Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2011 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Emperor’s New Body: Seeking for a Blueprint of Limb Regeneration in Humans

verfasst von : Ilya Digel, Aysegül Temiz Artmann

Erschienen in: Stem Cell Engineering

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Aspiring to comprehend and control regeneration – the ability to recreate lost or damaged cells, tissues, organs or even limbs – has been the mind-boggling challenge for over 250 years. Regeneration is a common feature in many animal species, whereas its capacity in mammals is notoriously limited. The partial or complete loss of digits or limbs and the deformation of facial injuries profoundly affect the quality of life of the wounded and present a set of challenges for the medical community. This chapter is devoted to some of the problems and prospects of human limb regeneration. It briefly reviews the appearance of regenerative abilities in different tribes across the animal kingdom as well as the genes and cellular signaling pathways involved. Special emphasis is placed upon blastema and scar formation as well as on morphogenetic pattering.
The analysis of evolutionary manifestations of regeneration ability, the apparent relation to the embryonic development mechanisms, as well as consideration of some existing clinical approaches suggest the possibility to “awaken” the regeneration ability in mammals and even in human beings. The ultimate goal of further research will be to identify ways for enhancing the capacity for wound healing and tissue restoration in humans. This would open new exciting prospects for future regenerative medicine.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Engineering the Stem Cell Niche and the Differentiative Micro- and Macroenvironment: Technologies and Tools for Applying Biochemical, Physical and Structural Stimuli and Their Effects on Stem Cells
Literatur
1.
Dinsmore CE. Conceptual foundations of metamorphosis and regeneration: from historical links to common mechanisms. Wound Repair Regen. 1998; 6:291–301.CrossRef
2.
Trembley A. Mémoires, Pour Servir à l’Histoire d’un Genre de Polypes d’Eau Douce, à Bras en Forme de Cornes. Leiden: Jean and Herman Verbeek; 1744.
3.
Molloy T, Wang Y, Murrell G. The roles of growth factors in tendon and ligament healing. Sports Med. 2003; 33:381–394.CrossRef
4.
Ferguson MW, O’Kane S. Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359:839–850.CrossRef
5.
Frazee O. The effect of electrical stimulation upon the rate of regeneration in Rana pipiens and Ambystoma jeffersonianum. J Exp Zool. 1909; 7:457–475.CrossRef
6.
Burr HS. The meaning of bioelectric potentials. Yale J Biol Med. 1944; 16:353–360.
7.
Lund EJ. Bioelectric fields and growth. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1947.
8.
Becker RO, Spadaro JA. Electrical stimulation of partial limb regeneration in mammals. Bull NY Acad Med. 1972; 48:627–641.
9.
Singer M. Induction of regeneration in the forelimb of post metamorphic frog by augmentation of the nerve supply. J Exp Zool. 1954; 126:419–426.CrossRef
10.
Polezhaev LV. Regeneration of organs in animals. Usp Sovrem Biol. 1950; 30:258–270.
11.
Person P, Libbin RM, Shah D, Papierman S. Partial regeneration of the above-elbow amputated rat forelimb. I. Innate responses. J Morphol. 1979; 159:427–438.CrossRef
12.
Godwin JW, Brockes JP. Regeneration, tissue injury and the immune response. J Anat. 2006; 209:423–432.CrossRef
13.
Goss RJ. Prospects of regeneration in man. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; 151:270–282.
14.
Sanchez AA. Regeneration and the need for simpler model organisms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359:759–763.CrossRef
15.
Schaller HC, Hermans-Borgmeyer I, Hoffmeister SA. Neuronal control of development in hydra. Int J Dev Biol. 1996; 40:339–344.
16.
Hicklin J, Hornbruch A, Wolpert L. Inhibition of hypostome formation and polarity reversal in Hydra. Nature. 1969; 221:1268–1271.CrossRef
17.
Meinhardt H, Gierer A. Applications of a theory of biological pattern formation based on lateral inhibition. J Cell Sci. 1974; 15:321–346.
18.
MacWilliams HK. Numerical simulations of hydra head regeneration using a proportion-regulating version of the Gierer-Meinhardt model. J Theor Biol. 1982; 99:681–703.CrossRef
19.
Ando H, Sawada Y, Shimizu H, Sugiyama T. Pattern formation in hydra tissue without developmental gradients. Dev Biol. 1989; 133:405–414.CrossRef
20.
Brockes JP, Kumar A. Plasticity and reprogramming of differentiated cells in amphibian regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 3:566–574.CrossRef
21.
Straube WL, Tanaka EM. Reversibility of the differentiated state: regeneration in amphi-bians. Artif Organs. 2006; 30:743–755.CrossRef
22.
Stocum DL. Amphibian regeneration and stem cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2004; 280:1–70.CrossRef
23.
Tsonis PA. Bridging knowledge gaps on the long road to regeneration: classical models meet stem cell manipulation and bioengineering. Mol Interv. 2007; 7:249–250.CrossRef
24.
Nye HL, Cameron JA, Chernoff EA, Stocum DL. Regeneration of the urodele limb: a review. Dev Dyn. 2003; 226:280–294.CrossRef
25.
Becker RO. The bioelectric factors in amphibian-limb regeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961; 43-A:643–656.
26.
Christensen RN, Tassava RA. Apical epithelial cap morphology and fibronectin gene expression in regenerating axolotl limbs. Dev Dyn. 2000; 217:216–224.CrossRef
27.
Tanaka EM, Gann AA, Gates PB, Brockes JP. Newt myotubes reenter the cell cycle by phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein. J Cell Biol. 1997; 136:155–165.CrossRef
28.
Velloso CP, Kumar A, Tanaka EM, Brockes JP. Generation of mononucleate cells from post-mitotic myotubes proceeds in the absence of cell cycle progression. Differentiation. 2000; 66:239–246.
29.
Holder N. Organization of connective tissue patterns by dermal fibroblasts in the regenerating axolotl limb. Development. 1989; 105:585–593.
30.
Kieny M, Chevallier A. Autonomy of tendon development in the embryonic chick wing. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1979; 49:153–165.
31.
Odelberg SJ. Cellular plasticity in vertebrate regeneration. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005; 287:25–35.
32.
Le GF, Rudnicki M. Satellite and stem cells in muscle growth and repair. Development. 2007; 134:3953–3957.CrossRef
33.
Carlson BM. Some principles of regeneration in mammalian systems. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005; 287:4–13.
34.
Polezhaev LV. Methods of regeneration. Sov J Dev Biol. 1975; 5:134–139.
35.
Kierdorf U, Kierdorf H, Szuwart T. Deer antler regeneration: cells, concepts, and controversies. J Morphol. 2007; 268:726–738.CrossRef
36.
Yokoyama H. Initiation of limb regeneration: the critical steps for regenerative capacity. Dev Growth Differ. 2008; 50:13–22.CrossRef
37.
Colitti M, Allen SP, Price JS. Programmed cell death in the regenerating deer antler. J Anat. 2005; 207:339–351.CrossRef
38.
Allen SP, Maden M, Price JS. A role for retinoic acid in regulating the regeneration of deer antlers. Dev Biol. 2002; 251:409–423.CrossRef
39.
Goss AN. Intra-uterine healing of fetal rat oral mucosal, skin and cartilage wounds. J Oral Pathol. 1977; 6:35–43.CrossRef
40.
Goss RJ. The evolution of regeneration: adaptive or inherent? J Theor Biol. 1992; 159:241–260.CrossRef
41.
Goss RJ, Grimes LN. Epidermal downgrowths in regenerating rabbit ear holes. J Morphol. 1975; 146:533–542.CrossRef
42.
Borgens RB. Mice regrow the tips of their foretoes. Science. 1982; 217:747–750.CrossRef
43.
Han M, Yang X, Taylor G, Burdsal CA, Anderson RA, Muneoka K. Limb regeneration in higher vertebrates: developing a roadmap. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005; 287:14–24.
44.
Tassava RA, Olsen CL. Higher vertebrates do not regenerate digits and legs because the wound epidermis is not functional. A hypothesis. Differentiation. 1982; 22:151–155.CrossRef
45.
Murphy ED, Roths JB. A Y chromosome associated factor in strain BXSB producing accelerated autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation. Arthritis Rheum. 1979; 22:1188–1194.CrossRef
46.
Fukuyama H, Adachi M, Suematsu S, Miwa K, Suda T, Yoshida N, Nagata S. Transgenic expression of Fas in T cells blocks lymphoproliferation but not autoimmune disease in MRL-lpr mice. J Immunol. 1998; 160:3805–3811.
47.
Heber-Katz E. The regenerating mouse ear. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999 Aug;10(4): 415–419.CrossRef
48.
Brockes JP, Kumar A. Comparative aspects of animal regeneration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008; 24:525–549.CrossRef
49.
Heber-Katz E, Leferovich J, Bedelbaeva K, Gourevitch D, Clark L. The scarless heart and the MRL mouse. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004a; 359:785–793.CrossRef
50.
Heber-Katz E, Leferovich JM, Bedelbaeva K, Gourevitch D. Spallanzani’s mouse: a model of restoration and regeneration. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2004b; 280:165–189.CrossRef
51.
Cebria F, Guo T, Jopek J, Newmark PA. Regeneration and maintenance of the planarian midline is regulated by a slit orthologue. Dev Biol. 2007; 307:394–406.CrossRef
52.
Keating MT. Genetic approaches to disease and regeneration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359:795–798.CrossRef
53.
Tanaka EM. Cell differentiation and cell fate during urodele tail and limb regeneration. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003; 13:497–501.CrossRef
54.
Poss KD, Keating MT, Nechiporuk A. Tales of regeneration in zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2003; 226:202–210.CrossRef
55.
Bryant SV, Endo T, Gardiner DM. Vertebrate limb regeneration and the origin of limb stem cells. Int J Dev Biol. 2002; 46:887–896.
56.
Capdevila J, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Patterning mechanisms controlling vertebrate limb development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001; 17:87–132.CrossRef
57.
Nakatani Y, Kawakami A, Kudo A. Cellular and molecular processes of regeneration, with special emphasis on fish fins. Dev Growth Differ. 2007; 49:145–154.CrossRef
58.
Gordon MD, Nusse R. Wnt signaling: multiple pathways, multiple receptors, and multiple transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281:22429–22433.CrossRef
59.
Botchkarev VA, Sharov AA. BMP signaling in the control of skin development and hair follicle growth. Differentiation. 2004; 72:512–526.CrossRef
60.
Slack JM, Lin G, Chen Y. The Xenopus tadpole: a new model for regeneration research. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008; 65:54–63.CrossRef
61.
Kawakami Y, Rodriguez EC, Raya M, Kawakami H, Marti M, Dubova I, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling regulates vertebrate limb regeneration. Genes Dev. 2006; 20:3232–3237.CrossRef
62.
Bayliss PE, Bellavance KL, Whitehead GG, Abrams JM, Aegerter S, Robbins HS, Cowan DB, Keating MT, O’Reilly T, Wood JM, Roberts TM, Chan J. Chemical modulation of receptor signaling inhibits regenerative angiogenesis in adult zebrafish. Nat Chem Biol. 2006; 2:265–273.CrossRef
63.
Mills AA. p63: oncogene or tumor suppressor? Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006; 16:38–44.CrossRef
64.
Echeverri K, Tanaka EM. Ectoderm to mesoderm lineage switching during axolotl tail regeneration. Science. 2002; 298:1993–1996.CrossRef
65.
Casimir CM, Gates PB, Patient RK, Brockes JP. Evidence for dedifferentiation and metaplasia in amphibian limb regeneration from inheritance of DNA methylation. Development. 1988; 104:657–668.
66.
Imokawa Y, Brockes JP. Selective activation of thrombin is a critical determinant for vertebrate lens regeneration. Curr Biol. 2003; 13:877–881.CrossRef
67.
Imokawa Y, Simon A, Brockes JP. A critical role for thrombin in vertebrate lens regeneration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359:765–776.CrossRef
68.
Lin YC, Grigoriev NG, Spencer AN. Wound healing in jellyfish striated muscle involves rapid switching between two modes of cell motility and a change in the source of regulatory calcium. Dev Biol. 2000; 225:87–100.CrossRef
69.
Nodder S, Martin P. Wound healing in embryos: a review. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1997; 195:215–228.CrossRef
70.
Mescher AL, Neff AW. Regenerative capacity and the developing immune system. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2005; 93:39–66.
71.
Flajnik MF, Kasahara M. Comparative genomics of the MHC: glimpses into the evolution of the adaptive immune system. Immunity. 2001; 15:351–362.CrossRef
72.
Fahmy GH, Sicard RE. A role for effectors of cellular immunity in epimorphic regeneration of amphibian limbs. In Vivo. 2002; 16:179–184.
73.
Tsonis PA, Del Rio-Tsonis K, Wallace JL, Burns JC, Hofmann MC, Millan JL, Washabaugh CH. Can insights into urodele limb regeneration be achieved with cell cultures and retroviruses? Int J Dev Biol. 1996; 40:813–816.
74.
Plytycz B, Seljelid R. MHC molecules and lymphocytes: evolutionary perspective. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 1998; 46:137–142.
75.
Hantash BM, Zhao L, Knowles JA, Lorenz HP. Adult and fetal wound healing. Front Biosci. 2008; 13:51–61.CrossRef
76.
Colwell AS, Longaker MT, Lorenz HP. Fetal wound healing. Front Biosci. 2003; 8:s1240–s1248.CrossRef
77.
Hopkinson-Woolley J, Hughes D, Gordon S, Martin P. Macrophage recruitment during limb development and wound healing in the embryonic and foetal mouse. J Cell Sci. 1994; 107(Pt 5):1159–1167.
78.
Muneoka K, Sassoon D. Molecular aspects of regeneration in developing vertebrate limbs. Dev Biol. 1992; 152:37–49.CrossRef
79.
Holder N, Bryant SV, Tank PW. Interactions between irradiated and unirradiated tissues during supernumerary limb formation in the newt. J Exp Zool. 1979; 208:303–310.CrossRef
80.
Polezhaev LV. Regeneration of the fingers in children. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 1980; 12:76–77.
81.
Globus M, Alles P. A search for immunoreactive substance P and other neural peptides in the limb regenerate of the newt Notophthalmus viridescens. J Exp Zool. 1990; 254:165–176.CrossRef
82.
Page-McCaw A. Remodeling the model organism: matrix metalloproteinase functions in invertebrates. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008; 19:14–23.CrossRef
83.
Ghahary A, Ghaffari A. Role of keratinocyte–fibroblast cross-talk in development of hypertrophic scar. Wound Repair Regen. 2007; 15(Suppl 1):S46–S53.CrossRef
84.
Akerman B, Haegerstam G, Pring BG, Sandberg R. Penetration enhancers and other factors governing percutaneous local anaesthesia with lidocaine. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1979; 45:58–65.CrossRef
85.
Peled ZM, Phelps ED, Updike DL, Chang J, Krummel TM, Howard EW, Longaker MT. Matrix metalloproteinases and the ontogeny of scarless repair: the other side of the wound healing balance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110:801–811.CrossRef
86.
Harty M, Neff AW, King MW, Mescher AL. Regeneration or scarring: an immunologic perspective. Dev Dyn. 2003; 226:268–279.CrossRef
87.
Adzick NS, Lorenz HP. Cells, matrix, growth factors, and the surgeon. The biology of scarless fetal wound repair. Ann Surg. 1994; 220:10–18.CrossRef
88.
Burkly LC, Michaelson JS, Hahm K, Jakubowski A, Zheng TS. TWEAKing tissue remodeling by a multifunctional cytokine: role of TWEAK/Fn14 pathway in health and disease. Cytokine. 2007; 40:1–16.CrossRef
89.
Brockes JP, Kumar A, Velloso CP. Regeneration as an evolutionary variable. J Anat. 2001; 199:3–11.CrossRef
90.
Bischoff M, Schnabel R. A posterior centre establishes and maintains polarity of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo by a Wnt-dependent relay mechanism. PLoS Biol. 2006; 4:e396.CrossRef
91.
Schaller HC, Hoffmeister SA, Dubel S. Role of the neuropeptide head activator for growth and development in hydra and mammals. Development. 1989; 107(Suppl):99–107.
92.
MacWilliams HK. Hydra transplantation phenomena and the mechanism of Hydra head regeneration. II. Properties of the head activation. Dev Biol. 1983; 96:239–257.CrossRef
93.
Shenk MA, Gee L, Steele RE, Bode HR. Expression of Cnox-2, a HOM/HOX gene, is suppressed during head formation in hydra. Dev Biol. 1993; 160:108–118.CrossRef
94.
Marsh HG, Beams HW. Electrical control of morphogenesis in regenerating Dugesia tigrina. I. Relation of axial polarity to field strength. J Cell Physiol. 1952; 39:191–213.CrossRef
95.
Slack JM. Inducing factors in Xenopus early embryos. Curr Biol. 1994; 4:116–126.CrossRef
96.
Stocum DL, Crawford K. Use of retinoids to analyze the cellular basis of positional memory in regenerating amphibian limbs. Biochem Cell Biol. 1987; 65:750–761.CrossRef
97.
Thesleff I, Jarvinen E, Suomalainen M. Affecting tooth morphology and renewal by fine-tuning the signals mediating cell and tissue interactions. Novartis Found Symp. 2007; 284:142–153.CrossRef
98.
Li S, Muneoka K. Cell migration and chick limb development: chemotactic action of FGF-4 and the AER. Dev Biol. 1999; 211:335–347.CrossRef
99.
Hammerschmidt M, Brook A, McMahon AP. The world according to hedgehog. Trends Genet. 1997; 13:14–21.CrossRef
100.
Zardoya R, Abouheif E, Meyer A. Evolutionary analyses of hedgehog and Hoxd-10 genes in fish species closely related to the zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93:13036–13041.CrossRef
101.
Reginelli AD, Wang YQ, Sassoon D, Muneoka K. Digit tip regeneration correlates with regions of Msx1 (Hox 7) expression in fetal and newborn mice. Development. 1995; 121:1065–1076.
102.
Wanek N, Gardiner DM, Muneoka K, Bryant SV. Conversion by retinoic acid of anterior cells into ZPA cells in the chick wing bud. Nature. 1991; 350:81–83.CrossRef
103.
Javois LC, Iten LE, Murphy DJ. Formation of supernumerary structures by the embryonic chick wing depends on the position and orientation of a graft in a host limb bud. Dev Biol. 1981; 82:343–349.CrossRef
104.
Bryant SV, Iten LE. Intercalary and supernumerary regeneration in regenerating the mature limbs of Notophthalmus viridescens. J Exp Zool. 1977; 202:1–16.CrossRef
105.
French V, Rowlands TF. Regeneration in the anterior–posterior axis of the insect thoracic segment. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1986; 98:137–165.
106.
Wolpert L. Positional information and pattern formation. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1971; 6:183–224.CrossRef
107.
Ventegodt S, Hermansen TD, Flensborg-Madsen T, Nielsen ML, Merrick J. Human development VI: supracellular morphogenesis. The origin of biological and cellular order. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006; 6:1424–1433.CrossRef
108.
Dotto GP. Notch tumor suppressor function. Oncogene. 2008; 27:5115–5123.CrossRef
109.
Lefort K, Dotto GP. Notch signaling in the integrated control of keratinocyte growth/differentiation and tumor suppression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2004; 14:374–386.CrossRef
110.
Devgan V, Mammucari C, Millar SE, Brisken C, Dotto GP. p21WAF1/Cip1 is a negative transcriptional regulator of Wnt4 expression downstream of Notch1 activation. Genes Dev. 2005; 19:1485–1495.CrossRef
111.
Lefort K, Mandinova A, Ostano P, Kolev V, Calpini V, Kolfschoten I, Devgan V, Lieb J, Raffoul W, Hohl D, Neel V, Garlick J, Chiorino G, Dotto GP. Notch1 is a p53 target gene involved in human keratinocyte tumor suppression through negative regulation of ROCK1/2 and MRCKalpha kinases. Genes Dev. 2007; 21:562–577.CrossRef
112.
Petitjean A, Ruptier C, Tribollet V, Hautefeuille A, Chardon F, Cavard C, Puisieux A, Hainaut P, Caron de FC. Properties of the six isoforms of p63: p53-like regulation in response to genotoxic stress and cross talk with DeltaNp73. Carcinogenesis. 2008; 29:273–281.CrossRef
113.
Nguyen BC, Lefort K, Mandinova A, Antonini D, Devgan V, Della GG, Koster MI, Zhang Z, Wang J, Tommasi diVA, Kitajewski J, Chiorino G, Roop DR, Missero C, Dotto GP. Cross-regulation between Notch and p63 in keratinocyte commitment to differentiation. Genes Dev. 2006; 20:1028–1042.CrossRef
114.
Kolev V, Mandinova A, Guinea-Viniegra J, Hu B, Lefort K, Lambertini C, Neel V, Dummer R, Wagner EF, Dotto GP. EGFR signalling as a negative regulator of Notch1 gene transcription and function in proliferating keratinocytes and cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2008; 10:902–911.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Emperor’s New Body: Seeking for a Blueprint of Limb Regeneration in Humans
verfasst von
Ilya Digel
Aysegül Temiz Artmann
Copyright-Jahr
2011
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Stem Cell Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11864-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-11865-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2011

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11865-4_1

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise