nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.09.2015

Systematic content evaluation and review of measurement properties of questionnaires for measuring self-reported fatigue among older people

verfasst von: Thorlene Egerton, Ingrid I. Riphagen, Arnhild J. Nygård, Pernille Thingstad, Jorunn L. Helbostad

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The assessment of fatigue in older people requires simple and user-friendly questionnaires that capture the phenomenon, yet are free from items indistinguishable from other disorders and experiences. This study aimed to evaluate the content, and systematically review and rate the measurement properties of self-report questionnaires for measuring fatigue, in order to identify the most suitable questionnaires for older people.

Methods

This study firstly involved identification of questionnaires that purport to measure self-reported fatigue, and evaluation of the content using a rating scale developed for the purpose from contemporary understanding of the construct. Secondly, for the questionnaires that had acceptable content, we identified studies reporting measurement properties and rated the methodological quality of those studies according to the COSMIN system. Finally, we extracted and synthesised the results of the studies to give an overall rating for each questionnaire for each measurement property. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42013005589).

Results

Of the 77 identified questionnaires, twelve were selected for review after content evaluation. Methodological quality varied, and there was a lack of information on measurement error and responsiveness.

Conclusions

The PROMIS-Fatigue item bank and short forms perform the best. The FACIT-Fatigue scale, Parkinsons Fatigue Scale, Perform Questionnaire, and Uni-dimensional Fatigue Impact Scale also perform well and can be recommended. Minor modifications to improve performance are suggested. Further evaluation of unresolved measurement properties, particularly with samples including older people, is needed for all the recommended questionnaires.

Vorheriger Artikel Comparing three different approaches to the measurement of needs concerning fatigue in patients with advanced cancer

Nächster Artikel Reliability of the autoimmune bullous disease quality of life (ABQOL) questionnaire in the USA

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Alexander, N. B., Taffet, G. E., Horne, F. M., Eldadah, B. A., Ferrucci, L., Nayfield, S., et al. (2010). Bedside-to-Bench conference: Research agenda for idiopathic fatigue and aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(5), 967–975. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02811.x.PubMedCrossRef

Gill, T. M., Desai, M. M., Gahbauer, E. A., Holford, T. R., & Williams, C. S. (2001). Restricted activity among community-living older persons: Incidence, precipitants, and health care utilization. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135(5), 313–321.PubMedCrossRef

Leveille, S. G., Fried, L., & Guralnik, J. M. (2002). Disabling symptoms: What do older women report? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(10), 766–773.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Kalkanis, A., Yucel, R. M., & Judson, M. A. (2013). The internal consistency of PRO fatigue instruments in sarcoidosis: Superiority of the PFI over the FAS. Sarcoidosis Vasculitis & Diffuse Lung Diseases, 30(1), 60–64.

Jones, D. E., Gray, J. C., & Newton, J. (2009). Perceived fatigue is comparable between different disease groups. QJM, 102(9), 617–624. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcp091.PubMedCrossRef

Hagell, P., Rosblom, T., & Palhagen, S. (2012). A Swedish version of the 16-item Parkinson fatigue scale (PFS-16). Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 125(4), 288–292. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01560.x.PubMedCrossRef

Riley, W. T., Rothrock, N., Bruce, B., Christodolou, C., Cook, K., Hahn, E. A., et al. (2010). Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: Further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks. Quality of Life Research, 19(9), 1311–1321. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9694-5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Hobart, J., Cano, S., Baron, R., Thompson, A., Schwid, S., Zajicek, J., et al. (2013). Achieving valid patient-reported outcomes measurement: A lesson from fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 19(13), 1773–1783.PubMedCrossRef

Lai, J. S., Crane, P. K., & Cella, D. (2006). Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Quality of Life Research, 15(7), 1179–1190. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-0060-6.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Dittner, A. J., Wessely, S. C., & Brown, R. G. (2004). The assessment of fatigue: A practical guide for clinicians and researchers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56(2), 157–170. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00371-4.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Whitehead, L. (2009). The measurement of fatigue in chronic illness: A systematic review of unidimensional and multidimensional fatigue measures. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(1), 107–128.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Mota, D. D., & Pimenta, C. A. (2006). Self-report instruments for fatigue assessment: A systematic review. Research and Theory of Nursing Practice, 20(1), 49–78.CrossRef

13.

Elbers, R. G., Rietberg, M. B., van Wegen, E. E., Verhoef, J., Kramer, S. F., Terwee, C. B., et al. (2012). Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: A systematic review of measurement properties. Quality of Life Research, 21(6), 925–944. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0009-2.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

14.

Tyson, S. F., & Brown, P. (2014). How to measure fatigue in neurological conditions? A systematic review of psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures used so far. Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(8), 804–816. doi:10.1177/0269215514521043.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Chang, C. H., Bode, R. K., & Heinemann, A. W. (2003). Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: An illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale. Quality of Life Research, 12(5), 485–501.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.PubMedCrossRef

17.

de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., & Mokkink, L. B. (2011). Practical guides to biostatistics and epidemiology: Measurement in medicine: A practical guide. Cambridge, GBR: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

18.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2012). COSMIN checklist manual. www.cosmin.nl: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research.

19.

Brink, T. L., Yesavage, J. A., Lum, O., Heersema, P. H., Adey, M., & Rose, T. L. (1982). Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clinical Gerontologist, 1(1), 37–43.CrossRef

20.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Riphagen, I., et al. (2009). Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(3), 313–333. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9451-9.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

22.

Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

23.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Gibbons, E., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 82. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

24.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Al-shair, K., Muellerova, H., Yorke, J., Rennard, S. I., Wouters, E. F., Hanania, N. A., et al. (2012). Examining fatigue in COPD: Development, validity and reliability of a modified version of FACIT-F scale. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 100. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-100.CrossRef

26.

Nilsson, M. H., Bladh, S., & Hagell, P. (2013). Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease: Measurement properties of a generic and a condition-specific rating scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 46(5), 737–746. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.11.004.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Mills, R. J., Young, C. A., Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2010). Rasch analysis of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 81(9), 1049–1051. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.151340.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Brown, R. G., Dittner, A., Findley, L., & Wessely, S. C. (2005). The Parkinson fatigue scale. Parkinsonism Related Disorders, 11(1), 49–55. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.07.007.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Baro, E., Carulla, J., Cassinello, J., Colomer, R., Mata, J. G., Gascon, P., et al. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Perform Questionnaire: A brief scale for assessing patient perceptions of fatigue in cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19(5), 657–666. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0878-x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

30.

Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Dineen, K., Bode, R., Von Roenn, J., Gershon, R. C., et al. (2005). An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigue. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(2), 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.016.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Persson, L. O., Karlsson, J., Bengtsson, C., Steen, B., & Sullivan, M. (1998). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: Results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1095–1103.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Deng, N., Guyer, R., & Ware, J. E. (2015). Energy, fatigue, or both? A bifactor modeling approach to the conceptualization and measurement of vitality. Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 81–93. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0839-9.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Lindeberg, S. I., Ostergren, P. O., & Lindbladh, E. (2006). Exhaustion is differentiable from depression and anxiety: Evidence provided by the SF-36 vitality scale. Stress, 9(2), 117–123. doi:10.1080/10253890600823485.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Mead, G., Lynch, J., Greig, C., Young, A., Lewis, S., & Sharpe, M. (2007). Evaluation of fatigue scales in stroke patients. Stroke, 38(7), 2090–2095. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.106.478941.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Brown, L. F., Kroenke, K., Theobald, D. E., & Wu, J. (2011). Comparison of SF-36 vitality scale and Fatigue Symptom Inventory in assessing cancer-related fatigue. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19(8), 1255–1259. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1148-2.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Yanez, B., & Stone, A. (2014). Linking fatigue measures on a common reporting metric. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 48(4), 639–648. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.12.236.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Meads, D. M., Doward, L. C., McKenna, S. P., Fisk, J., Twiss, J., & Eckert, B. (2009). The development and validation of the Unidimensional Fatigue Impact Scale (U-FIS). Multiple Sclerosis, 15(10), 1228–1238. doi:10.1177/1352458509106714.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Shahid, A., Shen, J., & Shapiro, C. M. (2010). Measurements of sleepiness and fatigue. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(1), 81–89. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.04.001.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Holloway, L., Humphrey, L., Heron, L., Pilling, C., Kitchen, H., Hojbjerre, L., et al. (2014). Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials: A review of content validity, face validity and psychometric performance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,. doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0116-1.PubMedCentralPubMed

40.

Barsevick, A. M., Cleeland, C. S., Manning, D. C., O’Mara, A. M., Reeve, B. B., Scott, J. A., et al. (2010). ASCPRO recommendations for the assessment of fatigue as an outcome in clinical trials. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39(6), 1086–1099. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.02.006.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

41.

Krupp, L. B., LaRocca, N. G., Muir-Nash, J., & Steinberg, A. D. (1989). The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Archives of Neurology, 46(10), 1121–1123.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Chalder, T., Berelowitz, G., Pawlikowska, T., Watts, L., Wessely, S., Wright, D., et al. (1993). Development of a fatigue scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37(2), 147–153.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Fitch, M. I., Bunston, T., Bakker, D., Mings, D., & Sevean, P. (2011). The fatigue pictogram: Psychometric evaluation of a new clinical tool. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal, 21(4), 205–217.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Fitch, M. I., Bunston, T., & Mings, D. (2012). The Fatigue Pictogram: Assessing the psychometrics of a new screening tool. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal, 22(1), 42–52.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Kjerulff, K. H., & Langenberg, P. W. (1995). A comparison of alternative ways of measuring fatigue among patients having hysterectomy. Medical Care, 33(4 Suppl), AS156–AS163.PubMed

46.

Magasi, S., Ryan, G., Revicki, D., Lenderking, W., Hays, R. D., Brod, M., et al. (2012). Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: Perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. Quality of Life Research, 21(5), 739–746. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9990-8.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Cella, D., Lai, J. S., & Stone, A. (2011). Self-reported fatigue: One dimension or more? Lessons from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19(9), 1441–1450. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0971-1.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Lai, J. S., Beaumont, J. L., Ogale, S., Brunetta, P., & Cella, D. (2011). Validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale in patients with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus, participating in a clinical trial. Journal of Rheumatology, 38(4), 672–679. doi:10.3899/jrheum.100799.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Cella, M., & Chalder, T. (2010). Measuring fatigue in clinical and community settings. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(1), 17–22. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.007.PubMedCrossRef

50.

McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

51.

Egerton, T. (2013). Self-reported aging-related fatigue: A concept description and its relevance to physical therapist practice. Physical Therapy, 93(10), 1403–1413. doi:10.2522/ptj.20130011.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1006–1012. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Lin, C. C., Chang, A. P., Chen, M. L., Cleeland, C. S., Mendoza, T. R., & Wang, X. S. (2006). Validation of the Taiwanese version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 32(1), 52–59. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.12.019.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Radbruch, L., Sabatowski, R., Elsner, F., Everts, J., Mendoza, T., & Cleeland, C. (2003). Validation of the German version of the brief fatigue inventory. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25(5), 449–458.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Nicklin, J., Cramp, F., Kirwan, J., Urban, M., & Hewlett, S. (2010). Collaboration with patients in the design of patient-reported outcome measures: Capturing the experience of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 62(11), 1552–1558. doi:10.1002/acr.20264.CrossRef

56.

Holley, S. K. (2000). Evaluating patient distress from cancer-related fatigue: An instrument development study. Oncology Nursing Forum, 27(9), 1425–1431.PubMed

57.

Matza, L. S., Phillips, G. A., Revicki, D. A., Murray, L., & Malley, K. G. (2011). Development and validation of a patient-report measure of fatigue associated with depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 134(1–3), 294–303. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.028.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Matza, L. S., Murray, L. T., Phillips, G. A., Konechnik, T. J., Dennehy, E. B., Bush, E. N., et al. (2015). Qualitative Research on Fatigue Associated with Depression: Content Validity of the Fatigue Associated with Depression Questionnaire (FAsD-V2). Patient,. doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0107-7.PubMed

59.

Fisk, J. D., Ritvo, P. G., Ross, L., Haase, D. A., Marrie, T. J., & Schlech, W. F. (1994). Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 18(Suppl 1), S79–S83.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Prince, M. I., James, O. F., Holland, N. P., & Jones, D. E. (2000). Validation of a fatigue impact score in primary biliary cirrhosis: Towards a standard for clinical and trial use. Journal of Hepatology, 32(3), 368–373.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Mathiowetz, V. (2003). Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the Fatigue Impact Scale for persons with multiple sclerosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(4), 389–395.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Imam, B., Anton, H. A., & Miller, W. C. (2012). Measurement properties of a telephone version of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale among individuals with a traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 50(12), 920–924. doi:10.1038/sc.2012.79.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579.PubMed

64.

Schiehser, D. M., Ayers, C. R., Liu, L., Lessig, S., Song, D. S., & Filoteo, J. V. (2012). Validation of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Related Disorders,. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.11.013.PubMed

65.

Rietberg, M. B., Van Wegen, E. E., & Kwakkel, G. (2010). Measuring fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: Reproducibility, responsiveness and concurrent validity of three Dutch self-report questionnaires. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(22), 1870–1876. doi:10.3109/09638281003734458.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Yost, K. J., Eton, D. T., Garcia, S. F., & Cella, D. (2011). Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(5), 507–516. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.018.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

67.

Broderick, J. E., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Schwartz, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (2013). Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 65(10), 1625–1633. doi:10.1002/acr.22025.

68.

Senders, A., Hanes, D., Bourdette, D., Whitham, R., & Shinto, L. (2014). Reducing survey burden: Feasibility and validity of PROMIS measures in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 20(8), 1102–1111. doi:10.1177/1352458513517279.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

69.

Aynehchi, B. B., Obourn, C., Sundaram, K., Bentsianov, B. L., & Rosenfeld, R. M. (2013). Validation of the Modified Brief Fatigue Inventory in head and neck cancer patients. Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 148(1), 69–74. doi:10.1177/0194599812460985.CrossRef

70.

Oude Voshaar, M. A., Ten Klooster, P. M., Bode, C., Vonkeman, H. E., Glas, C. A., Jansen, T., et al. (2015). Assessment of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A psychometric comparison of single-item, multiitem, and multidimensional measures. Journal of Rheumatology,. doi:10.3899/jrheum.140389.PubMed

71.

Nikolaus, S., Bode, C., Taal, E., & van der Laar, M. A. (2012). Expert evaluations of fatigue questionnaires used in rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi study among patients, nurses and rheumatologists in the Netherlands. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 30(1), 79–84.PubMed

72.

Wu, C. W., Liu, Z. D., Zhang, Y. B., Li, J. M., & Wang, D. X. (2008). Validity and reliability of Chinese version of Fatigue Impact Scale in cerebral infarction patients. Neural Regeneration Research, 3(2), 177–181.

73.

Theander, K., Cliffordson, C., Torstensson, O., Jakobsson, P., & Unosson, M. (2007). Fatigue Impact Scale: Its validation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Psychol Health Medicine, 12(4), 470–484. doi:10.1080/13548500601086771.CrossRef

74.

Harel, D., Thombs, B. D., Hudson, M., Baron, M., & Steele, R. (2012). Measuring fatigue in SSc: A comparison of the Short Form-36 Vitality subscale and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Rheumatology, 51(12), 2177–2185. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes206.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Sorensen, M., Chartash, E., Sengupta, N., & Grober, J. (2005). Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 32(5), 811–819.PubMed

76.

Hagell, P., Hoglund, A., Reimer, J., Eriksson, B., Knutsson, I., Widner, H., et al. (2006). Measuring fatigue in Parkinson’s disease: A psychometric study of two brief generic fatigue questionnaires. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 32(5), 420–432. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.021.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Salsman, J. M., Beaumont, J. L., Wortman, K., Yan, Y., Friend, J., & Cella, D. (2014). Brief versions of the FACIT-fatigue and FAACT subscales for patients with non-small cell lung cancer cachexia. Supportive Care in Cancer,. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2484-9.PubMedCentralPubMed

78.

Amtmann, D., Bamer, A. M., Noonan, V., Lang, N., Kim, J., & Cook, K. F. (2012). Comparison of the psychometric properties of two fatigue scales in multiple sclerosis. Rehabiliation Psychology, 57(2), 159–166. doi:10.1037/a0027890.CrossRef

79.

Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Choi, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Christodoulou, C., Gershon, R., et al. (2011). How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10), S20–S27. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.033.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

80.

Bjorner, J. B., Rose, M., Gandek, B., Stone, A. A., Junghaenel, D. U., & Ware, J. E, Jr. (2014). Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(1), 108–113. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.016.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

81.

Christodoulou, C., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Broderick, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (2014). Measuring daily fatigue using a brief scale adapted from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1245–1253. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0553-z.PubMedCrossRef

82.

Kosinski, M., Keller, S. D., Ware, J. E, Jr, Hatoum, H. T., & Kong, S. X. (1999). The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity. Medical Care, 37(5), MS23–MS39.PubMed

83.

Lam, C. L., Gandek, B., Ren, X. S., & Chan, M. S. (1998). Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1139–1147.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Lim, L. L. Y., Seubsman, S.-A., & Sleigh, A. (2008). Thai SF-36 health survey: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in healthy men and women. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 52. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-6-52.CrossRef

85.

Loge, J. H., Kaasa, S., Hjermstad, M. J., & Kvien, T. K. (1998). Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1069–1076.PubMedCrossRef

86.

McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E, Jr, Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32(1), 40–66.PubMedCrossRef

87.

Montazeri, A., Goshtasebi, A., Vahdaninia, M., & Gandek, B. (2005). The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 875–882.PubMedCrossRef

88.

Sabbah, I., Drouby, N., Sabbah, S., Retel-Rude, N., & Mercier, M. (2003). Quality of life in rural and urban populations in Lebanon using SF-36 health survey. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 30. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-30.CrossRef

89.

Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., & Ware, J. E, Jr. (1995). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1349–1358.PubMedCrossRef

90.

Ren, X. S., Amick, B, 3rd, Zhou, L., & Gandek, B. (1998). Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1129–1138.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Chang, D. F., Chun, C. A., Takeuchi, D. T., & Shen, H. (2000). SF-36 health survey: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability in a community sample of Chinese Americans. Medical Care, 38(5), 542–548.PubMedCrossRef

92.

Li, L., Wang, H. M., & Shen, Y. (2003). Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57(4), 259–263.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

93.

Tseng, H.-M., Lu, J.-F. R., & Gandek, B. (2003). Cultural issues in using the SF-36 Health Survey in Asia: Results from Taiwan. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 72.CrossRef

94.

Gandek, B., Ware, J. E, Jr, Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Bjorner, J., et al. (1998). Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1149–1158.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Systematic content evaluation and review of measurement properties of questionnaires for measuring self-reported fatigue among older people
verfasst von: Thorlene Egerton
Ingrid I. Riphagen
Arnhild J. Nygård
Pernille Thingstad
Jorunn L. Helbostad
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2015
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0963-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

Psychometric evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaire in assessing health-related quality of life in prostate cancer survivors: a curate’s egg

Development of a cross-cultural item bank for measuring quality of life related to mental health in multiple sclerosis patients

Interpreting SF-12 mental component score: an investigation of its convergent validity with CESD-10

An audit of diabetes-dependent quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Malaysia

Longitudinal associations between asthma control, medication adherence, and quality of life among adolescents: results from a cross-lagged analysis

Health-related quality of life of Asian patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Singapore

Premium Partner