Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
This study investigates factors that affect students’ performance at the Faculty of Business Administration at a private university in the Syrian Arab republic. The impact of four variables; high school GPA, motivation, source of high school certificate, and gender, on student’s faculty GPA have been examined using large sample of students for the period from 2005 to 2015. Applying Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimates, we find that high school GPA is the main determinants of student’s faculty performance. Moreover, the difference in average faculty GPA between males and females is significant with males underperforming females. Furthermore, motivation seems an important determinant of faculty GPA though it is less reliable than high school GPA. Hence, Awareness sessions should be conducted for high school students to raise their awareness of their future careers. Moreover, admission policies need to be reviewed and developed to include motivation element in the admission process.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Schwab, K. (2010). The global competitiveness report 2010–2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Tessema, M., Ready, K., & Malone, C. (2012). Effect of gender on college students’ satisfaction and achievement: The case of a midsized midwestern public university. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(10), 1–11.
Tross, S. A., Harper, J. P., Osher, L. W., & Kneidinger, L. M. (2000). Not just the usual cast of characteristics: Using personality to predict college performance and retention. Journal of College Student Development, 41(3), 323–334.
Educational Testing Service, USA, & Zwick, R. (2012). El rol de los exámenes de admisión, de las notas de educación secundaria y de la situación socioeconómica en la predicción del desempeño universitario. Pensamiento Educativo. Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 49(2), 23–30. CrossRef
Stewart, S., Lim, D. H., & Kim, J. (2015). Factors influencing college persistence for first-time students. Journal of Developmental Education, 38(3), 12–16.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. CrossRef
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. CrossRef
Amrai, K., Motlagh, S. E., Zalani, H. A., & Parhon, H. (2011). The relationship between academic motivation and academic achievement students. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 399–402. CrossRef
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300. CrossRef
Ibrahim, I. R. A., & AL-Ali, W. A. (2016). The academic intrinsic motivation and its relationship with the emotional intelligence level with a sample of the academic overachievers and underachievers of Najran university. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 119. CrossRef
Allen, D. (1999). Desire to finish college: An empirical link between motivation and persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 461–485. CrossRef
Geiser, S., & Santelices, M. V. (2007). Validity of high-school grades in predicting student success beyond the freshman year: High-school record vs. standardized tests as indicators of four-year college outcomes. Berkeley, CA: Centre for Studies in Higher Education.
Anderson, G., Benjamin, D., & Fuss, M. A. (1994). The determinants of success in university introductory economics courses. The Journal of Economic Education, 25(2), 99–119. CrossRef
Belfield, C. R., & Crosta, P. M. (2012). Predicting success in college: The importance of placement tests and high school transcripts (CCRC Working Paper No. 42). New York: Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
Camara, W., Kimmel, E., Scheuneman, J., & Sawtell, E. (2003). Whose grades are inflated? (College Board Research Report No. 2003–2004). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Katz, I., Kaplan, A., & Buzukashvily, T. (2011). The role of parents’ motivation in students’ autonomous motivation for doing homework. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 376–386. CrossRef
Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252–267. CrossRef
Breen, R., & Lindsay, R. (2002). Different disciplines require different motivations for student success. Research in Higher Education, 43(6), 693–725. CrossRef
Eymur, G., & Geban, Ö. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between motivation and academic achievement of pre-service chemistry teachers. Education and Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 36(161), 246–255.
Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, T. J., Vos, C. M. P., Westers, P., & Croiset, G. (2013). How motivation affects academic performance: A structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(1), 57–69. Accessed April 11, 2016, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3/fulltext.html
Woodfield, R., & Earl-Novell, S. (2006). An assessment of the extent to which subject variation between the arts and sciences in relation to the award of a first class degree can explain the ‘gender gap’ in UK universities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(3), 355–372. CrossRef
Atinaf, W., & Petros, P. (2016). Socio economic factors affecting female students academic performance at higher education. Health Care: Current Reviews, 4(1), 163.
- The Determinants of Business Students’ Faculty Performance: Evidence from a Private University in Syria
Kinaz Al Aytouni
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia