Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. Tax Incentives in the System of Direct Taxes in Poland

verfasst von : Włodzimierz Nykiel, Michał Wilk

Erschienen in: Taxation and Development - A Comparative Study

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As a member of the EU and the OECD Global Forum, Poland has moved to bring its tax system in line with internationally accepted standards. This has caused it to abolish tax sparing provisions in tax treaties, update exchange of information provisions, and draft new anti-tax avoidance rules. It is party to a robust network of information exchange agreements with tax administrations, including those viewed as tax havens. These developments raise the question whether Poland’s attractiveness as an investment destination will diminish. As it transitioned to a free market system, Poland adopted a number of tax incentives designed to attract foreign investment. These relate primarily to the areas of research and development, accelerated depreciation allowances and support for new businesses.

Synopsis

Following the majority, Poland taxes its resident companies on their worldwide income. Companies are resident if their effective place of management is in Poland. A credit for foreign taxes paid helps to alleviate the potential for double taxation when another country also subjects the income to taxation. The credit may not exceed the Polish tax liability on the foreign source income. Nonresidents are taxed on only income from Polish sources.
Dividends from foreign sources are taxed at the regular corporate tax rate of 19 % that applies to other income. Where a subsidiary is at least 75 %-owned, the Polish company may receive a credit for any taxes paid by the subsidiary on the profits distributed. A 19 % withholding tax applies to dividends paid by Polish companies unless a tax treaty provides otherwise.
Poland has entered into more than 90 tax treaties which follow either the OECD or UN Model treaties. The treaties contain both the exemption and tax credit methods. In the case of dividends received by Polish residents, for example, treaties either exempt the foreign source payment (e.g., Malaysia and Ireland) or provide for a reduced withholding tax rate. Poland is in the process of renegotiating treaties that provided a tax-sparing credit, believing that these were used improperly for tax avoidance purposes.
In legislation following the EU’s Parent-Subsidiary Directive, dividends received from companies resident in the EU, EEA, or Switzerland are exempt from Polish tax, if a minimum level of shareholding is met. To qualify for the exemption, shares must be held for at least 2 years before the distribution and the subsidiary must be subject to tax in the relevant jurisdiction on a worldwide basis.
There is a special regime for transactions with resident of countries deemed to be engaged in harmful tax competition. Under these rules, special documentation is required concerning transfer pricing. The Minister of Finance determines which tax regimes are “harmful,” a term not defined in the legislation, and publishes that list. Thirty-seven countries, many of which are developing countries, appear on the list.
As a member of the EU and of the OECD Global Form, Poland has moved to bring its tax system in line with accepted standards. This has caused it to pursue new tax policy initiatives, including renegotiating tax treaties to abolish tax sparing, updating exchange of information provisions, attempting to close loopholes in its tax system, and drafting new anti-tax avoidance rules (in the form of a General Anti-Abuse Rule or GAAR) and Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) legislation. These developments raise the question whether these changes will have the effect of reducing Poland’s attractiveness as an investment location. Addition of complexity into Poland tax regime and administration may make doing business in Poland less desirable. Introduction of CFC rules may decrease a competitive advantage now held by Polish investors.
Poland is a party to a robust network of information exchange on bilateral and multilateral fronts. It is also engaged in a campaign to expand information exchange with countries viewed as tax havens, having concluded information exchange agreements with Bahamas, Liberia, Isle of Man, Jersey, Guernsey, Belize, Andorra, Dominica, and others. Legislation has opened the door to exchange of information normally protected by bank secrecy laws.
As it transitioned from a socialist to a free market system, Poland adopted a number of tax incentives designed to attract foreign investment. These include special deductions for research and development centers, tax exemptions for investment in special underdeveloped economic zones, accelerated depreciation deductions for investments in certain assets, and temporary tax holiday for new businesses. While these measures are important tools to enable Poland to attract investment, they are viable only so long as they do not violate EU restrictions on State Aid.
Poland is a party to more than 60 bilateral trade and investment agreements.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Journal of Laws 2011, no. 74, item 397, as amended, hereinafter: the CIT Act.
 
2
Journal of Laws 2012, item 361, as amended, hereinafter: the PIT Act.
 
3
Journal of Laws 2013, item 1030.
 
4
See recently renegotiated treaty with Cyprus.
 
5
J. Banach, Polskie umowy o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania, C.H. Beck, Warsaw 2002, p. 221.
 
6
ibidem, p. 221.
 
7
Currently, Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 9 April 2013 concerning territories and countries applying harmful tax competition in corporate income tax (Journal of Laws 2013, item 494).
 
8
GAAR, implemented in 2003, was abolished by the Constitutional Court in 2004, which found it in violation of the rule of law as well as of the requirement of statutory imposition of taxes and, thus, unconstitutional.
 
9
C(2012)8806.
 
10
Poland’s rank in Paying Taxes 2014 PwC and World Bank Group report is relatively very low (113 rank out of 189 economies), see: http://​www.​pwc.​com/​gx/​paying-taxes/​assets/​pwc-paying-taxes-2014.​pdf (access: 27.11.2013).
 
11
Journal of Laws 1998, no. 141, item 913, as amended.
 
12
Response of the Ministry of Finance to the parliamentary request no. 680 concerning foreign tax reliefs, http://​www.​sejm.​gov.​pl/​sejm7.​nsf/​InterpelacjaTres​c.​xsp?​key=​3FFF765A (access: 16.11.2013).
 
13
For a thorough analysis, see H. Filipczyk, Ł. Pikus, D. Wasylkowski, Exchange of information and cross-border cooperation between tax authorities, National Report for Poland, Cahiers de droit fiscal international, IFA 2013, p. 624.
 
14
ibidem, p. 618.
 
15
ibidem, p. 618.
 
16
Journal of Laws 2007, no. 42, item 274 as amended, hereinafter: the SEZ Act.
 
17
Art. 17(1)(34) of the CIT Act and Art. 21(1)(63a) of the PIT Act.
 
18
K. Grabowska-Klimczak [in:] A. Tałasiewicz (ed.), Prawne i podatkowe aspekty prowadzenia działalności w Specjalnych Strefach Ekonomicznych, Wolters Kluwer, Warsaw 2010, p. 38.
 
19
For small and medium enterprises that limit is increased by 20 % (small enterprises) and 10 % (medium enterprises).
 
20
Journal of Laws 2003, no. 188, item 1849, as amended.
 
21
K. Grabowska-Klimczak, op. cit., p. 17.
 
23
This should not be confused with the tax credit used for avoiding double taxation.
 
24
A. Nykiel-Mateo, Pomoc państwa a ogólne środki interwencji w europejskim prawie wspólnotowym, Wolters Kluwer, Warsaw 2009, p. 11–12.
 
25
See: Art. 107(2) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter: TFEU).
 
26
Art. 107(3) TFEU.
 
27
A. Nykiel-Mateo, op. cit., p. 44, J. Kociubiński, Selectivity Criterion in State Aid Control, Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 2012, no. 1, p. 2.
 
Metadaten
Titel
Tax Incentives in the System of Direct Taxes in Poland
verfasst von
Włodzimierz Nykiel
Michał Wilk
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42157-5_14

Premium Partner