Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. The Beginning

verfasst von : Michael Roe

Erschienen in: Maritime Governance

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We left the story of maritime governance acknowledging that much remained to be done, and although many were contributing to resolving global problems and much had been achieved, some fundamental issues still had to be addressed. This book attempts to move the discussion further on and to suggest ways that policy-makers and those responsible for the design of maritime governance can improve upon what we have. We will venture into the dark world of the maritime administrator, shipowner, media company and politician in an attempt to unfathom the inadequacies of maritime governance, digging deep into the philosophical contexts of form, flow, time, speed and process. This chapter proceeds to examine the characteristics and problems that remain with maritime governance, in particular those relating to nation-states, institutions, the narrow definition of stakeholders, shipowner domination and the absence of fluidity in policy-making.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Form
Literatur
Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.CrossRef
Agnew, J. (1999). Mapping political power beyond state boundaries: Territory, identity, and movement in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 28(3), 499–521.CrossRef
Airriess, C. A. (2001). The regionalization of Hutchison port holdings in mainland China. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 267–278.CrossRef
Alderton, T., & Winchester, N. (2002). Globalization and de-regulation in the maritime industry. Marine Policy, 26(1), 35–43.CrossRef
Aligica, P. D. (2006). Institutional and stakeholder mapping: Frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change. Public Organization Review, 6, 79–90.CrossRef
Allegret, J.-P., & Dulbecco, P. (2002). Global governance versus domestic governance: What roles for international institutions? European Journal of Development Research, 14(2), 173–182.CrossRef
Altman, J. A., & Petkus, E, Jr. (1994). Towards a stakeholder-based policy process: An application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development. Policy Sciences, 27, 37–51.CrossRef
Anderson, J. (1995). The exaggerated death of the nation-state. In J. Anderson, C. Brook, & A. Cochrane (Eds.), A global world? Reordering political space (pp. 65–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, J. (1996). The shifting stage of politics: New medieval and postmodern territorialities? Environment and Planning D, 14(2), 133–153.CrossRef
Anderson, J., & O’Dowd, L. (1999). Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies, 33(7), 593–604.CrossRef
Andrews, D. M. (1994). Mobility and state autonomy: Toward a structural theory of international monetary relations. International Studies Quarterly, 38(2), 193–218.CrossRef
Angelides, C., & Caiden, G. (1994). Adjusting policy thinking to global pragmatics and future problematics. Public Administration and Development, 14, 223–239.CrossRef
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalisation. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minneapolis Press.
Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (2003). Veranderingen van politiek, vernieuwing van milieubeleid klassieke en postmoderne arrangements. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press. (in Dutch).
Ashford, D. E. (1977). Political science and policy studies: Towards a structural solution. Policy Studies Journal, 5, 570–583.CrossRef
Ashley, R. K. (1988). Untying the sovereign state: A double reading of the anarchy probelmatique. Millennium, 17, 227–262.CrossRef
Axelrod, R. (1987). The Gamma Paradigm for studying the domestic influence on foreign policy. Washington, DC: Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association.
Baindur, D., & Vegas, J. (2011). Challenges to implementing motorways of the sea concept—Lessons from the past. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(7), 673–690.CrossRef
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bennett, P. (2000). Environmental governance and private actors: Enrolling insurers in international maritime regulation. Political Geography, 19, 875–899.CrossRef
Berger, S. (Ed.). (1981). Organizing interests in Europe: Pluralism, corporatism and the transformation of politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Besley, T. (2001). Political institutions and policy competition. In G. Kochendorfer-Lucius & B. Pleskovic (Eds.), Institutional foundations of a market economy (pp. 102–109). Villa Borsig Workshop Series 2000. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRef
Bloor, M., Datta, R., Gilinskiy, Y., & Horlick-Jones, T. (2006). Unicorn among the cedars: On the possibility of effective ‘smart regulation’ of the globalized shipping industry. Social and Legal Studies, 15(4), 534–551.CrossRef
Borghese, E. M. (1998). The oceanic circle: Governing the seas as a global resource. New York: United Nations University Press.
Borzel, T. A. (2007). European governance—Negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. European Union Studies Meeting, Montreal, May 7–10, 2007.
Borzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state. Can it work? Regulation and Governance, 4, 113–134.CrossRef
Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16(4), 459–481.CrossRef
Brett, E. A. (1985). The world economy since the war—The politics of uneven development. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Brooks, M. R., & Pallis, A. A. (2008). Assessing port governance models: Prices and performance components. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(4), 411–432.CrossRef
Brown, A. E., & Stewart, J. (1993). Competing advocacy coalitions, policy evolution and airline deregulation. In P. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning (pp. 83–104). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Brunn, S. D. (1998). A treaty of silicon for the treaty of westphalia? New territorial dimensions of modern statehood. Geopolitics, 3(1), 106–131.CrossRef
Buitelaar, E., Lagendijk, A., & Jacobs, W. (2007). A theory of institutional change: Illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy. Environment and Planning A, 39, 891–908.CrossRef
Bush, P. D. (1987). The theory of institutional change. Journal of Economic Issues, XXI(3), 1075–1116.CrossRef
Calvert, R. (1995). Rational actors, equilibrium and social institutions. In J. Knight & I. Sened (Eds.), Explaining social institutions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Campanelli, O. (2012). The global governance of maritime piracy. Journal of Global Policy Governance, 1, 73–84.CrossRef
Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27, 377–409.CrossRef
Camus, A. (1956) The Fall. London: Vintage.
Capek, K. (1936). War with the Newts. London: Geo. Allen and Unwin.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.MATH
Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625.CrossRef
Charan, R., & Freeman, R. E. (1979). Building bridges with corporate constituents. Management Review, 68(11), 8–13.
Chowdhury, K. (2006). Interrogating “newness”. Globalization and postcolonial theory in the age of endless war. Cultural Critique, 62, 126–161.CrossRef
Clemens, E. S., & Cook, J. M. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441–466.CrossRef
Coleman, J. S. (1987). Norms as social capital. In G. Radnitzky & P. Bernholz (Eds.), Economic imperialism. New York: Paragon.
Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (1999). Governance in the participative organisation: Freedom, creativity and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(2–3), 173–188.CrossRef
Colomar, J. M. (1995). Strategies and outcomes in Eastern Europe. Journal of Democracy, 6(2), 74–85.CrossRef
Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Multi-level governance: Linking and networking the various regional and local levels. Report of Governance Working Group 4c, Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities. (2008). Guidelines for an integrated approach to maritime policy: Towards best practice in integrated maritime governance and stakeholder consultation, COM (2008) 395 final, Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities. (2009). Towards an integrated maritime policy for better governance in the mediterranean. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM (2009) 466 Final, Brussels.
Commons, J. R. (1968). Legal foundations of capitalism. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Cooper, R. (2000). The post-modern state and the world order. London: Demos.
Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600.CrossRef
Crosby, B. L. (1996). Policy implementation: The organizational challenge. World Development, 24(9), 1403–1415.CrossRef
Croucher, S. L. (2003). Perpetual imagining. Nationhood in a global era. International Studies Review, 5, 1–24.CrossRef
Davidson, G. (1971). A dictionary of angels, including the fallen angels. New York: The Free Press.
De Vivero, J. L. S., & Mateos, J. C. R. (2010). Ocean governance in a competitive world. The BRIC countries as emerging maritime powers—Building new geopolitical scenarios. Marine Policy, 34, 967–978.CrossRef
Del Rosso Jr., S. J. (1995). The insecure state (What future for the state?). Daedalus, 124, 2.
Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31.CrossRef
Derthick, M., & Quirk, P. (1985). The politics of deregulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Deutsch, K. (1966). Nationalism and social communication. New York: MIT Press.
Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, W. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2), 89–112.CrossRef
Donaldson, T. (1999). Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 237–241.CrossRef
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Dopfer, K. (1991). Toward a theory of economic institutions: Energy and path dependency. Journal of Economic Issues, XXV(2), 535–550.CrossRef
Douglas, J. N. H. (1968). Political geography and administrative areas: A method of assessing the effectiveness of local government areas. In C. A. Fisher (Ed.), Essays in political geography. London: Methuen.
Druckman, D. (1978). Boundary role conflict: negotiations as dual responsiveness. In J. W. Zartman (Ed.), The negotiation process: Theories and applications (pp. 100–101, 109). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Duncan, S., & Savage, M. (1989). Space, scale and locality. Antipode, 21(3), 207–231.CrossRef
Eising, R., & Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). Introduction. Network Governance in the European Union. In R. Eising & B. Kohler-Koch (Eds.), Interessenpolitik in Europa. Baden Baden: Nomos.
Evans, P. (1997). The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization, World Politics, 50(1), 62–87.
Evans, P. (2001). Beyond institutional monocropping: Institutions, capabilities and deliberative development (Unpublished).
Evans, B., Reuschemeyer, D., & Skopcol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Fletcher, A., Guthrie, J., Steane, P., Roos, G., & Pike, S. (2003). Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 505–527.CrossRef
Forsyth, C. J. (1993). Transnational corporations: Problems for study in the new international order of maritime shipping. Maritime Policy and Management, 20(3), 207–214.CrossRef
Frankel, M. (1955). Obsolescence and technological change in a maturing economy. The American Economic Review, 45(3), 296–319.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. London: Pitman.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 2–21.CrossRef
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders, theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fritz, J. (2010). Towards a ‘new form of governance’ in science policy relations in the European maritime policy. Marine Policy, 34, 1–6.CrossRef
Furger, F. (1997). Accountability and systems of self-governance: The case of the maritime industry. Law and Policy, 19(4), 445–476.CrossRef
Gekara, V. O. (2010). The stamp of neo-liberalism on the UK tonnage tax and the implications for British seafaring. Marine Policy, 34(3), 487–494.CrossRef
Giddens, A. (1985). The nation-state and violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gioia, D. A. (1999). Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 228–232.
Gordenker, L., & Weiss, T. G. (1995). Pluralising global governance: Analytical approaches and dimensions. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 357–387.CrossRef
Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, P. V. (2003). Regional institutional convergence? Reflections from Baltimore waterfront. Economic Geography, 79, 347–363.CrossRef
Harding, A. (1997). Urban regimes in a Europe of the cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 4(4), 291–314.MathSciNetCrossRef
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485.CrossRef
Hartshorne, R. (1950). The functional approach in political geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 40(2), 95–130.CrossRef
Harvey, D. (1981). The spatial fix—Hegel, Von Thunen and Marx. Antipode, 13(3), 1–12.CrossRef
Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the “spatial fix”. Geographische Review, 2, 23–30.
Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches in urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1531–1546.CrossRef
Healey, P., Cars, G., Madanipour, A., & de Magalhaes, C. (2002). Transforming governance institutionalist analysis and institutional capacity. In G. Cars, P. Healey, A. Madanipour, & C. de Magalhaes (Eds.), Transforming governance institutional analysis and institutional capacity (pp. 6–28). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Held, D. (1991). Democracy, the nation-state and the global system. Economy and Society, 20(2), 138–172.CrossRef
Hemmati, M. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: Beyond deadlock and conflict. London: Earthscan.
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.CrossRef
Hirst, P. (1997). Democracy, civil society and global politics. London: UCL Press.
Hobsbawm, E. (1998). The nation and globalization. Constellations, 5(1), 1–9.CrossRef
Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). Some fundamental legal concepts as applied in the study of primitive law. Yale Law Journal, 23, 16–59.CrossRef
Hosseus, D., & Pal, L. A. (1997). Anatomy of a policy area: The case of shipping. Canadian Public Policy, XXIII(4), 399–415.CrossRef
Hughes, E. C. (1936). The ecological aspect of institutions. American Sociological Review, 1(2), 180–189.CrossRef
Inayatullah, N., & Rupert, M. E. (1993). Hobbes, Smith and the problem of mixed ontologies in neorealist international political economy. In S. Rosow (Ed.), The global economy as political space (pp. 61–85). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Jackson, J. E. (Ed.). (1990). Institutions in American society. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Jacobs, W. (2007). Port competition between Los Angeles and Long Beach: An institutional analysis. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98, 360–372.CrossRef
Jacobs, W., & Hall, P. V. (2007). What conditions supply chain strategies in ports? The case of Dubai. GeoJournal, 68, 327–342.CrossRef
Jenkins, R. (1988). Transnational corporations and uneven development. London: Routledge.
Jenkins-Smith, H., & Sabatier, P. (1994). Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Public Policy, 14, 175–203.CrossRef
Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting capitalist states in their place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jessop, B. (2003). The future of the state in an era of globalization. International Politics and Society, 3, 30–46.
Jessop, B. (2004). Multilevel governance and multilevel metagovernance. Changes in the EU as integral moments in the transformation and reorientation of contemporary statehood. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 49–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Johnson, G., Smith, S., & Codling, B. (2000). Microprocesses of institutional change in the context of privatization. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 572–580.
Johnston, R. J. (1995). Territoriality and the state. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Geography, history and social science (pp. 213–226). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRef
Jones, B. D., Sulkin, T., & Larsen, H. A. (2003). Policy punctuations in American political institutions. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 151–169.CrossRef
Jordan, A. (2001). The European Union: An evolving system of multi-level governance… or government? Policy and Politics, 29(2), 193–208.CrossRef
Kaldor, M. (1993). Civil society and democratic renewal. In A. Roberts (Ed.), Power to the People? Economic self-determination and the regions. London: European Dialogue, Ebert Foundation.
Kasperson, R. E., & Minghi, J. V. (1969). The structure of political geography. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co.
Keohane, R. O. (2002). Global governance and democratic accountability, Miliband Lectures, London School of Economics.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. (1972). Transnational systems and international organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard University. (Unpublished Seminar Paper, Harvard Center for International Affairs).
Kjellberg, F. (1975). Political institutionalization. London: Wiley.
Knight, D. B. (1971). Impress of authority and ideology on the landscape (pp. 383–387). LXII: Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie.
Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Koelble, T. A. (1995). The new institutionalism in political science and sociology. Comparative Politics, 27(2), 231–243.CrossRef
Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance. New government-society interactions. London: Sage.
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organisation practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations, institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.CrossRef
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kovats, L. J. (2006). How flag states lost the plot over shipping’s governance. Does a ship need a sovereign? Maritime Policy and Management, 33(1), 75–81.CrossRef
Krasno, J. E. (Ed.). (2004). United Nations: Confronting the challenges of a global society. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Lambert, J. (1991). Europe: the nation-state dies hard. Capital and Class, 43, 9–24. (Spring).CrossRef
Lazarus, R. J. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94(5), 1153–1234.
Le Gales, P., & Harding, A. (1998). Cities and states in Europe. West European Politics, 21(3), 120–145.CrossRef
Lee, K., Humphreys, D., & Pugh, M. (1997). ‘Privatisation’ in the United Nations system: Patterns of influence in three intergovernmental organisations. Global Society, 11(3), 339–357.CrossRef
Leigh-Fermor, P. (2013). The broken road. From the Iron Gates to Mount Atlas. London: John Murray.
Lewis, D. K. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lloyd’s List. (2008). French owners urge IMO to follow lead on Erika3, October 13.
Lloyd’s List. (2009a). Is the European Commission really interested in ship safety, January 14.
Lloyd’s List. (2009b). IMO under fire over fatigue related accidents, February 19.
Lloyd’s List. (2010). Mordue quits European maritime safety chief role, January 25.
Luck, E. C. (2005). How not to reform the United Nations. Global Governance, 11, 407–414.
MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.CrossRef
Mangat, R. (2001). The death of distance? Globalization of international relations. E-merge, Student Journal of International Affairs.
Mann, M. (1997). Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation-state? Journal of International Political Economy, 4(3), 472–496.CrossRef
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.CrossRef
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
Martin, R. (2001). Geography and public policy: The case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography, 25(2), 189–210.CrossRef
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1998). The Communist Manifesto. London: Verso.
Mason, K. J., & Gray, R. (1999). Stakeholders in a hybrid market: The example of air business passenger travel. European Journal of Marketing, 33(9/10), 844–858.
Matheson, M. J. (2001). United Nations governance of postconflict societies. The American Journal of International Law, 95(1), 76–85.CrossRef
Mayntz, R. (1993). Policy-Netwerke and die Logik von Verhandlungssystemen. In A. Hertier (Ed.), Policy analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung (Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft 24, pp. 148–168). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Menger, K. (1963). Problems in economics and sociology. Urbana, IL: Univeristy of Illinois Press.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRef
Michalowski, R. J., & Kramer, R. C. (1987). The space between laws: The problem of corporate crime in a transnational context. Social Problems, 34(1), 34–53.CrossRef
Mittelman, J. H. (1999). Rethinking the ‘New Regionalism’ in the context of globalization. In J. Hettne, A. Inotai., & O. Sunkel (Eds.), Globalism and the new regionalism (Vol. 1, pp. 25–53). New Regionalism Series. London: Macmillan.
Mooij, J., & De Vos, V. (2003). Policy processes: An annotated bibliography on policy processes, with particular emphasis on India. Working Paper 221, Overseas Development Institute, London.
More, T. (1988). Utopia. London: Penguin.
Morgenthau, H. J. (2005). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: McGraw Hill.
Mukand, S. W., & Rodrik, D. (2005). In search of the Holy Grail: Policy convergence, experimentation and economic performance. The American Economic Review, 95(1), 374–383.CrossRef
Murray, R. (1971). The internationalization of capital and the nation state. New Left Review, 67, 84–108.
Nettl, J. P. (1968). The state as a conceptual variable. World Politics, 20(4), 559–592.CrossRef
Ng, A. K.-Y., & Pallis, A. A. (2010). Port governance reforms in diversified institutional frameworks; generic solutions, implementation asymmetries. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2147–2167.CrossRef
North, D. C. (1986). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 142, 230–237.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions: Institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
North, D. C. (1993). Economic performance through time. Stockholm, Sweden: Alfred Nobel Memorial Prize Lecture.
Notteboom, T. E., & Winkelmans, W. (2002). Stakeholder relations management in ports: Dealing with the interplay of forces among stakeholders in a changing competitive environment. In International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME), Panama.
O’Riordan, T., Cooper, C. L., Jordan, A., Rayner, S., Richards, K. R., Runci, P., & Yoffe, S. (1998). Institutional frameworks for political action. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change, the societal framework (Vol. 1, pp. 345–440). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
Oakerson, R. J., & Parks, R. B. (1988). Citizen voice and public entrepreneurship: The organizational dynamic of a complex metropolitan county. Publius, 18, 91–112.
Oberschall, A., & Leifer, E. M. (1986). Efficiency and social institutions: Economic reasoning in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 233–253.CrossRef
OECD. (2000). Reducing the risk of policy failure. Challenges for regulatory compliance, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
Olsen, J. P. (1981). Organizational integration in government. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 2). New York: Oxford University Press.
Opello, W. C, Jr., & Rosow, S. J. (2004). The nation-state and global order: A historical introduction to contemporary politic s. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48, 3–25.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Padgett, J. F. (1981). Hierarchy and ecological control in federal budgetary decision-making. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 75–129.CrossRef
Pallis, A. A. (2005–2006). Maritime interest representation in the EU. European Political Economy Review, 3(2), 6–28.
Pallis, A. A., & Tsiotis, S. G. P. (2006). Inside EU-level maritime interest groups: Structures, lobbying practices and governance. Report of the Jean Monnet Centre in European Port Policy, University of the Aegean, Chios, Greece.
Pallis, A. A., & Tsiotis, S. G. P. (2008). Maritime interests and the EU port services directive. Trasporti Europei, 38, 17–31.
Parker, M. (2000). Angelic organization: Hierarchy and the tyranny of Heaven. Organization Studies, 30(11), 1281–1299.CrossRef
Peters, B. G. (2002). Governance. A garbage can perspective. Political Science Series 84, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.
Phillips, S. D., & Orsini, M. (2002). Mapping the links; citizen involvement in policy processes. CPRN Discussion Paper F 21, Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa.
Picciotto, S. (1991). The internationalization of the state. Capital and Class, Spring, 43, 43–63.CrossRef
Picciotto, S. (1997) Networks in international economic integration, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17(2/3), 1014–1056.
Picciotto, S. (1998). Globalization, liberalization, regulation. In Conference on Globalization, The Nation-State and Violence, University of Sussex.
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes change. World Politics, 45, 595–628.CrossRef
Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32, 816–822.CrossRef
Potter, A. L. (1979). Political institutions, political decay and the Argentine crises of 1930, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.CrossRef
Quartey, S. H., & Puplampu, B. B. (2012). Employee health and safety practices: An exploratory and comparative study of the shipping and manufacturing industries in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(23), 81–95.CrossRef
Ramachandran, V., Rueda-Sabater, E., & Kraft, R. (2009). Rethinking fundamental principles of global governance: How to represent states and populations in multilateral institutions. Governance, 22(3), 341–351.CrossRef
Reisman, W. M. (1993). The constitutional crisis in the United Nations. The American Journal of International Law, 87(1), 83–100.
Rhenman, E. (1973). Organization theory for long range planning. New York: Wiley.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Riker, W. (1980). Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions. American Political Science Review, 74, 432–446.CrossRef
Robins, R. S. (1976). Political institutionalization and the integration of elites. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Robyn, D. (1987). Braking the special interests: Trucking deregulation and the politics of policy reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative Development, 35(3), 1–33.
Roe, M. S. (2007a). European Union Maritime Policy. The role of new member states and the need for a review of governance, International Shipping Management Forum 07, May 10–11, Athens, Greece.
Roe, M. S. (2007b). Shipping, policy and multi-level governance. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9, 84–103.CrossRef
Roe, M. S. (2007c). Jurisdiction, shipping policy and the “new” states of the European Union. International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME), Athens, July 4–6.
Roe, M. S. (2007d). Shipping policy governance: A post-fordist interpretation. In I. Visvikis (Ed.), Trends and developments in shipping management (pp. 131–142). Athens: T and T Publishing.
Roe, M. S. (2007e). Shipping policy, governance and jurisdictional friction. Economic Outlook, 104, 8–15 January.
Roe, M. (2008a). Safety, security, the environment and shipping—The problem of making effective policies. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 7(1), 263–279.CrossRef
Roe, M. S. (2008b). State versus the stakeholder: The governance of the maritime sector. International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME), Dalian, April 2–4.
Roe, M. S. (2009a). Maritime capitalist liposuction—A postmodern interpretation of maritime governance failure. International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME), Copenhagen, June 24–26.
Roe, M. S. (2009b). Policy failure in shipping: A global disaster of epic dimensions. 2nd International Symposium on Maritime Safety, Security and Environmental Protection, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece, September 17–18.
Roe, M. S. (2009c). Multi-level and polycentric governance: Effective policymaking for shipping. Maritime Policy and Management, 36(1), 39–56.CrossRef
Roe, M. S. (2009d). Maritime governance and policy-making failure in the European Union. International Journal of Shipping, Transport and Logistics, 1(1), 1–19.CrossRef
Roe, M. S. (2010a). Globalization and maritime policy-making—The case for governance rehabilitation. International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME), Lisbon, July 7–9.
Roe, M. S. (2010b). Shipping policy and globalization: Jurisdictions, governance and failure. In C. Grammenos (Ed.), The handbook of maritime economics and business (pp. 539–556, 2nd ed.). London: Lloyd’s List.
Roe, M. S. (2013). Maritime governance and policy-making. London: Springer.CrossRef
Roe, M. S., & Selkou, E. (2006). Multi-level governance, shipping policy and social responsibility. In International Conference ‘Shipping in the Era of Social Responsibility’ in honour of the late Professor Basil Metaxas (1925–1996), Argostoli, Kefalonia, Greece.
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territorality and beyond: Problematizng modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174.CrossRef
Rugman, A. (Ed.). (1982). New theories of the multinational enterprize. London: Croom Helm.
Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.MathSciNetCrossRef
Sampson, H., & Bloor, M. (2007). When Jack gets out of the box: The problems of regulating a global industry. Sociology, 41(3), 551–569.CrossRef
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61–75.CrossRef
Scharpf, F. W. (1977). Does organization matter? Task structure and interaction in the ministerial bureaucracy. In E. H. Burack & A. R. Negandhi (Eds.), Organizational design: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
Scharpf, F. W. (1993). Positiv und negativ Koordination in Verhandlungssystemen. In A. Hertier (Ed.), Policy-analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung (pp. 57–83). PVS Sonderheft 24, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Community and autonomy: Multi-level policy-making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 1(2), 219–242.
Schat, P. (1969). Political geography: A review. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 60(4), 255–260.CrossRef
Schmitter, P., & Lehmbruch, G. (1979). Trends towards corporatist intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Schotter, A. (1981). The economic theory of social institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Schrier, E., Nadel, E., & Rifas, B. E. (1984). Forces shaping international maritime transport. World Economy, 7, 87–102.CrossRef
Schwind, M. (1970). Die Aufgaben einer Politischen Geografie in neuer Sicht. Geographische Rundschau, XXII, 3.
Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.CrossRef
Selkou, E., & Roe, M. S. (2004). Globalization, policy and shipping. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Selkou, E., & Roe, M. S. (2005). Container shipping policy and models of multi-level governance. Annals of Maritime Studies, 43, 45–62.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper and Row.
Sheldon, A. (1980). Organizational paradigms: A theory of organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 8(3), 61–80.CrossRef
Shepsie, K. A. (1975). Congressional committee assignments: An optimization model with institutional constraints. Public Choice, 22, 55–78.CrossRef
Shepsie, K. A. (1979). Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. American Journal of Polictical Science, 23, 27–59.CrossRef
Shepsie, K. A. (1989). Studying institutions some lessons from the rational choice approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1, 131–147.CrossRef
Shepsie, K. A., & Weingast, R. (1983). Institutionalizing majority rule: A social choice theory with policy implications. American Economic Review, 73, 357–372.
Shepsie, K. A., & Weingast, R. (1984). When do rules and procedure matter? Journal of Politics, 46, 206–221.CrossRef
Shepsie, K. A., & Weingast, R. (1987). The institutional foundations of committee power. American Political Science Review, 81, 85–104.CrossRef
Shimko, K. (1992). Realism, neo-realism and American liberalism. Review of Politics, 54, 281–302.CrossRef
Shinohara, M. (2005). Quality shipping and incentive schemes: From the perspective of the institutional economics. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 7, 281–295.MathSciNetCrossRef
Silverstein, H. B. (1976). Technological politics and maritime affairs—Comparative participation in the intergovernmental maritime consultative organization. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 7, 367–407.
Silverstein, H. B. (1978). Superships and nation-states. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a New American State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Slaughter, A.-M. (1997). The real new world order. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 183–198.CrossRef
Sletmo, G. K. (2001). The end of national shipping policy? A historical perspective on shipping policy in a global economy. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 3, 333–350.CrossRef
Sletmo, G. K. (2002a). The rise and fall of national shipping policies. In C. Grammenos (Ed.), The handbook of maritime economics and business (pp. 471–494). London: Lloyd’s of London Press.
Sletmo, G. K. (2002b). National shipping policy and global markets: A retrospective for the future. International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME), Panama City, November 13–15.
Snyder, G. H., & Diesing, P. (1977). Conflict among nations: Bargaining, decision-making and systems structure in international crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stalder, F. (2006). Manuel Castells. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.CrossRef
Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-88. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Strange, S. (1976). Who runs world shipping? International Affairs, 52(3), 346–367.CrossRef
Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (Eds.). (1985). Private interest government beyond market and state. London: Sage.
Stubbs, P. (2005). Stretching concepts too far? Multi-level governance, policy transfer and the politics of scale in South-East Europe, Southeast European Politics, vi, 2, 66–87.
Sutherland, M., & Nichols, S. (2006). Issues in the governance of marine spaces. In M. Sutherland (Ed.), Administering marine spaces: International issues (FIG Publications No. 36, pp. 6–20). International Federation of Surveyors, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sutton, R. (1999). The policy process: An overview. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D, 18, 63–76.CrossRef
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thompson, G. (1999). Introduction: Situating globalization. International Social Sciences Journal, 160, 139–152.
Tilly, C. (1975). The formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tradewinds. (2008a). Accident process to cast wider net, February 29.
Tradewinds. (2008b). A good plan that could go wrong, February 29.
Tradewinds. (2008c). Time to reassess the safety regime, March 14.
Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977). The emergence of norms. Oxford: Clarendon.
Van Leeuwen, J., & Van Tatenhove, J. (2010). The triangle of marine governance in the environmental governance of Dutch offshore platforms. Marine Policy, 34, 590–597.CrossRef
Van Tatenhove, J. (2008). Innovative forms of marine governance: A reflection. Paper presented at Dies NatalisWageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Vanelslander, T. (2011). Port and maritime governance and regulation: Emerging issues. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(3), 215–217.CrossRef
Veblen, T. (1915). Imperial Germany and the industrial revolution. London: Macmillan.
Vogler, J. (1995). The global commons: A regime analysis. London: Wiley.
Von Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 319–330.
Von Hayek, F. (1967). Notes on the evolution of rules of conduct. In F. A. Von Hayek (Ed.), Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Walker, R. B. J. (1991). State sovereignty and the articulation of political space/time. Millennium, 20, 445–461.CrossRef
Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Wang, J. J., Ng, A. K.-Y., & Olivier, D. (2004). Port governance in China: A review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices. Transport Policy, 11, 237–250.CrossRef
Weingast, B. R. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7(1), 1–31.
White, H. C. (1992). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Whittesley, D. (1935). The impress of effective central authority upon the landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 25(2), 85–97.CrossRef
Williams, D. (1987). The specialized agencies and the United Nations. London: C. Hurst and Company.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
Wirth, C. (2012). Ocean governance, maritime security and the consequences of modernity in north-east Asia. The Pacific Review, 25(2), 223–245.CrossRef
Wood, E. M. (2001). Global capital. National states. In M. Rupert & H. Smith (Eds.), Historical materialism and globalization (pp. 17–39). New York: Routledge.
Wright, H. T. (1977). Recent research on the origin of the state. Annual Review of Anthropology, 6, 379–397.CrossRef
Wright-Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wuisan, L., Van Leeuwen, J., & Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2012). Greening international shipping through private governance: A case study of the clean shipping project. Marine Policy, 36, 165–173.CrossRef
Yeung, H. W. (1998). Capital, state and space: Contesting the borderless world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 23, 291–309.CrossRef
Zafonte, M., & Sabatier, P. (1997). Shared beliefs and functional interdependence as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems. Unpublished Manuscript, University of California.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural resistance. American Economic Review, 42, 726–743.
Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 2(1), 1–47.
Zucker, L. G. (1988). Where do institutional patterns come from? Organisations as actors in social systems. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 23–52). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Zurn, M. (2003). Globalization and global governance: From societal to political denationalization. European Review, 11(3), 31–364.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Beginning
verfasst von
Michael Roe
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Maritime Governance

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21746-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-21747-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21747-5_1

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise