Skip to main content

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Friendship Paradox and Social Network Participation

verfasst von : Ahmed Medhat, Shankar Iyer

Erschienen in: Complex Networks & Their Applications XII

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The friendship paradox implies that, on average, a person will have fewer friends than their friends do. Prior work has shown how the friendship paradox can lead to perception biases regarding behaviors that correlate with the number of friends: for example, people tend to perceive their friends as being more socially engaged than they are. Here, we investigate the consequences of this type of social comparison in the conceptual setting of content creation (“sharing”) in an online social network. Suppose people compare the amount of feedback that their content receives to the amount of feedback that their friends’ content receives, and suppose they modify their sharing behavior as a result of that comparison. How does that impact overall sharing on the social network over time? We run simulations over model-generated synthetic networks, assuming initially uniform sharing and feedback rates. Thus, people’s initial modifications of their sharing behavior in response to social comparisons are entirely driven by the friendship paradox. These modifications induce inhomogeneities in sharing rates that can further alter perception biases. If people’s responses to social comparisons are monotonic (i.e., the larger the disparity, the larger the modification in sharing behavior), our simulations suggest that overall sharing in the network gradually declines. Meanwhile, convex responses can sustain or grow overall sharing in the network. We focus entirely on synthetic graphs in the present work and have not yet extended our simulations to real-world network topologies. Nevertheless, we do discuss practical implications, such as how interventions can be tailored to sustain long-term sharing, even in the presence of adverse social-comparison effects.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Feld, S.L.: Why your friends have more friends than you do. Am. J. Sociol. 96(6), 1464–1477 (1991)CrossRef Feld, S.L.: Why your friends have more friends than you do. Am. J. Sociol. 96(6), 1464–1477 (1991)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pires, M.M., Marquitti, F.M.D., Guimaraes, P.R., Jr.: The friendship paradox in species-rich ecological networks: implications for conservation and monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 209, 245–252 (2017)CrossRef Pires, M.M., Marquitti, F.M.D., Guimaraes, P.R., Jr.: The friendship paradox in species-rich ecological networks: implications for conservation and monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 209, 245–252 (2017)CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nettasinghe, B., Krishnamurthy, V., Lerman, K.: Diffusion in social networks: effects of monophilic contagion, friendship paradox, and reactive networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 7(3), 1121–1132 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef Nettasinghe, B., Krishnamurthy, V., Lerman, K.: Diffusion in social networks: effects of monophilic contagion, friendship paradox, and reactive networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 7(3), 1121–1132 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nettasinghe, B., Krishnamurthy, V.: “What do your friends think?”: Efficient polling methods for networks using friendship paradox. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 33(3), 1291–1305 (2019) Nettasinghe, B., Krishnamurthy, V.: “What do your friends think?”: Efficient polling methods for networks using friendship paradox. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 33(3), 1291–1305 (2019)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Geng, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Tao, L.: Sentinel nodes identification for infectious disease surveillance on temporal social networks. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 493–499 (2019) Geng, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Tao, L.: Sentinel nodes identification for infectious disease surveillance on temporal social networks. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 493–499 (2019)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodas, N., Kooti, F., Lerman, K.: Friendship paradox redux: your friends are more interesting than you. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 7(1), pp. 225–233 (2013) Hodas, N., Kooti, F., Lerman, K.: Friendship paradox redux: your friends are more interesting than you. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 7(1), pp. 225–233 (2013)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Higham, D.J.: Centrality-friendship paradoxes: when our friends are more important than us. J. Complex Networks (2019) Higham, D.J.: Centrality-friendship paradoxes: when our friends are more important than us. J. Complex Networks (2019)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kooti, F., Hodas, N.O., Lerman, K.: Network weirdness: Exploring the origins of network paradoxes. In: Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2014) Kooti, F., Hodas, N.O., Lerman, K.: Network weirdness: Exploring the origins of network paradoxes. In: Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2014)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Eom, Y.H., Jo, H.H.: Generalized friendship paradox in complex networks: the case of scientific collaboration. Sci. Rep. 4(1), 1–6 (2014)CrossRef Eom, Y.H., Jo, H.H.: Generalized friendship paradox in complex networks: the case of scientific collaboration. Sci. Rep. 4(1), 1–6 (2014)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollen, J., Gonçalves, B., van de Leemput, I., Ruan, G.: The happiness paradox: your friends are happier than you. EPJ Data Sci. 6(1), 4 (2017)CrossRef Bollen, J., Gonçalves, B., van de Leemput, I., Ruan, G.: The happiness paradox: your friends are happier than you. EPJ Data Sci. 6(1), 4 (2017)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Scissors, L., Burke, M., Wengrovitz, S.: What’s in a Like? attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 1501–1510 (2016) Scissors, L., Burke, M., Wengrovitz, S.: What’s in a Like? attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 1501–1510 (2016)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, M.O.: The friendship paradox and systematic biases in perceptions and social norms. J. Polit. Econ. 127(2), 777–818 (2019)CrossRef Jackson, M.O.: The friendship paradox and systematic biases in perceptions and social norms. J. Polit. Econ. 127(2), 777–818 (2019)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Macy, M.W., Evtushenko, A.: Threshold models of collective behavior ii: the predictability paradox and spontaneous instigation. Sociol. Sci. 7, 628–648 (2020)CrossRef Macy, M.W., Evtushenko, A.: Threshold models of collective behavior ii: the predictability paradox and spontaneous instigation. Sociol. Sci. 7, 628–648 (2020)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Breiger, R.L., Pattison, P.E.: Cumulated social roles: the duality of persons and their algebras. Soc. Netw. 8(3), 215–256 (1986)CrossRef Breiger, R.L., Pattison, P.E.: Cumulated social roles: the duality of persons and their algebras. Soc. Netw. 8(3), 215–256 (1986)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Erdős, P., Rényi, A., et al.: On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci 5(1), 17–60 (1960)MathSciNet Erdős, P., Rényi, A., et al.: On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci 5(1), 17–60 (1960)MathSciNet
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira, T., Araujo, B., Tam, C.: Why do people share their travel experiences on social media? Tour. Manage. 78, 104041 (2020)CrossRef Oliveira, T., Araujo, B., Tam, C.: Why do people share their travel experiences on social media? Tour. Manage. 78, 104041 (2020)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shu, W., Chuang, Y.-H.: Why people share knowledge in virtual communities. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 39(5), 671–690 (2011)CrossRef Shu, W., Chuang, Y.-H.: Why people share knowledge in virtual communities. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 39(5), 671–690 (2011)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, H., Park, H., Kim, J.: Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? a qualitative study and an experimental study on users’ behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 71(9), 862–877 (2013)CrossRef Lee, H., Park, H., Kim, J.: Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? a qualitative study and an experimental study on users’ behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 71(9), 862–877 (2013)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger, J.A., Buechel, E.: Facebook therapy? why do people share self-relevant content online? Why Do People Share Self-Relevant Content Online (2012) Berger, J.A., Buechel, E.: Facebook therapy? why do people share self-relevant content online? Why Do People Share Self-Relevant Content Online (2012)
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke, M., Cheng, J., de Gant, B.: Social comparison and Facebook: Feedback, positivity, and opportunities for comparison. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2020) Burke, M., Cheng, J., de Gant, B.: Social comparison and Facebook: Feedback, positivity, and opportunities for comparison. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2020)
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ngo, S.-C., Percus, A.G., Burghardt, K., Lerman, K.: The transsortative structure of networks. Proc. R. Soc. A 476(2237), 20190772 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef Ngo, S.-C., Percus, A.G., Burghardt, K., Lerman, K.: The transsortative structure of networks. Proc. R. Soc. A 476(2237), 20190772 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Friendship Paradox and Social Network Participation
verfasst von
Ahmed Medhat
Shankar Iyer
Copyright-Jahr
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53503-1_25

Premium Partner