Skip to main content

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Teaching Social Impact Measurement to Enable Socially Savvy Decisions in Business

verfasst von : Jing Betty Feng, Xu Zhang

Erschienen in: The Palgrave Handbook of Social Sustainability in Business Education

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As methodologies for quantifying and valuing social sustainability are not yet well established, it is important for business education to offer courses that emphasize social impact evaluation and decision-making. This chapter provides a general educational framework to teach social impact measurement and to aid students in learning to make socially savvy decisions through an applied learning project. Following the Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) framework, students learn to evaluate social impacts related to society and labor practices, including employment, workforce development, local communities, social equity, and quality of well-being using quantifiable indicators. The teaching practice includes two major concepts: stakeholder analysis that focuses on the jointness of stakeholder interests to create value for stakeholders, and Cost–Benefit Analysis (CBA) that quantifies the value of all impacts of an initiative, in monetary terms, to all individuals in society. This practice can be effectively integrated into business courses to educate managers to be socially responsible and capable of considering the broader impact on society and various stakeholders in their decision-making process. This chapter aims to correspond directly to United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 8 (Decent work and economic growth), 10 (Reduced inequalities), and 16 (Peace, justice and strong institutions) but may go beyond them because the measurement can also be applied in various social sustainability perspectives.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Berman, K., & Knight, J. (2013). Financial intelligence, revised edition: A manager’s guide to knowing what the numbers really mean. Harvard Business Review Press. Berman, K., & Knight, J. (2013). Financial intelligence, revised edition: A manager’s guide to knowing what the numbers really mean. Harvard Business Review Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., & Weimer, D. (2018). Introduction to cost-benefit analysis. Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice (pp. 1–27). Cambridge University Press. Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., & Weimer, D. (2018). Introduction to cost-benefit analysis. Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice (pp. 1–27). Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bocken, N. M., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320.CrossRef Bocken, N. M., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brower, J., & Mahajan, V. (2013). Driven to be good: A stakeholder theory perspective on the drivers of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 313–331.CrossRef Brower, J., & Mahajan, V. (2013). Driven to be good: A stakeholder theory perspective on the drivers of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 313–331.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corvo, L., Pastore, L., Mastrodascio, M., & Cepiku, D. (2022). The social return on investment model: A systematic literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(7), 49–86.CrossRef Corvo, L., Pastore, L., Mastrodascio, M., & Cepiku, D. (2022). The social return on investment model: A systematic literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(7), 49–86.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: Why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 99–124.CrossRef Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: Why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 99–124.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dickson, M. A., Eckman, M., Loker, S., & Jirousek, C. (2013). A model for sustainability education in support of the PRME. Journal of Management Development, 32(3), 309–318.CrossRef Dickson, M. A., Eckman, M., Loker, S., & Jirousek, C. (2013). A model for sustainability education in support of the PRME. Journal of Management Development, 32(3), 309–318.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2011). Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1739–1774.CrossRef Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2011). Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1739–1774.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat GAIN. (2017). GAIN Training Guidebook: How to measure and model social and employment outcomes of climate and sustainable development policies. Green Jobs Assessment Institutions Network. GAIN. (2017). GAIN Training Guidebook: How to measure and model social and employment outcomes of climate and sustainable development policies. Green Jobs Assessment Institutions Network.
Zurück zum Zitat Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing social impact of social enterprises: Does one size really fit all? Springer.CrossRef Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing social impact of social enterprises: Does one size really fit all? Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grieco, C., Michelini, L., & Iasevoli, G. (2015). Measuring value creation in social enterprises: A cluster analysis of social impact assessment models. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1173–1193.CrossRef Grieco, C., Michelini, L., & Iasevoli, G. (2015). Measuring value creation in social enterprises: A cluster analysis of social impact assessment models. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1173–1193.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, M., Millo, Y., & Barman, E. (2015). Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 907–934.CrossRef Hall, M., Millo, Y., & Barman, E. (2015). Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 907–934.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jach, E. A., & Trolian, T. L. (2022). Applied learning and student views of social and political involvement. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(1), 78–92.CrossRef Jach, E. A., & Trolian, T. L. (2022). Applied learning and student views of social and political involvement. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(1), 78–92.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Júnior, J. R., d. O., Limongi, R., Lim, W. M., Eastman, J. K., & Kumar, S. (2023). A story to sell: The influence of storytelling on consumers’ purchasing behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 40(2), 239–261.CrossRef Júnior, J. R., d. O., Limongi, R., Lim, W. M., Eastman, J. K., & Kumar, S. (2023). A story to sell: The influence of storytelling on consumers’ purchasing behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 40(2), 239–261.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kay, N., & Pennucci, A. (2014). Full day kindergarten: A review of the evidence and benefit-cost analysis. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Kay, N., & Pennucci, A. (2014). Full day kindergarten: A review of the evidence and benefit-cost analysis. Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Zurück zum Zitat Korhonen, J., Giurca, A., Brockhaus, M., & Toppinen, A. (2018). Actors and politics in Finland’s forest-based bioeconomy network. Sustainability, 10(10), 3785.CrossRef Korhonen, J., Giurca, A., Brockhaus, M., & Toppinen, A. (2018). Actors and politics in Finland’s forest-based bioeconomy network. Sustainability, 10(10), 3785.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lingane, A., & Olsen, S. (2004). Guidelines for social return on investment. California Management Review, 46(3), 116–135.CrossRef Lingane, A., & Olsen, S. (2004). Guidelines for social return on investment. California Management Review, 46(3), 116–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maas, K., & Grieco, C. (2017). Distinguishing game changers from boastful charlatans: Which social enterprises measure their impact? Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 110–128.CrossRef Maas, K., & Grieco, C. (2017). Distinguishing game changers from boastful charlatans: Which social enterprises measure their impact? Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 110–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellen Macarthur Foundation (EMF). (2015). Circularity indicators: An approach to measuring circularity. EMF. Ellen Macarthur Foundation (EMF). (2015). Circularity indicators: An approach to measuring circularity. EMF.
Zurück zum Zitat McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57.CrossRef McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mies, A., & Gold, S. (2021). Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128960.CrossRef Mies, A., & Gold, S. (2021). Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128960.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, E., Buys, L., & Summerville, J. (2007). Quantifying the social dimension of triple bottom line: Development of a framework and indicators to assess the social impact of organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 3(3), 223–237.CrossRef Miller, E., Buys, L., & Summerville, J. (2007). Quantifying the social dimension of triple bottom line: Development of a framework and indicators to assess the social impact of organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 3(3), 223–237.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moltesen, A., Bonou, A., Wangel, A., & Bozhilova-Kisheva, K. P. (2018). Social life cycle assessment: An introduction. Life cycle assessment: Theory and Practice (pp. 401–422). Springer. Moltesen, A., Bonou, A., Wangel, A., & Bozhilova-Kisheva, K. P. (2018). Social life cycle assessment: An introduction. Life cycle assessment: Theory and Practice (pp. 401–422). Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholls, A. (2009). Capturing the performance of the Socially entrepreneurial organization (SEO): An organizational legitimacy approach. In J. Robinson, J. Mair, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), International perspectives on social entrepreneurship research (pp. 27–74). Palgrave Macmillan. Nicholls, A. (2009). Capturing the performance of the Socially entrepreneurial organization (SEO): An organizational legitimacy approach. In J. Robinson, J. Mair, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), International perspectives on social entrepreneurship research (pp. 27–74). Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat OECD, G. A. (2021). Social impact measurement for the social and solidarity economy. OECD Publishing. OECD, G. A. (2021). Social impact measurement for the social and solidarity economy. OECD Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., & Merveille, N. (2020). Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(19), 7912.CrossRef Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., & Merveille, N. (2020). Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(19), 7912.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pathak, P., & Dattani, P. (2014). Social return on investment: Three technical challenges. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(2), 91–104.CrossRef Pathak, P., & Dattani, P. (2014). Social return on investment: Three technical challenges. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(2), 91–104.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 82–115.CrossRef Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 82–115.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351.CrossRef Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Solórzano-García, M., Navío-Marco, J., & Ruiz-Gómez, L. M. (2019). Ambiguity in the attribution of social impact: A study of the difficulties of calculating filter coefficients in the SROI method. Sustainability, 11(2), 386.CrossRef Solórzano-García, M., Navío-Marco, J., & Ruiz-Gómez, L. M. (2019). Ambiguity in the attribution of social impact: A study of the difficulties of calculating filter coefficients in the SROI method. Sustainability, 11(2), 386.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Teaching sustainability to business students: Shifting mindsets. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 206–221.CrossRef Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Teaching sustainability to business students: Shifting mindsets. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 206–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat UNEP. (2020). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products and organizations 2020 (C. Benoît Norris, M. Traverzo, S. Neugebauer, E. Ekener, T. Schaubroeck, & S. Russo Garrido, Eds.). United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP. (2020). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products and organizations 2020 (C. Benoît Norris, M. Traverzo, S. Neugebauer, E. Ekener, T. Schaubroeck, & S. Russo Garrido, Eds.). United Nations Environment Programme.
Zurück zum Zitat Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2013). An assessment of important issues concerning the application of benefit–cost analysis to social policy. Principles and standards for benefit–cost analysis (pp. 25–62). Edward Elgar. Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2013). An assessment of important issues concerning the application of benefit–cost analysis to social policy. Principles and standards for benefit–cost analysis (pp. 25–62). Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Winskell, K., & Enger, D. (2014). Storytelling for social change. In K. G. Wilkins, T. Tufte, & R. Obregon (Eds.), The handbook of development communication and social change (pp. 189–206). Wiley.CrossRef Winskell, K., & Enger, D. (2014). Storytelling for social change. In K. G. Wilkins, T. Tufte, & R. Obregon (Eds.), The handbook of development communication and social change (pp. 189–206). Wiley.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Teaching Social Impact Measurement to Enable Socially Savvy Decisions in Business
verfasst von
Jing Betty Feng
Xu Zhang
Copyright-Jahr
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50168-5_5

Premium Partner