycle sustainability analysis of additively manufactured products. Procedia CIRP 48:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.016 CrossRef

46.

Holm M (2018) The future shop-floor operators, demands, requirements and interpretations. J Manuf Syst 47:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.03.004 CrossRef

47.

Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 CrossRef

48.

Jain R (2005) Sustainability: metrics, specific indicators and preference index. Clean Techn Environ Policy 7:71–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-005-0273-3 CrossRef

49.

Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Dillon OW, Jawahir IS (2010) Sustainable manufacturing: modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.006 CrossRef

50.

Jin M, Tang R, Ji Y, Liu F, Gao L, Huisingh D (2017) Impact of advanced manufacturing on sustainability: an overview of the special volume on advanced manufacturing for sustainability and low fossil carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 161:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.101 CrossRef

51.

Joung CB, Carrell J, Sarkar P, Feng SC (2013) Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol Indic 24:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.030 CrossRef

52.

Karlsson R, Luttropp C (2006) EcoDesign: what’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. J Clean Prod 14:1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.010 CrossRef

53.

Kerbrat O, Bourhis FL, Mognol P, Hascoët J-Y (2015) Environmental performance modeling for additive manufacturing processes. Int J Rapid Manuf 5:339–348CrossRef

54.

Kiswanto G, Hendriko H, Duc E (2014) An analytical method for obtaining cutter workpiece engagement during a semi-finish in five-axis milling. Comput Aided Des 55:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.05.003 CrossRef

55.

Kulatunga AK, Karunatilake N, Weerasinghe N, Ihalawatta RK (2015) Sustainable manufacturing based decision support model for product design and development process. Procedia CIRP 26:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.004 CrossRef

56.

Lambrecht H, Thißen N (2015) Enhancing sustainable production by the combined use of material flow analysis and mathematical programming. J Clean Prod 105:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.053 CrossRef

57.

Langeron JM, Duc E, Lartigue C, Bourdet P (2004) A new format for 5-axis tool path computation, using Bspline curves. Comput Aided Des 36:1219–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2003.12.002 CrossRef

58.

Lee C-K, Lee J-Y, Choi Y-H, Lee K-M (2016) Application of the integrated ecodesign method using the GHG emission as a single indicator and its GHG recyclability. J Clean Prod 112:1692–1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.081 CrossRef

59.

Li Y, Mathiyazhagan K (2018) Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector. J Clean Prod 172:2931–2941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.120 CrossRef

60.

Lu C, Gao L, Li X, Chen P (2016) Energy-efficient multi-pass turning operation using multi-objective backtracking search algorithm. J Clean Prod 137:1516–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.029 CrossRef

61.

Madan Shankar K, Kannan D, Udhaya Kumar P (2017) Analyzing sustainable manufacturing practices – a case study in Indian context. J Clean Prod 164:1332–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.097 CrossRef

62.

Mathieux F, Brissaud D, Zwolinski P (2007) Product ecodesign and materials: current status and future prospects. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv07111788

63.

Moktadir MA, Rahman T, Rahman MH, Ali SM, Paul SK (2018) Drivers to sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy: a perspective of leather industries in Bangladesh. J Clean Prod 174:1366–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.063 CrossRef

64.

Moldavska A, Welo T (2017) The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: a content-analysis based literature review. J Clean Prod 166:744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006 CrossRef

65.

Peralta Álvarez ME, Marcos Bárcena M, Aguayo González F (2017) On the sustainability of machining processes. Proposal for a unified framework through the triple bottom-line from an understanding review. J Clean Prod 142:3890–3904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.071 CrossRef

66.

Pigosso DCA, Zanette ET, Filho AG, Ometto AR, Rozenfeld H (2010) Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 18:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.005 CrossRef

67.

Platcheck ER, Schaeffer L, Kindlein W, Cãndido LHA (2008) Methodology of ecodesign for the development of more sustainable electro-electronic equipments. J Clean Prod 16:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.10.006 CrossRef

68.

Rachuri S, Sriram RD, Narayanan A, Sarkar P, Lee JH, Lyons KW, Srinivasan V, Kemmerer SJ (2011) Summary of the NIST workshop on sustainable manufacturing: metrics, standards, and infrastructure. Int J Sustain Manuf 2:237–259CrossRef

69.

Rauch M, Duc E, Hascoet J-Y (2009) Improving trochoidal tool paths generation and implementation using process constraints modelling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.006 CrossRef

70.

Reich-Weiser C, Vijayaraghavan A, Dornfeld DA (2008) Metrics for sustainable manufacturing. In: ASME 2008 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference Collocated with the 3rd JSME/ASME International Conference on Materials and Processing. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 327–335

71.

Rossi M, Germani M, Zamagni A (2016) Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies. J Clean Prod 129:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.051 CrossRef

72.

Roy R (1994) The evolution of ecodesign. Technovation 14:363–380CrossRef

73.

Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2012) Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process, International series in operations research & management science, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef

74.

Salonitis K, Ball P (2013) Energy efficient manufacturing from machine tools to manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 7:634–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.045 CrossRef

75.

Shao G, Brodsky A, Shin S-J, Kim DB (2017) Decision guidance methodology for sustainable manufacturing using process analytics formalism. J Intell Manuf 28:455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0995-3 CrossRef

76.

Shojaeipour S (2015) Sustainable manufacturing process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6705-7 CrossRef

77.

Sossou G, Demoly F, Montavon G, Gomes S (2018) An additive manufacturing oriented design approach to mechanical assemblies. J Comput Des Eng 5:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.005 CrossRef

78.

STELIA Aerospace (2018. World premiere for additive manufacturing: STELIA Aerospace presents a demonstrator for metallic self-reinforced fuselage pannels manufactured by 3D impression. URL http://additivemanufacturing.com/2018/02/21/world-premiere-for-additive-manufacturing-stelia-aerospace-presents-a-demonstrator-for-metallic-self-reinforced-fuselage-pannels-manufactured-by-3d-impression/. Accessed 3.5.18

79.

Stoycheva S, Marchese D, Paul C, Padoan S, Juhmani A, Linkov I (2018) Multi-criteria decision analysis framework for sustainable manufacturing in automotive industry. J Clean Prod 187:257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.133 CrossRef

80.

Tang Y, Mak K, Zhao YF (2016) A framework to reduce product environmental impact through design optimization for additive manufacturing. J Clean Prod 137:1560–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.037 CrossRef

81.

Vaneker THJ (2017) the role of design for additive manufacturing in the successful economical introduction of AM. Procedia CIRP 60:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.012 CrossRef

82.

Vereinte Nationen (ed) (2007) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies, 3rd edn. United Nations publication. United Nations, New York

83.

Watson JK, Taminger KMB (2018) A decision-support model for selecting additive manufacturing versus subtractive manufacturing based on energy consumption. J Clean Prod 176:1316–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.009 CrossRef

84.

Yang S, Zhao YF (2015) Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5 CrossRef

85.

Yuan C, Zhai Q, Dornfeld D (2012) A three dimensional system approach for environmentally sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Ann 61:39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.105 CrossRef

86.

Zackrisson M, Kurdve M, Shahbazi S, Wiktorsson M, Winroth M, Landström A, Almström P, Andersson C, Windmark C, Öberg AE, Myrelid A (2017) Sustainability performance indicators at shop floor level in large manufacturing companies. Procedia CIRP 61:457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.199 CrossRef

87.

Zhang H, Calvo-Amodio J, Haapala KR (2013) A conceptual model for assisting sustainable manufacturing through system dynamics. J Manuf Syst 32:543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.05.007 CrossRef

Titel: Sustainability performance indicators for additive manufacturing: a literature review based on product life cycle studies
verfasst von: Getasew Taddese
Severine Durieux
Emmanuel Duc
Publikationsdatum: 08.04.2020
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 7-8/2020
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05249-2

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7-8/2020

Influence of process parameters on thinning ratio and fittability of bellows hydroforming

Experimental investigation on micromachining of epoxy/graphene nano platelet nanocomposites

Investigations of surface quality and energy consumption associated with costs and material removal rate during face milling of AISI 1045 steel

In situ fatigue monitoring investigation of additively manufactured maraging steel

Effects of size and geometry on the thermomechanical properties of additively manufactured NiTi shape memory alloy

Analysis of flow field for electrochemical machining deep spiral hole with gradually changing groove section

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten