Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 10/2009

01.12.2009

The association of survey language (Spanish vs. English) with Health Utilities Index and EQ-5D index scores in a United States population sample

verfasst von: Nan Luo, Yu Ko, Jeffrey A. Johnson, Stephen Joel Coons

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Objective

To explore whether variations in the EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark II (HUI2), and HUI Mark III (HUI3) index scores were associated with the survey language (Spanish vs. English) in the US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States study.

Methods

The EQ-5D, HUI2, and HUI3 index scores were compared across three language/ethnic groups (i.e., non-Hispanics surveyed in English [NHE], Hispanics surveyed in English [HE], and Hispanics surveyed in Spanish [HS]) using multiple regression models.

Results

Of the 4,033 respondents, 568 elected to be surveyed in Spanish. After controlling for socioeconomic and health-related variables, the mean difference (standard error) in EQ-5D, HUI2, and HUI3 index scores between HS and NHE were 0.014 (0.011), 0.050 (0.012), and 0.071 (0.020), respectively. After controlling for potential confounding variables, HS were less likely than NHE to report problems/disabilities in HUI2/3 health attributes of vision, speech, self-care, emotion, pain, and cognition (range of odds ratios: 0.31–0.45, P < 0.01 for all). No important differences were found in EQ-5D dimensions between any groups or in any of the index scores between HE and NHE.

Conclusion

Health researchers studying health status of culturally diverse populations should be aware that different preference-based health indices may lead to different results.
Vorheriger Artikel The Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for children: responsiveness and longitudinal validity

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Idler, E. L., & Kasl, S. V. (1995). Self-ratings of health: Do they also predict change in functional ability? Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50, S344–S353.
2.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21–37.CrossRefPubMed
3.
McCallum, J., Shadbolt, B., & Wang, D. (1994). Self-rated health and survival: A 7-year follow-up study of Australian elderly. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1100–1105.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Fylkesnes, K. (1993). Determinants of health care utilization—visits and referrals. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 21, 40–50.PubMed
5.
Ren, X. S., & Amick, B. C., 3rd. (1996). Race and self assessed health status: The role of socioeconomic factors in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 50, 269–273.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Shetterly, S. M., Baxter, J., Mason, L. D., et al. (1996). Self-rated health among Hispanic vs non-Hispanic white adults: The San Luis Valley health and aging study. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 1798–1801.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Agyemang, C., Denktaş, S., Bruijnzeels, M., et al. (2006). Validity of the single-item question on self-rated health status in first generation Turkish and Moroccans versus native Dutch in the Netherlands. Public Health, 120, 543–550.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Leung, B., Luo, N., So, L., et al. (2007). Comparing three measures of health status (perceived health with Likert-type scale, EQ-5D, and number of chronic conditions) in Chinese and white Canadians. Medical Care, 45, 610–617.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kandula, N. R., Lauderdale, D. S., & Baker, D. W. (2007). Differences in self-reported health among Asians, Latinos, and non-Hispanic whites: The role of language and nativity. Annals of Epidemiology, 17, 191–198.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Borrell, L. N., & Dallo, F. J. (2008). Self-rated health and race among Hispanic and non-Hispanic adults. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 10, 229–238.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Finch, B. K., Hummer, R. A., Reindl, M., et al. (2002). Validity of self-rated health among Latino(a)s. American Journal of Epidemiology, 15(155), 755–759.CrossRef
12.
Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33, 337–343.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Torrance, G. W., Feeny, D. H., Furlong, W. J., et al. (1996). Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Medical Care, 34, 702–722.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40, 113–128.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Gold, M. R., Patrick, D. L., Torrance, G. W., et al. (1996). Identifying and valuing outcomes. In M. R. Gold, J. E. Siegel, L. B. Russell, & M. C. Weinstein (Eds.), Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine (pp. 82–134). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
Drummond, M. F., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L., et al. (1997). Cost-utility analysis. In Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. (2nd ed., pp. 139–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Barofsky, I. (2000). The role of cognitive equivalence in studies of health-related quality-of-life assessments. Medical Care, 38(9 Suppl), II125–II129.PubMed
18.
Szende, A., & Williams, A. (Eds.). (2004). Measuring self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Budapest: SpringMed Publishing Ltd.
19.
Cohen, S. B. (2003). Design strategies and innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Medical Care, 41, III5–III12.PubMed
20.
21.
Lubetkin, E. I., Jia, H., Franks, P., & Gold, M. R. (2005). Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: Examining the EQ-5D in the US general population. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2187–2196.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Fu, A. Z., & Kattan, M. W. (2006). Racial and ethnic differences in preference-based health status measure. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 22, 2439–2448.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Gaskin, D. J., & Frick, K. D. (2008). Race and ethnic disparities in valuing health. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 28, 12–20.CrossRef
24.
Angel, R., & Guarnaccia, P. J. (1989). Mind, body, and culture: Somatization among Hispanics. Social Science and Medicine, 28, 1229–1238.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Franzini, L., & Fernandez-Esquer, M. E. (2004). Socioeconomic, cultural, and personal influences on health outcomes in low income Mexican-origin individuals in Texas. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1629–1646.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Hayes, R. P., & Baker, D. W. (1998). Methodological problems in comparing English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients’ satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of care. Medical Care, 36, 230–236.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Morales, L. S., Cunningham, W. E., Brown, J. A., et al. (1999). Are Latinos less satisfied with communication by health care providers? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, 409–417.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Weech-Maldonado, R., Fongwa, M. N., Gutierrez, P., et al. (2008). Language and regional differences in evaluations of Medicare managed care by Hispanics. Health Services Research, 43, 552–568.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43, 203–220.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Szende, A., Oppe, M., & Devlin, N. (Eds.). (2007). EQ-5D value sets: Inventory, comparative review and user guide. Dordrecht: Springer.
31.
Luo, N., Johnson, J. A., Shaw, J. W., et al. (2007). A comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 27, 321–326.
32.
Pickard, A. S., Neary, M. P., & Cella, D. (2007). Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 70.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Horsman, J., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., et al. (2003). The Health Utilities Index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 54.CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
36.
37.
Hawthorne, G., Richardson, J., & Day, N. A. (2001). A comparison of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Annals of Medicine, 33, 358–370.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Pickard, A. S., Johnson, J. A., & Feeny, D. H. (2005). Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Quality of Life Research, 14, 207–219.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Bjorner, J. B., Kreiner, S., Ware, J. E., et al. (1998). Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1189–1202.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1998). A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: The universalist approach. Quality of Life Research, 7, 323–335.
41.
Stewart, A. L., & Nápoles-Springer, A. (2000). Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Medical Care, 38((9 Suppl)), II102–II124.PubMed
42.
Sullivan, P. W., & Ghushchyan, V. (2006). Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 26, 401–409.CrossRef
43.
Li, L., & Fu, A. Z. (2009). Some methodological issues with the analysis of preference-based EQ-5D index score. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology. doi: 10.​1007/​s10742-009-0053-3.
Metadaten
Titel
The association of survey language (Spanish vs. English) with Health Utilities Index and EQ-5D index scores in a United States population sample
verfasst von
Nan Luo
Yu Ko
Jeffrey A. Johnson
Stephen Joel Coons
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2009
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9544-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2009

Quality of Life Research 10/2009 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Same question, different answers: a comparison of global health assessments using visual analogue scales

Commentary

Patient-reported outcomes instruments: bridging the gap between international copyright laws and common practice for developers and users—a case example

OriginalPaper

Development and validation of a composite score based on clinically meaningful events for the opioid-related symptom distress scale

OriginalPaper

Does urinary incontinence affect quality of life of Greek women less severely? A cross-sectional study in two Mediterranean settings

OriginalPaper

Psychometric properties of the Patient Activation Measure among individuals presenting for elective lumbar spine surgery

OriginalPaper

Derivation and testing of an interval-level score for measuring locomotor disability in epidemiological studies of middle and old age

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise