Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Tax and Public Finance 2/2018

20.04.2017

Tax competition and fiscal equalization under corporate income taxation

verfasst von: Caterina Liesegang, Marco Runkel

Erschienen in: International Tax and Public Finance | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper challenges the view that tax base equalization by the so-called representative tax system (RTS) removes inefficient undertaxation in corporate tax competition. The innovation of the paper is that it focuses on a tax on corporate income, instead of the unit tax on capital considered in previous studies. We employ a tax competition model with fiscal equalization and show that the RTS fails to fully internalize pecuniary and fiscal externalities. As a consequence, the RTS yields inefficiently low tax rates in the Nash equilibrium of the tax competition game between governments. Tax revenue equalization performs even worse, but combined with equalization of private income it implements the efficient tax rates on corporate income.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The empirical evidence is not clear-cut, though. For example, Büttner (2003) tests for fiscal externalities and finds only weak evidence. Surveys of the tax competition literature can be found in Wilson (1999), Wilson and Wildasin (2004) and, more recently, Genschel and Schwarz (2011).
 
2
DePater and Myers (1994) emphasize the role of pecuniary externalities, which are also key to our analysis. However, the nature of the pecuniary externality in their paper is different from that in our model. While in their paper the pecuniary externality stems from the heterogeneity of countries, in our analysis the pecuniary externalities are nonzero even in the symmetric case.
 
3
There is also a literature discussing incentive effects of fiscal equalization in the presence of labor mobility, in contrast to capital mobility considered in our paper. A survey is given in Boadway (2004).
 
4
There are further recent studies on fiscal equalization and tax competition. In Gaigné and Riou (2007) trade of consumption goods is taken into account. Hendriks et al. (2008) investigate the effects of fiscal equalization when countries compete not only in taxes but also in expenditures. Wang et al. (2014) and Ogawa and Wang (2016) investigate whether fiscal equalization has an effect on tax cooperation in a repeated model of tax competition. Lui (2014) focuses on the effect of equalization on the disciplinary effect of tax competition on public expenditure. However, all these studies do not model corporate taxation as a tax on corporate income and therefore do not obtain our results.
 
5
Put differently, the assumption of decreasing returns to scale generates the corporate income that governments want to tax with the corporate income tax. Note, however, that all our main results also hold for the case of constant returns to scale (\(m=1\)). See also footnote 8.
 
6
The sign of PE follows from using (8)–(10) and the Euler theorem \(mF=\bar{k}F_k+\bar{\ell }F_\ell \) in the definition of PE in (13). We obtain \(\text{ PE }=-(1-m)F_k (F_k-\rho r)/nF_{kk}>0\).
 
7
The appendix proves that the Samuelson rule also holds in our framework.
 
8
In case of \(m=\rho =1\) we would have \(\text{ CE }+ \text{ WE }+ \text{ PE }=0\). But note that this is not a meaningful case in our model. With \(\rho =1\), the first-order conditions (6) and (7) imply \(\phi =F-\bar{k} F_k-\bar{\ell }F_\ell \). For \(m=1\), the Euler theorem reads \(F=\bar{k}F_k+\bar{\ell }F_\ell \). Hence, for \(m=\rho =1\) we have \(\phi =0\), i.e., tax bases, tax revenues and public consumption would be zero in all countries, which does not make sense for our purposes. Intuitively, this is plausible since for \(m=\rho =1\) we have constant returns to scale and full deductibility of capital costs and, thus, there is no corporate income that governments may tax.
 
9
If we define \(\eta :=\bar{k} H''/\bar{\ell }H'\) as the elasticity of the marginal return \(H'\), we see that (15) is positive (negative), if \(H'\) is sufficiently elastic (inelastic), since then the positive wage and profit income externalities outweigh (are overcompensated by) the negative capital income externality.
 
10
Formally, using Eqs. (9) and (10) we obtain \(\sum _{j=1}^n(\partial \phi _j/\partial t_i)=-n\rho \bar{k}(\partial r/\partial t_i)>0\).
 
11
Note that in Germany there are different equalization schemes on different levels of governments. On the level of municipalities, tax base equalization is implemented, while redistribution on the state level follows tax revenue equalization.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baretti, C., Huber, B., & Lichtblau, K. (2002). A tax on tax revenue: The incentive effects of equalizing transfers: Evidence from Germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 391–408.CrossRef Baretti, C., Huber, B., & Lichtblau, K. (2002). A tax on tax revenue: The incentive effects of equalizing transfers: Evidence from Germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 391–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bayoumi, T., & Masson, P. (1995). Fiscal flows in the United States and Canada: Lessons for monetary union in Europe. European Economic Review, 39, 253–274.CrossRef Bayoumi, T., & Masson, P. (1995). Fiscal flows in the United States and Canada: Lessons for monetary union in Europe. European Economic Review, 39, 253–274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boadway, R. (2004). The theory and practice of equalization. CESifo Economic Studies, 50, 211–254.CrossRef Boadway, R. (2004). The theory and practice of equalization. CESifo Economic Studies, 50, 211–254.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bucovetsky, S., & Smart, M. (2006). The efficiency consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8, 119–144.CrossRef Bucovetsky, S., & Smart, M. (2006). The efficiency consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8, 119–144.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Büttner, T. (2003). Tax base effects and fiscal externalities of local capital taxation: Evidence from a panel of German jurisdictions. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 110–128.CrossRef Büttner, T. (2003). Tax base effects and fiscal externalities of local capital taxation: Evidence from a panel of German jurisdictions. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 110–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Büttner, T. (2006). The incentive effect of fiscal equalization transfers on tax policy. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1533–1554. Büttner, T. (2006). The incentive effect of fiscal equalization transfers on tax policy. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1533–1554.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlby, B., & Warren, N. A. (2003). The fiscal incentive effects of the Australian equalisation system. Economic Record, 79, 434–445.CrossRef Dahlby, B., & Warren, N. A. (2003). The fiscal incentive effects of the Australian equalisation system. Economic Record, 79, 434–445.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DePater, J. A., & Myers, G. M. (1994). Strategic capital tax competition: A pecuniary externality and a corrective device. Journal of Urban Economics, 36, 66–78.CrossRef DePater, J. A., & Myers, G. M. (1994). Strategic capital tax competition: A pecuniary externality and a corrective device. Journal of Urban Economics, 36, 66–78.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Devereux, M., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2008). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1210–1235.CrossRef Devereux, M., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2008). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1210–1235.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Egger, P., & Raff, H. (2015). Tax rate and tax base competition for foreign direct investment. International Tax and Public Finance, 22, 777–810.CrossRef Egger, P., & Raff, H. (2015). Tax rate and tax base competition for foreign direct investment. International Tax and Public Finance, 22, 777–810.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Egger, P., Köthenbürger, M., & Smart, M. (2010). Do fiscal transfers alleviate business tax competition? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Public Economic, 94, 235–246.CrossRef Egger, P., Köthenbürger, M., & Smart, M. (2010). Do fiscal transfers alleviate business tax competition? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Public Economic, 94, 235–246.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fenge, R., & Wrede, M. (2007). EU financing and regional policy: Vertical fiscal externalities when capital is mobile. Finanzarchiv, 63, 457–476.CrossRef Fenge, R., & Wrede, M. (2007). EU financing and regional policy: Vertical fiscal externalities when capital is mobile. Finanzarchiv, 63, 457–476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaigné, C., & Riou, S. (2007). Globalization asymmetric tax competition, and fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9, 901–925.CrossRef Gaigné, C., & Riou, S. (2007). Globalization asymmetric tax competition, and fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9, 901–925.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Genschel, P., & Schwarz, P. (2011). Tax competition: A literature review. Socioeconomic Review, 9, 339–370.CrossRef Genschel, P., & Schwarz, P. (2011). Tax competition: A literature review. Socioeconomic Review, 9, 339–370.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hauptmeier, S., Mittermaier, F., & Rincke, J. (2012). Fiscal competition over taxes and public inputs. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 407–419.CrossRef Hauptmeier, S., Mittermaier, F., & Rincke, J. (2012). Fiscal competition over taxes and public inputs. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 407–419.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hendriks, J., Peralta, S., & Weber, S. (2008). Competition in taxes and investment under fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2392–2402.CrossRef Hendriks, J., Peralta, S., & Weber, S. (2008). Competition in taxes and investment under fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2392–2402.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janeba, E., & Peters, W. (2000). Implikationen des kommunalen Finanzausgleichs auf den Standort- und Steuerwettbewerb [Implications of intergovernmental revenue sharing on tax competition]. Beihefte der Konjunkturpolitik (Applied Economics Quarterly), 50, 35–53. Janeba, E., & Peters, W. (2000). Implikationen des kommunalen Finanzausgleichs auf den Standort- und Steuerwettbewerb [Implications of intergovernmental revenue sharing on tax competition]. Beihefte der Konjunkturpolitik (Applied Economics Quarterly), 50, 35–53.
Zurück zum Zitat Köthenbürger, M. (2002). Tax competition and fiscal equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 391–408.CrossRef Köthenbürger, M. (2002). Tax competition and fiscal equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 391–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kotsogiannis, C. (2010). Federal tax competition and the efficiency consequences for local taxation of revenue equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 17, 1–14.CrossRef Kotsogiannis, C. (2010). Federal tax competition and the efficiency consequences for local taxation of revenue equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 17, 1–14.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lui, Y. (2014). Does competition for capital discipline governments? The role of fiscal equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 21, 345–374.CrossRef Lui, Y. (2014). Does competition for capital discipline governments? The role of fiscal equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 21, 345–374.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mélitz, J., & Zumer, F. (2002). Regional redistribution and stabilization by the center in Canada, France, the UK and the US: A reassessment and new tests. Journal of Public Economics, 86, 263–286.CrossRef Mélitz, J., & Zumer, F. (2002). Regional redistribution and stabilization by the center in Canada, France, the UK and the US: A reassessment and new tests. Journal of Public Economics, 86, 263–286.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noiset, L. (1995). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods: A comment. Journal of Urban Economics, 38, 312–316.CrossRef Noiset, L. (1995). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods: A comment. Journal of Urban Economics, 38, 312–316.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ogawa, H., & Wang, W. (2016). Asymmetric tax competition and fiscal equalization in a repeated game setting. International Review of Economics and Finance, 41, 1–10.CrossRef Ogawa, H., & Wang, W. (2016). Asymmetric tax competition and fiscal equalization in a repeated game setting. International Review of Economics and Finance, 41, 1–10.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Silva, E.C.D. (2017). Tax competition and federal equalization schemes with decentralized leadership. International Tax and Public Finance, 24, 164–178. Silva, E.C.D. (2017). Tax competition and federal equalization schemes with decentralized leadership. International Tax and Public Finance, 24, 164–178.
Zurück zum Zitat Smart, M. (1998). Taxation and deadweight loss in a system of intergovernmental transfers. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31, 189–206.CrossRef Smart, M. (1998). Taxation and deadweight loss in a system of intergovernmental transfers. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31, 189–206.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smart, M. (2007). Raising taxes through equalization. Canadian Journal of Economics, 40, 1188–1212.CrossRef Smart, M. (2007). Raising taxes through equalization. Canadian Journal of Economics, 40, 1188–1212.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, W., Kawachi, K., & Ogawa, H. (2014). Fiscal transfer in a repeated-interaction model of tax competition. FinanzArchiv, 70, 556–566.CrossRef Wang, W., Kawachi, K., & Ogawa, H. (2014). Fiscal transfer in a repeated-interaction model of tax competition. FinanzArchiv, 70, 556–566.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wildasin, D. E. (1989). Interjurisdictional capital mobility: Fiscal externality and a corrective subsidy. Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 193–212.CrossRef Wildasin, D. E. (1989). Interjurisdictional capital mobility: Fiscal externality and a corrective subsidy. Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 193–212.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, J. D. (1986). A theory of interregional tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 296–315.CrossRef Wilson, J. D. (1986). A theory of interregional tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 296–315.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, J. D. (1999). Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52, 296–304. Wilson, J. D. (1999). Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52, 296–304.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, J. D., & Wildasin, D. (2004). Theories of tax competition: Bane or boon. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1065–1091.CrossRef Wilson, J. D., & Wildasin, D. (2004). Theories of tax competition: Bane or boon. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1065–1091.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wrede, M. (2014). Agglomeration, tax competition, and fiscal equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 21, 1012–1027.CrossRef Wrede, M. (2014). Agglomeration, tax competition, and fiscal equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 21, 1012–1027.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zodrow, G., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tibout, property taxation and the underprovision of public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356–370.CrossRef Zodrow, G., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tibout, property taxation and the underprovision of public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356–370.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Tax competition and fiscal equalization under corporate income taxation
verfasst von
Caterina Liesegang
Marco Runkel
Publikationsdatum
20.04.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Tax and Public Finance / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0927-5940
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6970
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9451-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

International Tax and Public Finance 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe