The Hermeneutics of Creativity and Innovation in Knowledge Society – between Structuralism and Pragmatism

Cf: “The connotations associated with this highly controversial concept – as well as the efforts to identify the engines and driving forces behind this process of transformation – extend from a neo-liberal conspiracy in connection with the Washington Consensus to a vague internationalism framed by mutual understanding and peaceful co-existence. From my point of view, I find neither a supposed conspiracy nor an experience of a general interdependency around the globe to be sufficient as a foundation for a more profound understanding. I prefer the more specific definition of globalization, in accordance with Manuel Castells and others, which refers to the synergic and centrifugal effects of a de-regulated world economy with increasing trans-national features and the rise of a new networked, digital convergent information system operating in real time. A de-regulated world economy is, of cause, not something new in history – the world economy was even more liberal before World War I – but today, this trans-national economy is operated by a new information system and it is this that makes a difference. Here, it might clarify matters if a distinction is made between a world economy, which has existed for many centuries (as has been described by Immanuel Wallerstein and others), and global economy, dependent of prerequisites emerging in the last decades (according to Castells). Acknowledged together as mutually related driving forces, the economical and technological “engines” have created an extremely successful – and fragile – economic development, probably without comparison in the history of human kind. The economical crisis emerging in 2008–09 has revealed the internal complexity of this process, the immaturity of the actors as well as the need for better regulations within this new world order. However, globalization has only existed as a reality in the last three decades, so it is perhaps not surprising that we do not know exactly how to cope with the situation. Today, for the first time in human history, we experience and conduct our lives according to a global simultaneity – with all its unpredictable consequences.” (Kristensson Uggla 2010, p. 40f).

Cf “The dictionary contains no metaphors; they exist only in discourse.” (Ricoeur 1975a, 1977 p.97). Perhaps one should add that dictionaries contain only dead metaphors, where the internal tension is almost eliminated due to a process of normalization.

Cf “la métaphore est. une méprise categorial calculée” (Ricoeur 1975a, p.250).

Cf “le ‘même’ opere en dépit du ‘different’” (Ricoeur 1975a, p. 250).

Cf. “the category-mistake is the de-constructive intermediary phase between description and re-description” (Ricoeur 1975a/1977, p. 22).