Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics 2/2023

06.01.2023

Tail risk, beta anomaly, and demand for lottery: what explains cross-sectional variations in equity returns?

verfasst von: Asgar Ali, K. N. Badhani

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study investigates the tail-risk and returns relationship in an emerging equity market—India. We observe both the beta and the tail risk anomalies at the univariate portfolio level. However, after controlling for the lottery effects (MAX and idiosyncratic volatility), the relationship between the systematic tail risk measures and the expected returns turns positive for some of the proxies of tail risk, while the relationship between beta and expected returns becomes flat. The lottery effect explains the tail risk anomaly reported in the literate. These results suggest that investors care for probabilities of extreme changes in stock prices but do not care much about moderate variations in stock returns. Emerging markets have a significant presence of individual investors, who consider investing in the stock market as an opportunity to gamble and earn lottery-like payoffs, which results in an overvaluation of lottery stocks. Since these stocks also have high systematic risk and a high probability of extreme negative returns, we observe that the expected returns are negatively correlated with beta and left tail risk measures before controlling for the lottery effects. These results are robust after controlling for other relevant variables such as the size of the firm, book-to-market ratio, momentum, retail ownership, and illiquidity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
see, for example, Harris et al. (2019), Chabi-Yo et al. (2018), Bollerslev et al. (2015), Kelly and Jiang (2014), Bali et al. (2014), Xiong et al. (2014), Huang et al. (2012).
 
2
In some studies, no premium was observed for stocks with higher tail risk (e. g., Van Oordt and Zhou 2016).
 
3
Earlier studies using this approach for estimating tail-beta include Post and Versijp (2007) and Bali et al (2014).
 
4
Individual investors generally keep concentrated portfolio of a few stocks, but at the same time they also invest in well diversified portfolios, like mutual funds.
 
5
The distribution has four parameters (location parameter \(\xi ,\) scale parameter \(\omega ,\) degree-of-freedom parameter, \(\nu\) and skewness parameter \(\alpha .\) In multivariate case of \(d\)-dimension \(\xi\), \(\nu\) and \(\nu\) are vectors of length\(d\), while \(\omega\) is a \(d\times d\) positive-definite square matrix. the Azzalini and Capitanio (2014, Chapter 6) give detail description of the distribution and the ‘sn package’ (maintained by Adelchi Azzalini) provides implementation of this distribution in Yoshiba (2018) provides detailed procedure for estimating skew-t copula and its tail dependence.
 
6
We are using an unbalanced panel data as many stocks were listed after year 2000 and many other stocks were delisted during the sample period. The actual number of total sample stocks vary each month depending on availability of data. Each decile portfolio for the month contains nearest integer number of stocks dividing the number of available sample stocks by ten. Any excess or shortfall in number of stocks is adjusted in last portfolio.
 
7
The value weighted average excess return is 9.98 percent per annum. The market indices (Nifty and Sensex) have also earned positive risk premium of around 3.12 percent per annum. While, the equal weighted average excess returns of the sample stocks is negative. This implies that majority of stocks have given returns lower than the risk-free rate and positive market risk premium is attributed to a small number of better performing large stocks.
 
8
Max and IVOL are more correlated with overall measure of tail risk (i.e., CVaR), rather than the measures of systematic tail risk. It implies that the high correlation between CVaR and measures of lottery effect is due to idiosyncratic part of tail risk and stocks with lottery like features also have high idiosyncratic tail risk.
 
9
However, the insignificant or the negative size premiums have been observed in different markets across the world in recent empirical studies and existence of size premium is being debated (see Van Dijk 2011; Astakhov et al. 2019, for a survey).
 
10
Ownership percentage of retail investors explains the inverted size premium more consistently. Retail investors have higher ownership in small stocks and speculative trading activities of these investors are likely to cause overvaluation of these stocks. We will elaborate on this in the next section.
 
11
Similar results were observed from Chinese market (Hai et al. 2020; Wan 2018). The literature suggest that the IVOL effect may also be caused by factors like heterogeneous belief, short sale constraints, information asymmetry, short-run return reversal and asymmetric limits to arbitrage (see Hou and Loh 2016, Footnote 1). He and Xue (2022) classify these factors in two groups—The first group focuses on some proxies for the lottery preferences of investors, including skewness and expected idiosyncratic skewness coskewness beta and idiosyncratic coskewness beta, and maximum daily return. The second group focuses on various forms of market frictions, such as order imbalances, return reversals, illiquidity and the effect of arbitrage costs.
 
12
Recent literature has focused on how individuals allocate their funds among and within the several investment layers. See for example, Das et al. (2010), Baptista (2012), Parker (2021).
 
13
Simultaneous investment in lottery and insurance is known as Friedman-Savage Puzzle in the literature.
 
14
This trend is also observed in other emerging markets Badarinza. (2016). In developed market on the other hand, most of the investment is channelized through financial intermediaries (institutional investors) and household investors are shifting towards passive investing Anadu et al.(2020).
 
15
According to RBI data only 4 percent of household financial investments are in stocks and bonds in 2018–19, while 37 percent is in the form of bank deposits, 19 percent in provident funds and other retirement saving schemes and 10 percent in government sponsored saving schemes. (Reserve Bank of India, Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy, Table 12).
 
16
Barberis and Huang (2008) argue that the investors with cumulative prospect theory utility overweight tiny probabilities of large gains.
 
17
While individual investors are mainly considered responsible for lottery-effect but studies shows that the institutional investors also invest in lottery stocks for example Akbas and Genc (2020) and Agarwal et al. (2021) document preference of mutual funds for lottery stocks.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal V, Jiang L, Wen Q (2021) Why do mutual funds hold lottery stocks? J Financ Quan Ana (in press) Agarwal V, Jiang L, Wen Q (2021) Why do mutual funds hold lottery stocks? J Financ Quan Ana (in press)
Zurück zum Zitat Akbas F, Genc E (2020) Do mutual fund investors overweight the probability of extreme payoffs in the return distribution? J Financ Quan Anal 55(1):223–261CrossRef Akbas F, Genc E (2020) Do mutual fund investors overweight the probability of extreme payoffs in the return distribution? J Financ Quan Anal 55(1):223–261CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. J Financ Mark 5(1):31–56CrossRef Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. J Financ Mark 5(1):31–56CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Anadu K, Kruttli M, McCabe P, Osambela E (2020) The shift from active to passive investing: risks to financial stability? Finance Ana J 76(4):23–39CrossRef Anadu K, Kruttli M, McCabe P, Osambela E (2020) The shift from active to passive investing: risks to financial stability? Finance Ana J 76(4):23–39CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ang A, Chen J, Xing Y (2006a) Downside risk. Rev Financ Stud 19(4):1191–1239CrossRef Ang A, Chen J, Xing Y (2006a) Downside risk. Rev Financ Stud 19(4):1191–1239CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ang A, Hodrick RJ, Xing Y, Zhang X (2006b) The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. J Financ 61:259–299CrossRef Ang A, Hodrick RJ, Xing Y, Zhang X (2006b) The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. J Financ 61:259–299CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Annaert J, De Ceuster M, Verstegen K (2013) Are extreme returns priced in the stock market? European evidence. J Bank Financ 37(9):3401–3411CrossRef Annaert J, De Ceuster M, Verstegen K (2013) Are extreme returns priced in the stock market? European evidence. J Bank Financ 37(9):3401–3411CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arellano-Valle RB (2010) On the information matrix of the multivariate skew-t model. Metron 68(3):371–386CrossRef Arellano-Valle RB (2010) On the information matrix of the multivariate skew-t model. Metron 68(3):371–386CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Astakhov A, Havranek T, Novak J (2019) Firm size and stock returns: a quantitative survey. J Econ Surveys 33(5):1463–1492CrossRef Astakhov A, Havranek T, Novak J (2019) Firm size and stock returns: a quantitative survey. J Econ Surveys 33(5):1463–1492CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atilgan Y, Bali TG, Demirtas KO, Gunaydin AD (2020) Left-tail momentum: underreaction to bad news, costly arbitrage, and equity returns. J Financ Econ 135(3):725–753CrossRef Atilgan Y, Bali TG, Demirtas KO, Gunaydin AD (2020) Left-tail momentum: underreaction to bad news, costly arbitrage, and equity returns. J Financ Econ 135(3):725–753CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azzalini A, Capitanio A (2003) Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t-distribution. J R Statis Soc Statis Method 65(2):367–389CrossRef Azzalini A, Capitanio A (2003) Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t-distribution. J R Statis Soc Statis Method 65(2):367–389CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azzalini A, Capitanio A (2014) The skew-normal and related families. Camb Uni Press, IMS Mono series Azzalini A, Capitanio A (2014) The skew-normal and related families. Camb Uni Press, IMS Mono series
Zurück zum Zitat Badarinza C, Campbell JY, Ramadorai T (2016) International comparative household finance. Ann Rev Econ 8:111–144CrossRef Badarinza C, Campbell JY, Ramadorai T (2016) International comparative household finance. Ann Rev Econ 8:111–144CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bali TG, Cakici N, Whitelaw RF (2011) Maxing out: stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. J Financ Econ 99(2):427–446CrossRef Bali TG, Cakici N, Whitelaw RF (2011) Maxing out: stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. J Financ Econ 99(2):427–446CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bali TG, Cakici N, Whitelaw RF (2014) Hybrid tail risk and expected stock returns: when does the tail wag the dog? Rev Asset Pric Stud 4(2):206–246CrossRef Bali TG, Cakici N, Whitelaw RF (2014) Hybrid tail risk and expected stock returns: when does the tail wag the dog? Rev Asset Pric Stud 4(2):206–246CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bali TG, Brown SJ, Murray S, Tang Y (2017) A lottery-demand-based explanation of the beta anomaly. J Financ Quan Ana 52(6):2369–2397CrossRef Bali TG, Brown SJ, Murray S, Tang Y (2017) A lottery-demand-based explanation of the beta anomaly. J Financ Quan Ana 52(6):2369–2397CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baptista AM (2012) Portfolio selection with mental accounts and background risk. J Bank Financ 36(4):968–980CrossRef Baptista AM (2012) Portfolio selection with mental accounts and background risk. J Bank Financ 36(4):968–980CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barberis N, Huang M (2008) Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. Amer Econ Rev 98(5):2066–2100CrossRef Barberis N, Huang M (2008) Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. Amer Econ Rev 98(5):2066–2100CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bawa VS, Lindenberg EB (1977) Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. J Financ Econ 5(2):189–200CrossRef Bawa VS, Lindenberg EB (1977) Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. J Financ Econ 5(2):189–200CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bi J, Zhu Y (2020) Value at risk, cross-sectional returns, and the role of investor sentiment. J Emp Financ 56:1–18CrossRef Bi J, Zhu Y (2020) Value at risk, cross-sectional returns, and the role of investor sentiment. J Emp Financ 56:1–18CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Black F, Michael C J, and Myron S (1972) The capital asset pricing model: some empirical tests. In: Jensen MC (ed) Studies in the theory of capital markets, New York: Praeger, 1972. Black F, Michael C J, and Myron S (1972) The capital asset pricing model: some empirical tests. In: Jensen MC (ed) Studies in the theory of capital markets, New York: Praeger, 1972.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollerslev T, Todorov V (2011) Tails, fears, and risk premia. J Finance 66(6):2165–2211CrossRef Bollerslev T, Todorov V (2011) Tails, fears, and risk premia. J Finance 66(6):2165–2211CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bollerslev T, Todorov V, Xu L (2015) Tail risk premia and return predictability. J Financ Econ 118(1):113–134CrossRef Bollerslev T, Todorov V, Xu L (2015) Tail risk premia and return predictability. J Financ Econ 118(1):113–134CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell JY, Ramadorai T, Ranish B (2019) Do the rich get richer in the stock market? Evidence from India. Ameri Econ Rev 1(2):225–240 Campbell JY, Ramadorai T, Ranish B (2019) Do the rich get richer in the stock market? Evidence from India. Ameri Econ Rev 1(2):225–240
Zurück zum Zitat Carhart MM (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J Financ 52(1):57–82CrossRef Carhart MM (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J Financ 52(1):57–82CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chabi-Yo F, Ruenzi S, Weigert F (2018) Crash sensitivity and the cross section of expected stock returns. J Financ Quan Anal 53(3):1059–1100CrossRef Chabi-Yo F, Ruenzi S, Weigert F (2018) Crash sensitivity and the cross section of expected stock returns. J Financ Quan Anal 53(3):1059–1100CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chichernea DC, Kassa H, Slezak SL (2019) Lottery preferences and the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle. Euro Financ Man 25(3):655–683CrossRef Chichernea DC, Kassa H, Slezak SL (2019) Lottery preferences and the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle. Euro Financ Man 25(3):655–683CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Das S, Markowitz H, Scheid J, Statman M (2010) Portfolio optimization with mental accounts. J Financ Quan Ana 45(2):311–334CrossRef Das S, Markowitz H, Scheid J, Statman M (2010) Portfolio optimization with mental accounts. J Financ Quan Ana 45(2):311–334CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DiTraglia FJ, Gerlach JR (2013) Portfolio selection: an extreme value approach. J Bank Financ 37(2):305–323CrossRef DiTraglia FJ, Gerlach JR (2013) Portfolio selection: an extreme value approach. J Bank Financ 37(2):305–323CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33(1):3–56CrossRef Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33(1):3–56CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama EF, French KR (1997) Industry costs of equity. J Financ Econ 43(2):153–193CrossRef Fama EF, French KR (1997) Industry costs of equity. J Financ Econ 43(2):153–193CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama EF, French KR (2005) Financing decisions: who issues stock? J Financ Econ 76(3):549–582CrossRef Fama EF, French KR (2005) Financing decisions: who issues stock? J Financ Econ 76(3):549–582CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama EF, French KR (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. J Financ Econ 116(1):1–22CrossRef Fama EF, French KR (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. J Financ Econ 116(1):1–22CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama EF, MacBeth JD (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests. J Polit Econ 81(3):607–636CrossRef Fama EF, MacBeth JD (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests. J Polit Econ 81(3):607–636CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frazzini A, Pedersen LH (2014) Betting against beta. J Financ Econ 111(1):1–25CrossRef Frazzini A, Pedersen LH (2014) Betting against beta. J Financ Econ 111(1):1–25CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gao X, Lin TC (2015) Do individual investors treat trading as a fun and exciting gambling activity? Evidence from repeated natural experiments. Rev Financ Stud 28(7):2128–2166CrossRef Gao X, Lin TC (2015) Do individual investors treat trading as a fun and exciting gambling activity? Evidence from repeated natural experiments. Rev Financ Stud 28(7):2128–2166CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gao GP, Lu X, Song Z (2019) Tail risk concerns everywhere. Man Science 65(7):3111–3130CrossRef Gao GP, Lu X, Song Z (2019) Tail risk concerns everywhere. Man Science 65(7):3111–3130CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. J Finance 64(2):549–578CrossRef Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. J Finance 64(2):549–578CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Han B, Kumar A (2013) Speculative retail trading and asset prices. J Financ Quan Ana 48(2):377–404CrossRef Han B, Kumar A (2013) Speculative retail trading and asset prices. J Financ Quan Ana 48(2):377–404CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harlow WV, Rao RK (1989) Asset pricing in a generalized mean-lower partial moment framework: theory and evidence. J Financ Quan Ana 24(3):285–311CrossRef Harlow WV, Rao RK (1989) Asset pricing in a generalized mean-lower partial moment framework: theory and evidence. J Financ Quan Ana 24(3):285–311CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harris RD, Nguyen LH, Stoja E (2019) Systematic extreme downside risk. J Inter Financ Mar Inst Money 61:128–142CrossRef Harris RD, Nguyen LH, Stoja E (2019) Systematic extreme downside risk. J Inter Financ Mar Inst Money 61:128–142CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat He Z, Xue W (2022) Idiosyncratic volatility puzzle exists at the country level. North Amer J Econ Financ 62:101765CrossRef He Z, Xue W (2022) Idiosyncratic volatility puzzle exists at the country level. North Amer J Econ Financ 62:101765CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hou K, Loh RK (2016) Have we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle? J Financ Econ 121(1):167–194CrossRef Hou K, Loh RK (2016) Have we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle? J Financ Econ 121(1):167–194CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang W, Liu Q, Rhee SG, Wu F (2012) Extreme downside risk and expected stock returns. J Bank Financ 36(5):1492–1502CrossRef Huang W, Liu Q, Rhee SG, Wu F (2012) Extreme downside risk and expected stock returns. J Bank Financ 36(5):1492–1502CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jahankhani A (1976) EV and ES capital asset pricing models: some empirical tests. J Financ Quant Anal 11:513–528CrossRef Jahankhani A (1976) EV and ES capital asset pricing models: some empirical tests. J Financ Quant Anal 11:513–528CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joe H (2006) Discussion of copulas: tales and facts. Extremes 9(1):37–41CrossRef Joe H (2006) Discussion of copulas: tales and facts. Extremes 9(1):37–41CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joe H (2015) Dependence modeling with copulas. CRC Press Joe H (2015) Dependence modeling with copulas. CRC Press
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly B, Jiang H (2014) Tail risk and asset prices. Rev Financ Stud 27(10):2841–2871CrossRef Kelly B, Jiang H (2014) Tail risk and asset prices. Rev Financ Stud 27(10):2841–2871CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kollo T, Pettere G (2010) Parameter estimation and application of the multivariate skew t-copula. In: copula theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 289–298 Kollo T, Pettere G (2010) Parameter estimation and application of the multivariate skew t-copula. In: copula theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 289–298
Zurück zum Zitat Kotz S, Nadarajah S, (2004) Multivariate t-distributions and their applications. Camb Uni Press. Kotz S, Nadarajah S, (2004) Multivariate t-distributions and their applications. Camb Uni Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar A (2009) Who gambles in the stock market? J Financ 64(4):1889–1933CrossRef Kumar A (2009) Who gambles in the stock market? J Financ 64(4):1889–1933CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lewellen J, Nagel S (2006) The conditional CAPM does not explain asset-pricing anomalies. J Financ Econ 82(2):289–314CrossRef Lewellen J, Nagel S (2006) The conditional CAPM does not explain asset-pricing anomalies. J Financ Econ 82(2):289–314CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lin TC, Liu X (2018) Skewness, individual investor preference, and the cross-section of stock returns. Rev Financ 22(5):1841–1876 Lin TC, Liu X (2018) Skewness, individual investor preference, and the cross-section of stock returns. Rev Financ 22(5):1841–1876
Zurück zum Zitat Long H, Jiang Y, Zhu Y (2018) Idiosyncratic tail risk and expected stock returns: evidence from the Chinese stock markets. Finan Res Lett 24:129–136CrossRef Long H, Jiang Y, Zhu Y (2018) Idiosyncratic tail risk and expected stock returns: evidence from the Chinese stock markets. Finan Res Lett 24:129–136CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McNeil AJ, Frey R, and Embrechts P (2015) Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques, and tools. Prince Uni Press, revised ed McNeil AJ, Frey R, and Embrechts P (2015) Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques, and tools. Prince Uni Press, revised ed
Zurück zum Zitat Newey W, West KD (1987) A simple, positive definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703–708CrossRef Newey W, West KD (1987) A simple, positive definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703–708CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oehler A, Horn M (2020) Behavioral portfolio theory revisited: lessons learned from the field. Account Financ Oehler A, Horn M (2020) Behavioral portfolio theory revisited: lessons learned from the field. Account Financ
Zurück zum Zitat Parker FJ (2021) A goals-based theory of utility. J Behav Finance 22(1):10–25CrossRef Parker FJ (2021) A goals-based theory of utility. J Behav Finance 22(1):10–25CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Post T, Versijp P (2007) Multivariate tests for stochastic dominance efficiency of a given portfolio. J Financ Quant Anal 42(2):489–515CrossRef Post T, Versijp P (2007) Multivariate tests for stochastic dominance efficiency of a given portfolio. J Financ Quant Anal 42(2):489–515CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy AD (1952) Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica 20(3):431–449CrossRef Roy AD (1952) Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica 20(3):431–449CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shefrin H, Statman M (2000) Behavioral portfolio theory. J Financ Quant Anal 35(2):127–151CrossRef Shefrin H, Statman M (2000) Behavioral portfolio theory. J Financ Quant Anal 35(2):127–151CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shefrin HM, Thaler RH (1988) The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Econ Inq 26(4):609–643CrossRef Shefrin HM, Thaler RH (1988) The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Econ Inq 26(4):609–643CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sklar M (1959) Fonctions de repartition an dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris 8:229–231 Sklar M (1959) Fonctions de repartition an dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris 8:229–231
Zurück zum Zitat Van Dijk MA (2011) Is size dead? A review of the size effect in equity returns. J Bank Finance 35(12):3263–3274CrossRef Van Dijk MA (2011) Is size dead? A review of the size effect in equity returns. J Bank Finance 35(12):3263–3274CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Oordt MR, Zhou C (2016) Systematic tail risk. J Financ Quant Anal 51(2):685–705CrossRef Van Oordt MR, Zhou C (2016) Systematic tail risk. J Financ Quant Anal 51(2):685–705CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Hai H, Park JW, Tsai PC, Eom C (2020) Lottery mindset, mispricing and idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: evidence from the Chinese stock market. North Amer J Econ Fin 54:101266CrossRef Van Hai H, Park JW, Tsai PC, Eom C (2020) Lottery mindset, mispricing and idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: evidence from the Chinese stock market. North Amer J Econ Fin 54:101266CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wan X (2018) Is the idiosyncratic volatility anomaly driven by the MAX or MIN effect? Evidence from the Chinese stock market. Inter Rev Econ Fin 53:1–15CrossRef Wan X (2018) Is the idiosyncratic volatility anomaly driven by the MAX or MIN effect? Evidence from the Chinese stock market. Inter Rev Econ Fin 53:1–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong JX, Idzorek TM, Ibbotson RG (2014) Volatility versus tail risk: which one is compensated in equity funds? J Port Man 40(2):112–121CrossRef Xiong JX, Idzorek TM, Ibbotson RG (2014) Volatility versus tail risk: which one is compensated in equity funds? J Port Man 40(2):112–121CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshiba T (2018) Maximum likelihood estimation of skew-t copulas with its applications to stock returns. J Stat Compu Simu 88(13):2489–2506CrossRef Yoshiba T (2018) Maximum likelihood estimation of skew-t copulas with its applications to stock returns. J Stat Compu Simu 88(13):2489–2506CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhen F, Ruan X, Zhang JE (2020) Left-tail risk in China. Pac Basin Financ J 63:101391CrossRef Zhen F, Ruan X, Zhang JE (2020) Left-tail risk in China. Pac Basin Financ J 63:101391CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Tail risk, beta anomaly, and demand for lottery: what explains cross-sectional variations in equity returns?
verfasst von
Asgar Ali
K. N. Badhani
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02355-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Empirical Economics 2/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner