nach oben

Journal of Combinatorial Optimization

Erschienen in:

28.06.2021

The enforcement of ECA regulations: inspection strategy for on-board fuel sampling

verfasst von: Lingyue Li, Suixiang Gao, Wenguo Yang

Erschienen in: Journal of Combinatorial Optimization | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

At present, the effective implementation of emission control areas regulation is faced with the problems of limited inspection capacity and unknown ship behavior. To bridge this gap, this paper quantitatively analyzes the inspection strategy (which arriving ships are selected for inspection) for on-board fuel sampling considering limited inspection capacity and ships’ violation behaviors. We first describe the behaviors of ships by considering economic benefit, social responsibility and other factors to analyze the actual situation. Based on this, a semi-random input model with limited inspection capacity is established and the optimal inspection strategy is obtained. Furthermore, the impacts of related factors on the optimal inspection strategy are analyzed. Finally, measures that based on automatic identification system data are proposed to improve the inspection strategy. The results show that compared to randomly select ships, the method proposed in our study can determine a more reasonable inspection strategy. Additionally, the AIS-based method may be a possible way to improve the inspection strategy.

Vorheriger Artikel Improved local search algorithms for Bregman k-means and its variants

Nächster Artikel Study on the incentive and coordination mechanism of tumor healthcare alliance based on evolutionary game

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

According to the simulation, the numerator and denominator of c have the same order of magnitude. The range of c and \(\sigma\) are [0.6, 1.8] and 0.16, respectively. In addition, the determination of non-compliant ships is mainly affected by the relative value of b and has little relationship with the absolute value b. Therefore, the establishment of b is relatively reasonable.

Animah I, Addy-Lamptey A, Korsah F, Sackey JS (2018) Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI regulation 14 by ships in the Gulf of Guinea sub-region: issues, challenges and opportunities. Transp Res D-Tr E 62:441–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.03.020CrossRef

Beecken J, Mellqvist J, Salo K, Ekholm J, Jalkanen JP (2014) Airborne emission measurements of SO2, NOx and particles from individual ships using a sniffer technique Atmospheric. Meas Tech 7:1957–1968. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1957-2014CrossRef

Beecken J et al (2015) Emission factors of SO2, NOx and particles from ships in Neva Bay from ground-based and helicopter-borne measurements and AIS-based modeling. Atmos Chem Phys 15:5229–5241. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5229-2015CrossRef

CARB (2015) Annual enforcement report (2009–2015 editions). California Air Resources Board

Chen J, Wang S, Qu X, Yi W (2018a) A modelling framework of drone deployment for monitoring air pollution from ships international conference on intelligent interactive multimedia systems and services, pp 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92231-7_29

Chen JH, Wan Z, Zhang H, Liu X, Zhu YH, Zheng AB (2018) Governance of shipping emission of SOx in China’s coastal waters: the SECA policy. Challenges Directions Coast Manage 46:191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2018.1451727CrossRef

Gl DNV (2015) Sulphur Limits 2015 – Guidelines to ensure Compliance. Det Norske Veritas and Germanischer Lloyd, Germany

Doulkeridis C, Vouros GA, Qu Q, Wa S (2018) Mobility analytics for spatio-temporal and social data: first international workshop. Spring, BerlinCrossRef

Du Y, Chen Q, Quan X, Long L, Fung RYK (2011) Berth allocation considering fuel consumption and vessel emissions. Transp Res Part e: Logist Transp Rev 47:1021–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.011CrossRef

Dulebenets MA (2016) Advantages and disadvantages from enforcing emission restrictions within emission control areas maritime. Business Rev 1:107–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-05-2016-0011CrossRef

EMSA (2018) Sulphur Inspection Guidance. European Maritime Safety Agency,

EnviSuM (2019) Clean Shipping: Exploring the impact of emission regulation.

EU (2015) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/253 of 16 February 2015 laying down the rules concerning the sampling and reporting under Council Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels. European Union,

EU (2016) Ocean acidification exacerbated by emissions from ships on major shipping routes. European Commission. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/oceans/. Accessed accessed January 1, 2020

Fu M, Liu H, Jin X, He K (2017) National- to port-level inventories of shipping emissions in China. Environ Res Lett 12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa897a

Fung F (2016) Enforcement of Fuel Switching Regulations-Practices adopted in the US, EU and other regions, and lessons learned for China. Natural Resources Defense Council

Hassellöv I-M, Turner DR, Lauer A, Corbett JJ (2013) Shipping contributes to ocean acidification. Geophys Res Lett 40:2731–2736. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50521CrossRef

Hui X, Shu Lin D, Lian Zhong H, Jinan L (2016) AIS data-based estimation of emissions from sea-going ships in Bohai Sea areas (in Chinese). China Environ Sci 36:953–960

IMO (1974) International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. International Maritime Organization,

IMO (2014) Reduction of GHG emissions from ships, third IMO GHG Study 2014.

Jalkanen JP, Johansson L (2011) Kukkonen J (2016) A comprehensive inventory of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in. Atmos Chem Phys 16:71–84. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-71-2016CrossRef

Jiang B, Xue H, Li J (2018) Study on regulation strategies of China's ship emission control area (ECA) based on evolutionary game (in Chinese) Logistic Sci-Tech 7:70–74

Johan M, Jörg B, Vladimir C, Johan E (2017) Fixed remote surveillance of fuel sulfur content in ships from fixed sites in the Göteborg ship channel and Öresund bridge Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

Kattner L, Mathieu-Uffing B, Burrows JP, Richter A, Schmolke S, Seyler A, Wittrock F (2015) Monitoring compliance with sulfur content regulations of shipping fuel by in situ measurements of ship emissions. Atmos Chem Phys 15:10087–10092. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10087-2015CrossRef

Lähteenmäki-Uutela A, Yliskylä-Peuralahti J, Olaniyi E, Haukioja T, Repka S, Prause G, De Andres GO (2019) The impacts of the sulphur emission regulation on the sulphur emission abatement innovation system in the Baltic Sea Region . Clean Technol Environ 21:987–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01684-2CrossRef

Lähteenmäki-Uutela A, Yliskylä-Peuralahti J, Repka S, Mellqvist J (2019) What explains SECA compliance: rational calculation or moral judgment? WMU J Marit Aff 18:61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00163-1CrossRef

Li L, Gao S, Yang W, Xiong X (2020) Ship’s response strategy to emission control areas: from the perspective of sailing pattern optimization and evasion strategy selection. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.101835

Lingyue L, Suixiang G, Wenguo Y (2020) Inspection strategy for on-board fuel sampling within emission control areas. In: Combinatorial Optimization and Applications. COCOA 2020. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 12577. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64843-5_41

Liu Y, Wang Z (2019) Game simulation of policy regulation evolution in emission control area based on system dynamics. In Paper presented at the 2019 3rd scientific conference on mechatronics engineering and computer science,

MAN BW (2014) Operation on low-sulphur fuels. MAN Diesel & Turbo, Denmark

Mao SB, Tu EM, Zhang GH, Rachmawati L, Rajabally E, Huang GB (2018) An automatic identification system (AIS) database for maritime trajectory prediction and data mining. Proc Adapt Learn Opt 9:241–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57421-9_20CrossRef

Nazha N (2018) North American Emission Control Area, Canada’s Compliance and Enforcement Program. Paper presented at the 5th PPCAC conference,

OECD (2016) Reducing sulphur emissions from ships. The impact of international regulation. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,

Olaniyi EO, Prause G (2019) Seca regulatory impact assessment: administrative burden costs in the Baltic Sea Region . Transp Telecommun J 20:62–73. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2019-0006CrossRef

Olaniyi EO, Prause G, Boyesen J (2018) The impact of SECA regulations on clean shipping in the Baltic Sea Region. In Ölçer A, Kitada M, Dalaklis D, Ballini F (eds) Trends and challenges in maritime energy management WMU studies in maritime affairs, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74576-3_22

Perera LP, Mo B (2016) Emission control based energy efficiency measures in ship operations. Appl Ocean Res 60:29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.08.006CrossRef

Phillip AB (2015) EPA penalty policy for violations by ships of the sulfur in fuel standard and related provisions. Environmental Protection Agency, United Sates

Prause G, Olaniyi EO (2019) A compliance cost analysis of the SECA regulation in the Baltic Sea entrepreneurship and sustainability. Issues 6:1907–1921. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(26)CrossRef

Psaraftis HN, Kontovas CA (2013) Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: a taxonomy and survey. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 26:331–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.012CrossRef

Ronen D (2017) The effect of oil price on the optimal speed of ships. J Oper Res Soc 33:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1982.215CrossRef

Tetreault BJ (2005) Use of the automatic identification system (AIS) for maritime domain awareness (MDA) oceans 2005, vols 1–3, pp 1590–1594

Tichavska M, Tovar B, Gritsenko D, Johansson L, Jalkanen JP (2017) Air emissions from ships in port: does regulation make a difference? Transp Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.003CrossRef

Topali D, Psaraftis HN (2019) The Enforcement of the Global Sulfur Cap in Maritime Transport Maritime Business Review 4:199–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-12-2018-0050CrossRef

Verweij B, Ahmed S, Kleywegt AJ, Nemhauser G, Shapiro A (2003) The sample average approximation method applied to stochastic routing problems: a computational study. Comput Optim Appl 24:289–333. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021814225969MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Wang S, Meng Q (2012) Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 48:701–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.12.003CrossRef

Winther M, Christensen JH, Plejdrup MS, Ravn ES, Eriksson OF, Kristensen HO (2014) Emission inventories for ships in the arctic based on satellite sampled AIS data. Atmos Environ 91:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.006CrossRef

Xia J, Wang K, Wang SA (2019) Drone scheduling to monitor vessels in emission control areas. Transp Res B Methods 119:174–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.10.011CrossRef

Xing H (2016) Study on quantification of exhaust emissions from ships. Dalian Maritime University

Xizhong M (2017) On changeover procedures between HSFO and LSMGO when ship enters or leaves SECA ship & ocean. Engineering 46:144–150

Zhang L, Meng Q, Xiao Z, Fu X (2018) A novel ship trajectory reconstruction approach using AIS data. Ocean Eng 159:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.085CrossRef

Zhang WB, Goerlandt F, Kujala P, Wang YH (2016) An advanced method for detecting possible near miss ship collisions from AIS data. Ocean Eng 124:141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.07.059CrossRef

Titel: The enforcement of ECA regulations: inspection strategy for on-board fuel sampling
verfasst von: Lingyue Li
Suixiang Gao
Wenguo Yang
Publikationsdatum: 28.06.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Combinatorial Optimization / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1382-6905
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2886
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-021-00756-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

A tight approximation algorithm for problem

Visibility polygons and visibility graphs among dynamic polygonal obstacles in the plane

An approximation algorithm for the spherical k-means problem with outliers by local search

On zero-error codes produced by greedy algorithms

An integrated method for hybrid distribution with estimation of demand matching degree

A new lower bound for the eternal vertex cover number of graphs

Premium Partner