nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. The European Parliament

verfasst von : Aleksandra Chiniaeva

Erschienen in: Parliamentarization of International Governmental Organizations

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The EP is a rare example of the parliamentary assembly of an international organization that has fought for its power and won. The EP went through certain milestones before the Lisbon Treaty, as seen below in Table 3.1, which provided the Assembly with full “co-legislative” powers in virtually all areas of the EU legislative activity, the right to elect the President of the European Commission, and an equal say with the Council as regards the entire EU budget, as well as other enhanced powers.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Characterization of International Parliamentary Bodies

Nächstes Kapitel Inter-Parliamentary Union

See also R. Corbett, F. Jacobs, and D. Neville, pp. 4–9.

European Parliament Resolution of 7 February 2018 on the composition of the European Parliament (2017/2054(INL) — 2017/0900(NLE)).

European Council Decision (EU) 2018/937 of 28 June 2018 establishing the composition of the European Parliament.

The issue on the composition of the EP is disputed among academics. A new approach to the degressive proportionality was introduced in Delgado-Márquez et al. (2013), pp. 458–471. Also see Florek (2011).

Florek (2011).

Article 1 of the European Council Decision (EU) 2018/937 of 28 June 2018 establishing the composition of the European Parliament.

Corbett (2011), p. 191.

Protocol (No. 6) on the Location of the Seats of the Institutions and of the Bodies, Offices, Agencies and Departments of the European Union.

Schütze (2015), p. 163.

Judgment of the Court of 1 October 1997. French Republic v European Parliament. Case C-345/95, European Court Reports 1997 I-05215.

Judgment of the Court of 12 May 1964. Albert Wagner v Jean Fohrmann and Antoine Krier. Case 101-63.

Corbett et al. (2011), pp. 293–295.

Article 289(2) TFEU.

Article 8 of the SEA.

Article 9 of the SEA.

The Treaty on European Union (Maastricht, 7 February 1992) inserted Article 130(d), but the Lisbon Treaty switched it to the ordinary legislation procedure.

Article 40 (ex Article 41) of the Protocol (No. 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, however, currently it is also a matter for consultation of the parliament. OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, pp. 230–250.

Article 218(10) TFEU. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 24 June 2014. European Parliament v Council of the European Union (Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius). Case C-658/11. The court stated in para. 54 that “Article 218(6) TFEU covers three types of procedure for concluding international agreements, each one prescribing a different role for the Parliament. Thus, the Parliament may be called upon to consent to the conclusion of an agreement, or it may only be consulted in that regard, or it may even be excluded from the process of concluding the agreement, without prejudice, however, to its right to be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure, in accordance with Article 218(10) TFEU.”

Judgment of the Court of 29 October 1980. SA Roquette Frères v Council of the European Communities. Isoglucose - Production quotas. Case 138/79.

As para 36 of Case 138/79 states:

[W]ithout prejudice to the questions of principle raised by that argument of the council it suffices to observe that in the present case on 25 June 1979 when the council adopted regulation no 1293/79 amending regulation no 1111/77 without the opinion of the assembly the Council had not exhausted all the possibilities of obtaining the preliminary opinion of the Parliament. In the first place the council did not request the application of the emergency procedure provided for by the internal regulation of the parliament although in other sectors and as regards other draft regulations it availed itself of that power at the same time. Further the Council could have made use of the possibility it had under article 139 of the Treaty to ask for an extraordinary session of the assembly especially as the bureau of the Parliament on 1 March and 10 May 1979 drew its attention to that possibility.

Corbett et al. (2011), p. 305.

Case C-65/93 European Parliament v Council of the European Union, para. 27.

The Report on the General Revision of Parliament’s Rules and Procedure (2016/2114(REG)).

The right was maintained under Article 225 TFEU.

Grabitz et al. (2017), p. 3.

Framework Agreement on Relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission, OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, pp. 47–62.

Kaczorowska-Ireland (2016), p. 77.

Article 4 of the Treaty amending Certain Budgetary Provisions of the treaties establishing the European Communities and of the Treaty establishing a single Council and a single Commission of the European Communities of 22 April 1970, (OJEC). 02.01.1971, No. L 2. [s.l.]. ISSN 0378-6978, p. 1.

Craig and Búrca (2011), p. 57.

Article 314 (7d) TFEU.

Full information regarding the budgetary process is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/biblio/documents/2018/2018_en.cfm (12.11.2017).

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, pp. 884–891.

OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, pp. 1–11.

High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy is ex officio the Vice-President of the Commission. (Article 18(4) TEU).

Corbett et al. (2011), p. 296.

Kaczorowska-Ireland (2016), p. 76.

Corbett et al. (2011), pp. 287–290, p. 310.

Article 8 of the Regulation (EC) No. 401/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (Codified version). OJ L 126, 21.5.2009, pp. 13–22.

Article 9 of the Regulation (EC) No. 1920/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.

Article 79 of the Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC.

Article 318 TFEU.

Article 159 TFEU.

Framework Agreement on Relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission. OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, pp. 47–62.

Questions, answers and annexes thereto are available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/parliamentary-questions.html (22.11.2017).

Judgment of the Court of 12 May 1964. Albert Wagner v Jean Fohrmann and Antoine Krier. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal d'arrondissement de Luxembourg—Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. Case 101-63.

Judgment of the Court of 29 October 1980. SA Roquette Frères v Council of the European Communities. Isoglucose—Production quotas. Case 138/79; Maizena GmbH v Council of the European Communities. Isoglucose—Production quotas. Case 139/79.

Kaczorowska-Ireland (2016), p. 77.

Corbett et al. (2011), p. 319.

Corbett et al. (2011), pp. 5–6.

Corbett R, Jacobs F, Neville D (2011) The European Parliament. John Harper Publishing, London

Craig P, Búrca G (2011) EU law text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef

Delgado-Márquez BL, Kaeding M, Palomares A (2013) A more balanced composition of the European Parliament with degressive proportionality. Eur Union Politics 14(3):458 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116513485470. Accessed 30 June 2018CrossRef

Florek J (2011) Allocation of seats in the European Parliament and a degressive proportionality. Cornell University Library, Ithaca. https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3075. Accessed 14 Oct 2017

Grabitz E, Hilf M, Nettesheim M (2017) Das Recht der Europäischen Union. Kommentar. Band III. Verlag C.H. Beck oHG, Munich

Kaczorowska-Ireland A (2016) European Union Law. Routledge, Milton ParkCrossRef

Schütze R (2015) European Union Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Titel: The European Parliament
verfasst von: Aleksandra Chiniaeva
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Parliamentarization of International Governmental Organizations
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71340-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-71341-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71341-6_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner