Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 4/2016

08.02.2016

Teachers’ Organization of Participation Structures for Teaching Science with Computer Technology

verfasst von: Karthigeyan Subramaniam

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper describes a qualitative study that investigated the nature of the participation structures and how the participation structures were organized by four science teachers when they constructed and communicated science content in their classrooms with computer technology. Participation structures focus on the activity structures and processes in social settings like classrooms thereby providing glimpses into the complex dynamics of teacher–students interactions, configurations, and conventions during collective meaning making and knowledge creation. Data included observations, interviews, and focus group interviews. Analysis revealed that the dominant participation structure evident within participants’ instruction with computer technology was (Teacher) initiation–(Student and Teacher) response sequences–(Teacher) evaluate participation structure. Three key events characterized the how participants organized this participation structure in their classrooms: setting the stage for interactive instruction, the joint activity, and maintaining accountability. Implications include the following: (1) teacher educators need to tap into the knowledge base that underscores science teachers’ learning to teach philosophies when computer technology is used in instruction. (2) Teacher educators need to emphasize the essential idea that learning and cognition is not situated within the computer technology but within the pedagogical practices, specifically the participation structures. (3) The pedagogical practices developed with the integration or with the use of computer technology underscored by the teachers’ own knowledge of classroom contexts and curriculum needs to be the focus for how students learn science content with computer technology instead of just focusing on how computer technology solely supports students learning of science content.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anfara VA, Brown KM, Mangione TL (2002) Qualitative analysis on stage: making the research process more public. Educ Res 31:28–38CrossRef Anfara VA, Brown KM, Mangione TL (2002) Qualitative analysis on stage: making the research process more public. Educ Res 31:28–38CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ardac D, Akaygun S (2004) Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. J Res Sci Teach 41(4):317–337CrossRef Ardac D, Akaygun S (2004) Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. J Res Sci Teach 41(4):317–337CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bogdan RC, Biklen SK (1998) Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods, 3rd edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston Bogdan RC, Biklen SK (1998) Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods, 3rd edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
Zurück zum Zitat Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2007) Research methods in education, 6th edn. Routledge-Falmer, London Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2007) Research methods in education, 6th edn. Routledge-Falmer, London
Zurück zum Zitat Cviko A, McKenney S, Voogt J (2012) Teacher enacting a technology-rich curriculum for emergent literacy. Educ Technol Res Dev 60(1):31–54CrossRef Cviko A, McKenney S, Voogt J (2012) Teacher enacting a technology-rich curriculum for emergent literacy. Educ Technol Res Dev 60(1):31–54CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cviko A, McKenney S, Voogt J (2014) Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy: a cross-case analysis. Comput Educ 72:68–79CrossRef Cviko A, McKenney S, Voogt J (2014) Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy: a cross-case analysis. Comput Educ 72:68–79CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donnelly DF, Linn MC, Ludvigsen S (2014) Impacts and characteristics of computer-based science inquiry learning environments for precollege students. Rev Educ Res 84(4):572–608CrossRef Donnelly DF, Linn MC, Ludvigsen S (2014) Impacts and characteristics of computer-based science inquiry learning environments for precollege students. Rev Educ Res 84(4):572–608CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Drent M, Meelissen M (2008) Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Comput Educ 51:187–199CrossRef Drent M, Meelissen M (2008) Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Comput Educ 51:187–199CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ertmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT (2010) Teacher technology change: how knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. J Res Technol Educ 42(3):255–284CrossRef Ertmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT (2010) Teacher technology change: how knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. J Res Technol Educ 42(3):255–284CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ertmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT, Sadik O, Sendurur E, Sendurur P (2012) Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: a critical relationship. Comput Educ 59(2):423–435CrossRef Ertmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT, Sadik O, Sendurur E, Sendurur P (2012) Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: a critical relationship. Comput Educ 59(2):423–435CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Espinoza F (2006) -2007). The use of graphical analysis with microcomputer-based laboratories to implement inquiry as the primary mode of learning science. J Educ Technol Syst 35(3):315–335CrossRef Espinoza F (2006) -2007). The use of graphical analysis with microcomputer-based laboratories to implement inquiry as the primary mode of learning science. J Educ Technol Syst 35(3):315–335CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ford M (2008) ‘Grasp of practice’ as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Sci Educ 17:147–177CrossRef Ford M (2008) ‘Grasp of practice’ as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Sci Educ 17:147–177CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez LM, Sherin GM, Griesdorn J, Finn L-E (2008) Creating social relationships: the role of technology in preservice teacher preparation. J Teach Educ 59(2):117–131CrossRef Gomez LM, Sherin GM, Griesdorn J, Finn L-E (2008) Creating social relationships: the role of technology in preservice teacher preparation. J Teach Educ 59(2):117–131CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hakkarainen K (2003) Progressive inquiry in a computer-supported biology class. J Res Sci Teach 40(10):1072–1088CrossRef Hakkarainen K (2003) Progressive inquiry in a computer-supported biology class. J Res Sci Teach 40(10):1072–1088CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hegedus SJ, Penuel WR (2008) Studying new forms of participation and identity in mathematics classrooms with integrated communication and representational infrastructures. Educ Stud Math 68:171–183CrossRef Hegedus SJ, Penuel WR (2008) Studying new forms of participation and identity in mathematics classrooms with integrated communication and representational infrastructures. Educ Stud Math 68:171–183CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hennessy S (2006) Integrating technology into teaching and learning of school science: a situated perspective on pedagogical issues in research. Stud Sci Educ 42:1–48CrossRef Hennessy S (2006) Integrating technology into teaching and learning of school science: a situated perspective on pedagogical issues in research. Stud Sci Educ 42:1–48CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hennessy S, Wishart J, Whitelock D, Deaney R, Brawn R, la Velle L, Winterbottom M (2007) Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Comput Educ 48:137–152CrossRef Hennessy S, Wishart J, Whitelock D, Deaney R, Brawn R, la Velle L, Winterbottom M (2007) Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Comput Educ 48:137–152CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hickey DT, Kindfield ACH, Horwitz P, Christie MAT (2003) Integrating curriculum, instruction, assessment, and evaluation in a technology-supported genetics learning environment. Am Educ Res J 40(2):495–538CrossRef Hickey DT, Kindfield ACH, Horwitz P, Christie MAT (2003) Integrating curriculum, instruction, assessment, and evaluation in a technology-supported genetics learning environment. Am Educ Res J 40(2):495–538CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins TE, Spitulnik MW (2008) Supporting teachers’ use of technology in science instruction through professional development: a literature review. J Sci Educ Technol 17:51–521CrossRef Higgins TE, Spitulnik MW (2008) Supporting teachers’ use of technology in science instruction through professional development: a literature review. J Sci Educ Technol 17:51–521CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes JE, Kerr SP, Ooms A (2005) Content-focused technology inquiry groups: cases of teacher learning and technology integration. J Educ Comput Res 32(4):367–379CrossRef Hughes JE, Kerr SP, Ooms A (2005) Content-focused technology inquiry groups: cases of teacher learning and technology integration. J Educ Comput Res 32(4):367–379CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan R, Duncan RG (2009) Student teachers’ images of science in ecology and genetics. J Biol Educ 43(2):62–69CrossRef Jordan R, Duncan RG (2009) Student teachers’ images of science in ecology and genetics. J Biol Educ 43(2):62–69CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kerr ST (2005) Why we all want it to work: towards a culturally based model for technology and educational change. Br J Educ Technol 36(6):1005–1016CrossRef Kerr ST (2005) Why we all want it to work: towards a culturally based model for technology and educational change. Br J Educ Technol 36(6):1005–1016CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MC, Hannafin MJ, Bryan LA (2007) Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Sci Educ 91(6):1010–1030CrossRef Kim MC, Hannafin MJ, Bryan LA (2007) Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Sci Educ 91(6):1010–1030CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kovalainen M, Kumpulainen K (2005) The discursive practice of participation in an elementary classroom community. Instr Sci 33:213–250CrossRef Kovalainen M, Kumpulainen K (2005) The discursive practice of participation in an elementary classroom community. Instr Sci 33:213–250CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krajcik JS (2002) The value and challenges of using learning technologies to support students in learning science. Res Sci Educ 32(4):411–414CrossRef Krajcik JS (2002) The value and challenges of using learning technologies to support students in learning science. Res Sci Educ 32(4):411–414CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krueger RA, Casey MA (2009) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks Krueger RA, Casey MA (2009) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Zurück zum Zitat Lincoln YS (1995) Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretative research. Qual Inq 1(3):275–289CrossRef Lincoln YS (1995) Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretative research. Qual Inq 1(3):275–289CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Linn MC, Eylon BS (2011) Science learning and instruction. Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. Routledge, New York Linn MC, Eylon BS (2011) Science learning and instruction. Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. Routledge, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Matuk CF, Linn MC, Eylon B-S (2015) Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units. Instr Sci 43(2):229–257CrossRef Matuk CF, Linn MC, Eylon B-S (2015) Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units. Instr Sci 43(2):229–257CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mortimer EF, Scott PH (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press, Maidenhead Mortimer EF, Scott PH (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press, Maidenhead
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller J, Wood E, Willoughby T, Ross C, Specht J (2008) Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Comput Educ 51(4):1523–1537CrossRef Mueller J, Wood E, Willoughby T, Ross C, Specht J (2008) Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Comput Educ 51(4):1523–1537CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Naraian S (2011) Pedagogic voicing: the struggle for participation in an inclusive classroom. Anthropol Educ Q 42(3):245–262CrossRef Naraian S (2011) Pedagogic voicing: the struggle for participation in an inclusive classroom. Anthropol Educ Q 42(3):245–262CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat NGSS Lead States (2013) Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington NGSS Lead States (2013) Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira AW (2009) Developing elementary teachers’ understanding of the discourse structure of inquiry-based science classrooms. Int J Sci Math Educ 8:247–269CrossRef Oliveira AW (2009) Developing elementary teachers’ understanding of the discourse structure of inquiry-based science classrooms. Int J Sci Math Educ 8:247–269CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira AW, Sadler TD, Suslak DF (2007) The linguistic construction of expert identity in professor-student discussions of science. Cult Sci Educ 2(1):119–150CrossRef Oliveira AW, Sadler TD, Suslak DF (2007) The linguistic construction of expert identity in professor-student discussions of science. Cult Sci Educ 2(1):119–150CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patchen T (2012) Capitalizing on participation: latina/o adolescents and the classroom economy. Urban Rev 44:511–533CrossRef Patchen T (2012) Capitalizing on participation: latina/o adolescents and the classroom economy. Urban Rev 44:511–533CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patchen T, Smithenry DW (2014) Diversifying instruction and shifting authority: a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) analysis of classroom participation structures. J Res Sci Teach 51(5):606–634CrossRef Patchen T, Smithenry DW (2014) Diversifying instruction and shifting authority: a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) analysis of classroom participation structures. J Res Sci Teach 51(5):606–634CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pea RD (2004) The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. J Learn Sci 13(3):423–451CrossRef Pea RD (2004) The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. J Learn Sci 13(3):423–451CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Polman JL (2004) Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments. Cogn Instr 22(4):431–466CrossRef Polman JL (2004) Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments. Cogn Instr 22(4):431–466CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reiser BJ (2004) Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. J Learn Sci 13(3):273–304CrossRef Reiser BJ (2004) Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. J Learn Sci 13(3):273–304CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russell DW, Lucas KB, McRobbie CJ (2004) Role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in thermal physics. J Res Sci Teach 41(2):165–185CrossRef Russell DW, Lucas KB, McRobbie CJ (2004) Role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in thermal physics. J Res Sci Teach 41(2):165–185CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sandholtz JH, Ringstaff C, Dwyer DC (1997) Teaching with technology: creating student-centered classrooms. Teachers College Press, New York Sandholtz JH, Ringstaff C, Dwyer DC (1997) Teaching with technology: creating student-centered classrooms. Teachers College Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Sandoval WA, Daniszewski K (2004) Mapping trade-offs in teachers’ integration of technology-supported inquiry in high school science classes. J Sci Educ Technol 13(2):161–178CrossRef Sandoval WA, Daniszewski K (2004) Mapping trade-offs in teachers’ integration of technology-supported inquiry in high school science classes. J Sci Educ Technol 13(2):161–178CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sleegers P, Van den Berg R (2000) Building innovative schools: the need for new approaches. Teach Teach Educ 16:801–808CrossRef Sleegers P, Van den Berg R (2000) Building innovative schools: the need for new approaches. Teach Teach Educ 16:801–808CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Subramaniam K (2010) Understanding changes in teacher roles through collaborative action research. J Sci Teacher Educ 21(8):937–951CrossRef Subramaniam K (2010) Understanding changes in teacher roles through collaborative action research. J Sci Teacher Educ 21(8):937–951CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sutherland R, The InterActive Project Team (2004) Designs for learning: ICT and knowledge in the classroom. Comput Educ 43:5–16CrossRef Sutherland R, The InterActive Project Team (2004) Designs for learning: ICT and knowledge in the classroom. Comput Educ 43:5–16CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tabak I, Baumgartner E (2004) The teacher as partner: exploring participation structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cogn Instr 22(4):393–429CrossRef Tabak I, Baumgartner E (2004) The teacher as partner: exploring participation structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cogn Instr 22(4):393–429CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waight N, Abd-El-Khalick F (2006) From scientific practice to high school science classrooms: transfer of scientific technologies and realizations of authentic inquiry. J Res Sci Teach 44:154–182CrossRef Waight N, Abd-El-Khalick F (2006) From scientific practice to high school science classrooms: transfer of scientific technologies and realizations of authentic inquiry. J Res Sci Teach 44:154–182CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waight N, Abd-El-Khalick F (2011) The impact of technology in the enactment of “inquiry” in a technology enthusiast’s sixth grade science classroom. J Res Sci Teach 48:37–70CrossRef Waight N, Abd-El-Khalick F (2011) The impact of technology in the enactment of “inquiry” in a technology enthusiast’s sixth grade science classroom. J Res Sci Teach 48:37–70CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wells G (1993) Reevaluating the IRF sequence: a proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguist Educ 5:1–37CrossRef Wells G (1993) Reevaluating the IRF sequence: a proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguist Educ 5:1–37CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wells G (2007) The mediating role of discoursing in activity. Mind Cult Act 14(3):160–177CrossRef Wells G (2007) The mediating role of discoursing in activity. Mind Cult Act 14(3):160–177CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating communities of practice; a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating communities of practice; a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Zurück zum Zitat Zacharia Z (2003) Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in Physics. J Res Sci Teach 40:792–823CrossRef Zacharia Z (2003) Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in Physics. J Res Sci Teach 40:792–823CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Teachers’ Organization of Participation Structures for Teaching Science with Computer Technology
verfasst von
Karthigeyan Subramaniam
Publikationsdatum
08.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9610-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Journal of Science Education and Technology 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.