Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Taking Liberties? Free Speech, Multiculturalism and the Ethics of Satire

verfasst von : Anshuman A. Mondal

Erschienen in: Comedy and the Politics of Representation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Satires are complex moral performances, which is why they assume such centrality in debates about freedom of speech, especially within broadly libertarian positions that seek to remove or restrict any curbs or limits on free expression. This is because it provides an excuse for mockery or “abuse and insult”, furnishing it with a moral seriousness it might not otherwise have. Satirical mockery speaks to the ethical considerations that are at the heart of any politics of representation because it raises crucial questions about freedom of expression. What gives free speech the legitimacy that endows upon it the status of a human right? Is it a good-in-itself, or because it enables certain good consequences? Should we tolerate expression that puts those consequences at risk?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
This distinction between “illocutionary” statements and “perlocutionary” statements occurs within the category that Austin calls “performative” statements. Performative statements are distinct from “constative” statements insofar as the latter simply describe a referential object, whereas performative statements do some “work” by performing an action. The very act of speaking has effects in the world. In illocutionary statements, this action inheres in the speech itself at the moment of its utterance—Austin’s famous example is of the launching of a ship by breaking a champagne bottle against it accompanied by the statement, “I hereby declare this ship ready to sail”, in which the declaration itself performs the action required to enable the ship to sail. The effect of a perlocutionary statement—for example, an act of persuasion—is contingent upon the object of the utterance. Any form of mediated speech, for example a representational work, is therefore perlocutionary in its effects.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Austin, J. L., and J. O. Urmson. 1973. How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Edited by J. O. Urmson. Reprint. New York: Oxford University Press. Austin, J. L., and J. O. Urmson. 1973. How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Edited by J. O. Urmson. Reprint. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ball, John Clement. 2003. Satire & the Postcolonial Novel: V. S. Naipaul, Chinua Achebe, Salman Rushdie. New York; London: Routledge. Ball, John Clement. 2003. Satire & the Postcolonial Novel: V. S. Naipaul, Chinua Achebe, Salman Rushdie. New York; London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke, Kenneth. 1984. Attitudes Toward History. 3rd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press. Burke, Kenneth. 1984. Attitudes Toward History. 3rd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke, Sean. 2008. The Ethics of Writing: Authorship and Legacy in Plato and Nietzsche. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Burke, Sean. 2008. The Ethics of Writing: Authorship and Legacy in Plato and Nietzsche. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge. Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott, Robert Carl. 1966. The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Elliott, Robert Carl. 1966. The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg, L., and D. L. F. Nilsen. 2008. Introduction to Satire. Beford: Pilgrims Process. Feinberg, L., and D. L. F. Nilsen. 2008. Introduction to Satire. Beford: Pilgrims Process.
Zurück zum Zitat Hobsbawm, E. J. 1978. The Age of Revolution: Europe, 1789–1848. London: Abacus. Hobsbawm, E. J. 1978. The Age of Revolution: Europe, 1789–1848. London: Abacus.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight, Charles A. 2004. The Literature of Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Knight, Charles A. 2004. The Literature of Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Malik, Kenan. 2009. From Fatwa to Jihad: The Rushdie Affair and Its Legacy. London: Atlantic. Malik, Kenan. 2009. From Fatwa to Jihad: The Rushdie Affair and Its Legacy. London: Atlantic.
Zurück zum Zitat McFarlane, Anna. 2015. “Sideways in Time: Alternate History and Counterfactual Narratives.” 05, 2015. McFarlane, Anna. 2015. “Sideways in Time: Alternate History and Counterfactual Narratives.” 05, 2015.
Zurück zum Zitat Mill, John S. 1859 [2011]. On Liberty. Seattle: Amazon Classics. Mill, John S. 1859 [2011]. On Liberty. Seattle: Amazon Classics.
Zurück zum Zitat Mondal, Anshuman A. 2014. Islam and Controversy: The Politics of Free Speech After Rushdie. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef Mondal, Anshuman A. 2014. Islam and Controversy: The Politics of Free Speech After Rushdie. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Newey, Glen. 2013. “Unlike a Scotch Egg.” London Review of Books 35 (23): 22–24. Newey, Glen. 2013. “Unlike a Scotch Egg.” London Review of Books 35 (23): 22–24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nussbaum, Felicity. 1984. The Brink of All We Hate: English Satires on Women 1660–1750. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. Nussbaum, Felicity. 1984. The Brink of All We Hate: English Satires on Women 1660–1750. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters, John Durham. 2005. Courting the Abyss: Free Speech and Liberal Tradition, Kindle edition. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Peters, John Durham. 2005. Courting the Abyss: Free Speech and Liberal Tradition, Kindle edition. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rushdie, Salman. 1991. Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism 1981–1991. London: Penguin Books/Granta. Rushdie, Salman. 1991. Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism 1981–1991. London: Penguin Books/Granta.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson, Paul. 2003. On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef Simpson, Paul. 2003. On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Taking Liberties? Free Speech, Multiculturalism and the Ethics of Satire
verfasst von
Anshuman A. Mondal
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90506-8_2

Premium Partner