nach oben

Political Behavior

Erschienen in:

13.02.2021 | Original Paper

The Effects of Basic Human Values on Populist Voting. An Analysis of 13 European Democracies

verfasst von: Hugo Marcos-Marne

Erschienen in: Political Behavior | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Basic human values have been used to predict voting patterns associated with the left–right and the authoritarian-libertarian divides. However, the connection between basic human values and populist voting has received less attention, especially if an ideational approach to populism is considered, that allows for separating it from traditional dimensions of competition. To fill this research gap, this article explores the relationship between basic human values and voting for left-wing populist parties (LPPs) and right-wing populist parties (RPPs), in 13 European democracies. The results suggest that values help explain voting for populist parties beyond the effect they have on preferences related to the economic left–right and the authoritarian-libertarian divides. First, basic predispositions reflecting tradition and conformity are negatively associated with voting for populist parties of the left and the right, thus suggesting a connection that is independent of the host ideologies to which populism attaches. Second, giving less importance to universalism and more to security correlates with voting for RPPs. Last, benevolence shows no effect on populist voting that is independent of other dimensions of political competition.

Vorheriger Artikel The Persistence of Prejudice: Voters Strongly Penalize Candidates with HIV

Nächster Artikel Partisan Alignment Increases Voter Turnout: Evidence from Redistricting

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Research in this regard has focused mainly on personality traits and populism. Although connected with personality, basic human values are a different construct that may have distinct implications on voting (Roccas et al. 2002).

Reporting a full account of the conceptual debate on populism is far beyond the aims of this paper. See Weyland (2001), Aslanidis (2015) or Osuna and Javier (2020) for alternative approaches.

Although a new wave of the ESS has been recently released, the 2016 one allows a more fine-grained identification of populist parties. This is so because populism is not an immutable feature of parties´ discourses, and some of the empirical analyses used to identify populist parties build upon data from 2015–2016.

While the M5S has been classified as a left-wing populist party (Santana and Rama 2018; Van Hauwaert and Van Kessel 2017), doubts persist on its ideological nature (Mosca and Tronconi 2019). Attending to its difficult characterization, separate analyses have been run excluding it from the list of LPPs. Main results remain the same.

Original wording: “Now I will briefly describe some people. Please listen to each description and tell me how much each person is or is not like you”. Respondents use a scale that ranges between 1 (very much like me) and 6 (not like me at all). This original scale was inverted so higher values represent more similarities with the respondent. A complete list of the 21 questions can be found in the online appendix (Table OA.2).

This operationalization is indicated by Schwartz for the use of basic human values in regression analysis and consists of three consecutive stages. First, individual mean-scores for the 10 values are calculated using the corresponding items. Second, individual overall means are calculated using the 21 items. Third, centered scores for the 10 values are obtained after subtracting to each one the overall mean score. Alternative operationalizations of values, such as using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), have been discarded following ESS recommendations (Schwartz 2003, 2016).

Social benefits/services place too great strain on economy; Social benefits/services prevent widespread poverty; Social benefits/services lead to a more equal society; Social benefits/services cost businesses too much in taxes/charges; Social benefits/services make people lazy. Scales have been rearranged when necessary so higher values always represent positions in favor of social benefits. Respondents declare the extent to which they agree with the statements in a five-point scale (strongly agree-strongly disagree).

Immigration bad or good for country's economy; Country's cultural life undermined or enriched by immigrants; Immigrants make country worse or better place to live. Scales have been rearranged when necessary so higher values always represent a positive view of immigrants and immigration. Respondents position themselves in each of the scales using a 11-point scale (ranging between 0 and 10).

Including left–right self-positioning besides preferences towards immigration and redistribution looks to account for all possible triggers of voting that refer to thick ideologies. The interpretation of these three coefficients alone could be tricky because these variables are related (although collinearity diagnosis show no issues in that regard), but such detailed specification of the model allows a better identification of how certain values relate to populist voting regardless of traditional policy preferences.

The importance of the distinction between higher education and other categories has been long stablished in studies of populism (Hawkins et al. 2012). To measure it, I use the ESS question that measures the highest level of education successfully completed. The ESS question builds upon the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED).

No multicollinearity issues are expected. The Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was consistently below 2 in all regressions run.

Although using voters of radical non-populist parties as reference had been ideal for these purposes, there are few in the survey. For the classification of mainstream parties as left or right-wing I have utilized data from the Chapel Hill Experts Survey (Polk et al. 2017). I selected most voted parties among the non-populist forces that share the left–right ideological space with populist forces. For right-wing mainstream parties, I choose most voted parties among the conservative, Christian-democratic and liberal parties. For left-wing mainstream ones, the most voted party in the socialist family. The division of families by CHES is based upon membership or affiliation with European Parliament families, the Parliament and governments database (Döring and Manow 2019), and self-identification. A table with all parties considered is available in the online appendix (Table OA.4).

Only 3 of the populist parties considered are not located below 3 or above 7 in the left–right scale, according to Polk et al. (2017). These are LDD (Belgium), M5S (Italy), and FI (Italy), and the latter obtains a 6.7 in the scale according to the experts. Analyses excluding LDD and M5S do not alter the main findings obtained.

Separate country-by-country regressions analyses were conducted too. As expected, decreasing the number of cases affected confidence intervals and significance tests, but the direction of main effects was still observable. Results largely support the existence of a negative effect of universalism and a positive one of security in voting for RPPs and confirm the overall negative importance of conformity in voting for LPPs and RPPs. Country-by-country results are much less clear regarding tradition (e.g., a strong positive association exists with voting for RPPs in Norway and Switzerland), which highlights the importance of considering different arenas of competition. Complete results are available upon request from the author.

Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2013). How populist are the people? measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600.CrossRef

Akkerman, A., Zaslove, A., & Spruyt, B. (2017). ‘We the People’ or ‘We the Peoples’? a comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in the Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 377–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12275.CrossRef

Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. London: Palgrave.CrossRef

Andreadis, I., Hawkins, K., Llamazares, I., & Singer, M. (2018). Populist voting in Chile, Greece, Spain, and Bolivia. In K. Hawkins, R. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), The Ideational Approach to Populism Concept, Theory, and Analysis. London: Routledge.

Aslanidis, P. (2015). Is populism an ideology? a refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224.CrossRef

Bakker, B. N., Rooduijn, M., & Schumacher, G. (2015). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12121.CrossRef

Barnea, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19(1), 17–40.CrossRef

Bernhard, L., & Kriesi, H. (2019). Populism in election times: A comparative analysis of 11 countries in Western Europe. West European Politics, 42(6), 1188–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1596694.CrossRef

Betz, H.-G., & Johnson, C. (2004). Against the current—stemming the tide: the nostalgic ideology of the contemporary radical populist right. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263546.CrossRef

Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263500. CrossRef

Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x. CrossRef

Clark, T. S., & Linzer, D. A. (2015). Should i use fixed or random effects? Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.32.CrossRef

Datler, G., Jagodzinski, W., & Schmidt, P. (2013). Two theories on the test bench: Internal and external validity of the theories of Ronald Inglehart and Shalom Schwartz. Social Science Research, 42(3), 906–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.009.CrossRef

de Araújo, R., Bobowik, M., Vilar, R., Liu, J. H., Gil, H., de Zuñiga, L., et al. (2020). Human values and ideological beliefs as predictors of attitudes toward immigrants across 20 countries: The country-level moderating role of threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2635.CrossRef

de Zúñiga, H., Gil, M. B., & Scherman, A. (2017). Social media social capital, offline social capital, and citizenship: Exploring asymmetrical social capital effects. Political Communication, 34(1), 44–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1227000.CrossRef

Dennison, J. (2019). How issue salience explains the rise of the populist right in Western Europe. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz022.CrossRef

Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow. 2019. Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies.

ESS. 2016. ESS Round 8: European Social Survey Round 8 Data (2016). Data file edition 2.2. NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway.

Fatke, M. (2016). Personality traits and political ideology: A first global assessment. Political Psychology, 38(5), 881–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12347.CrossRef

Fatke, M. (2019). The personality of populists: How the big five traits relate to populist attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.018.CrossRef

Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In S. Feldman (Ed.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

Gidron, N., & Mijs, J. J. B. (2019). Do changes in material circumstances drive support for populist radical parties? panel data evidence from the Netherlands during the great recession, 2007–2015. European Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz023.CrossRef

Hauwaert, V., Steven, M., & Van Kessel, S. (2017). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216.CrossRef

Hawkins, K. (2009). Is Chávez populist?: Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721.CrossRef

Hawkins, K., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). The ideational approach to populism. Latin American Research Review, 52(4), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.85.CrossRef

Hawkins, K., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2019). Introduction: the ideational approach. In K. Hawkins, R. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), The Ideational Approach to Populism. Concept, Theory, and Analysis. London: Routledge.

Hawkins, K., Ryan, K., Littvay, L., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2019a). The ideational approach to populism. Concept, theory, and analysis. London: Routledge.

Hawkins, K., Rovira Kaltwasser, C., & Andreadis, I. (2019b). The activation of populist attitudes. Government and Opposition. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.23.CrossRef

Hawkins, Kirk, Scott Riding, and Cas Mudde. 2012. Measuring Populist Attitudes. C&M Working Paper (#55).

Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western Publics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Rovira Kaltwasser, C . (2013). The responses of populism to Dahl’s democratic dilemmas. Political Studies, 62(3), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12038.CrossRef

Kaminska, Olena. 2020. Guide to Using Weights and Sample Design Indicators with ESS Data European Social Survey.

Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Kulin, J., & Svallfors, S. (2013). Class, values, and attitudes towards redistribution: A European comparison. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr046.CrossRef

Leimgruber, P. (2011). Values and votes: The indirect effect of personal values on voting behavior. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02009.x.CrossRef

Marcos-Marne, H. (2020). A tale of populism? the determinants of voting for left-wing populist parties in Spain. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720950215.CrossRef

Marcos-Marne, H., Plaza-Colodro, C., & Freyburg, T. (2020a). Who votes for new parties? economic voting, political ideology and populist attitudes. West European Politics, 43(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1608752.CrossRef

Marcos-Marne, H., Plaza-Colodro, C., & Hawkins, K. A. (2020b). Is populism the third dimension? the quest for political alliances in post-crisis Spain. Electoral Studies, 63, 102112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102112.CrossRef

Margalit, Y. (2019). Economic insecurity and the causes of populism, reconsidered. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.152.CrossRef

McClosky, H., & Chong, D. (1985). Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wing radicals. British Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 329–363.CrossRef

Miles, A. (2015). The (re)genesis of values: Examining the importance of values for action. American Sociological Review, 80(4), 680–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415591800.CrossRef

Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006.CrossRef

Mosca, L., & Tronconi, F. (2019). Beyond left and right: the eclectic populism of the Five Star Movement. West European Politics, 42(6), 1258–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1596691.CrossRef

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.CrossRef

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: An Ideational Approach. In P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), CRi Kaltwasser. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11.CrossRef

Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490.CrossRef

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Osuna, O., & Javier, JosÉ. (2020). From chasing populists to deconstructing populism: A new multidimensional approach to understanding and comparing populism. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12428.CrossRef

Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32(4), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x.CrossRef

Polk, J., Rovny, J., Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., et al. (2017). Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research & Politics, 4(1), 2053168016686915. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016686915.CrossRef

Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., & Anduiza, E. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12261.CrossRef

Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008.CrossRef

Rooduijn, M. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000145.CrossRef

Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2015). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815596514.CrossRef

Santana, A., & Rama, J. (2018). Electoral support for left wing populist parties in Europe: Addressing the globalization cleavage. European Politics and Society, 19(5), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2018.1482848.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there Universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x.CrossRef

Schwartz, Shalom H. 2003. "A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations " In Questionnaire development report of the European Social Survey, edited by European Social Survey.

Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz Theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.CrossRef

Schwartz, Shalom. 2016. Computing Scores for the 10 Human values European Social Survey.

Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31(3), 421–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Caprara, M. G., et al. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36(4), 899–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z.CrossRef

Silva, C., Bruno, I. A., Eva, A., Blanuša, N., Corti, Y. M., Delfino, G., et al. (2019). Public opinion surveys : A new scale. In K. A. Hawkins, R. E. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism. Concept, theory, and analysis. London: Routledge.

Spruyt, B., Keppens, G., & Van Droogenbroeck, F. (2016). Who supports populism and what attracts people to iIt? Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639138.CrossRef

Rooduijn, Matthijs, Stijn Van Kessel, Caterina Froio, Aandre Pirro, Sarah De Lange, Daphne Halikiopoulou, Paul Lewis, Cas Mudde, and Paul Taggart. 2019. The populist: An overview of populist, far right, far left and eurosceptic parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org.

Vehrkamp, Robert, and Wolfgang Merkel. 2019. Populism barometer 2018. Populist attitudes of voters and non-voters in Germany 2018 Berlin: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412.CrossRef

Titel: The Effects of Basic Human Values on Populist Voting. An Analysis of 13 European Democracies
verfasst von: Hugo Marcos-Marne
Publikationsdatum: 13.02.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Political Behavior / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09689-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Pay Your Debts: Moral Dilemmas of International Debt

Does the number of candidates increase turnout? Causal evidence from two-round elections

Expressive Politics as (Costly) Norm Following

Asian American Candidate Preferences: Evidence from California

Competitive Elections, Status Anxieties, and the Relative Strength of Ethnic versus National Identification in Africa

Will It Teach Them a Lesson? Validating a Measure of Retributive Efficacy in Social Issue Activism

Premium Partner